Adams Family Correspondence, volume 12
ry10
th1798
I hope long before this time you have arrived Safe at Berlin. The
first intelligence which I received of your having left England, was under the
Copenhagen head soon after. Letters were received from mr Murrey of the 9th of November, in which he mentions your writing to him from
Hamburgh. I immediatly informed my dear Louissa’s Parents and received a Letter from mrs
jhonson this last week; in which she expresses herself relived from much anxiety by the
information. in her Letter to me, she acknowledes receiving one from Mrs Adams dated in
sep’br with the pleasing account of her 389 Health, and happiness. I mention these circumstances because Letters from one
quarter, are sometimes more fortunate in their destination than others.
on the last of Jan’ry I received a
Letter from you dated the 7th october at London. at the same
time your Father received one from your Brother of the 3d
and a communication from you of the 4th. your Letters always
possess one good quality beyond many others. they have an intrinsick value which Age
does not impair. as far as they respect political intelligence, or rather what is calld
News. we should like to get them sooner. very few reach under two and three months I
flatter myself I shall hear from you as often as that, even tho further removed.
Congress you know are now in Session and have been so ever Since
Nov’br yet tho total want of official intelligence from
our Envoys, are an excuse for suspending opperations which ought not to have been
hessitated about at their Summer Session. the subject was brought again before the House
and after a debate of two Days, postponed untill this Month, not doubting but that
Something to be relied upon would before now have arrived.
From various quarters, it is reported that after the Presenting the Letters of Credence by our Envoys, not any thing further has taken place, and expectation is entertaind of their Speedy return.
In the mean time our Commerce is suffering a general Wreck, and nothing is respected by these Piratical Sea Robbers. An astonishing degree of forbearence, and respect to the Laws of Neutrality; and to the Government, is manifested by our Countrymen, and one might be almost ready to credit Mr Munroes assertion, “that his Countrymen would not only bear with Patience, a breach of Treaty, but with pleasure, provided it was benificial to France.”1
There is however a spirit in Man. I see it rising from the North. it will come with the Besom of destruction; and sweep from the bed of the ocean these Mauraders. I hope however they will receive the sanction of Law.
During the Winter, Health has been restored to this city, and to the United States. we have an abundance of the fruits of the Earth, and might sit under our own vines, and fruit Trees, having none to make us affraid if we were as wise, as experience ought to make us; but in such a state of warfare, against all order, Law and Religion, the spirit of French prosiliteism pervades all quarters of the civilized world. it is not to be wonderd at, that we should partake of the general calimity
390In daily expectation of some important event, we wait. we have ceased to wonder at the most improbable. the threatned invasion of England has brightned her Glory, united all Parties, for all seem determined to exert every energy, and I trust every effort to subdue them will prove ineffectual. England appears the only barrier left, with a chance for Stoping the ravages of the most Sanguinary Nation whose History has yet been transmitted to Posterity.
I send you a Number of Pamphlets you will see by them, what trouble
France has given the united states by spain.2 in short we are buffetted by both Nations, yet
enjoy more happiness and tranquility than any other Nation. if we could but have our
commerce protected, and preserve our Neutrality, we may pitty all other Nations, but
envy none of them. The Chel’er de Friere lives amongst us
universally respected and beloved he has a most agreable Lady, for his wife, with whom I
am much pleased.3 I am sorry to inform
you of the sudden death of mr Regal last week. he was sick but two days. he has left a
young amiable wife 35 years younger than himself, who has not a relative in the Country.
both mr & Mrs Regal made many Friends here. he was a Man of extensive learning and
science. She will not fail of every consolation which the kindness and benevolence of
Friends can render to her. her circumstances are easy, as mr Regal was I think a German
and an officer under the Duke of Bavaria. I have been thus particular not knowing but
you might meet with some Friend of theirs—
Your sister was well last week and I had Letters from William & John Who are at Atkinson under the Patronage of your Aunt Peabody, at an accademy there.4 our other Friends are all well.
