Adams Family Correspondence, volume 8
Altho I have written you before, I know you have no objection to recieving another
letter before you answer my last—1 My
greatest motive for writing now is to know the truth of a Report which has been
industriously spread here within this week past, “that there is so great a Coolness
between the P——t & V-P——t that they do not speak to each other.” I know that there
are some people, (I hope but few) who wish to cherish a jealously in the minds of the
good people of Massachusetts, towards the Vice President— I have some reason to think
that Dr. Demigog is one—2 And I doubt a little whether your father's
quondam pupil, (with a flat nose) may not be another.3 He seems to be crazy after the phantom
popularity. The aforesaid Dr. and he are very intimate, of
late— It is said too that the Vice President's influence is much diminished. And as a
proof, it is said that judge Tudor has lost the Office of Attorney to this district in
the federal Court—4 All these things are
said by a certain set of people in this town, with a view to detract from the Character
of a man who has done more for his Country than any other man, now in it— I have
attended but very little to politics lately—but this has caught my Ear as I passed— I
know not but that the distinction of Southern & Northern may have an Influence even upon the greatest Man,
But I cannot believe it. The people of the new England States are crazy. They are
divided among themselves. They can not see their own Interest—blind as Beetles—
I was at Exhibition Tuesday last— Your Brother was well— Dr
Tufts was in town to day—[. . .] [. . .]erting—
I wish you would give the [enclosed?] letter, to Charles— He will be so kind as to
deliver it— [. . .] you have recd your Coat— Our friends at
Braintree were well this Morning—
Your sincere friend
m.Cranch
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mr John Quincy Adams / New
York”; docketed: “Wm Cranch / October 1st 1789.” Some loss
of text where the seal was removed.
Not found.
Perhaps Dr. Charles Jarvis
(1748–1807), Harvard 1766, who had a long history of service to the city of Boston and
had recently been elected to the Mass. General Court. In his Autobiography,
JA wrote of Jarvis' “virulence against me,” possibly connected to the
animosity between JA and Edward Church, who was Jarvis' cousin (
Sibley's Harvard
Graduates
, 16:376–383; JA,
D&A
, 3:384–385;
AA to Mary Smith Cranch, 1 Sept., and note 5,
above).
Probably Jonathan Mason Jr.
Judge William Tudor, JA's former law student, wrote to JA
on 27 July (Adams Papers) about the
maneuvering for judicial appointments going on in Massachusetts. Tudor noted to
JA that “to no Person but to yourself . . . have I ever hinted a Wish
to be noticed in the Places that must soon be disposed of. But you will now give me
leave to say that I should be pleased with an appointment to some Office (the
advocateship is now out of the Question) which my Education might enable me to
discharge the Duties of.” JA replied on 18 Sept. (MHi: Tudor-Adams Papers) counseling patience: “how the
President will decide, on the judiciary Appointments I know not.— There is no System
nor Harmony among the Men from Massachusetts—one recommends one, and another another.
Dont you be chagrin'd, mortified humiliated nor vexed let it go as it will.” Tudor did
not receive any appointment but was eventually admitted to practice law before the
district and circuit courts in 1796 (
Sibley's Harvard Graduates
, 17:261).
th1789
I wrote you a Letter last week, but as it did not get to the Post office, I have
detaind it with an intention of sending you one of a later date. I believe I have
received all your Letters. your last was dated Sepbr 8th I
have not written to any of my Friends so often as I ought to. you know very well that
when a person is fixed to any particular spot, that very few subjects worth
communicating can occur. as I have not been to any publick amusement, I cannot say any
thing upon that score, but I can tell you something which may well excite your surprize.
it is that I have cause every Sunday to regreet the loss of Parson Wibird, and that I
should realy think it an entertainment to hear a discourse from him. do not however tell
him so, but except three sermons which three NewEngland Clergymen have preachd to us, I
have been most misirably off. Dr Rogers where we usually attend, has been unable to
preach ever since I have been here1 and
the pulpit has been supplied as they could procure Labourers—by 414Gentlemen who preach without Notes, all of whom are
predestinarians and whose Noise & vehemence is to compensate for every other
difficency to go to meeting & set an hours & half to hear a discourse the
principals of which are so totally different from my own sentiments, that I cannot
possibly believe them, is really doing penance. I have sometimes gone to St Pauls.2 there I find much more liberal discourses,
but bred a desenter and approveing that mode of worship, I feel a reluctance at changing
tho I would always go to church, if I resided where there was no other mode of worship.
