Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
th:June 1800.
This morning I had the pleasure to receive your favor
of the 12th: instt: and am happy to learn your safe arrival at the hospitable
mansion, where I fervently hope, you and my Father, may enjoy days &
years of tranquil life. For my own sake & for the sake of all my
family, it would, I believe, be a happy circumstance, if there should be
no further occasion for either of my parents leaving home, and I bear no
personal ill will to the Jacobins for wishing my Father a speedy retreat
to Quincy— I do regard the approaching crisis in the public affairs of
our Country as unusually momentous and it would afford me much greater
sorrow than delight to see my parents exposed in their declining years
to the danger of political convulsions, which if my apprehensions be
well founded, no prudence or rectitude of conduct will be able to avoid—
The melancholy side of the picture & all its darkest shades are
alone familiar to my mind, & the only consolatory reflections I
make, are drawn from the hope, that my imagination not only conjures up
but magnifies spectres, which are invisible to all other eyes— I believe
the vile Aurora, which I so constantly read, disturbs the peace of my
mind, and sometimes I wish it were possible for me to refrain from the
use of it— There is a dialogue in one of the late papers, which contains
much wit and sarcasm, something in the style of a Great Speakers diary,
though rather more pointed— I will send it to you with some others when
my father goes on. such little squibs, when well done have little effect
other than to excite mirth— You will like the “specimen of 285 modern conversation, for the
benefit of country gentlemen at Caucuses.
1
I have heard very few of
the many ill natured speeches, which have been made against the
President, in consequence of the measures which concluded the last
Session— The friends of his Administration,
who like Cobbett, have abandoned him to his own stubborness, are more
rancorous than the worst of Jacobins— If the ex-Secretary of war has
broken out, I have heard nothing; very few persons, except his
particular friends & relatives, will partake of his mortification or
sympathize very ardently on the occasion of his asking & obtaining
leave to resign.
I hear with much concern the declining state of
health in which You found Mrs: Norton. She
has been always of a delicate frame, and I fear, there is little hope,
of her being able to sustain the present shock. She has thus far
fulfilled the purpose of her existence, with fidelity and virtue, &
although her loss will be afflicting & grievous to her family &
friends, they can have no doubt of her reaping the reward of the just in
another world.
The aged & venerable Pastor of our little town deserves a tribute of remembrance for the good & aimiable qualities he once possessed. The few last years of his life, exhibited a painful instance of comfortless celibacy, and the very sight of him excited little other sensation than pity, when it was remembered what he was & what he might have been. In his lately established Successor, you will find a sensible & aimiable man whose Society, when he becomes familiar will afford you pleasure.
What is to become of your Grandchildren? When I suffer my thoughts to dwell upon the prospect, my heart sinks within me and I can devise nothing but poverty & wretchedness for their portion, without assigning them a burthensome existence, supported by the bounty of their remote relatives. That you were obliged to take Susan from her parents is a sufficient indication of the hopeless condition of that family, and a disbanded army takes from the other branch all the visible means of even a scanty subsistence— I know that the joys of my father will be damped & his recollection of painful incidents constantly kept alive by the presence of that infant; but what could be done? You have an irksome task to perform, but the act is charitable and must be its own reward.
I received the Books in safety & have them in my
Office— Did you obtain the coverlids &ca:? There should be a great coat of mine some where.
I expected my father to reach here this evening, from accounts I had by travellers, but possibly he may prefer staying at Chester to night. I have not a line from William, since his departure, and I intend giving him a scolding for his negligence—perhaps he will retort the accusation, though not with so much justice.
The weather hitherto has been moderate & the City continues healthy— May it long remain so.
I am dear Mother / Your Son
No letters from Berlin
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs: A Adams / Quincy”; internal address:
“Mrs: A Adams”; endorsed: “T B Adams
10th / June 1800.”
The Philadelphia Aurora
General Advertiser, 4 June, published a satirical conversation
between wine-drinking members of the Federalist Party, including William
Bingham, Uriah Tracy, and Samuel Whittlesey Dana, during which they
discuss the Sedition Act, their political opponents, and the legal
opinions of Judge Samuel Chase.