I hope your Father will be able to write you, but if he is not, my Letters must be a substitute. Tell Thomas we want him, but approve his going with you. if I do not write him now, his turn shall be next. my Love to mrs Adams. I have not yet Seen her Mamma but expect a visit from her soon. we exchange Letters frequently.
I am my Ever dear Son / most affectionatly / Your Mother
RC (Adams
Papers); endorsed by TBA: “Mrs: Adams
10 Feby 1798 / 30 April Recd /
4 May answd.”
AA was paraphrasing James Monroe’s A View of the Conduct of the Executive … Connected with the
Mission to the French Republic, During the Years 1794, 5, & 6, Phila.,
1797, p. 34, 35, Evans, No.
32491.
Among the pamphlets AA sent was possibly the Message from the President of the United States, Accompanying a
Report to Him from the Secretary of State, and Sundry Documents Relative to the
Affairs of the United States on the Mississippi; the Intercourse with the Indian
Nations, and the Inexecution of the
391
Treaty Between the United States and Spain, Phila., 1798,
Evans, No. 34801.
Agnes Frances Lockyer Freire, for whom see 10:319, wrote to AA on 13 Nov.
1797, returning the copy of the Franco-Portuguese peace treaty that AA
had lent her and sending two pamphlets, one of which was John Gifford’s Letter to Thomas Erskine (Adams Papers).
Letters not found.
Your kind favor of November 7th:
written at East Chester came to hand on the 24th: ulto: and I have now to acknowledge the receipt, on this day, of
your more recent communication, dated the 3d: ulto: at Philadelphia. I have written to you but once since our
arrival here, but my brother has been so frequent & copious in his letters both to
you and my father, that I derive a sort of excuse for my own negligence, from his
punctuality. You do not know perhaps, how extremely irksome & discouraging a thing
it is, to be employed as a copyist of all sorts of letters for eight or ten days,
sometimes without intermission, & then to be under the necessity of composing an original letter. I have not my brother’s facility in writing
nor his readiness, nor yet his diligence. This, you will say perhaps, is my own fault. If I thought it such myself, I would endeavor to
correct & reform it, but some length of experience has persuaded me, that in these
particulars, there is no equality between us. Even the flattering compliment you are
pleased to pay me, upon the style of my letters, does not convince me so much of my own
merit as of your maternal partiality.
I am pleased to hear that you have proposed to Mr: Malcom to take my place here, & I hope he may find it
convenient & agreeable to accept the offer, as I am resolved to embark, if possible,
early in the coming fall, for America.— I shall hope therefore that Mr: M—— may make his arrangements for departure about the same
time, so that no considerable interval may elapse between my embarkation & his
arrival. I shall be sorry to leave my brother alone, but my inclination so irresistibly
calls me home & is therein so nearly connected with a prudent regard for my own
interest, that I could not reconcile to my feelings or to my sense of propriety, the
protraction of my stay in Europe beyond the above mentioned period. I am even now
impatient for its arrival, for altho’ the residence of Berlin has been rendered
infinitely more comfortable by the family establishment of my brother & his aimiable
wife, than it otherwise would have been, yet what can compensate for a tedious &
painful separation from 392 every thing worthy of the love affection &
veneration of an American citizen, his Country and his friends?— To a mind interested in
what nearly concerns the welfare of others, & attentive to the current events, the
residence of any part of Europe must hourly become more odious & insupportable. The
picture which presents itself to inspection is to my view the most humiliating, that the
history of man has ever furnished. When violence is seen stalking abroad, and by far the
greater portion of men are worshiping it as their redeemer, what hope is there that its
progress will be arrested, short of the attainment of its object, the downfal of virtue
of wisdom, (& perhaps reason too may be added to the list) throughout the world. I
think this cause ought to be resisted more effectually than it has been; but it must
eventually triumph over all opposition in Europe. It is an insurrection of poverty
against wealth & in such a contest superiority of numbers must prevail.
