Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
I reachd this city in good Health last Evening I have not
felt dissagreable at any place upon my Journey through absence of any
Gentleman attendent, except at this North River I found a Boat just going
off. with several Horses and chaises on Board, my own Carriage could not go.
I saw none but Irishmen by their Tongues going on Board, decent looking
people however. the ferryman appeard civil and what was of no small
concequence, sober I call’d Richard & took him over with me. We had a
Short passage of 15 minuets only, a brisk wind you may be sure. just after I
got into the Boat, some person from the House run down with a Letter to me.
it was from mrs Adams informing me that they had removed to No 30 Broad street—1 I landed, and hearing mr Hall
lived near the ferry, I 253 found
the House, & mr Hall conducted me here.2 it is a clever House, and Sally
& susan gave Me a cordial Welcome— Mr Adams was at his office.3 he came home in the Evening and
appeard glad to See me, tho a good deal affected by it, inquired after your
Health & talkd about the Election, said many similar things to those
which you have already heard— the coalition which we heard of in
Philadelphia had reachd this city. col B——s visit, his numerous confidential
communications whilst at Philadelphia are believed by Many: You took him to
your own Room & there a coalition of Parties took place— mr Madison too,
is to be secretary of state in case of the refusal of Marshal4 I am told that col Burr has said,
that col Smith was appointed to the place now held by mr Lassher. this
gained so much credit, that mr Morris who is in the office of mr sands, and
who is desirious of obtaining it, he told Mr Adams, that tho he thought he
might entertain a reasonable hope of having the appointment from his
Services in the office which he now held but he felt So much for col smith
and his family that he should not open his Lips upon the occasion—5 there is a very general regreet
exprest, for the col; he is considerd as the former of the troop’s as the
chief hand in their order Decipline and regularity, and I really think if
there is any opening to which he could be appointed it would not be
considerd improper, unless by those who May themselves wish for it, and the
number of those are pretty numerous— a military appointment is what he is
peculiarly fitted for— I do not know what call there is for any officers of
that description unless in the fortification Line—
Burrs report, I take to be for Mere political purposes— the Pardon of all the insurgents was unexpected here— it was generally Supposed that Fries would have been made an example of—6
There are many Picaroons in
this city. Malcombe Says for Several days there was no opening ones mouth at
the coffe House— I saw mr Sands & mr Giles the Marshall. they Made me a
visit to day. they appeard much mortified at their late Election they say,
that they urged Troupe LeRoy and others to permit themselves to be put up,
but no, they would not. Troupe is devoted to P——g Lessher sent out all the
antifeds he could pick up to vote against the federal Party.7 the report of much Moneys being
expended is current—
Tomorrow morning I Shall persue my journey and hope to reach Quincy by tomorrow week—
I have got Thomas Books such as were packd on Board a vessel. inclosed is the Bill of lading8 write to me So that I may find a Letter 254 at the post office at New Haven and at Hartford with a direction that the Letter remain in the office untill sent for by mrs Adams— I received mr shaws Letter & News paper to day—9 My Love to mr shaw I shall write to him Soon. I shall direct my Letters to Thomas care in Philadelphia when I find he has returnd to the city
with renewed
constant Regard and affection / your
RC (Adams Papers); notation by
CFA: “A. A. / May 23d.
1800.”
Not found.
The ferry from Paulus Hook, N.J., landed in New York
City at Mesier’s Dock, which was near the 144 Washington Street home of
Fitch Hall (Raymond J. Baxter and Arthur G. Adams, Railroad Ferries of the Hudson and Stories of a
Deckhand, N.Y., 1999, p. 64; New York
Directory, 1800, p. 218, Evans, No. 37844).
CA’s law office was in the U.S. Custom
House at the lower end of Broadway (New York
Directory, 1799, p. 148, Evans, No. 35740; Stokes, Iconography of
Manhattan Island
, 3:974).
In May, rumors circulated that JA and
Thomas Jefferson had formed a political alliance. On the 13th Gouverneur
Morris noted in his diary, “It is said that Mr. Jefferson and Mr. Adams have
made a Coalition,” and in a letter of the same date Theodore Sedgwick
informed Alexander Hamilton that the removal of James McHenry and
Timothy Pickering were “peace offerings” from JA to
Jefferson. Rumors also spread that JA would appoint
Democratic-Republicans to replace McHenry and Pickering and that
Jefferson might withdraw from the presidential race. Senator James Gunn
of Georgia told Morris that Aaron Burr was to be appointed secretary of
war (Morris, Diaries
, 2:91; Hamilton, Papers
, 24:482–484).