the Clergymen here I am told are so Rigid that their company is very little sought
after. they never mix with their people as they do with us, and there is in there Air
and countanances that solemn Phiz and gate which looks so like mummery that instead of
Reverence they create disgust, and they address theirfoll Audience with so much self
importance, and Priestly despotisim, that I am really surprizd at their having any men
of sense and abilities for their hearers; I have seen but one exception to this
character & that in a dr Lynd who is really the best & most liberal of the whole
sett.3 we have in Massachusetts a sett
of clergy that are an honour to Religion, to Learning, & to our country, and for
whom I feel an increased esteem & veneration since my Residence in Newyork. I do not
however mean by my remarks that they are not Religious moral men here. I never heard a
Syllable to their injury, but they certainly are men of very mean capacities when
compared to those of our state. there is no man of esteemed eminence amongst them even
as a divine
The adjournment of Congress leaves me a leisure which I most sincrely wish I could
improve in visiting Braintree. if they had honestly adjournd to April, I say honestly
for many of the southern members will not get here till then, I should not have
hesitated in comeing on immediatly & spending the winter with my dear Friends in B.
but it has been my Lot to be fetterd one way or an other. the liberality of Congress
obliged me to remove most of my furniture so as to make it quite inconvenient for us to
pass a part of our Time at our own Home, without being at a Considerable expence, and
the prospect of a return in december very much discourages me in my progect. mr Adams's
close & unremitting attention to Buisness during Six months, has made a journey
quite necessary for him, yet he will not go unless it is to his own Home. my son J Q A
proposes returning this week to Boston & Brisler leaves me tomorrow.4 How the machine will get on without him I know
not. I have offerd him what I esteem very liberal wages, & double what I can get
others for, 415
I hope the appointments in the judicial Line will give Satisfaction, notwithstanding
some dissapointments. if I may judge by the News papers, there is no state in the union
where there are so many grumblers as in our own. it has been my Lot in Life to spend a
large portion of it in publick Life, but I can truly say the pleasentest part of it was
spent at the foot of pens Hill in that Humble cottage when my good Gentleman was a
practitioner at the Bar, earnt his money, during the week, & at the end of it poured
it all into my Lap to use or what could be Spaired to lay by. nobody then grudgd us our
living, & 25 years such practise would have given us a very different Property from
what we now possess. it might not have given us the 2d Rank
in the united states, nor the satisfaction of reflecting by what means & whose
exertions these states have arrived at that degree of Liberty Safety & independance
which they now enjoy. if the united states had chosen to the vice P.s Chair a man
wavering in his opinions, or one who sought the popular applause of the multitude, this
very constitution would have had its death wound during this first six months of its
existance. on several of the most trying occasions it has fallen to this dangerous vice, to give the casting vote for its Life—there are several
members of the House & some of the S——e who are to say no worse wild as—Bedlammites
but hush—I am speaking treason. do not you betray me
Remember me kindly to all inquiring Friends—and believe me my dear sister / Yours most / affectionatly
RC (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters).
Rev. John Rodgers (1727–1811)
was the pastor of the Presbyterian church of New York, which was divided between two
churches, one at Wall Street near Broadway and the other at the corner of Beekman and
Nassau streets. Rodgers, who had trained for the ministry under Gilbert Tennent,
served the New York parish from 1765 until his death, though he was forced to vacate
his post during the British occupation of the city (Jonathan Greenleaf, A History of the Churches, of All Denominations, in the City of
New York, N.Y., 1846, p. 126–133; Sprague, Annals Amer. Pulpit
,
3:154–165).
St. Paul's Chapel, an
extension of Trinity Episcopal Church, opened in 1766 between Fulton and Vesey
streets. George Washington attended services there, and it is today the oldest public
building in continuous use in New York City (Greenleaf, History of the Churches, p. 61–62; www.saintpaulschapel.org, 26 Jan.
2006). See also Descriptive List of
Illustrations, No. 13, above.
Rev. William Linn
(1752–1808), Princeton 1772, was a Presbyterian and Dutch Reformed minister and
schoolteacher originally from Pennsylvania. In 1786 he was called to become associate
pastor of the Collegiate Dutch Reformed Church in New York. During his tenure there,
his reputation was such that he was also invited to become the first chaplain to the
House of Representatives, beating out John Rodgers for the position (
Princetonians
, 2:231–235).
JQA recorded in
his Diary that he left New York on 5 Oct. aboard the Rambler, arriving in Newport on 6 October. He continued by stage, arriving at
Boston on 8 Oct. and Braintree on 9 Oct. (D/JQA/14, APM Reel 17).