Adams Family Correspondence, volume 13
th.Sept
r[
1799]
On the 11th: instt: I received your favor of the 4th: and last
evening, on my return from Mr: Breck’s Country seat, where I passed Friday &
Saturday night’s, your’s of the 8th: had come to hand. Same
time, recd: from William the poem you sent me for Miss
Wister & his letter of the 6th: I am obliged by all
these things & newspapers to boot. Coopers address, valedictory, I now remember to
have seen & read at the time it first appeared, and upon a second perusal, I shall
only say, that if Dr: Priestly could recommend such a man as
Cooper to office, & assist in giving currency to such opinions as are here
expressed, he deserves all, that Porcupine ever wrote or any body else could think
against him— I had never heard of his meddling before in any of our political
concerns—But I have been told, that “the french Republic,” is still a standing toast
with him. Dennie, does not like him, as you may have observed from his remarks on the
New Englandman’s letter, though he had only seen the prospectus of it when he
commented.1 These exotic reputations
are slipp’ry things to build on. I find so little fame, that stands the test of all
trials & all scrutiny, that I am sometimes disposed to become a cynic & carp
indiscriminately at all that fa[ll] in my way.
I enclose you an extract of a letter from J.Q.A. which came to hand
a few days ago— The original letter I shall have to answer before it could be returned
to me if I should send it. Indeed, the rest is all of 554 a private and
uninteresting nature to any body but myself. I had an idea of sending this extract to
the Printer, but he has neglected something I sent him a few days ago, so ungraciously
that I wont subject myself to a second slight. These Philadelphia Printers are poor
tools to work with on their own side. The Aurora is infinitely the best edited of any
among them. This extract will better appear at this moment in a Boston paper, if it be
worth appearing at all, so that you may send it to Russell in its present shape,
altering only the name of [the] place where received.2 The Treaty with Prussia was signed on the 11th: July, and I suppose a copy has been received e’re this by
the Secy—though I know not that it has been.3 I got a letter from Whitcomb since that from my
brother, though not so late—& I expect a letter or two of an earlier date from him
than the one I have.4
Mr: & Mrs: Breck, their daughter & Mrs: Wilson all
desired me to present you their best respects— I was very pleasantly & agreeably
entertained during my visit there, which was the first frolic I have had since I left
town.
I have not yet perused the poem you sent as a present to Sarah— nor
communicated the treasure to her— she will be gratified by
this little token of your notice, more than by any reply I
could have made to her effusions. It is a little singular, that the father of this
family (Mr: Wistar) of German origin, is violently
democratic in opposition to all the connection.5
Judge Rush it is, not the Dr: who is
using all his influence in favor of Mr: Mc:Kean— I undertook to annalyse the characters of the
Republican committee who write for the Chief, but Brown & Relf have not dared to
publish & I cannot get the piece from them to send it elsewhere—6
I am in haste dear mother / Your Son
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Mrs: A Adams.”
Some loss of text where the seal was removed and due to wear at the edge.
The Walpole, N.H., Farmer’s Weekly
Museum, 19 Aug., disparaged the defense of Joseph Priestley by “A New-England
Man,” writing that he “cannot be induced by the subtilty of polemic disputation, by
the pomp of learning, by the pride of philosophy, by the pageanty of electric tricks,
nor by all the convulsive spasms of the tortured mouse in his exhausted receiver, to
respect the character of this ’busy and intermedling priest.’”
The enclosure has not been found, but was likely an extract from
JQA’s 9 July letter to TBA lamenting William Cobbett’s
treatment of JA and providing an exhaustive update of Napoleon’s
campaigns. He also enclosed letters from German acquaintances seeking assistance with
U.S. legal matters and reported that he had sold TBA’s horse and shipped
him a trunk (Adams Papers). The Massachusetts Mercury, 1 Oct., printed seven paragraphs of
the letter that covered public matters, changing the date to 13 July and attributing
it to “a gentleman of respectability in Europe.” A note printed below the extract from
the “Communicator” disputed JQA’s assertion that Cobbett’s newspaper was
555 the most popular in the United States, claiming
instead that “Porcupine’s Gazette is, and has been long despised by almost all Americans who love
their country.” TBA received JQA’s letter on 11 Sept.
and answered it on the 23d, thanking his brother for the accounts of European
politics, reporting on JQA’s financial affairs, and offering comment on
Capt. Thomas Truxtun and the yellow fever in Philadelphia (Adams Papers).
