Papers of John Adams, volume 14

To James Warren, 12 April 1783 Adams, John Warren, James
To James Warren
Dear Sir Paris April 12. 17831

What would I have given to have been your Doorkeeper for a few days while you had under Deliberation the Dispatches We Sent by Barney, that I might have listened with my Ear at the Key hole and overheard your Debates. I fancy Some Members will be of Opinion, that they have committed a Mistake in committing the Lamb so unreservedly to the Custody of the Wolf.— If Congress are not betrayed by the Want of Intelligence or by Misinformation into any unseasonable Votes, all will be very well.— I Should not wish to See, any other Vote than a Simple Ratification of the provisional Treaty of the 30. of Nov. 1782.— Yet the Departure of Barney was, by various means partly accidental and partly designed So long delayed, even to the 17 of January, and the English and the French might have Sent the News in their own Way and in their own Colours So much sooner, tho We know not that they did, that you might be led to form Opinions upon partial Evidence. You may well Suppose, We are anxious to know. Not a Word from any Part of America, directly or indirectly which gives cause to suppose that you have recd the News even of the Treaty of the 30. of Nov. Nor that you have recd the Dutch Treaty, four Copies of which I put on board four different Vessells at Amsterdam in October.2 We cannot account for the failure of Arrivals in Spain France, Holland, So absolutely without Supposing an Embargo.

The Treaty with sweeden is made, Denmark has ordered our Flagg to be respected like that of Republicks of the first order. Portugal has done the Same. The Emperor has an Inclination to treat with Us but The House of Austria never makes the first Advances. Mr Dana has announced himself to the Chanceller Osterman and recd for Answer that the Way was clear.

Mr Fox the new Minister declares his good dispositions and his 402Determination to finish with the Utmost Liberality. Mr Hartly it is Said is to finish with Us. and the Duke of Manchester with the other Powers.3

Your Son is Said by some to have gone to Italy and by others to have embarked for America from Marseilles where he has wisely been to lay the foundation of Trade & Fortune.

our young Men may lawfully make their Fortunes We their Fathers, have been employed in preparing the Way.— I dont know what to do with my Boys, however.

Affectionately yours

J. Adams

RC (MHi:Warren-Adams Coll.); internal address: “General Warren.”; endorsed: “Mr J Adams / April 83.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 108.


A notation on the Letterbook copy states, “Paris 15th. April 1783. Delivered to Mr. George Mason.” For the letter's origin and context, see note 2 to JA's 9 April letter to Warren, above.


For the arrival, ratification, and exchange of ratifications of the Dutch-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce and the Convention on Recaptures, see Robert R. Livingston's letter of 13 Feb., above, and JA's 30 May letter to Livingston, below.


George Montagu, 4th Duke of Manchester, presented his credentials as British ambassador to France on 6 May ( Repertorium , 3:162). He replaced Alleyne Fitzherbert and signed the definitive peace treaties between Britain, France, and Spain at Versailles on 3 Sept., the same day that JA and his colleagues signed the definitive Anglo-American peace treaty at Paris (Morris, Peacemakers , p. 427, 435–436).

To James Warren, 13 April 1783 Adams, John Warren, James
To James Warren
Confidential. Dear Sir, Paris April 13th. 1783.1

I have in some late Letters opened to You in Confidence the Dangers, which our most important Interests have been in, as well as the Opposition and Jealousy and Slanders, which your Ministers have met with, from the vain, ambitious and despotic Character of one Minister, I mean the C. de Vergennes— But You will form but an imperfect Idea after all of the Difficulties We have had to encounter, without taking into Consideration another Character equally selfish and interested—equally vain and ambitious—more jealous and envious, and more false & deceitful, I mean Dr. Franklin.

It is a Saying of Algernoon Sidney concerning Sir Walter Rawleigh, that “his Morals were not sufficiently exact for a great Man”2—And the Observation can never be applied with more propriety than to Dr. Franklin.— His whole Life has been one continued Insult to good Manners and to Decency. His Son, and Grandson, as 403he calls him with characteristic Modesty; the Effrontery with which he has forced these his offspring up in the World, not less than his Speech of Polly Baker, are Outrages to Morality & Decorum, which would never have been forgiven in any other American— These things however are not the worst of his Faults— They shew however the Character of the Man; in what Contempt he holds the Opinions of the World, and with what Haughtiness he is capable of persevering through Life in a gross & odious System of Falsehood and Imposture.3