I do believe that a majority of our Countrymen are content with
their present form of Government; that they deprecate a revolution, and are ready to
make great sacrifices in defence of what freemen hold most dear. I even anticipate with
a sort of enthusiastic impatience the commencement of the struggle, which I believe to
be not far off, and though I have not been bred to arms, I feel an ardor in the cause,
which would render delightful to me the assumption of them in its support. The present
tranquility which pervades the United States, I sincerely hope to be but vengeance
asleep, & when the recent measures of the french government shall be known, it will
be time in my opinion for it to rouse from slumber and grapple with its antagonist. That
the United States are at peace with all the world may yet afford to Chief Justice McKean, triumphant occasion to render thanks to God,—to me I freely confess, it
inspires no such holy fervor. Whether this disposition of mind savours of impiety, I
know not, but hypocrisy at least has no share in it.
In speaking of the Chief Justice, I allude to a late very
extraordinary charge of his to a grand Jury, delivered at Philadelphia, in which the old
dotard prates about the necessity of government, which “may
be called a Representative Democracy.” In the same
charge he denounces a printer for calumniating & traducing, in his newspaper, our
magnanimous allies, & recommends to the Jury to present the impudent fellow, who in
flagrant defiance of a recognizance to keep the peace, still persists in his outrageous
behaviour, in contempt of his (the Chief’s) authority. Now this high guardian of the
laws, says not a word to the Jury, about certain other publishers 393 of newspapers, from whose presses the vilest slander is continually issuing against
all the decent & respectable characters in his darling democratic government. No!
No! Scandal, Falsehood, defamation, in short, every engine which is of use to destroy
reputation, that belongs to his own Countrymen, is very far from meeting his
animadversion. It is only against Porcupine, (who sometimes divulges family secrets, to be sure, rather unseasonably, but who
oftener tells monstrous true-tales of our great allies
& their little allies) that the mad-rage, or if you
please (the Madeirage) of his Honor is pointed. “The Market
street Scoundrel,” may go on with his hireling abuse upon American Citizens, and never
stand in awe of a reprimand from the same Honorable gentleman.1
I beg pardon for digressions, but I do
confess that this strain pleases me greatly; it flows with ease & rapidity from an
abundant source; for scarcely any subject so much occupies my thoughts & irritates
my nerves as the tolerance of such a press as Bache’s at the seat of Government. I am
not fond of reforming abuses by the help of mob’s, but I would cheerfully abate such a
nuisance in a summary manner. Were I a personal sufferer by french spoliation, I could
not bear to see the mockery of my calamities, the exultation in my distresses of which
Bache is so prodigal. The reading of these detestable papers has made me as intolerant
in politics as they are themselves. I hate the dirty, low hypocritical democracy of
them, and I sincerely hope that for every Bache there may be a Porcupine throughout the
world. As to complaisance or decency or delicacy, these are words not to be found in the
dictionary of the vulgar tongue, which is doubtless the
only one consulted by these Editors of newspapers in the amendment or reformation of
their orthography; but if there exists a man shameless enough to tell the people of the United States, that the cause of the french Republic, is their cause, I am
glad there lives another man to tell the people that he
lies.
The one other book to which you
allude, has, as you conjectured, already reached us. I hardly know what to say of it,
though by the rules of galantry I should pronounce the hero guilty of a notorious breach
therein; for his awkward management and want of address. The benefit of telling one’s own story in these cases, is not much to be courted.
The ladies never forgive that
crime. It admits of no apology, and whoever is reduced to the extremity of confession
must suffer all the consequences of such an offence.— But there are different grades in
vice, and in the opinion of every man, the outrage 394 of the ex-Secretary upon public decorum, bears no
comparison with the behaviour of those who extorted it from him. Has not the man, who
has published a book of 406 pages, betrayed confidence also; divulged secrets of State,
infinitely momentous in comparison of a paltry amour? Has he not discovered upon every
occasion since his return a malign spirit, a base temper, fit only for a Devil or one of
the Illuminati? What sentiment of honor or morality can
possess that man’s mind, that has not pride or generosity enough to sacrifice a
resentment to a sense of public good, but will rather expose to the enemies of his
Country those sacred secrets deposited with him, while he was employed in its service?