JQA signed the second Prussian-American Treaty of Amity and Commerce on 11 July in Berlin, for which see vol. 12:355, 356, replacing the original 1785 treaty, which expired on 8 Aug. 1796. Timothy Pickering enclosed a copy of the treaty in a letter to JA of 16 Sept. 1799 and reported that the original had arrived at his office (Adams Papers).
The letters from Tilly Whitcomb to TBA have not been found.
The prominent Democratic-Republican in the Wister family appears
to have been Dr. Casper Wistar, a cousin of Daniel Wister. Dr. Wistar was vice
president of the American Philosophical Society when Thomas Jefferson was named
president of the organization in 1797. On 20 Aug. 1799 Wistar was mentioned as a
potential Democratic-Republican candidate for Congress (John W. Jordan, ed., Colonial and Revolutionary Families of Pennsylvania, 3
vols., N.Y., 1911, 1:261–262; Jefferson, Papers
, 29:276–277; Boston Gazette, 20 Aug.).
The piece TBA sent to the Philadelphia Gazette has not been found but was possibly “To the Electors of
Pennsylvania” by “Plain Truth,” which appeared in the newspaper on 4 October. The
writer attacked “the ’republican’ committee” that supported Thomas McKean for
governor, denied that Federalists were timing their attacks to influence the election,
and criticized McKean’s support of Dr. George Logan and the protesters against the
Alien Acts who were arrested at St. Mary’s Church in February.
It was fully my intention to have called upon you before I went with Mr Dana on the Western Circuit, either the last week or before next Friday, when he will set off for Northhampton, but I have been much afflicted with a cold which has confined me to my house and will prevent my visit. I flatter myself to have the pleasure of seeing you at Quincy upon our return—
Having understood that the President wished to have some persons of education enter the navy as Midshipmen and having been applied to by the friend of a young man of this Town, who from the inability of his Mother to continue him at College, has been obliged to take up his connections at the end of the second year of his course, and whom I beleive to be a young man of good character, I have presumed to mention him to you— His name is John Goodwin, a nephew to Capt— Goodwin who sails out of Boston and Son of our late Gaoler—1 He is desirous of going in Capt Seaver, because he expects our Son as well as two of his Classmates goes with him, to whom he is known— If it might be done, I should be glad to know of it before my departure that he might be preparing to go when Capt Seaver shall be ready, which I understand will be in the beginning of next Month—2 I am dear Madam with respect / your friend
a.Dana
RC (Adams Papers).
John Goodwin IV (b. 1779) was the nephew of Capt. Nathaniel
Goodwin (1744–1817) and the son of Esther Bradish and the late Cambridge jailer John
Goodwin III (1742–1798) (Vital Records of Cambridge,
Massachusetts, to the Year 1850, 2 vols., Boston, 1914–1915, 1:296; Vital Records of Charlestown, Massachusetts, to the Year
1850, 2 vols., Boston 1984–1995, 1:353, 362 392–393; Lucius R. Paige, History of Cambridge, Massachusetts, Boston, 1877, p. 497;
An Historic Guide to Cambridge, 2d rev. edn.,
Cambridge, 1907, p. 32; Boston Columbian Centinel, 12 May
1798, 26 Feb. 1817).
On 8 April 1799 JA wrote to Benjamin Stoddert
(LbC, APM Reel 119)
authorizing a commission for Dana’s son Edmund Trowbridge Dana as a midshipman on the
frigate Congress, Capt. James Sever. Goodwin appears to
have entered service as a midshipman the following May, and Dana’s Harvard College
classmates James Allen and John Harris may also have served aboard the Congress. The outfitting of the vessel at the Charlestown
Navy Yard was completed in December, and it embarked on its first voyage from Newport,
R.I., on 6 Jan. 1800 (
Naval Documents of the Quasi-War
, 5:14, 16, 19;
Harvard
Quinquennial Cat.
; Spencer C. Tucker, ed., The
Encyclopedia of the Wars of the Early American Republic, 1783–1812, 3 vols.,
Santa Barbara, Calif., 2014, 1:120–121). For the service on the frigates Constitution and Boston of
other members of Harvard’s class of 1799, see AA to JQA, 30 July, and note 6, above.