At the Superior Court November the defendant offered to give in Evidence on plea of
non Cul his right to Caesar by purchase &c. The Council for Caesar objected that it
cou'd not be admitted on this plea and the Court doubted. It was compared to the Cases
in Trials pr pais2
and Gilbert L.E. [Law of Evidence]3
where title agreements &c. are good evidence, when they don't go in discharge of
trespass but in denial of plaintiffs declaration. And the Cause was contin'd. A special
verdict was proposed.