Papers of John Adams, volume 20
th.1789
I had often considered your Situation, before the Receipt of your
Letter of the 16th, and I had hoped you would “Possess
yourself in Patience.” If you already draw a Picture Teste
di legno and talk of sharpening an Ax for Decapitation, what am I to look for in the Run
of a Twelvemonth?
I do not like your diminutive italien Idea. You who are said to be
more than half british ought to have called yourself a spare Rudder or Mainmast; and
that would have given me a fine oppertunity to comment upon the Parsimony of those who will not pay for a good one
when the Length and Risk of an Enterprise demand such a 113 precautionary Duplicate. Once more however I recur to the Tëte-debois—tis a delphic
one you must own; and you are to expect the dilectable
Chance of being applied to in all Cases of Difficulty; I do
not mean when the Judgement of the Senate is in Reality at Moieties, For, that will not be the Event one Time
in Fifty, while 49 Times relative Contingencies of Popularity will balance the Votes and your oracular Decision will have the
Praise or Blame. “You have decided in Favour of the Power
of the Prime because you look up to that Goal.” If I did
not know you well I would not write thus to you. A weak Man
only would be discouraged by such Suggestions of the Base. All whom you esteem here are
pleased with your Vote. But better than that, I know you have your own Approbation upon
your own Principles which lead regularly to impavidum
ferient ruinæ.1
I feel at this Period redoubled mortifications that you was not at
Home when I dined with your Lady and conversed with Doctr.
Tufts upon the Point of Time when the continental
Government was to affect our Laws of Revenue. He conceded to my Idea that we could not
be deranged ’till the compleat Organization of Congress, when I expected a Proclamation
from the President directing the Continuence of the offices & officers of the
Confederation till further orders, and providing against
any Derangements in the individual States, where the new Constitution might be naturally
supposed to interfere—till the legislative measures of Congress
should be in Operation.—
I have 8 or 9 Causes of Libels to be tried this Week some of them
as high as twelve hundred pounds; and I am told most of the Bar are engaged together for
mutual Assistance to defend upon the principle that no Impost
Law has been in Force here since ——— I know not when.
“Congress” are to have such and such Powers—“and to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States”2
If these Seizures of mine are acquitted all the Duties I have
collected in the Period, be it what it may, are to be
refunded.— It was upon that Paragraph of the VIIIth Section,
that I fixed for the Termination of my State Collection of Impost. what say the
Merchants of N york or Philada. respecting State Duties? Is
it only here that Doubts exist? I can give only one of two Reasons why a Proclamation
did not appear. The Idea at Head Quarters must have been either that Nobody could suppose we had a Right here to Impost or 114 that nobody could doubt but that we had it— yet, in
Fact, there is a great Division of Sentiment upon the
Point.
I have directed the Attorney General to go forward by Demurrer or Appeal. And I had advised the supreme Judges to converse upon the Subject as they were riding the Eastern Circuit or smoaking their Evening Pipes together.
Have we now the Right of Tender? In my opinion the Constitution decides that without the necessity of any Law of Congress. Can a Pyrate be now tried? our Law is sufficient till congress promulge one. This last Principle avails in the Impost. Excuse my Impertinence
in showing my Opinion, while I meant to intreat yours.
I salute You and your Lady and Family cordially. Pardon the Slovenlyness, I have detained the Postmaster already too long from his Office
Your devoted Friend
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Mr Lovell. 26. July.
Ansd / 1. septr. 1789.”
“If the firmament were to split and crash down upon him, he would
remain unafraid when hit by the wreckage” (Horace, Odes and
Epistles, transl. Niall Rudd, Cambridge, 2004, Book III, Ode 3, lines 7–8).
Here, in the left margin, Lovell wrote: “Sec VIII last paragraph.” He referred to Art. 1, sect. 8, of the Constitution, known as the “elastic clause,” which granted incidental powers to Congress, thereby strengthening the new federal government in a way that the Articles of Confederation had not done.