Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
th:August 1799.
As I am in the City for a few days, you may wish me to write rather oftener than usual, to convince you that I am not ill. The weather since the month of June has been generally more than commonly favorable for this climate— it still continues so, and we begin to flatter ourselves that the City may escape the afflicting scourge it has heretofore experienced.
The mortality which lately prevailed on board the friggate Genl:
534 Green, was a very distressing affair— I lament it
the more, as I see among the list of victims in the crew several names of persons with
whom I made a slight acquaintance, when I was at Newport.1
You will have read the publication for which the Aurora-man has
been bound over to appear & answer at the next district Court. It was republished by
Brown & Relf in the Philada: Gazette of the [. . .]
currt:— His defence, will, I understand, be an attempt to
prove the tr[uth] of what he has asserted— The letter under
the hand of John Adams is said to be one in which the
subject of his recall from the mission in England & Mr:
Pinckney’s appointment as Successor, was spoken of & animadverted upon with freedom—
The partition of Braintree into three separate & distinct townships, bearing several
names and the calling that Quincy in which he resides, is jocosely mentioned in the same
letter as having deprived the Duke of his title. I
collected these particulars in conversation, a few minutes ago, with a young man, who is
in the secrets of the Aurora party, from being one of its patronizers— Truth, said
another, of the same sett to me, is no libel— the Aurora man means to justify by proof
of the facts alledged.2
I was told further, by the first of these youth’s, that it looked
as if there was likely to be a division in the Cabinet— How so? said I— They say, the
old gentleman wont go with them— with whom? Why the violent war party, that pretends to
dictate all Executive measures— It is further said, continued he—that the violents are
in despair, because the President will have an opinion of his own & will not follow
the extravagances of any body. If he perseveres he will shortly
have the hearts of all the democrats— God forbid! I exclaimed— I dont mean said
he, that the P——t must turn democrat, but only if he acts Independently— Has he ever
done otherwise—said I— No, but then we were not always sure of him so much as we are
now. This pap & sugar, might do to pacify a crying hungry baby, but what else it is
good for, I pretend not to know.
Report says that Truxtun has resigned—disputing precedence with Talbot— This, I suppose, is in part, the tale, which you told me, hung upon the report of Talbots resignation— I heard yesterday, the matter had been referred to the President & he had decided in favor of Talbots right—3
You accompanied the P——t, I perceive, to Castle William and
assisted at the Baptismal rites of Fort Independence— I was rejoyced to see your name in
company with Mrs: Washington—4
I find the Mansion house in Market Street a very comfortable resort when I come to town, even though I meet but poor cheer—even the water pump is dry in the yard— I believe some of the wood has been carried away, though not much— I shall take particular care of the things I use, & see every thing as secure as I found it.
There is a leak somewhere in the room that serves as a passage from the entry to the kitchen— I found the floor almost covered with water, and as I have no keys to the doors, I cannot open them to admit the air— I have left open the inner doors, which were shut, and the floor is gradually drying, though the next rain will probably wet it again— Dust & Cobwebs are plentiful enough—
Present me kindly to my father & every body—
th:1799.
P S. The Supreme Court of the U. S. adjourned this day— Little business was done, because there was little to do— I paid my respects to the chief Justice & Judge Chase, but the latter I did not see.5
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs: A Adams”;
internal address: “Mrs: A Adams”; endorsed: “T B Adams /
August 1 / 1799.” Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
The frigate General Greene, Capt.
Christopher Raymond Perry, was struck with fever at Havana on 18 June. After 20 died
and 35 were sickened, the vessel returned to Newport, R.I., on 27 July. It reentered
service on 28 Sept., sailing for St. Domingue (Philadelphia
Gazette, 6 Aug.; Hartford, Conn., American
Mercury, 15 Aug.; New York Journal, 5 Oct.).
William Duane, in the Philadelphia Aurora
General Advertiser, 24 July, charged that JA’s administration was
beholden to Britain, and alleged that in 1798 the British had expended $800,000 in
bribes in the United States, claiming: “We have it in the handwriting of John Adams
now President of the United States, that British influence has been employed and with
effect, in procuring the appointment of an officer of the most confidential and
important trust under the government.” The evidence was a May 1792 letter from
JA to Tench Coxe (PHi),
in which JA suggested that there was “much British Influence in the
appointment” of Thomas Pinckney as U.S. minister to Britain. The article prompted the
prosecution of Duane on a charge of seditious libel, and in Oct. 1799 Duane was
brought to trial in the federal circuit court in Pennsylvania. The trial was
postponed, however, and in early 1800 the indictment was withdrawn. When in Oct. 1800
it was suggested that JA’s letter might be a forgery, Duane printed it in
full while trumpeting that his indictment had been rescinded on JA’s
order. For JA’s comments on the letter, see his 27 Oct. letter to
Pinckney (PHC:Charles Roberts Autograph
Coll.). As TBA noted, the Aurora article was
reprinted in the 5 Aug. 1799 issue of the Philadelphia
Gazette, which had been published by Andrew Brown Jr. and Samuel Relf
(1776–1823) since 1 July (Smith,
Freedom’s Fetters
, 282–288; Philadelphia Gazette, 1 July; Margaret Woodbury, “Public
Opinion in Philadelphia,” Smith College Studies in
History, 5:33 [Oct. 1919]).