Your letter by Mr: Paleske of
28 Feby: though short gave me great pleasure as
it was so long since I had enjoyed that of seeing your hand-writing— I have
indeed no right to expect that you should have leisure to write me at large
upon any subject, and know that a free communication of your sentiments
cannot be indulged, upon public topics.— With regard to private concerns it
more properly belongs to other correspondents to give me such information as
can be interesting to me; and to touch upon some you remark is disagreeable—
I would intreat at least that as far as concerns a transaction implicating
pecuniary interests of mine, you would as much as possible discard it from
your mind— I deplore the unhappy habits of life, which led to the damage I
sustained, but at the same time I must acknowledge it might have been much
worse— Had my confidence been in its fullest extent abused my personal
misfortune would have been much greater, and I cannot but bear testimony at
least to that restraint which set bounds to the breach of my trust. Where I
cannot justify, I would gladly palliate, and especially would as far as
possible wish to mitigate the rigour of your sentiments on this occasion—
For my own loss, I have consoled myself easily, and among other resources
recurred to those antient teachers of wisdom, on whom I have been taught by
you to set so great a value— I enclose 287 with
this, the result of my consultations on this subject, with a venerable old
moralist, which is so long, that I can only request you to read it, though
if I did not know how little leisure you have from less important
occupations, I would beg you as a classic scholar to compare it with the
original— There is a translation of the same Satire extant, done by Creech,
which resembles the one I send you, only in the last line—A resemblance
which was accidental and could not easily be avoided— An English author of
some reputation now living, a Mr Lewis has
published an imitation of this poem, which I
have not read, but which by the account of the reviewers, is loose both in
construction and versification— I am somewhat surprized, that neither
Johnson, nor Pope, nor Boileau, who have all given imitations from Juvenal,
never selected this which I consider as the finest of all his Satires—1 The description of the
tortures suffered by a guilty conscience, is superior to any thing of the
kind I have ever met with elsewhere— The chief thing to be disapproved is
the concluding sentiment which seems of a more vindictive spirit, than is
consistent with the previous formal declaration against revenge.
My wife feels much flattered by the kind desire you express to see her; and she as well as myself is anxiously desirous to see you, and all our friends in America— Perhaps I ought, as the principal purpose for which I was sent here has been effected, to ask for my recall, and I must honestly confess I see not what service I can henceforth render the United-States here, worth the cost at which they maintain me. But you once enquired of me where would be my independence upon returning to America; and though before I was married I felt little concern upon that head, I am now fully sensible of all its weight.
My disposition for returning to the bar, time is not likely to make more ardent, though I must truly declare that neither pride nor indolence have the smallest influence in exciting my aversion to it. My time was never more fully employed, and I never allowed so little of it to indulgence or relaxation, from the day when I commenced the study of the law, untill that when I left its practice, as since I have now been resident in Europe— My leisure has indeed been so considerable, that I could follow the bent of my own inclination or caprice in the choice of my studies, and perhaps I have not always chosen the most profitable, or even the best— At least however I have neither been idle, nor acquired habits of idleness, and I am persuaded that upon the whole my hours of application have been more useful to the culture of my own mind, and heart, than they 288 would have been, in the dry and drudging study of legal questions applied to cases of practice which would have occurred to me.— Upon personal and family considerations therefore, I do not ask to be recalled—though if you should think proper to recall me, as costing the United States more than my services are worth, I shall have no pretension to complain
Of political intelligence, I can at present give you
little— The total dissolution of the alliance between Russia and Austria and
England, and the dissensions between the first of those powers and the two
others, which I intimated to you as probable, in a former letter2 have taken place and the
resentment on the part of the Russian Emperor has been carried so far as to
recall his ministers both from London and Vienna, and to require the recall
of the Austrian and British Ministers at his court— It is reported even that
he has adopted some severe regulations against the british commerce— At
least his negotiations with this cabinet have been lately very active, and
your old friend Count Lusi (who always speaks of you with respect and
attachment, and who has repeatedly requested me to call you him to your remembrance) is now on
his way to St: Petersbourg to sign an alliance
between the two courts— Upon the stability of all this indeed, not much
dependence is to be placed— The person at the head of the Russian Empire is
universally acknowledg’d to be a man of good intentions and a well disposed
heart— But his temper is violent, ever ready to fly from one extreme to
another, affected excessively by trifling incidents, and habituated to
observe few rules of moderation in his measures.— It was said I think in the
days of Tiberius, that no calamity could be greater for the roman empire,
than to have a prince pass immediately from exile to the imperial purple—
That extreme restraint and state of humiliation and danger at once, in which
the emperor lived for nearly forty years, being in one instant changed for
the possession of supreme power, might turn giddy steadier brains than his,
and lead to eccentricities of conduct men of firmer minds and of better
education.—3 I do not
imagine therefore that Prussia will enter into any very important
engagements with him, that may bind her to act upon an offensive plan,
though her desire to bound the grasping ambition of Austria, on the side of
Italy is not equivocal.
