. Min. Bk. 85, SCJ
Ipswich, June 1770, N–5; Min. Bk. 93, SCJ
Salem, Nov. 1770, C–10. Withdrawal of a juror was a means of continuing, or terminating
short of judgment, an action in which a jury had been empaneled. It was generally
done with consent of all the parties, but, at least in later practice, might be done
on the motion of one party on grounds of surprise and the like. The practice also
might be allowed where the jury, upon deliberation, could not reach a verdict. See
Wood, Institute of the Laws of England
600; cases collected in annotation, 48 L.R.A.
432 (1900). The reason for its use here and the distinction between this practice
and the later continuance (note 8
below) are not known.
Cite web page as: Founding Families: Digital Editions of the Papers of the Winthrops and the Adamses, ed.C. James Taylor. Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society, 2016.