A sacred regard to Truth is among the first and most essential Virtues of a public Man— How many Kings have involved themselves and their Kingdoms in Misfortunes, by a Laxness in this particular? How much Mischief has been done in all Ages by Ministers of State, who have indulged themselves in a Duplicity and Finesse, or in other Words, in an Hipocrisy and Falsehood, which some are even abandoned enough to recommend and prescribe to Politicians, but which never yet did any thing but Harm and Mischief.— I am sorry to say, but strict and impartial Justice obliges me to say, that from five complete Years of Experience of Dr. Franklin, which I have now had in Europe, I can have no Dependence on his Word. I never know when he speaks the Truth, and when not. If he talked as much as other Men, and deviated from the Truth as often in proportion as he does now, he would have been the Scorn of the Universe long ago— But his perpetual Taciturnity has saved him.

It would be Folly to deny, that he has had a great Genius, and that he has written several things in Philosophy and in Politicks, profoundly— But his Philosophy and his Politicks have been infinitely exaggerated, by the studied Arts of Empiricism, until his Reputation has become one of the grossest Impostures, that has ever been practised upon Mankind since the Days of Mahomet.

A Reputation so imposing in a Man of Artifice and Duplicity, of Ambition and Vanity, of Jealousy and Envy, is as real a Tyranny as that of the Grand Seignior. It is in vain to talk of Laws of Justice, of Right, of Truth, of Liberty, against the Authority of such a Reputation. It produces all the Servility of Adulation—all the Fear, all the Expectation & Dependence in common Minds, that is produced by the imposing Pomp of a Court and of Imperial Splendour. He has been very sensible of this, & has taken Advantage of it.

As if he had been conscious of the Laziness, Inactivity and real Insignificance of his advanced Age, he has considered every American Minister, who has come to Europe, as his natural Enemy. He 404has been afraid that some one would serve his Country, acquire a Reputation, and begin to be thought of by Congress to replace him.—

Sensible that his Character has not been so much respected in America as in Europe, he has sought an Alliance to support him with Mr de Sartine4 and the C. de Vergennes and their “Autours” Satellites. It is impossible to prove, but from what I know of him, I have no doubt, that he is the Man, who, by means of the Emissaries or Satellites just alluded to, made to those Ministers all the malicious Insinuations against Mr. Lee & Mr. Izard, which, altho’ absolutely false and groundless, have made as much Noise in the World, & had almost the same Effects, as if they had been true—5 From the same detestable Source came the Insinuations and Prejudices against me, and the shameless abandoned Attack upon me, the History of which You know better than I.— Hence too the Prejudices against Mr. Dana, Mr. Jay & every other. These are my Opinions, tho’ I cannot prove them, otherwise than by what I have seen and heard myself, what results from a long Series of Letters & Transactions, and what I know of the Characters of the Men. The C. has had his Head filled with so many Prejudices against others, and in favor of him, and has found him so convenient a Minister,—ready always to comply with every Desire,—never asking any thing but when ordered and obliged to ask for Money—never proposing any thing—never advising any thing, that he has adopted all his Passions, Prejudices & Jealousies, and has supported him, as if his own Office depended upon him— He and his Office of Interpreters have filled all the Gazettes of Europe with the most senseless Flattery of him, and by means of the Police set every Spectacle, Society, and even private Club and Circle to clapping him with such Applause, as they give to Opera Girls.— This being the unfortunate Situation of foreign Affairs, what is to be done?

Franklin has, as he gives out, asked Leave to resign— He does not mean to obtain it, but to save the Shame of being recalled. I wish with all my Soul he was out of public Service, and in Retirement, repenting of his past Life, and preparing, as he ought to be, for another World. But as the Peace is made, and he is old, and it will make a horrid Wonder in the World to remove him, and it would be impossible to publish the whole Truth in Justification of it to the People of America as well as of Europe, perhaps it may be as well to let him alone.— But at least Congress should firmly and steadily support their other Ministers against his insidious Manœuvres— 405They should add no more Feathers to his Cap. This will however be difficult. He will watch Opportunities, and French Influence will forever aid him, and both will be eternally attacking openly and secretly every other Minister—so that I am persuaded he will remain as long as he lives, the Demon of Discord among our Ministers, and the Curse and Scourge of our foreign Affairs.

