Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
d1800
I received on saturday Your kind favour of Feb’ry accept My thanks for the orations.1 I send you in return Major
Jacksons, which was very handsomely deliverd, and is as highly spoken of as
any amongst the Multitude. I think it will not lose by a comparison with any
which I have read, and I already have enough for a vol’m. Messengers is the Wildest Raphosody of any I
do not esteem the whole; more than I did a part. Some of the orators have
been unjust to their Country, no one of them which I have read, more than mr
Paine— misirable would our Country have been and scarcly worth Saving, if
its fate had rested upon the Breath of one individual. we have no reason to
think that we should have lost our Liberties, or our Independance, if
Washington had fallen in Battle that he was a Great a Good a Brave Man, that
in him were concentered qualities which were peculiarly suited to the
important Stations in which he was call’d to act, every tongue must
acknowledge, and that he 162
discharged every trust committed to him for the best interest of his
Country: and would have laid down his Life for it—We all believe and his
Mourning gratefull country now bear full testimony to his Services—a
Testimony which in Many instances will do them immortal honour—
I thank mrs smith for the ornament sent me, which I shall place round My Arm the next drawing Room. they are pretty devices— I saw the Death of our venerable Aunt in the News paper— she is the last of the Ancient stock of Worthies, whose memories, we can rise up and call blessed, and this is a sweet and cheering reflection—not a single stain upon all their Characters
Blessed are the dead, who dye in the Lord—2 She had out lived all her Mental faculties, and her removal may be considerd as a blessing to herself and Relatives. it used to be a petition of My Fatherss that he might not out live his usefullness— his Prayers were answerd— and I think it would be the wish and desire of every good Christian—
You inquire my dear sir if I want any thing from Boston:
the season is so far advanced that I believe it will not be worth while to
import any thing unless it be Some cheese which I have regreeted not sending
round. I do not mean English but good American— I shall write to Dr Tufts
and request him to send me a Barrel— I will thank you to engage of mr Hall a
dozen of his best Hams & a cask of Tongues against I return3 Mr
Otis’s Motion will not make Congress rise, but I wish it would expidite
them.4 they are now
troubled with the Ghost of Nash, and how long he is to be allowd to haunt
them I cannot determine. the Antis who brought the subject forward, merely
for Electionering purposes—now want it postponed So as to leave an implied
censure upon the President, but they will not be let off so—5
adieu my dear Sir. I hope the federilist will not split with respect to their Govenour. Mr Ames mr Cabot and Many others would make good Govenours, but mr strong I think has equal pretentisions, and greater if the people will think So—
Mr shaw says the post is going / Yours &c
RC (MHi:Smith-Townsend Family Papers); endorsed:
“Philaa. 3 March 1800 / Mrs. Adams—”
Smith wrote to AA on 23 Feb. (Adams Papers),
commenting on Boston’s 22 Feb. commemorations of George Washington and
sending her Fisher Ames’ address to the Mass. General Court. He also
reported on electioneering for the Massachusetts gubernatorial election
(Fisher Ames, An Oration on the Sublime Virtues
of General George Washington, Boston, 1800, Evans, No. 36829).
Revelation, 14:13.
“Prime Pork” was among
the food products offered by William Hall at his store at No. 10
Codman’s Wharf in Boston (Massachusetts
Mercury, 4 Oct. 1799).
For Harrison Gray Otis’ compromise motion during the debate over the proposal to disband the provisional army, see AA to Smith, 16 Jan. 1800, note 3, above.
On 20 Feb. Edward Livingston of New York introduced a
resolution in the House of Representatives to censure JA
for approving Jonathan Robbins’ extradition, for which see
AA to
Smith, 19 Nov. 1799, and note 3, above, arguing that the case
should have been tried in the United States and characterizing
JA’s actions as “a dangerous interference of the
Executive with Judicial decisions.” James Asheton Bayard had offered an
earlier resolution calling JA’s actions “conformable to the
duty of the Government, and to the obligations of good faith.” John
Marshall also defended JA, arguing that “the President is
the sole organ of the nation in its external relations” and the courts
had no role to play in foreign relations. After “a lengthy speech” by
John Nicholas in favor of Livingston’s resolution, it was defeated on 8
March 1800 by a vote of 61 to 35. Bayard’s resolution and Marshall’s
speech were published as Mr. Bayard’s Motion,
17th February, 1800, [Phila., 1800], Evans, No. 38787, and Speech of the Hon. John Marshall … on the
Resolutions of the Hon. Edward Livingston, Phila., 1800, Evans, No. 37887 (
Annals
of Congress
, 6th Cong., 1st sess., p. 526, 532–533,
613, 619; Philadelphia American Daily
Advertiser, 10 March).
AA wrote to Hannah Carter Smith on 20 March, describing Philadelphia’s social entertainments, expressing hope that the Smiths would summer in Quincy, and enclosing a sewing pattern for a boy’s outfit (MHi:Smith-Townsend Family Papers).