It is extremely probable that her anxiety on this account
will be soon quieted without any agency of her own.— The Austrians who
commenced the campaign in Italy by besieging Massena with his army in Genoa,
and who enjoyed for some days the confident hope 289 that they should have them all as
prisoners of war, have given time to Buonaparte and Berthier with an army of
60,000 thousand men, to cross the mountains, and instead of besieging, will
in every probability be driven from all their last year’s conquests as
rapidly as they were made—4
They lost the only opportunity which they had to defeat the first consul’s
plan, which they might have done by falling upon the separate detachments of
his army, as they first entered Piedmont: but and hitherto they have done nothing but retreat before the
french as they advanced. Buonaparte entered Milan, on the 2d: of this month; and it is probable that soon
after that date a battle took place: for the Austrians would probably not
abandon the blockade of Genoa without trying the issue of one battle, which
however, if fought, I have no doubt but it was lost by them— It is said that
Buonaparte has the project of restoring the king of Sardinia, but the same
purpose was last year attributed to the cabinet of Vienna, and probably with
as much foundation—5
Buonaparte’s design is more likely to be that of restoring the Cisalpine
Republic, adding part or the whole of Piedmont to it, and ceding a part of
it as it originally stood, to Austria.—6 No affair of any considerable
consequence has during a month past taken place between the hostile armies
in Swabia— The Austrians feel themselves not in sufficient force to attack,
and the French are waiting for some decisive operation in Italy, before they
recommence their career of victory.— There is all reason to suppose that
before the close of the summer the court of Vienna will be compell’d to
accept the terms of peace which the french will give, and it is understood
that the negotiations there are still even now continued.
I am, Dear Sir, ever faithfully your’s
RC (Adams Papers); internal address:
“The President.”; endorsed: “18th June 1800”; docketed: “June 1801.”
FC-Pr (Adams Papers).
JQA enclosed a fourteen-page English
translation of Juvenal’s thirteenth satire, which he composed between 27
May and 5 June (Adams Papers,
filmed at [June 1800]). English classicist
Thomas Creech (1659–1700), Oxford M.A. 1683, had completed a translation
of the satire that appeared in John Dryden, comp., The Satires of Decimus Junius Juvenalis,
London, [1692], while Matthew Gregory Lewis (1775–1818), Oxford 1794,
had recently published The Love of Gain: A Poem.
Imitated from the Thirteenth Satire of Juvenal, London, 1799,
which was widely panned. JQA’s references to imitations of
Juvenal include Samuel Johnson’s London: A
Poem, London, 1738, and The Vanity of
Human Wishes, London, 1749, about the third and tenth satires,
respectively, and Nicolas Boileau Despréaux’s 1660 poem “Adieux d’un
poëte à la ville de Paris.” Alexander Pope’s work was heavily influenced
by Juvenal (D/JQA/24, 27 May 1800, 5 June,
APM Reel 27; Leo
M. Kaiser, “John Quincy Adams and His Translation of Juvenal 13,” Amer. Philos. Soc., Procs.
, 114:280, 281 [20 Aug.
1970];
DNB
; London Analytical Review, 1:522–524 [May 1799];
Hoefer, Nouv. biog. générale
; Howard D.
Weinbrot, Alexander Pope and the
290
Traditions of Formal Verse Satire,
Princeton, N.J., 1982, p. 4). For TBA’s role in publishing
JQA’s translation, see
TBA to JQA, 6
Dec., and note 4, below.
JQA to JA, 30 Oct. 1799, for which see AA to Mary Smith Cranch, 28 Jan. 1800, and note 5, above.
Prior to Tiberius’ becoming emperor of the Roman
Empire in A.D. 14, internal politicking about the line of succession
resulted in his exile to Rhodes. Paul I was similarly estranged before
his accession to the throne of Russia as his mother, Catherine II,
forbade him to engage in official duties (
Oxford Classical
Dicy.
; Albert Rambaud, The
History of Russia from the Earliest Times to 1877, transl.
Leonora B. Lang, 2 vols., N.Y., 1878, 2:128).
Louis Alexandre Berthier (1753–1815) was Napoleon’s
chief of staff from 1796 to 1814 and was appointed minister of war in
Dec. 1799. On 2 April 1800 Berthier was placed in command of a reserve
army to be raised in southern France, and he led the new force
throughout the Italian campaign (Hoefer, Nouv. biog.
générale
; Roberts, Napoleon
, p. 80, 233,
250–251, 263, 266).
On 22 Oct. 1799, Paul I wrote to Francis II demanding
the restoration of King Charles Emmanuel IV of Sardinia and Grand Duke
Ferdinand III of Tuscany. Francis rebuffed Paul’s requests, souring
Austro-Russian relations (Hugh Ragsdale, “A Continental System in 1801:
Paul I and Bonaparte,” Journal of Modern
History, 42:70 [March 1970]).
The Cisalpine Republic collapsed on 29 April 1799
when Marshal Aleksandr Suvorov captured Milan, but it was reestablished
following Napoleon’s recapture of the city on 2 June 1800 (Spencer C.
Tucker, ed., A Global Chronology of Conflict:
From the Ancient World to the Modern Middle East, 6 vols.,
Santa Barbara, Calif., 2010, 3:1007, 1023).