Adams Family Correspondence, volume 4
1781-06-23
And is there no medium Sir, between terms which might be misconstrued, and the cold formal
adieu of mere ceremony tagd with a title. Your Sentimentilist as you are pleased to stile
her2 prizes the Emanations of a pure and friendly Heart, before all the studied complasance of a
finished courtier.
Uncandid do you say? You never will find Portia so. When the character of the Statesman, the Senator, the Benevolent Philanthropist is maintained in its purity the grave parent of children who look up to him for an example for their future conduct should not suffer an impeachment in the Eye of the World, much3 less should there be just occasion for it.
I will give you a specimen of a conversation that passd not long since between Portia and a
Lady of her acquaintance for whom she entertains a high Esteem as one of the best Female
characters in America tho Portia would fain believe she errs in judgeing of one character.
Cornelia. Have you seen the intercepted Letter of your Friend L
Thus ended a conversation but not a conversion. Uncandid as you are pleased to stile Portia,
if she had not valued her correspondent for real and substantial virtues of Heart and mind,
the just or unjust reflections of the world would have affected her no more than any other
vague reports. By giving freedom to her pen and unreservedly censuring what she must ever
consider as the Shades of a character she has given proof of a real Friendship which will not
be diminished untill she shall be convinced that the character drawn by Cornelia is a just
one.—And now Sir for one passage in your Letter which you may well think has not escaped my
notice. “When I write again on this Subject, I shall transmit
some anecdotes which you will think Interesting to your Friend abroad.” Now what Inference am
I to draw from this? If you mean to retaliate for the pain you say I have given you, by this
dark hint, you are mistaken, for my confidence in my Friend abroad is as unbounded as my
affection for him which knows no limits. He will not injure me even by a thought. Virtue and
principal confirm the Bond which affection first began, and my security depends not upon
passion which other objects might more easily excite, but the sober and setled Dictates of
Religion and Honour. It is that which cements at the same time that it ensures the
affections.
constant Lampand waves his purple wings.”
I shall not make any inquiry of Mr. S
Great and important is the day. May America shew herself equal to the call. Our wretched finances undoe us. This Town exerted itself 162and has forwarded all the Men required and has paid the money required for the Beaf.—What a stupid race are the British retalers of News, to think one sensible American would credit their story of peace makers excluding America, when they would all be glad to hug her.
I hope you have recoverd from your fall, if it was an honest one from your Horse and not down a pair of dark stairs.6—I will not receive your sarcasam so have blotted it out, and in lieu of it “read Portias affectionate Friend,”7 and in return bestow the sincere Emanations of Friendship which glow in the Bosom of
Lovell's reply of 13 July, below, mentions two letters from AA, dated 10 and 23 June, in language making it clear that the present letter is the second of these two. AA's letter of 10 June has not been found.
In Lovell's letter to AA, 29 May, above, quoted again later in the present letter and alluded to in its leavetaking.
MS: “must.”
From AA's characterization of her, from the general tenor of her comments, and from other hints, one may at least guess that “Cornelia” was Mercy Warren, but the identification cannot be established without more evidence than is now available. On “the intercepted Letter” from Lovell to Gerry, 20 Nov. 1780, see especially AA to Lovell, 17 March and 10 May, and Lovell to AA, 16 June, all above.
The first word in brackets has been editorially supplied for sense; the second word is only partially legible. Another reading of the passage might be: “common prey for plunder.”
See Lovell's reply, 13 July, below.
Closing quotation mark editorially supplied. Lovell's “sarcasam” was in the highly formal phrasing of the leavetaking in his letter of 29 May, q.v. above, responding to AA's disapproval of his earlier use of terms of gallantry.