John Lasher (1726–1806) was a New York City merchant.
He served as surveyor and inspector of the port of New York between 1784
and his resignation in 1800. For JA’s 24 June recess
appointment of WSS to Lasher’s vacated post, see
AA to
JQA, 1 Sept., and note 1, below. William
Walton Morris (1760–1832) served as one of the surveyors appointed to
map western lands under the Northwest Ordinance (Washington, Papers,
Presidential Series
, 2:191; Marshall, Papers
, 4:168; Jay, Selected
Papers
, 4:653–654). For New York merchant Joshua Sands,
see vol. 11:464.
JA solicited advice on 20 May in a joint
letter to Charles Lee, Benjamin Stoddert, and Oliver Wolcott Jr., and
the next day instructed Lee to prepare a pardon for Fries’ Rebellion
leaders John Fries, Frederick Heaney, and John Gettman (all Adams Papers).
JA further ordered the drafting of a proclamation
pardoning all those involved, stating, “I must take on myself alone the
responsibility of one more appeal to the humane and generous natures of
the American People.” Lee prepared the proclamation later that day, and
on 23 May JA issued “a full, free, and absolute pardon, to
all and every person or persons concerned in the said insurrection”
(
Annals of Congress
, 7th Cong., Appendix, p.
1552–1553).
That is, Joshua Sands; Aquila Giles (1758–1822), a
federal marshal for the state of New York; the lawyer and former federal
judge Robert Troup; and Herman Le Roy, a merchant who had known the
Adamses since the early 1780s (vols. 4:148, 9:276; Washington, Papers,
Revolutionary War Series
, 9:513–5–14;
ANB
).
Enclosure not found.
Not found.
The latest letters I have had the pleasure of receiving
from you are of January 5. and Feby: 8.1 But Mr: Paleske has arrived at London 255 on his
way hither, and I expect to see him here in the course of a few days— He
informs me that he has letters for me from you.
A longer time has elapsed since I wrote you last than I can apologize for with propriety; it is possible that at some future day I may send you the result of an occupation which almost in spite of myself, I have suffered to engross for several months past, not only every moment of my leisure, but even much time which ought to have been devoted to other pursuits— For the present, I can only tell you, that it is the translation of a popular German poem, which is so far completed, that I promise you it shall not henceforth interrupt the frequency of my correspondence with you.2 The stagnation of political events during the winter months, together with various other motives, induced me at first, to undertake the work as an amusement for myself, and a few friends; but what I had taken as a pleasant companion soon master’d me so completely, that for months together I could scarcely snatch from it here and there an hour for any other purpose whatsoever.— What is worst of all is, that now, I may consider the thing as in a manner finish’d, I am so asham’d of it, in every sense, that I hesitate even at promising you a sight of it; and should not now mention it to you, but that the long interval since I wrote you, required some excuse on my part, and in this case as in most others where excuses are necessary, I know of none better than a statement of the naked truth.
I am sorry that the President should have expected from
me a narrative of the revolution in France, which brought forward another
Constitution, and placed Buonaparte, at the head of the Government in that
Country, with powers, superior to those of any limited monarch in Europe.
That hideous monster of democracy, begotten by madness upon corruption,
which produced such infinite mischief in Europe, is now so thoroughly
exploded from the country where it originated that I could not imagine it
necessary to send any comment upon the transactions at Paris, upon the
commencement of the last Winter— The character and tendency of the present
french Constitution is so very obvious, that I scarcely thought it
susceptible of elucidation.— But it has afforded me some amusement, upon
perusing Dr: Priestley’s Letters to the
inhabitants of Northumberland, to see him cry up the french Directorial Constitution, as superior to that
of the United States, for the very articles which the french have been the
first to abolish.— Poor Doctor! whatever his gifts are, he has not the
happiness of being gifted with the second sight.— He has shared the
misfortune of all those who for the last ten years 256 have in America, ventured in their
panegyrics upon french affairs to descend into particulars— I have scarcely
known an instance of the kind,—of a person applauded, but he was guillotined
or banish’d—of a thing admired, but it was overthrown as detestable, at the
very moment when the encomiastic pen was in motion.