I received Your Letter of Febry 23. and was glad to learn that you were well, for from not
hearing from you from the time of ordination I was fearfull that the fatigue
had made You sick. we have now arrived to the 5th of March with a small quantity of snow upon the ground and the
weather mild. with You I suppose there is much more; Congress might easily
accomplish the buisness necessary for the benifit of the Nation, but I Must
say their is a most shamefull waste of time. the Antifeds have brought
before the House the delivering up to Justice, Thomas Nash which in strict
conformity with the Treaty with G Britain was done. the Antiparty, have by
every subterfuge mean art & declamation Wasted the time of the House
upon that Subject more than a week, and I dare answer will keep the buisness
more than a week more before them. the Jacobins are a very wicked
unprincipeld set of Beings. this whole affair is brought up not from a Love
of Justice, or apprehension that a fellow creature was unjustly punished,
but merely to hold out to their Party, that the President had Encroached
upon the Judiciary; and assumed an influence which was unconstitutional. the
whole corespondence is before the public and every candid person must see,
that the delivering the Rascal up, was in conformity to the Treaty which is
the Law of the Land, and the President is Sworn to see the Laws executed,
but Electionering purposes are answerd by the gloss put upon 164 the transaction by the Jacos, which
is carefully retaild in all the Democratic papers.1 the replies and confutation of
their arguments are carefully conceald from the party who these people wish
to lead blind fold— I have not a doubt but their will be a Majority in the
House who will approve the conduct of the Executive; one or two more
Elections will be quite sufficient I believe to convince this people that no
engine can be more fatally employd than frequent popular Elections, to
corrupt and destroy the Morals of the people— 3 years are now past, and we
have enjoyd as much peace quiet Security and happiness, as any people can
boast of. in the same period of time much more than for the three years
which preceeded—our National Character has risen in the public estimation,
and the public confidence has in no ways been diminished— faction has not
been so turbulent nor Malice so active— the Electionering campaign I presume
will bring all their forces into action—
I send you an oration of major Jacksons, with which I
think you will be pleased—and now as you observe, I hope the good Mans
Spirit may rest in quiet for America has testified her gratitude & her
Grief in the fullest manner, and I firmly believe with more sincerity than
any people ever before felt for any Man— but when the collection of Sermons
Eulogiums Poems &c are collected, more than two thirds of them will be
found to have originated in N England— there from thence, did he derive his chief aid in War, and his
chief and principle support, in the administration of the Government at a
late festival in Kentucky, amongst a number of Jacobin toasts is one to the
Memory of Genll Washington to the years 1779,
and no longer by which they mean to cast a slur upon the whole of his
administration of the government—but Hence wretches, to your native dens—the
bogs of Ireland, the dens of scotland, and the out casts of Britain—2
Mrs smith and my little Caroline left me yesterday, to go to scotch plain’s I was very loth they should go, but could detain them no longer— I hope dr Tufts will send us his performance. I dare say it was a very judicious one—
I have written to the Dr. I hope the Building will go on with all speed— Mr Porter the dr writes inclines to leave us this spring.3 I had rather they should remain untill the fall of the year—but if he determines to go, can you think of a Man and Women to take their place untill the fall I hope to return by the time their year expires, or that at all events they will stay untill I do—
Louissa is very well and desires me to present her Duty to you. Remember me affectionatly to all my Friends— I see by the late 165 papers that mr Gannet is Married again. I hope miss Gannet will strive to obtain and preserve the regard of her Mother, whose Character stands high, and who will do justice to the charge she has taken upon her, from what I have heard of her—4
adieu My Dear sister my best regards to Brother Cranch, in which I am always joind by the President
ever your affectionate / Sister
RC (MWA:Abigail Adams Letters); addressed: “Mrs Mary Cranch— / Quincy.”
The Philadelphia Aurora
General Advertiser, 12 and 22 Feb., questioned whether
Federalist influence foiled Jonathan Robbins’ attempt to prove he was
American and thereby avoid extradition to Britain. The New York Journal, 26 Feb., likewise
suggested that the burden of proof should have been on Robbins’ accusers
to show that he was not American before the United States surrendered
him (Ruth Wedgwood, “The Revolutionary Martyrdom of Jonathan Robbins,”
Yale Law Journal, 100:330 [Nov.
1990]).
The Philadelphia Gazette of
the United States, 3 March, condemned a pro-French celebration
in Fayette County, Ky., that featured toasts to “the memory of Gen.
Washington, may his illustrious actions and services be faithfully
recorded down to the year 1787, but no farther” and “the president of
the U. States; may he soon retire to Quincy, by general consent,
accompanied by his ’Defence of the American Constitutions.’” About
“these associations of Traitors who meet to celebrate the successes of
the enemies of their country” the newspaper made the sardonic
observation that they “feast upon ’barbacues.’”
AA to Cotton Tufts, 21 Feb., and Tufts to AA, 25 Feb., both above.
The Massachusetts
Mercury, 24 Jan., reported the 19 Jan. marriage of Rev. Caleb
Gannett and Ruth Stiles (1765–1808). It was the Harvard steward’s second
marriage, his first wife, Katherine Wendell Gannett (b. 1756), having
died in July 1798. The couple’s daughter Katherine Brattle Gannett
(1782–1863) drew Cranch’s criticism in a letter to AA of 9
March 1800 (Adams Papers):
“She has been ruin’d by bad management in her very earley years Such a
desposition as hers needed the Strictest goverment requir’d her to yeald
implicit obeydence & not to be allow’d to gain her point by artful
tricks— her confidants were vicious servants & their companions till
no conversation was too gross for her ears to bear. The greatest evil
next to being vicious ourselves is having wicked Servants imploy’d about
our children when they are very young” (JA, Papers
,
2:411–412;
Michael R. Gannett, comp., The Gannetts in
America: The Family of Matthew Gannett of Scituate,
Massachusetts, Wilton, Conn., 1954, p. 7–8).