God be praised there are no more such Ministers from the United States in Europe, nor is
there more than one man in our Government at home, liable
to be seized with the distemper, so common among his neighbors & intimates, that of
betraying their Countrys trust.
We hope our friends will send us the works mentioned in your
letter, the volume of M—— & the book of F——.2 I have little fear that they will disturb the
repose of the late President in his retirement; he must know too well their drift, and
be too well fortified with conscious rectidue to be apprehensive of their effects upon
the minds of that portion of his fellow-citizens, who supported his administration, and
whose approbation he must be always solicitous to retain. But the repeated instances of
ungrateful returns, which he has experienced from men whom he patronized, who owed him
their advancement & the only real consequence they possess, must inflict a wound
upon his sensibility. To know the real worth of fidelity in attachments some experience
of ingratitude is perhaps necessary; but it is a painful proof, and few minds can endure
it with composure. The writing of pamphlets & letters
against the Executive of the United States, is no longer a paltry trick of party, it has
long been reduced to system, though borrowed, like so many other infamies from the
french reformers. If we do come to extremities, I should hope that a coat of tar & feathers will point out to scorn & derision the
authors & publishers of such works. I am particularly partial to this lenient mode of punishment, for if I mistake not it is
national; it is our own yankee invention, & the salutary effects of it are already
known among us from experience. It is further recommended by the facility with which it
may be administered, but a one horse cart is a necessary appendage to it, for the
purpose of giving the patient an airing, in full view of his assembled fellow-citizens.
It suits 395 all shapes and sizes of vilains & malefactors,
for a daub more of pitch or a daub less, a feather more or a feather less in the plumage
is not perceptible to even the nicest connoisseurs.
Since our residence here we have received intelligence from our Country more frequently & generally later, than we used to get in Holland—but for much the greater portion of it we are indebted to our dear parents. My friend Quincy indeed, has resumed the pen, which courtship & marriage & such like employment compelled him to lay aside, and promises faithfully to atone for past remissness. I have heard from him twice in the course of the winter, & learnt with pleasure from his own relation, how abundantly happy & satisfied he is with his change of condition.3
The distresses of my beloved Sister must be felt & regretted by all her family; for myself, I can say with sincerity, that her sufferings affect me deeply. She is worthy an happier lot. From your letters prior to the last we had concluded she would pass the winter with you at Philadelphia— I shall soon write to her myself.
It was natural to expect that a period of four years, which I calculate as the term of my absence, should give birth to a variety of incidents, some of them painful, & some, to which the sympathising tear would be justly tributary. Even the narrow circle of our family connections, mourns the loss of members, not long since counted among its fairest ornaments. To us, at a distance the chasm already created seems wide, and we dread as the greatest of all calamities, any addition to it from those, who are unspeakably dear to us.
In my last letter to you, (22d: Decr:) I mentioned an expectation that I should have but little
intercourse with the Society of Berlin during this season.4 I had purposely & from choice avoided a
presentation at Court, and thereby kept myself for sometime out of sight, but I have
already been detected, and shall not be able to persist much longer in my systematic
distance. Upon the recovery of their Majesties the king & queen, I expect therefore
to be presented, & for this purpose I have caused a suit of the United States uniform to be made for me, in which as one of
their Citizen Soldiers, I shall appear. It is the most commodious and at the same time
the least expensive of all Court dresses, and none is more in vogue here.—5 I hope not to be reduced to the same extremity
as was once a Russian General, who being present at a
review of the royal guards at Potsdam, was asked by the Great Frederic how he found the
manoeuvres & evolutions? The Russian, somewhat embarrassed 396 replied—“Sire, Je ne suis qu’un Général Civil.” Ah! replied the Monarch—“Nous ne
connaissons pas ça ici.”
The uniform I have had made, is very nearly the same with that
prescribed by the Secretary at War, for our Navy Officers, though when it was ordered I
had not seen his directions.6 I dare say
the french Minister here will look askance at it, & I hope he may, for he can’t
question my right to wear it, and I want him to see how an American looks in the livery of his own Country.7
With the tenderest affection, I am, my dear Mother / Your Son
P.S. The Ring which was entrusted to the care of Mr: Hall, as a present to you & which he lost, was of no
great value, but I regret its miscarriage, because I know that such little tokens are
often prized by the receiver much above their intrinsic worth.