France has suffered as much as America, by the unskilful & dishonest Conduct of our foreign Affairs. They have had no Confidence in any but him— And he either knew nothing or cared nothing about Affairs— They have not only not confided in any other, but they have persecuted every other— By which Means France has not derived half the Advantage from the Alliance in the War, nor will She hold half the Benefit after the Peace, which She might have done, if She had vouchsafed to hearken to the Advice of those, who would have given it honestly and wisely.

To enter into the contemptible detail of all the unworthy Artifices, the Follies and Impositions, that have been the Fruit of these Characters; the “petit Commerce” of— &c— &c—the Arts in Holland, Spain, Russia, Sweeden, Denmark and all the rest of Europe, to prevent the progress of our Cause, and defeat our Negociations; to straiten in the Article of Money, and distress Us in the War; to keep Us humble, tame and dependent; to strip Us of the Fishery and Western Lands; the Millions of Affronts, Neglects, Contempts, or, in one French Word, “Desagremens,” which have been put upon the Servants of Congress, would fill Volumes.

The Moral and the Politick of all is—“See with your own Eyes—judge with your own Understanding—repeal every shackling Instruction to your Ministers—support them inflexibly against all foreign Influence, and all little spiteful Intrigues.[”]

For my own part, I have been made a Sacrifice to such Intrigues in so gross a manner, that unless I am restored and supported, I am unalterably determined to retire— So resolves your / invariable Friend

J. Adams6

RC in John Thaxter's hand (MHi:Warren-Adams Coll.); internal address: “General Warren”; endorsed: “Mr Adams’ character of Dr. Franklin”; notation in pencil in an unknown hand: “Should be destroyed.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 108.


A notation on the Letterbook copy states, “Paris 16th. April— Delivered to Capt. Adam Hoops of Philadelphia, who was bound to Nantes to embark for America.” For the letter's origin and context, see note 2 to JA's 9 April letter to Warren, above. The present letter is JA's most violent and detailed denunciation of Benjamin Franklin in any extant letter to date, thus rendering understandable the notation indicated in the descriptive note.


JA paraphrases Sidney's comment that 406“’tis convenient the world should be informed, that tho he was a well qualified gentleman, yet his morals were no way exact” (Algernon Sidney, Discourses Concerning Government, 2 vols., Edinburgh, 1750, ch. 3, sect. 30). A copy is in JA's library at MB ( Catalogue of JA's Library ).


JA was offended by Franklin's lack of pretense in acknowledging his illegitimate son William Franklin, the loyalist governor of New Jersey, and his grandson William Temple Franklin who was in turn the illegitimate son of William. In the same vein is JA's reference to a piece of fiction published by Franklin almost exactly 36 years earlier on 15 April 1747 in the London General Advertiser and widely reprinted in British and American newspapers. For the publication, entitled “The SPEECH of Miss POLLY BAKER, before a Court of Judicature, At Connecticut near Boston in New-England; where she was prosecuted the Fifth Time, for having a Bastard Child: Which influenced the Court to dispense with her Punishment, and induced one of her Judges to marry her the next Day,” see Franklin, Papers , 3:120–125. For a detailed account of its origins and history, see Max Hall, Benjamin Franklin & Polly Baker: The History of a Literary Deception, Chapel Hill, N.C., 1960. See also CFA's comment on Franklin and the “Polly Baker” piece in JA, Works , 1:319–320.


Antoine Raymond Jean Gualbert Gabriel de Sartine served as French naval minister until Oct. 1780 (vol. 10:311). For Sartine's extensive correspondence with the American Commissioners in 1778 and with JA in 1779 and 1780, see the indexes to vols. 6, 8, and 10. JA's mention of the former naval minister in this letter may be due partly to his view that Franklin had acquiesced in Sartine's reluctance, shared with Vergennes, to deploy additional French naval vessels to American waters in accordance with American proposals, such as those contained in the commissioners’ memorial to Vergennes of [ante 9] Jan. 1779 and JA's 13 July 1780 letter to Vergennes (vol. 7:292–311; 9:520–529).


During his first diplomatic mission in 1778 and 1779, JA was aware that Franklin's opinion of Arthur Lee and Ralph Izard was unfavorable, his relationship with the two men was very acrimonious, and his view was shared by the French government. But JA also believed that the opinions and demeanor of both Lee and Izard made them wholly unsuited for diplomacy and did little to further Franco-American relations. See, for example, JA's letter to James Lovell of 20 Feb. 1779 and his Diary entry for 9 Feb. 1779 (vol. 7:419–421; JA, D&A , 2:346–347).


In JA's hand.