For the dispute between Capt. Silas Talbot and Capt. Thomas Truxtun on their relative naval ranks, see Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 6, above.
The Philadelphia Gazette, 8 Aug.,
reported on JA’s 3 Aug. dedication of Fort Independence, including
AA’s toast to Martha Washington.
TBA was in Philadelphia to attend the U.S. Supreme
Court. During the session from 536 5 to 10 Aug. the
justices took action in four cases. In New York v.
Connecticut, a dispute over a contested strip of borderland, the justices ruled that
private citizens rather than the state of New York were party to the dispute. In
Hazlehurst v. United States the court denied an appeal of
an earlier ruling that Charleston, S.C., merchants had defaulted on customs bonds. In
addition, two estate disputes, Turner v. Enrille and
Turner v. Bank of North America, were dismissed owing to
incomplete filings by the plaintiffs (TBA to William Smith Shaw, 6 Aug., MHi:Misc. Bound Coll.; TBA, Diary, 1798–1799, 5–9 Aug.;
Doc. Hist.
Supreme Court
, 8:35–37, 178, 186–188, 271–274).
th:August 1799
I thank you for your kind letter of the 4th: instt: which came to hand last evening,
accompanied by one from Dr: Tufts, enclosed by William. My
letters are left usually at Mr: Wistar’s and Sarah when she gave me those of last evening—say’s “Thomas, I
expect I have got a rich treat for thee; from the number of packets addressed to thee, I
should judge thee a favorite among thy friends”— I enclose for your amusement a specimen
of poetic talent in this lady, which though humble is not entirely destitute of
merit.1 To explain the occasion, which
produced it, you must understand, that during the excessive heat of the weather, for
several days after I came to the Country, I found it pleasanter to read under a shade in
the open air than in the house—accordingly I explored the adjoining g[rove] &
finally pitched upon a little thicket of shrubs & bushes, in which I made a
comfortable seat, on the land belonging to the Wistar family— My retre[at] was secret
for some days, but at length was discovered by some one, and the enclosed verses
attached by a drab colored ribband to a tree, were found
one morning on entering my arbor— I only guess at the author, but think it probable I am
right in my conjectures on that head. I have returned no answer to this invocation as
yet, nor do I expect the muses will gain a votary at my age, since they have deferred
their Courtship to so late a period. Yet I some times threaten to make an effort in
their service, and am only restrained by pride, which whispers in my ear this wholesome
advice— You had better stick to humble prose in which you have some experience, than
venture upon hobbling verses, which can do you little credit and may detract from it
much— The counsel is salutary & I let it govern me.
I received the letter with the extracts, you enquire for, and thought I had noticed them casually since—however, I was amused by the communication.2
You will observe how full of electioneering all our papers are— The
friends of Mc.Kean have come out with a fresh manifesto, as
have 537 those of Ross— Each party is sanguine in
expectation of triumph, but McKean’s friends say that a
schism will happen in the County of York, & that will turn the scale in their favor.
I am doubtful of the event, but from former experience of this State, I believe it will
go contrary to my wishes.3
Your present society at Quincy is very enviable, and I should
delight to participate in it on some accounts, though on others I am better here. It is
so common a thing for people to take up their abode in the Country at this Season, that
when you meet an acquaintance in town, the question is, well where abouts are you? The Country has in fact become so thickly settled within
ten miles of the City in every direction, that one need never to be at a loss for
society if disposed to frequent it. I feel more inclined to seclusion than I ever did
before, & I hope the same disposition will strengthen rather than diminish. When you
come on in the fall, I shall be able to determine how far a compliance with your kind
proposal, will coincide with my advantage— It will subject me unavoidably to more
company and more invitations to idleness, dissipation & interruption, than if I
lodged in another place & family, besides terrifying clients, who would never think
of going to the Presidents house for a young lawyer— It seems to me that this is one
serious disadvantage under which I shall labor for some time, that most people think I
am not in want of business or the reward of doing it, for
my support, and they will rather favor a poor man’s son, than me on that account. This
is a very serious error & one I am much interested in removing.
With best love to all friends, I am, Your
RC and enclosure (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mrs: A Adams.” Some loss of text where the seal was
removed.
For the enclosed poem by Sarah Wister, see Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 8, above.
Sarah’s father, Daniel Wister (1739–1805), was a grandson of John Wuster, a Palatine
German who emigrated from Heidelberg to Philadelphia in 1727 (John W. Jordan, ed., Colonial and Revolutionary Families of Pennsylvania, 3
vols., N.Y., 1911, 1:264–266).
Not found.
In the weeks preceding the Oct. 1799 Pennsylvania gubernatorial
election, electioneering in the press was rife. In the Philadelphia American Daily Advertiser, 12 Aug., Democratic-Republican
supporters of Thomas McKean claimed that their candidate was being subjected to “the
grossest slanders” by Federalist supporters of James Ross but that “the incessant
efforts, that have been made to discolour his actions, or to pervert the meaning of
his words, have only served to shew how little can be adduced against him by all the
activity of Party Zeal.” On the same day supporters of Ross offered their own
commentary in the Philadelphia Gazette of the United
States, alleging that McKean sought votes from those “whom not long since he
would have trampled in the dust.” The Philadelphia Universal
Gazette, 1 Aug., suggested the importance of York County in the election,
describing plans by McKean’s supporters to hold campaign events there.