The Report which you mention as accompanying your last letter, has not yet come to hand.8
RC (Adams
Papers); addressed: “Mrs: A Adams / Philadelphia”;
internal address: “Mrs: A Adams.”; endorsed: “T B Adams /
12 Febry 1798.”
Thomas McKean’s 27 Nov. 1797 charge to the grand jury of
Pennsylvania, in explaining the three classes of treason, stated that the third form
was aiding or assisting an enemy of the United States during wartime. After giving his
explanation, McKean noted, “It will be unnecessary to enlarge under this head, as we
are (thank God) at peace with all the world.” McKean also commented that in “a Representative Democracy” those in power “are chosen
immediately by the people,” and he declared that “a free and
equal government” was “one of the greatest temporal blessings the Almighty ever
bestowed on mankind.” At the same time McKean indicted William Cobbett for seditious
libel for articles he published from May to July about the Spanish minister Carlos
Martínez de Irujo. In the end the grand jury dismissed Cobbett’s indictment. The
Philadelphia Porcupine’s Gazette, 16 Nov., referred to
Benjamin Franklin Bache as “The Market Street Scoundrel” and described him as an
“atrocious wretch (worthy descendant of old Ben),” who
“knows that all men of any understanding set him down as an abandoned liar, as a tool
and a hireling, and he is content that they should do so” (Philadelphia Gazette, 29 Nov.; Marcus Daniel, Scandal
& Civility: Journalism and the Birth of American Democracy, Oxford, 2009,
p. 225–227, 360).
For the publications by James Monroe and Jean Antoine Joseph Fauchet, see AA’s letter to TBA of 3 Jan. 1798, and note 4, above.
Letters not found.
Although this letter has not been found, AA likely summarized a portion of it describing LCA’s illness in her 21 April letter to Mary Smith Cranch: “The extraordinary exertion and fatigue of our Voyage and journey proved too much for the delicate constitution of mrs Adams, and Since our arrival she has undergone Severe illness, illness of Such a nature as an experienced Matron would easily divine upon calculation and comparison of dates, but which a young Batchelor knows not how to describe, but by the use of terms which practise very properly renders familiar only to professionals.— I conceive that you take my meaning, notwithstanding the veil of Mystery, which is thrown over it.” AA also reported TBA’s comments on the poor quality of their lodgings and his description of Berlin (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters).
On 24 May TBA was presented to King Frederick
William III, Queen Louise, and Prince Henry. He described the event in his 397 Diary, “introduced at Court, Ball & Supper …
very glad when the ceremony was over.” He also noted that Prince Charles of Nassau
“spoke to me of my uniform” and “enquired how many troops we have upon foot—&ca Being now one of the initiated I may follow the fashions
if agreeable” (TBA, Journal, 1798
, p. 17).
On 24 Aug. 1797 James McHenry distributed regulations regarding
uniforms for naval officers. The captains’ uniform consisted of a “full dress Coat” in
“Blue Cloth, with long buff lappels, and standing collar and lining of buff to be made
and trimmed full with a gold Epaulet on each shoulder.” The vest and breeches were
also buff in color with matching flaps and buttons “so as to correspond and be in
uniform with the Coat” (United States Office of Naval Records and Library, Naval Documents Related to the Quasi-War between the United
States and France, 7 vols., Washington, D.C., 1935–1938, 1:10, 11).
Antoine Bernard Caillard (1737–1807) served as the French
minister to Prussia from 29 Oct. 1795 to 5 July 1798 (Hoefer, Nouv. biog. générale
;
Repertorium
, 3:131–132). For more on Caillard, see LCA, D&A
, 1:72, 73.
That is, the report on William Blount’s conspiracy, for which see AA to Mary Smith Cranch, 6 July 1797, note 4, above.