Adams Family Correspondence, volume 12
I have neither Seen or heard of any unpleasent remarks or
strictures upon your late addresses. what may be reserved for hereafter I know not.
the Chronical has been quite favourable, drawing however wrong inferences that your
administration would be very different from your predecessors.1 the impression made upon the minds of the
publick as far as I can learn them, have been highly favourable, but the publick have
exhausted themselves upon your predecessor. they must take breath, and recollect
themselves, before they can bestwo even merrited praise. our good Brother Cranch, Said
he was enraptured with the speach, that he had read it repeatedly, and every time with
new delight & pleasure. Mr Flint who lately attended the ordination of mr Peirce
at Brookline, reported that it was held in high estimation.2 I saw a proposal in Websters paper, of having
it printed & Framed with the late Presidents.3 The solemnity of the scene in which you was
the Principle actor, the dignified Speach deliverd previous to the oath of office, the
Presence of the Great Friend and Father of his Country, who presented himself to the
publick, as a pledge for his successor, could not fail to inspire into the minds and
Hearts of all present, the strongest emotions of tenderness, nor do I wonder that it
found its way to their Eyes. there are many other reflection which would have
penetrated my Heart upon the occasion—
I cannot consider the event in the light which a Lady of our
acquaintance describes it, “a Game of chance, the highest Card in the pack, a second
throw could make no addition but a Crown.” promotion
cometh neither from the East nor from the West nor from the south, but God is the
judge, Saith the scripture—4
I inclose you the Letter and my reply. when I was at Plimouth a number of them were purchasing tickets, and invited me to join them. I bought one with them. this will explain the first part of the Letter, the feelings, and spirit are endeavourd to be conceald under the appearence of Friendship. I hope the professions are sincere, tho there is a manifest design to lead me to consider the event as Chance, rather than choice. The Idea of great Wealth held up, so that the Chance of 5 thousand dollors or Eight shillings could be no object with me, is a reflection not justified, and this she knew—5
49You observe that the News is unpleasent. I presume you mean as it respects mr Pinkny but this does not appear to be well founded, or do you mean, as it respects Peace? I do not think it improbable that Pinckny may be refused, considering what are the designs of the Directory. but as you once observed in a Letter to a Friend in the year 1782 That your whole Life from Infancy, had been passed through an uninterrupted series of delicate Situations, so when you found yourself suddenly translated into a New one, the View of it, neither confounded or dismayed you.6
I hope you will continue to possess the same fortitude, and resourses, for where there is neither fixed Principles nor any Laws Humane or divine, which are considerd binding, it puzzels all calculation to know what part to act.
I read the Letter of Mifflin & your reply. I should not have wisht you to have accepted the House on any terms. I have not got my last papers so do not know what they have done with the House.
there is one observation in your Letter which Struck me as
meaning more than is exprest. J. n is as he was!7 can he still be a devotee to a cause, and to a
people, run Mad, without, any wish for Peace, without any desire after a rational
system of Government, and whose thirst for power and absolute dominion is become
Gluttonous? can it be? I regreet that dr Preistly has been left to the commission of
Such an error of Judgment as to be present at the Feast of ——— as Porcupine call them.
he has laid himself open to the scourge, & peter lays it on with exultation he has
given him a handle, and the Friends of the Doctor, must censure he ought not to have
had, any Hand or part in the buisness. poor Mckean, he has made him a Henpeck indeed.8 how the truth cuts. I wonder peter does not
get broken bones. poor Pennsilvania keeps no gallows, but she keeps Rogues and Villans
who deserve one, and she will find to her cost that she has not reachd the
Millenium.9
I know when you get to Housekeeping you will pine for society, for your Farm, For your Wall, and wish as Boylestone Adams, says that it was the end of the fourth, instead of the beginning Year.
please to tell Brisler that his wife looks quite sober & sad that she has not had a Letter from him for a month. The man imitates his Master, and has written so frequently to his wife of late, that she, like her mistress feels mortified when ever a dissapointment prevents her from receiving assurences of unabating Love and affection, which tho a thousand times told, will never diminish of their Value in the estimation of your
Your Mother—who is here, desires me to give her Love to you she has past through this cold Winter better than I expected— Mrs Temple just passing by reminds me of a sausy old poet who says, Frailty, thy name is woman—10 could mr Russel look from his happy abode, what would he say to see his property flying into the hands of a young British officer, whose commission of Leiut is all the wealth he owns. his wife, aya she ought never to have been his, and I know not but mr Russel was as indiscreat at 55 as she has been at 29. all the contrivance of that old Sinner his Father—11 Let every Man enjoy his property as he passes through Life, do with it all the good he can—and not leave it to be disposed of at his discease, by he knows not whom—
RC (Adams
Papers); endorsed: “Mrs A. March 25 / 1797.”
