A website from the Massachusetts Historical Society; founded 1791.
close
-
The Adams Papers Digital Edition is undergoing active maintenance while we work on improvements to the system. You may experience slow performance or the inability to access content. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. We will endeavor to return to full capabilities as soon as possible.

Browsing: Papers of John Adams, Volume 10


Docno: ADMS-06-10-02-0005

Author: Adams, John
Recipient: Jenings, Edmund
Date: 1780-07-18

To Edmund Jenings

[salute] Dear Sir

I have just received yours of 15th. Mr. Gridleys News, was I suppose only The Fruit of the Tree of Cracovie. I have seen the Observations &c. in the general Advertiser. I thank you sir, for all your Trouble. The Lord knows what Compensation you will ever have for it all. I lay burthens upon you without Number, or Mercy, I think. But I cannot and will not be idle. I think We are serving our Country, in this Way.
The Labour of copying, the Translation, to send to you is but a small Part of what I have taken upon myself. You must know, that I made this Translation more than three months ago and sent it to Congress, on the 19 of April last. Since which I have copied it for you, and also have made another Copy with my own Hand for a Gentleman who is translating it into French.1 It contains what ought to be well settled and digested in the Mind of every man in Power in Europe and America.
You will not easily conceive, how my little vain heart felt, when I { 9 } first read those Words. “France, acknowledging America to be what she is, has formed Alliances with Terms of perfect Equality and Reciprocity, and behold the Ascendant to which she directly arose, from that politick Humiliation. There never was a wiser or firmer Step taken by any established Power, than that which the new states in America took, for their first footing in the Alliance. There never was more Address, Art, or Policy, shewn by any State, than France has given Proof of in the Same; when both Agreed and became allied, on Terms, which exclude no other Power, from enjoying the same benefits by a like Treaty.”2 I was personally as well as publickly too much interested in this not to feel it in every Pore.
You Say there is nothing new, in the memorial to an American who has had these great questions long in Contemplation.
It is very true Sir, that the Principles and the system has long been familiar to <me, and> to Congress, to the Most enlightened People in America, in general.
I had myself the Honour to be the first, who ventured to break the Ice in Congress, on the subject of foreign alliances. And to contend, against very great Men, whom I will not name at present, that it was the Interest and Policy of France, to Support our Independency, and to make a Treaty of Commerce, and Alliance with Us upon Terms of perfect Equality and Reciprocity. That We ought not to give to France any exclusive Priviledges in trade or any unusual Conditions whatsoever. That diminishing the Power of the natural Ennemy of France, So much as breaking off, 13 Colonies alone, was quite enough to make it her Interest to support Us, and to induce her to engage with Us provided she was convinced of the Justice of our Cause. By all the Accounts We had from France as well as all other Parts of Europe We had reason to think that the general Voice of man kind, and particularly that of France was in favour of the Rectitude of our Cause. That if We added to these motives, an equal share in our Trade and that Influence and Reputation in Europe which would be derived to any Nation in the World from an Alliance and free equal Trade with Us, We could not doubt that France and Spain at least would readily and chearfully engage with Us. That We ought, with the Utmost Firmness to resist every thought of giving to France, any unequal Advantages in our Trade even over England for it never could be our Interest to ruin England, or annihilate their maritime Power, if We could possibly save our Liberty and Independence without it.
I never had the Honour to support any Argument, in Speech or in Writing with more Applause, than this was received with in Congress. { 10 } They put me upon the Committee to draw up the Treaty and the Committee appointed me to draw it, which I did accordingly, and it now remains in Charles Thompsons Files in my Hand Writing. It was drawn in perfect Conformity to these Principles, and accepted by Congress after the most painfull scrutiny into every Part, Paragraph by Paragraph. It would fill a Volume to give You the arguments at large upon every Part, with the Speakers Names, if I were able to do it upon Memory.3
After the Treaty was finished and Dr. Franklin sent off with it, who sailed in October I went home, for a Visit to my Constituents. While I was gone in the month of December—The Terms of Enlistment of the Army expired, General Washington was obliged to retreat thro the Jersies, and some Gentlemen, saw the Necessity of foreign Alliances in a <foreign> Stronger Light, and moved for Instructions to the Commissioners to offer France some Additional Motives to engage. These Propositions had been made before and I had always combated them with success, but now they prevailed, and the Consequence of it was that a Treaty was made, without that perfect Reciprocity that I had been such an Enthusiast for. But my Countrymen will some time or other wish it had been otherwise, tho it is now unavoidable—and if my Life should be Spared I am determined Posterity shall know which was my Treaty and which was other Peoples Treaty.4 I never was more mortified in my Life, than upon finding at my Return to Congress, what they had done. I gave to the Gentlemen who had done it, my sentiments upon it very freely.
The leading Principles in the Memoir to the sovereigns, are taken precisely from the Principles of the Treaty which Congress first sent to this Court.5 They are very generally understood and firmly believed among the People in America. But Since I have been in Europe I have not found the subject understood by scarcely any Body, untill I saw this Pamphlet. You may easily judge how much I was pleased with it. I respected it the more on another Account. I have had these 20 years an Esteem for Pownal. He was a good Governor and for that very Reason removed. If all American Governors had been like Pownal, this War would not have existed. He has oddities which will ever prevent him from doing much good in this World: but he has Abilities and not a bad Heart. I write this again in Confidence to you.
If the strictures upon Galloway are not sent off, pray scratch out all the Personalities against him. It is beneath me to be personal against such a Creature. Tho a meaner, falser, heart, never circulated Blood.
{ 11 }
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Mr. Adams July 18. 1780.”
1. For the various versions of JA's reworking of Thomas Pownall's Memorial, including that sent to M. Addenet for translation, see A Translation of Thomas Pownall's Memorial, 19 April – [ca. 14 July], Nos. I and II, Editorial and Descriptive Notes (above).
2. Pownall's Memorial, p. 94, but see also A Translation of Thomas Pownall's Memorial, 19 April – [ca. 14 July], No. I, text at note 38 (above).
3. Although colored by his reading of Pownall's Memorial, JA gives an accurate account, here and in the previous paragraph, of his role in advocating the need for foreign assistance and the drafting of the Treaty Plan of 1776. For the progress of the Treaty Plan from JA's draft through the version adopted by Congress and sent to the Commissioners, see Plan of Treaties, 12 June – 17 Sept. 1776, vol. 4:260–302.
4. For the original instructions adopted by Congress on 24 Sept. 1776, see vol. 4:300–302; for the additional instructions adopted on 30 Dec. 1776, see vol. 5:65 and JCC, 6:1054–1058. JA's statements regarding the September instructions and the impact of those voted on 30 Dec. are misleading. He correctly states that the instructions of 30 Dec. authorized the Commissioners to offer France additional trade and military inducements, should the original treaty plan prove insufficient. He is wrong, however, in attributing those aspects of the Franco-American agreements with which he did not agree solely to the new instructions or to the Commissioners acting contrary to the spirit of the Treaty Plan. The new instructions did not require the Commissioners negotiating the Treaty of Amity and Commerce to depart from those previously received, and that treaty follows very closely the terms of the Treaty Plan of 1776. In fact, JA notes several times in his “Letters from a Distinguished American” that the Treaty of Amity and Commerce did not grant exclusive privileges to France ([ante 14–22 July], Nos. V and X, but see also the Editorial Note and Nos. III, IV, VI, VII, and IX, above). It was the Treaty of Alliance to which JA objected, but neither the new instructions nor the Commissioners' wishes had much to do with its existence. The instructions of 30 Dec. were intended to provide guidance in the event that France was unwilling to form a treaty connection with the United States solely for commercial advantage. As it turned out France was agreeable to a commercial treaty, but also wanted a political or military alliance that would insure an American commitment to the war for its duration. What JA ignores in his criticism of the Franco-American negotiations is that if the Commissioners had been unwilling to accept a Treaty of Alliance, there might have been no Treaty of Amity and Commerce, and thus no implementation of the Treaty Plan.
5. The principles set down by Pownall in his Memorial were almost certainly derived from his own experience and not, as JA seems to imply, from the Treaty Plan of 1776.

