Adams Family Correspondence, volume 4
1782-09-03
If my Letters have been as successfull as I wish them, you must have heard many times from me since I received a single line from your Hand. This is the sixth time I have written to you; since I received your last Letters, which were dated in March.1 From that time up to this 3d of September not a syllable has come to Hand. A few vague english News paper Reports, respecting a negotiation for a peace. I find your Name mentiond so late as June. Not a vessel has arrived from Holland since Capt. Deshon. We cannot account for so long a space of times elapsing: since it is said the United provinces acknowledged the Independance of America, without receiving any official account of it.
The enlargement of the prisoners from Mill prison, together with the intelligence they brought of the proposed acknowledgment of our independance, coincideing with the general wish for peace, the specious Letters sent out of New York by Carleton and Digby about the same time,2 so facinated all Ranks of people that a General Joy pervaded every class; I hardly dared to oppose, to the congratulatory addresses I received upon the occasion, the obstinate persuasion I had; that it was only a tub to the Whale.3
I ventured to say in some companies, where my unbelief appeared very singular, that altho I ardently wished for peace, I could not conceive that an object, of so great Magnitude, could be the Work of a few weeks, or Months; and altho the acknowledgment of our Independence, was an indispensable preliminary, yet there were many other important articles to be adjusted by the contending powers. I thought it would be better to suspend those warm expressions of joy; which could only be warranted by an assureance that an honorable peace had taken place. If any real foundation existed for such reports, a week or two would give us official assureances of it, and I must beg to suspend my belief untill that period.
It really pained me to see the sanguine hopes of my Country perish like the baseless fabrick of a vision. Yet in less than ten days they reflected, and doubted, the elated joy subsided, and they spurned the Idea of a seperate peace.
The Marquis de Vaudreuil arrived in Boston harbour about a fortnight ago with 13 ships of the Line. His intention is to repair the damaged ships.4
The two Armies have past an inactive Summer. When when shall 372I receive any Letters from my dear Friend? Instead of being more and more reconciled to this seperation, every day makes it more painfull to me. Can I with any degree of calmness look Back and reflect that it is near 3 years since we parted, and look forward without seeing, or being in the least able to form an Idea of the period which is still to take place.
In my last Letter I made you a serious proposal. I will not repeat it at present. If it is accepted one Letter will be sufficient. If it is rejected, one Letter will be too many.5
We have had a most uncommon Season. Cold and dry—not one rainy day since the begining of
June, and very few showers. The drought has been very extensive, and our corn is near all cut
of.— Scarcly a spire of green Grass is to be seen. The B
I have the very great pleasure to acquaint you that our dear and worthy Brother
C
Let me beg you my dear Friend to be particularly attentive to your Health. Do not practise
so indiscriminately lieing with your windows open, it certainly is a bad practise in a country
so damp as Holland. My Notice of this opportunity is so short that I cannot write to Mr.
T
Mrs. D
I feel in my Heart a disposition to complain that when you write, you are so very concise. I am sorry I cannot prevail with you to write by way of Spain or France, but you must have reasons to which I am a Stranger.
Our two dear Boys are very studious and attentive to their Books and our daughter thinks of nothing else but making a voyage to her pappa.
JA to AA, 22, 29 March, above. Later letters from him to
AA surviving in the Adams Papers are
dated 1 April, 14 May, 16 June, 1, 25
July, and
The Carleton-Digby letter to Washington of 2 Aug. (text in Washington, Writings, ed. Sparks,
8:540–541), forwarded by Washington to Congress on 5 Aug., was not fraudulent, but it was
misleading because it greatly overstated the concessions the British government was prepared
to make for peace with America. On the ground that no word of this kind had been received
from its own ministers in Europe, Congress took a properly wary attitude toward it. See
Cotton Tufts to JA, 26 Sept.,
below; Washington, Writings, ed. Fitzpatrick, 24:466, 468–469, 471–472;
JCC
, 23:462–463; Burnett, ed., Letters of
Members
, 6:438, 440, 442, 443.
To “throw a tub to the whale” was to “bamboozle or mislead an enemy” when in danger, as
whalemen did when a boat was threatened by a whale or school of whales (E. Cobham Brewer, Dictionary of Phrase and Fable, London, n.d., under Tub).
Louis Philippe de Rigaud, La Société de Cincinnati de
France..., Paris, n.d., p. 276).
See above, AA to JA, 5 Aug., a letter it is believed JA did not receive. However, see also below, AA to JA, 5 September.
See above, AA to JA, 9 Dec. 1781, and note 3 there.