Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
d1798
I was much obliged to you for sending me the answer to Barlows Letter. our Printers in Boston are very inattentive to many publications which would be usefull whilst they print very purile peices— Barlows Letter made its first appearence the last week in the Centinal. I design it shall be succeeded by the replie, tho I think it a very partial one and that it treats Barlow with much more respect than the infamous Letter merrits—1 I say of America, as Gibbons did of England in the Year 92, “that if America with the experience of her own happiness, and the knowledge of French perfidy and French calamities should be seduced to Eat the apple of Security, she would indeed deserve to be driven from the Paradice which she enjoys.” [“]every dog has his day: and these Gallic dogs have had their day of most insolent prosperity”2 had Gibbon lived to this day, what would have been his reflections upon the fate of Buonaparte?
you sent me two Auroras one of which containd a most insolent comment upon the Presidents speech. a Friend also sent me the Chronical. it certainly had not taken its Lesson, for in that I read in a publication full of invective against Great Britain—& apprehension of war with France, “the writer says at this Eventfull period, when nothing but darkness is visible on our political horizon: the speech of the President has appeard like a star Emerging from the storm-threatening clouds, and the patriotic fears of true Americans have subsided. we shall preserve our dignity without craving the assistance of the potentates of the old world” “The situation of Europe is incalculable” we think as the first Majestrate wonderfully gracious and condescending!3 the answer of the House of Rep’s will have a happy effect upon the union and politicks of the states. it looks as if French influence was sunk very low it will also have an influence in Europe. I most sincerely wish that all party bickerings & personal resentments would yeald, to the Great and momenteous National interests, that they would conduct, so as to command respect;
322Mr Harper is a good many years younger than Nestor—yet aims to be the Chief leader—
Age bids me speak, nor shall the advice I bring
a young man should be modest and diffident, but praise and adulation are great corrupters of the Heart, and a Man, is never, in so much danger from his Enemies, as from his flatterers—
William, I write to you with a freedom which you must make, only a
prudent use of and as women are not Masons, or bound to keep secrets, they are entitled to a greater
latitude of speech than Men— I think mr Harper a Man of tallents, and a usefull Member
he might be still more so, if he husbanded his tallants with prudence and discretion—
there are Gentlemen in that House whose opinions are more respected, and who have more
influence than mr Harper;
I have written you a long Letter—rather censorious, I believe, but as I have not any body to talk politicks to this Evening, I have amused myself by writing them
Continue to send me the papers which contain any thing interesting, and believe me / your affectionate
RC (DLC:Shaw Family Papers); addressed by Louisa Catharine Smith: “Mr William S Shaw / Philadelphia”; endorsed: “Aunt Adams /
rec 1 Jan. / ansd. 2 Jan”; docketed: “1798 / Decr 23.”
In a letter to AA of 14 Dec., Shaw enclosed the Newburyport Herald, 4 Dec., in which he highlighted a
response to Joel Bar low’s 4 March letter to Abraham Baldwin. The response criticized
Barlow as a fanatic who was “fundamentally wrong, in all the principles which regard
the French revolution, and the connection of the United States with France” and also
took exception to the “contemptuous manner” Barlow used in speaking of JA
and the Senate. While the Boston Columbian Centinel does
not appear to have reprinted this reply, it published Barlow’s letter on 22 Dec.,
prefaced by an apology for printing the letter long after its initial appearance and
accompanied by critical comment: “It is an useful Document;
and will serve as an Appendix to the volume of the
Dispatches from our Envoys. It incontestably proves, what the Jacobins have often
denied, a fixed determination, in the French Directory, to dictate measures and men in the United States.” The newspaper also
speculated that Barlow’s letter was written in “Talleyrand’s
bureau” and alleged that Barlow was “as great an advocate for ’passive obedience, and servile
dependence as
Thomas Hutchinson.”
AA paraphrased Edward Gibbon’s 10 Nov. 1792 letter
to John Baker Holroyd, Lord Sheffield, included in Gibbon’s Miscellaneous Works, 3 vols., Dublin, 1796, 1:257, a copy of which is in
JA’s library at MB (Catalogue of JAs Library).
For the article in the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, see Shaw to AA, 12 Dec. 1798, and note 3, above. The
Boston Independent Chronicle, 17–20 Dec., published an
article by Democritus that suggested Federalists wanted war with France, noting, “The
idea of renewing a friendly intercourse with 323 our first ally,
was rejected as a kind of blasphemous conception.” AA accurately quoted
the writer’s remarks about JA’s 8 Dec. message to Congress.
A conflation of Homer, The Iliad,
Book IX, lines 85–86, 125–126.
I have recd your Letters of 10. 15. and
16.1 Your solicitude for my Health may
subside. I am pretty well— I had a cold, not a bad one— and something of the
Inflammation in my face of last spring—but it is gone. Rush gave me such a Dose of Salts
that I thought it not fit to go out to Congress next day. But the day after I was well
enough.— I am Old—Old very Old and never Shall be very well—certainly while in this
office for the Drudgery of it is too much for my Years and Strength.
The Barn must not be a monument of Foppery. I should be content to have it 16 foot Post. But if it is thought Advisable I Suppose We can get at Boston or from the Eastward new Posts long enough for twenty feet. I protest against two Buildings—and all expensive ornament. My Fortune is small—Family large—and expensive—And shiftless Children and Grand Children enough to distract me.— A fine Barn coupled with my Hut would be a Womans head on a fishes shoulders. Let me Spin an even thread of Plainness thro Life.
It is Christmas and a fine Day. I rode Yesterday—fourteen miles and intend as much to day. Our Family is very quiet.— No Quarrells— No Complaints— an hundred and twenty Leagues in this cold season would be a terrible risque for you—and only to be here two Months and then a worse Journey home.— My Health would be no better for your being a Witness of any Pains or Achs I might have. I have had recourse to an old Medicine, Sulphur Cram of Tartar and honey which has done me more good than Lockier or Rush. I Sleep well—appetite is good—work hard— Conscience is neat and easy— Content to live and willing to die; So I Sincerely think.— Hoping to do a little good—able to do very little—perplexed and ambarrassed very often: by the Folly of some: the Intrigue of others—and the Selfishness & Ambition of many.
Our Neighbour Field I see is gathered at length to his Fathers.2 Away they all go, the old People; and the young ones come tottering on.
I write you nothing abt public affairs
because it would be Useless to copy the Newspapers which you read. and I can say nothing
more.
I am as ever
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mrs A”;
endorsed: “J A Dec’br 25 1798.”
AA’s letter to JA of 15 Dec. lamented the increasing likelihood that winter weather would make it impossible to travel to Philadelphia. She also reported that Gen. John Brooks had declined a commission in the provisional army and that she was enjoying writing frequently: “It is all my amusement. I want to know how the world passes, tho I can not gain admittance now into the Cabinet” (Adams Papers).
Ebenezer Field (b. 1722) died on 15 Dec. (Boston Russell’s Gazette, 17 Dec.).
JA wrote AA a second letter on 25 Dec.,
in which he discussed taking a Christmas coach ride with William Smith Shaw and told
AA not to worry if there was still no word of TBA’s
arrival. AA’s reply of 4 Jan. 1799 commented on the Adamses’ situation,
stating: “If we have not all we wish, we have perhaps as much as we ought.” She also
discussed domestic matters before remarking on the French Navy’s defeat at the Battle
of Donegal and Pommereul’s Campaign of General Buonaparte in
Italy (both Adams
Papers).