May 14. 1778
man [Gentleman] you allude to, thinks that our Affairs
have been mismanaged and the public Interest imprudently dissipated: and that
many Persons have been improperly admitted to the public Purse. Another
Gentleman, who has had the principal direction of the Purse, complains of
reflections upon the French Nation and Government, Customs, manners &c. I
wish there were no ground for any of these reflections: But one thing I know,
that an immense Sum of Money is gone, that a great Sum of Money is still due.
And another thing I know, that I am at a loss to discover what
America has received as an equivalent for all these Sums and
Debts.
As to Mr. Delap, whom you recommend for Agent, I have not a
Sentiment but of respect for that Gentleman: but, Sir, the Appointment of
continental Agents and the Management of commercial Affairs, is now in a new
Channel under the orders of Congress, and I believe the Commissioners will not
think themselves at Liberty to interfere in it. Mr. Bondfield
I believe has a regular appointment, and for any thing I have ever heard
behaves well. If any complaints should arise, the Commissioners will
undoubtedly attend to them, with the utmost impartiality.
If you should determine homewards, be so good as to let me know as early as
you can, and the part of the Continent to which you shall go.... Whether you go
or stay, I wish you all happiness and prosperity, being with sincere Esteem
your friend and Servant.
Mr. William McCreery at
Bourdeaux.
I find written under this Letter, in my private Letter Book, the Words "Not
Sent." Upon more mature deliberation, I thought it improper and dangerous, to
lay open so much of the State of our Affairs and the Altercations of the
Parties, to any private Gentleman in
France, especially at the distance of Bourdeaux:
and therefore resolved to withhold the Letter, though it contained nothing but
the exact truth.
The public Business of this day May 14 included the following Letter
Passi
May 14. 1778
Sir
In the several Cruises made by Captains Wicks,
Johnson, Cunningham,
Thompson and others, of our armed Vessells, on the Coasts of Great Britain, it
is computed that between four and five hundred Prisoners have been made, and
set at Liberty, either on their landing in
France, or at Sea, because it was understood that We could not
keep them confined in
France. When Captain Wicks brought in, at one
time, near an hundred, We proposed to Lord Stormont, an
Exchange for as many of ours confined in
England: but all Treaty on the Subject was rudely refused, and
our
People are still detained there, notwithstanding the liberal discharges, We had made of theirs, as abovementioned. We hear that Captain Jones has now brought into Brest, near 200, which We should be glad to exchange for our Seamen who might be of Use in our Expeditions from hence: but as an Opinion prevails that Prisoners of a Nation with which France is not at War, and brought into France by another Power, cannot be retained by the Captors, but are free, as soon as they arrive, We are apprehensive that these Prisoners may also be sett at Liberty, return to England, and serve to man a Frigate against Us, while our brave Seamen, with a number of our Friends of this nation, whom We are anxious to sett free, continue useless and languishing in their Goals. In a Treatise of one of your Law Writers, entituled A Treatise of Prises or Principles of French jurisprudence concerning the Prizes, which are made at Sea printed in 1763 We find the above Opinion controverted page 129 . 30. in the following Words. "This seems to shew, that it is not true, as some Persons pretend, that as soon as a Prisoner, making his escape or otherwise, has sett his foot on Land, in a neutral Power, he is absolutely free from that moment. Indeed it will not be permitted to retake him, without the consent of that Power; but she would be wanting to the Laws of Neutrality, if [s]he should refuse her Consent. This is a Consequence of the Assylum due to the Ship in which was the Prisoner or the Hostage."
People are still detained there, notwithstanding the liberal discharges, We had made of theirs, as abovementioned. We hear that Captain Jones has now brought into Brest, near 200, which We should be glad to exchange for our Seamen who might be of Use in our Expeditions from hence: but as an Opinion prevails that Prisoners of a Nation with which France is not at War, and brought into France by another Power, cannot be retained by the Captors, but are free, as soon as they arrive, We are apprehensive that these Prisoners may also be sett at Liberty, return to England, and serve to man a Frigate against Us, while our brave Seamen, with a number of our Friends of this nation, whom We are anxious to sett free, continue useless and languishing in their Goals. In a Treatise of one of your Law Writers, entituled A Treatise of Prises or Principles of French jurisprudence concerning the Prizes, which are made at Sea printed in 1763 We find the above Opinion controverted page 129 . 30. in the following Words. "This seems to shew, that it is not true, as some Persons pretend, that as soon as a Prisoner, making his escape or otherwise, has sett his foot on Land, in a neutral Power, he is absolutely free from that moment. Indeed it will not be permitted to retake him, without the consent of that Power; but she would be wanting to the Laws of Neutrality, if [s]he should refuse her Consent. This is a Consequence of the Assylum due to the Ship in which was the Prisoner or the Hostage."
We know not of what Authority this Writer may be, and therefore pray a
moment of your Excellencys Attention to this matter, requesting your Advice
upon it, that if it be possible some means may be devised to retain these
Prisoners, till as many of ours can be obtained in exchange for them. We have
the Honor to be &c.
To Mr. De Sartine.
Benjamin Franklin
Arthur Lee
John Adams