Docno: ADMS-06-10-02-0006

Author: Adams, John
Recipient: Jenings, Edmund
Date: 1780-07-18

To Edmund Jenings

I have just received the Court Gazette with Clintons Proclamations.1
I would give any Thing I had time to write you, a whole sheet about Carolina.
The Party of Horse, that galloped out—what did they meet with? By the Return of killed, and Prisoners, it must have been the most obstinate and desperate defence that ever was made, or a barbarous and diabolical Massacre—take which you will, and what is the symptom to the British Govt.?2
What think you of “the small Rebel Parties, that still linger at a { 12 } distance in the Province”?3 These small Parties will very soon be great Armies.
What think you, of those “wicked and desperate Men, who still endeavour to support, the flame of Rebellion, by authority derived from the late Legislature, and attempt by fines Imprisonments and even sanguinary Punishments, to compell the faithfull, to take Arms”?4
What think you of the cruel Exhortation to the disaffected, on the backs of the two Carolinas?
What think you of 210 Addresses out of 115 or 120 thousand white Inhabitants? When the names are concealed—and where there is known to have been near that Number banished, who have probably returnd with the Army from N. York and Savanna?5 When every Art, every Terror and every Allurement is known to be used upon those occasions to get subscribers?
I have from the Beginning of this dispute had constant Reason to honour the Sincerity the Honour the Spirit and Firmness, Bravery and Patriotism of south Carolina, as much without Exception as my own state in the Confederation.
But knowing their Embarrassment with Negroes, and their small Numbers of Militia, my Idea of that people has vastly increased by the Accounts from thence. There is hardly another state that would not have disclosed a larger Proportion of unworthy Men.
Britain! thou hast cast thy last die—Thou hast now made every Corner of the United states hostile to thee. Remember this in the day when Repentance comes.
1. The London Gazette of 8 July contained copies of an undated handbill issued by Gen. Henry Clinton immediately after the fall of Charleston, proclamations issued by Clinton on 22 May and 3 June, and an address reportedly signed by “210 of the Principal Inhabitants,” see also notes 3, 4, and 5.
2. The report to which JA apparently refers has not been found; it did not appear in the Gazette of 8 July.
3. This is an exact quotation from the handbill mentioned in note 1.
4. This is a paraphrase of a passage from Clinton's proclamation of 22 May, mentioned in note 1.
5. As printed in the Gazette and other London newspapers at the time, the address did not include the names of the signers. Not until 29 Aug. did the London Courant print the list of names, but see also Davies, ed., Docs. of the Amer. Rev., 1770–1783, 18:102–104.
Cite web page as: Founding Families: Digital Editions of the Papers of the Winthrops and the Adamses, ed.C. James Taylor. Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society, 2014.
http://www.masshist.org/apde2/