A website from the Massachusetts Historical Society; founded 1791.
close

Browsing: Papers of John Adams, Volume 11


Search for a response to this letter.

Docno: ADMS-06-11-02-0276-0004

Author: President of Congress
Author: Huntington, Samuel
Recipient: Adams, John
Recipient: Franklin, Benjamin
Recipient: Jefferson, Thomas
Recipient: Jay, John
Recipient: Laurens, Henry
Date: 1781-06-15

III. Instructions to the Joint Commission to Negotiate a Peace Treaty

Instructions to the Honble. John Adams Benjamin Franklin John Jay Henry Laurens and Thomas Jefferson ministers plenipotentiary in behalf of the United States to negotiate a Treaty of Peace1
Gentlemen
You are hereby authorized and instructed to concur in behalf of these United States with his most Christian Majesty in accepting the Mediation proposed by the Empress of Russia and the Emperor of Germany.2
You are to acceed to no Treaty of Peace which shall not be such as may 1st. effectually secure the Independence and Sovereignty of the thirteen United3 States4 according to the ||form & effect of the treaties subsisting between|| the said States ||& his most Christian Majesty|| and in which the ||said treaties shall not be5 ft in their|| full Force and Validity.
{ 375 } | view { 376 }
As to ||disputed boundaries and|| 6 other particulars we refer you to the Instructions given to Mr. John Adams dated 14 August 1779 and 18 October 17807 from which you will easily8 the Desires and Expectations of Congress ||but we think it unsafe at this disdistance to tye you up by|| absolute and preremptory directions ||upon any other subject than the two|| essential Articles ||abovementioned||.9 You are therefore ||at liberty|| to secure the Interest of the United States ||in such manner as circumstances may direct and as the state of the belligerent and disposition of the mediating powers may require||. For this purpose you are to make the most ||candid & confidential communications to thc ministers of|| 10 our generous Ally the King of France ||to undertake nothing in|| the Negotiations for Peace ||or truce without their knowledge & concurrence & ultimately|| to govern yourselves by ||their advice & opinion|| endeavouring in your whole Conduct11 to make ||them sensible how much we rely upon his majestys influence for effectual support in|| every Thing that may be necessary to the ||present security or|| future Prosperity of the United States of America.
If a Difficulty should arise in the Course of the Negotiations for Peace from the ||backwardness of Britain to make a formal acknowledgment of our independence|| you are ||at liberty to agree to a trucc or|| to make such ||other concessions as may|| not affect the ||substance of what|| we contend for; and provided Great Britain be not ||left in possession of any part of|| the thirteen12 States.13
[signed] Saml. Huntington President
[signed] Witnessed this day by Chas Thomson secy.
RC in James Lovell's hand (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Instructions to J. Adams B Franklin J. Jay H. Laurens T. Jefferson”; notation: “Mr. J.A.”; enclosed with the president of Congress' letter of 5 July and filmed under that date (Adams Papers, Microfilms, Reel No. 355). JA apparently deciphered only parts of the enciphered text, interlining the letters above Lovell's numbers. These passages are indicated in the notes. Significant differences between the RC and the instructions as adopted by Congress are indicated in the notes.
1. Compare these instructions with those JA had previously received of 16 Oct. 1779 and 18 Oct. 1780 (JA, Diary and Autobiography, 4:181–183; vol. 10:278–280). See also notes 2, 9, and 14, below.
2. This instruction survived intact from introduction to adoption, but had no effect because when it reached Europe the Austro-Russian mediation was no longer an option. Its presence, however, indicated a decisive change in the way in which the U.S. would participate in peace negotiations. Unlike JA 's instructions of 16 Oct. 1779, the new directions from Congress did not establish as a precondition to negotiations that Great Britain treat with the U.S. as a free and independent country. It was JA 's uncertainty about the status of the U.S. at any negotiations conducted under the aegis of Austria and Russia that led him to reject the mediation when he met with the Comte de Vergennes in July, for which see his correspondence with Vergennes, below.
{ 377 }
3. This word does not appear in the instructions as adopted by Congress ( JCC , 20:651).
4. The text in this paragraph to this point represents the only instance in which the instructions were strengthened in the course of the congressional debates. Initially it was joined to the first instruction and read “but to accede to any treaty of peace which may be the result thereof [the Austro-Russian mediation] in which the independence and sovereignty of the thirteen United States is effectually assured to them” (same, 20:605–606).
5. JA deciphered all of the enciphered passages in this paragraph to this point. He probably stopped because James Lovell left out the next two cipher numbers. As adopted by Congress the next word should read “left.”
6. This the only passage that JA deciphered in this paragraph. This is significant because this paragraph is the most important in the instructions, containing as it does the injunction to the peace commissioners that they fully inform the French ministers of the progress of the negotiations and govern themselves by the “advice & opinion” they received therefrom. It may explain why JA did not comment on that aspect of the instructions until after he reached Paris in 1782 to join the negotiations, and it substantiates his assertion in his journal that he had never seen that instruction until he arrived at Paris ( Diary and Autobiography , 3:38).
7. JA 's instructions of 1779 were adopted on 14 Aug., but dated 16 Oct. ( JCC , 14:956–960; JA, Diary and Autobiography , 4:181). Congress issued additional instructions on 18 Oct. 1780, see vol. 10:278–280.
8. At this point Lovell omitted the word “perceive” ( JCC , 20:651).
9. This paragraph, to this point, is significant for two reasons. It represents an effort by Congress to avoid revisiting the question of national boundaries, a contentious issue for both interstate and Franco-American relations. On 7 and 8 June proposals to reopen the matter were rejected and the text of the instructions remained virtually the same throughout the debates; the only significant addition was the specific reference to JA 's former instructions ( JCC , 20:608–609, 611–613).
Of even more importance, particularly for JA , was the statement that set down independence and the sanctity of the Franco-American treaties as the only ultimata for an Anglo-American peace treaty. This was a striking departure from JA 's original instructions, which declared the northern boundary of the U.S. on the Great Lakes and the western boundary on the Mississippi River to be sine qua non for any treaty. This alteration was a severe blow to southern states, particularly Virginia, that claimed land bordering the Mississippi, and it created a sectional conflict because the preservation of U.S. fishing rights on the banks of Newfoundland remained the sine qua non for the Anglo-American commercial treaty for which JA also had received a commission in 1779 (JA, Diary and Autobiography , 4:183–184).
10. As adopted by Congress, the passage reads “candid and confidential communications upon all subjects to the ministers of” ( JCC , 20:651).
11. The passage beginning with the word “ultimately” and continuing to this point was inserted on 11 June, following a conference with the Chevalier de La Luzerne (same, 20:625– 627). For a detailed description of that meeting and its results see the Editorial Note, above.
12. At this point Lovell omitted the word “United” ( JCC , 20:652).
13. JA deciphered all of the enciphered passages in this paragraph.
JA 's original instructions provided for the suspension of hostilities during negotiations on the condition that all British forces be withdrawn from the territory of the United States (JA, Diary and Autobiography , 4:183). In 1780 Congress responded to JA 's request for guidance by modifying its position and authorizing a long truce if such would constitute Britain's “virtual relinquishment of the object of the war” (vol. 9:80–83; 10:278–280). This paragraph is a further modification that sets even looser parameters for a truce than the instructions of 1780.

