Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
ngQuincy Jan’
ry13 1799
Yesterday in high stile with his Carriage and four, His Honor the
Lieut Govenour made me a visit. this is the first notice I have received of his
Gaurdianship. he desired I would inform the President that he had been here, as he had
promised him that he would take
care of me. I told him I should certainly comply with his request; the seeing me
for the first Time, since the loss of Mrs Gill, renewed his sorrow, and he could scarcly
converse upon any other subject he 352 seems to have buried
with her, his pleasures and his comforts, for he said the 25 years which he lived with
her, he never knew an interruption of their domestic happiness, as it respected each
other.1
I received your Letter of the 5th
inclosing the Letter from Thomas, which corresponds with what I wrote, you; capt
Jenkings told mr smith; I cannot help feeling still anxious for him, and shall, untill I
hear of his arrival. if the senate scrutinize every Character with as much rigour as
they have done Col W S. S. I should suppose that some of the Gen’lls of the army would not pass mustur, but I Imagine it is the political, and
not the Moral Character which is such a stumbling Block— I would however as soon trust
col s—h as Gen’ll Hamilton. I have not any Confidence in the
honour, integrity or Patriotism of any Man, who does not believe that, thou shalt not
commit Adultery, is a possitive command Prohibition
of God thou shalt not covet thy Neighbours wife, is an other, and yet I have been
credibly informd, that the Audacious publication of that Man, has only renderd him more
bold, and hardned in iniquity—2 it only
requires a temptation sufficiently powerfull to Ambition, to lead from the path of
political Rectitude; it is a strange way of Reasoning I would not upon any consideration
do a publick wrong or injury, but I can be guilty of breaking the most solemn private
engagement, and that to one whom I am bound by affection, and by Honor, to protect, to
Love and Respect. I can disgrace and stigmatize my Lawfull ospring, and feel neither
shame or compunction, but I would not betray a public trust. I cannot see that I commit
any breach of Charity in this comment;
I read all the public papers and am glad to find Congress so buisy. some men prate too much and it is too evident, that it is to be admired. they answer their end for I admire at them. I think I never saw Gallitin so netled and so off his gaurd before. as to Nicholas he seems to have brought with him, all the Malignity of Giles, and the spight of Tailor—
I hope I am not too censorious, yet upon looking over my Letter, I begin to suspect that I have given myself a pretty free latitude. I believe I had better close before I attack any other. assureing you that I am in full Charity with all Good men, and that I am your truly affectionate
RC (Adams Papers); addressed by Louisa Catharine Smith: “The President of the
United / States / Philadelphia”; endorsed: “Mrs A / Jan.
13. 1799.”
In a 16 June 1798 letter thanking AA for her condolences on the death of his wife, Rebecca Boylston Gill, Lt. Gov. Moses Gill similarly described his grief: “The lenient hand of 353 time has as yet been insufficient to assuage my Grief … and I sorrow most of all that I shall see her Face no more” (Adams Papers).
Alexander Hamilton’s Observations on
Certain Documents Contained in No. V & VI of “The History of the United States
For the Year 1796,” in Which the Charge of Speculation Against Alexander Hamilton,
Late Secretary of the Treasury, is Fully Refuted, Phila., 1797, Evans, No. 32222, for which see
vol. 12:344–346.
I thank God, it is now in my power to give you the pleasure you
desired of receiving from me a chearful Letter. This Moment they brought me from the
Post Office a Letter from our dear Thomas dated the 12 informing me of his Arrival at
New York. He will come on to Phyladelphia and only laments that he cannot have the
pleasure of embracing both his Parents at once. His Passage has not been uncommonly long
tho the Weather must have been turbulent enough. From the bottom of my heart I rejoice
at this happy Event, which has dissipated a gloom which hung over and surrounded me.
Both the N. York News papers announce his arrival in a pleasing Style, for which I give
them credit.1 You must be patient and not
be too much in Haste to embrace him. He must stay with me, sometime. We will write you
all our Plans and Speculations. We have had a thaw and long rains for many days which
must have injured the Roads so that I cannot foresee when he will arrive but I hope it
will be soon enough to dance at the Ball, which will be on Wednesday night the 16th.
2
At a time when I am necessarily deprived of the Company of all the rest of my Family I consider this Arrival as a Choice Blessing and a great Consolation.
You will have recd a Letter from him no
doubt before this will reach you,—think of Us and rejoice with Us.
I dont wonder that Mr Cranch is
disposed to see his Interpretation of the Prophecies confirmed. The twelve hundred and
thirteenth or fourteenth Year of the Hegira approches near the End of the 1260 days—
Less than half a Century has Mahomet to be believed a Prophet, according to Mr
Cranch.3 But I have not time. Yours /
with unabated Affection
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mrs A”; endorsed: “J A Jan’ry 13 / 1799.”
The New-York Gazette and the New
York Daily Advertiser, 12 Jan., reported
TBA’s arrival; the latter added, “We give him a cordial welcome to his
native shores, and we congratulate our country on the return of one of her most
promising Sons.”
A ball in honor of JA was held on 16 Jan. at the New
Theatre in Philadelphia. The theater was elaborately decorated for the occasion, with
a temporary floor built over the orchestra pit to accommodate several hundred
attendees. Upon JA’s arrival the band played the “President’s March,” and
toasts were offered to “the Government and its supporters,” to the city of
Philadelphia, and to the military, among others (Philadelphia
Gazette, 17 Jan.; Philadelphia Gazette of the United
States, 17 Jan.).
In a 4 Jan. letter to JA (Adams Papers), AA wrote that Richard
Cranch’s “whole system is about to be fullfilld in Spight of Pater Wests predictions.”
Rev. Samuel West believed that biblical prophecies pointed to the end of the pope’s
reign in 1813. However, others calculated that the end of 1,260 years of rule by the
Roman Catholic Church would occur at the end of the eighteenth century, and they
believed that view was vindicated by the French victory over Rome and the exile of
Pope Pius VI in Feb. 1798. JA was also referencing the Islamic year of
1213 and the belief that Islam would also fall in its 1,260th year (Sprague, Annals Amer. Pulpit
, 8:43; Michael Lienesch, “The Role of Political
Millennialism in Early American Nationalism,” Western
Political Quarterly, 36:446–452 [Sept. 1983];
Cambridge Modern
Hist.
, 8:637–638; George Stanley Faber, A
Dissertation on the Prophecies … Relative to the Great Period of 1260 Years, 2
vols., London, 1806, 1:iii–iv).