Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
th:December 1800.
Our Supreme Court being in session, has occupied my time
so much as to prevent answering your favors of the 10th: & 13th: instts:
1
I have seen Mrs: Kirkham
since I got your letter, and given her the fresh order; she will prepare the
articles & I shall send them as soon as I can.
I have applied to two Coachmakers to ascertain what you desired; neither of them have any ready made coachees on hand, but at my request, one of them furnished me with the enclosed estimate, of what a new one would cost; but if you want one so suddenly as you mention, there will not be time to complete it.2 I will make further search on Monday, and write again.
Perhaps your intention of returning in January is a good one, so far as respects the practicability of traveling; but ought you not to calculate upon meeting with snow at that season, beyond New York, which may obstruct your journey & possibly render your carriage useless? A journey of between three & four hundred miles in the depth of winter is a formidable thing; I hope you may find strength to support it, but I cannot help looking at it with terror, and the only circumstance which reconciles me to it is, that if you do not sett out in January, you must in March, which is, if possible, yet worse.
Yes dear Mother, you are about to retire from public life, after a faithful Service, on your part, as well as on that of my father, for a period of near forty years. The concurrence of circumstances, which has produced such a result in the great electioneering struggle, is little honorable to our character as a consistent people, and in my opinion, forebodes no good to the Country. That Commercial confidence has felt a severe shock at the happening of this event, is sufficiently evident from the sudden depression of the public funds, and that foreign powers will draw from it erroneous if not unfavorable opinions, is equally to be expected.3 We have never made this last an item in our account of national character; our boastings of Independence have made us neglect to enquire, what real pretentions we have to such preeminence. I forbear to enter more largely into an expression of my reflections on this topic; but as a citizen of the United States I will add, that I feel myself disgraced & degraded, by the change.
Mr: Dallas, who has been
indefatigable for ten years past in his endeavors to bring about this
change, has always affected to speak in terms of high respect for the
present chief Magistrate. “I could not have believed,” (said he to me a few
days ago) “that New England would have behaved so shamefully towards your
father, as to have given an equal support to any candidate for the
Presidency. I am less surprized, at the conduct of New York, because it is
well known that Mr: Burr’s reward for producing
the change there, was to be nothing less than the Vice Presidency— His
efforts therefore were 491
proportionably great, and the success of the Republican cause is entirely owing to them.” I made no reply, as
indeed he expected none, but said I, now you have got the Government into
your own hands, what do you intend to do with us?
“I have done now, said he— I shall make my profession hereafter the sole object of my attention—” Most disinterested gentleman—I dare aver that I can point to the path-way of his ambition, by naming a foreign Embassy, or some such thing, not quite so much in the line of his profession—
“Is not Mr: Jefferson a most
fortunate man,” (said4 he at
another time) “to come in to office, when our coffers are full—peace & a
treaty made with France, by the present administration, which prevents the
danger of any difference with England on that score—No Standing army— Upon
my soul I cant help thinking that a good understanding must have subsisted
between your father & Mr Jefferson, on these
subjects.” You give excellent reasons said Mr:
Ingersoll, who overheard Mr: Dallas, for turning
Mr: Adams out— dont you think so?
All this talk is in a good humored style—very amusing to himself I dare say, but not much so to me, though I can listen to it with composure—
I dined in a small company yesterday at Mr: Binghams where was Mr: Swift, the late Secy of
legation—5 From him I
understood that chief Justice Ellsworth had sent home his resignation of his
seat on the Bench, which leaves a vacancy to be filled.6 I presume that Mr: Patterson of New Jersey will be promoted to
the highest seat, as Judge Cushing the senior judge is understood to have
once declined it. Not knowing what considerations will govern the President
in supplying the place at this time, I venture to suggest that some young or
middle-aged man, for many obvious reasons would be, in my opinion, most
eligible— I have thought of Mr: Dexter &
Mr: Ingersoll or Mr: E— Tilghman, but whether either of these latter gentlemen would
accept the office, if offered to them—I know not— It is thought Mr: Tilghman would, but I am pretty sure Mr: Ingersoll would not— Lewis I have sometimes
thought, aspired to a seat, but I doubt the validity of his pretentions— If
the old rule of locality is to have its weight, Connecticutt may perhaps be
looked to for a character, but I think the President will obey the dictates
of his own opinion in this instance, without regard to the narrow principle
which has heretofore prevailed with respect to such appointments, &
which 492 I know was never approved by him—
Judge Cushing will not be likely to retain his place much longer, as his age
& infirmities must bear him down and Mr:
Dexter is the man I should wish to see, as the representative Judge of
Massachusetts— But my opinions are worth very little on this subject and are
only offered for their humble share of consideration—
With true love & affection I am, dear Mother / Your Son
RC (Adams Papers); internal address:
“Mrs: Adams.”; endorsed: “T B A. 20
December / 1800.”
AA’s 10 Dec. letter to TBA
has not been found. During its December term, the Penn. Supreme Court
decided three eviction cases, one petition for the discontinuance of a
suit, and a dispute over nonpayment of promissory notes (Alexander James
Dallas, Reports of Cases Ruled and Adjudged in
the Several Courts of the United States, and of Pennsylvania, Held
at the Seat of the Federal Government, 4 vols., Phila.,
1798–1807, 4:218–224, Shaw-Shoemaker, No. 12384).
Enclosure not found.
Since 11 Dec., 8 percent stock in the Bank of the
United States had fallen 5.5 percent, a drop the Philadelphia Gazette, 15 Dec., blamed on the news that
presidential electors would favor Thomas Jefferson. Stock reports showed
shares falling from a high of 113.5 to a low of 107 percent of par. The
Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 16
Dec., countered with a claim that another economic indicator, the price
of produce, had risen 10 percent, a statement the Philadelphia Gazette, 16 Dec., called “a
direct, palpable, wilful falsehood!” (Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 11, 18
Dec.).
Opening parenthesis editorially supplied.
Zephaniah Swift (1759–1823), Yale 1778, was a
Connecticut lawyer and politician who served in the House of
Representatives during the 3d and 4th Congresses. He was secretary to
the second peace mission to France and was appointed to the Conn.
Supreme Court in 1801, serving as chief justice from 1806 to 1819 (
Biog.
Dir. Cong.
).
Oliver Ellsworth wrote to JA on 16 Oct.
1800 (Adams Papers) from Le
Havre, France, notifying the president that ill health would delay his
return to the United States and consequently resigning his post as chief
justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (U.S. Senate, Exec.
Jour.
, 6th Cong., 2d sess., p. 359–360). Neither
William Cushing nor William Paterson was elevated to the position of
chief justice; for JA’s nomination of Ellsworth’s
replacement, see
AA to TBA, 25 Dec., and note 7,
below.