Docno: ADMS-06-11-02-0277

Author: Adams, John
Recipient: Gerry, Elbridge
Date: 1781-06-16

To Elbridge Gerry

[salute] Dear sir

Mr. Le Roy the Bearer of this, is a young American educated in Amsterdam where he has good Connections. He wants mercantile Connections in America.1
{ 378 }
I wish he could give you hopes of any usefull Connections between our Country and this. If he can, it is more than I am able to do.
The armed Neutrality turns out little better than a Bubble. But as We have little to hope from it, We have nothing to fear. France has settled every Thing this Year, better than ever, and much to the satisfaction of America as I hope and believe. But you must not entertain the most distant Idea of Peace while there is one British soldier alive and at Liberty in America. I am my dear sir your Frd.
[signed] J. Adams
RC (NNPM: Gilder Lehrman Coll., on deposit).
1. On 16 June JA wrote at least four more letters of introduction for Herman Le Roy. The other letters were to AA ( Adams Family Correspondence , 4:148), Richard Cranch ( RC offered for sale, 1951), Benjamin Rush (Old Family Letters: Copied from the Originals for Alexander Biddle, Series A, Phila., 1892, p. 20– 21), and William Tudor (MHi: Tudor Papers). For a sketch of Le Roy, who had translated Dutch documents for JA , see the letter to AA .