Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
th.99
I have just received your letter of the 8th of Feb. and feel grieved to find you in so low spirits and so unwell, but
flatter myself that the sight of your son (whom I hope has long before this happily
arrived,) & his excellent company will revive your spirits and restore your
health.1 The snow has almost entirely
left us and we have had some days of the past week as pleasant and warm as we have at
the 410 eastward in April, but the change of weather here
is enough to kill one— yesterday and to day have been as cold as we have had almost
any time this winter.
You will see by the papers that Mr King is appointed to negotiate
a commercial treaty in London, with The Emperor of all the Russias & that Mr Smith
is sent to negotiate a treaty of amity and commerce with the Sublime Ottoman
Porte—this last nomination excited considerable debate in the house Senate & was finally caried by a majority
of two only, fourteen & twelve.2
Sam. Smith made a motion in the house for augmenting the salaries of the Executive officers, but the motion was lost by a majority of two or three votes only.3 I hardly know what to make of a great majority of Congress.
Have you read Gen. Heaths memoirs? If I can judge of them by the extracts which I have seen in the newspapers and I presume I may— they must be foolish indeed. Parson Gardner I presume must be the author of the Agawam Critick, published in the Centinel.
Love to L & affectionate remembrance to / Mr. Adams / your
m.S. S—
Monday Morn. Saturday night & yesterday we had so much snow as to make it good slaying.
RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “Wm S Shaw.”
In her letter to Shaw of 8 Feb., AA reported having insomnia and relayed news from Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody, including the speculation that Stephen Peabody Webster had been “unfortunate in buisness” (DLC:Shaw Family Papers).
After overtures from Count Philadelphia Gazette,
14 Feb. (Hamilton, Papers
, 22:500–502; U.S. Senate, Exec.
Jour.
, 5th Cong., 3d sess., p. 310–312; Walther Kirchner, Studies in Russian-American Commerce, 1820–1860, Leyden,
Netherlands, 1975, p. 15; Albert Matthews, “Journal of William Loughton Smith,
1790–1791,” MHS, Procs.
, 51:27 [Oct. 1917]).
On 23 Jan. Maryland Democratic-Republican Samuel Smith introduced
in the House of Representatives a resolution to increase the salaries of executive
officers of the federal government. Debate of the bill on 16 Feb. centered on the
inclusion of particular officers and the size and duration of salary increases. At the
close of the day the bill failed by a vote of 45 to 42. A resolution proposed the next
day calling for smaller increases of three years’ duration was passed on 26 Feb. and
signed into law on 2 March (
Annals of Congress
, 5th Cong., 3d sess., p. 2754,
2792, 2821, 2920–2927, 3019–3020;
U.S. Statutes at Large
, 1:729–730).