“Their Constitut[ion] was in [the] year 1762. 13th of July: when a Number of persons,
having upon Conversat[ion], found they were of the same opinion in matters of Religion:
and agreed to incorporate into a Church.
“In the year 1749 a Number of persons separated from the Standing Church, for 3 Reasons:
1. a Dislike to the Church Constitution. 2. The Manner of Supporting the gospel. 3
Manner of preaching. After they separated they continued in what is called the Separate
Order for sometime, but in the same year gathered into a Church, upon what they Call
Large Communion: that is mixt Communion.
“In 1762 Nathl. Green, and others separated from the Separates, having been baptized
some time before; Green was baptized in Sturbridge by Blunt. Blunt recanted his own
Baptism. And the same year, 1762, Mr. Green and others, from Leicester, Spencer, and
Charlton became a baptist Church as aforesaid.
“Their Number in Ch[ristiani]ty was 6: who were Joined in a short time by 8 or 10
more. The names of the 6 were, Nathl. Green, Jno. Hill, and Jno. Hill Junr., Dorothy
Shaw, Mary Hill, the wife of John Hill Junr. and Dorothy Shaw, Daughter of Dorothy
Shaw. In Decem. 10th 1762 the Church called Nathl. Green to the Exercise of his ministerial
gifts. He accepted the call, and continued the preacher alone in this Church—on tryal,
till 13 of July 1763, when He gave the answer to the call—And was ordain'd their Pastor
on the 12 of October 1763.
“Mr. Green had great Difficulties in the Separate Church, [in ?] endeavouring to suppress
the Strange Spirit of the Separates: and this determined his Leaving the Separates.”
Journal of John Davis, 27 April 1771, Backus Papers.
See also 3 Backus, Church History
176. Rev. John Blunt, pastor at Sturbridge from 1749 to 1752, renounced his Baptism
and became a Separate in the latter year. See Goen, Revivalism and Separatism
103, 224–225. It has been said that Nathaniel Green's church was formed “by the dismission
of several members” from Thomas Green's Leicester church (note 1437
below). See Estes, “Historical Discourse” 55–56. There is no evidence of this, but
it is possible that some members of Thomas Green's congregation did join Nathaniel
at some point, since there seem to have been doctrinal differences between the two
churches. See note 1639