The Boston Independent Chronicle
published several articles in March differentiating the incoming JA
administration from that of George Washington. On 6 March the newspaper reprinted an
article from the New York Journal, 1 March, expressing
its “sincere wish” that JA “may in every respect shun the pernicious
example of his predecessor.” On the 16th it reprinted an 8 March article from the
same, concluding that JA’s inaugural address set him in “striking
contrast” to Washington and hoping that JA might “persevere in it,
uninfluenced by the menaces or machinations of artful and designing men!” Finally, a
20 March article, similarly reprinted from the New York press, extracted
JA’s comments on France from his inaugural address and read in his
words a “desire to preserve our friendship with that republic, which, contrary to the
assertion of the federal junto, he declares has been ‘much for the honor and credit of
both countries.’” See also,
AA to JA, 1 March, and
note 14, above.
Rev. John Pierce, for whom see CFA, Diary
, 3:269, was
ordained and installed as the minister of the First Church of Brookline on 15 March
(Sprague, Annals
Amer. Pulpit
, 8:331).
Noah Webster’s New York Minerva, 3
March, carried an advertisement soliciting proposals to publish by subscription
Washington’s Farewell Address. The article AA read has not been found;
however, news reprinted from New York in the Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 10 March, recommended that JA’s
inaugural address be published in a “similar stile.”
Psalms, 75:6–7.
AA was referring to Mercy Otis Warren’s letter to her of 27 Feb., which she sent to JA along with the FC of her reply, dated 4 March, above.
Here, AA paraphrased JA’s 14 Feb. 1782
letter to Robert R. Livingston, then secretary for foreign affairs, in which
JA responded to Livingston’s concerns about the delicacy of his
diplomatic position in the Netherlands (JA,
Papers
, 12:233–235).
See JA to AA, 13 March 1797, above.
On 6 Feb. Joseph Priestley had attended a commemoration held at
Oeller’s Hotel in Philadelphia of the Franco-American alliance of 1778. Labeling the
event “The Festival of Fools,” Peter Porcupine excoriated Priestley for his
participation: “Men of faction will still be factious in whatever country and under
whatever government they may live. Here is no established hierarchy for Doctor
Priestley to rail at … and yet he cannot be quiet. Wherever the standard of discontent
is hoisted, there the Doctor is a volunteer, ready armed and accoutred, whether it be
in a conventicle or a club-room, whether the attack be to be made with scraps of
scripture, mangled and profaned from the quivering lips of malice, or with blackguard
toasts roared forth from the lungs of gluttony and drunkenness.” Similarly, Thomas
McKean was condemned for forgetting the dignity of his position as a judge and
becoming “the companion of a herd of sottish malcontents” (Philadelphia Gazette, 7 Feb.; Porcupine’s Political
Censor, for Jan. 1797, Phila., 1797, p. 30, 39, 40, Evans, No. 31946).
“Poor Pennsylvania keeps no gallows!” is likely quoted from Porcupine’s Political Censor, for Jan. 1797, p. 33,
although it originated with line 347 of the “Guillotina” for 1797, for which see vol.
11:483. While used
satirically in both cases, the line is a reference to the 1794 Pennsylvania law
restricting the use of capital punishment to cases of first degree murder (Albert
Post, “Early Efforts to Abolish Capital Punishment in Pennsylvania,”
PMHB
, 68:40
[Jan. 1944]).
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act I, scene
ii, line 146.
Elizabeth Watson Russell (1767–1809), the widow of the wealthy
Boston merchant Thomas Russell, married Grenville Temple in Boston on 20 March 1797.
Temple (1768–1829) was the son of Elizabeth Bowdoin and Sir John Temple, the British
consul general to the United States (vol. 3:188–189, 5:272; Boston Repertory, 23 Jan. 1810; The Manifesto Church: Records of the Church in Brattle Square
Boston … 1699–1872, Boston, 1902, p. 265; W. H. Whitmore, An Account of the Temple Family, with Notes and Pedigree of the
Family of Bowdoin, Boston, 1856, p. 7–8).