But Doctor Priestley loves the french Revolution; and so
large is the swallow, so Ostrich-like the digestion of every man of that
description that I have no doubt he will be as ready to admire its present
result, as he was any of the former—unless his self-love should take offence
at their having so contemptuously thrown away, what he pronounced to be the
supreme excellence of their Constitution. The Doctor fears that pure patriotism, exists only in Utopia; which may be
admitted as a just and candid confession, though as a sarcasm upon human
nature I believe it is not true— The Doctor looks through a concave glass at
mankind, and affirms upon his honour that it is the nature of man to walk
upon his head.
He is remarkably tender in his letters, of the feelings
and characters of the late french Government; that is of the five worthy
directors, who have since, been with so little ceremony kicked out of office
by the french themselves, as utterly unfit for the places they had held— He
disapproves the President’s incessant, unnecessary, not to say unjust invectives against those worthy friends of
liberty—3 And I have
heard the present french Minister at this Court, General Beurnonville, utter
invectives against those same persons, in comparison with which all that the
President ever said of them, was panegyric.4
The Doctor tells us much about his speculative turn; and that he speculates upon
every thing— But if he had limited the subjects of his speculations, he
might have been more successful in them— If he had reason’d much less
through the course of his life he would have reason’d better— He recommends
to the United States with respect to foreign nations the policy of China.—
China, says he, though a commercial country, carries on no commerce
itself—Has no resident Ambassadors in any country, and what country has flourished more than China?
Suppose a political writer in America, should advise the
United States, to adopt an absolute and unlimited monarchy; and should add;
such is and has been from time immemorial the government of China; and what country has flourished more?
Absurd as the argument would appear to Doctor Priestley, it is his 257 own— The flourishing state of China, is no more to be attributed to its commercial or diplomatic system than to its despotism— But an undoubted effect of the Chinese system is that they are in respect of literature, the arts and the sciences many centuries in the rear of Europe, and that to this day, they are ignorant of the circulation of the blood.
His encomium upon Stone’s intercepted letter to himself
affords another specimen, if it be sincere, of his acuteness in reasoning—
He as well as Mr: Stone wishes for a total
revolution of Government in England; but that it may be effected peaceably,
and without the interference of any foreign power—Which is just as if he
should say to his neighbour, I wish I could see a man run a sword through
your heart, though, being very tender soul’d, I hope it would not hurt
you.
I am sick of such reasoners as Doctor Priestley, and the french nation are most heartily sick of them too— Instead of his five Directors, removable by fragments annually; they have got a first Consul, for ten years, with powers as much greater than those of an American President, as the command of a lieutenant General exceeds the command of a lieutenant— Instead of jealous exclusions from Office of every man, who has learnt by experience to fill an office, they have made re-elections possible in all cases— Instead of elections for short periods, they have extended them to very long ones; and the most important body of men in their Constitution, their Senate, the electors both of their Legislative, their Executive and their tribunate, are for life, and self-elected.— How far all this may be, an advancement towards the millennium which Doctor Priestley expects to flow from the french revolution, I pretend not to say; but it departs from all his favourite principles, at least as much as it approaches to that happy consummation.5
But you will perhaps be more desirous to hear some account of our domestic state than political discussions— My wife since the last misfortune which I mentioned to you in a former letter has enjoyed very good health untill this last fortnight, when she has had a very violent attack of the influenza, a disorder which for some months past has been prevalent here. She is however recovering fast, and will I hope be in a few days entirely well— The rest of us are in good health— Louisa has not heard from her parents and friends in America for several months, which gives her great anxiety. She has written to them many times.
Your’s ever affectionately.
RC (Adams Papers); internal address:
“Mrs: A. Adams.”; endorsed: “J Q Adams
25th / May 1800.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 134.
Tr (Adams
Papers).
For AA’s letter to JQA of 5 Jan., see that of 8 Feb., and note 2, above.
JQA began an English translation of
Christoph Martin Wieland’s 1796 epic German poem Oberon on 9 Nov. 1799, six days after he finished reading it.
He completed the translation on 22 May 1800, after which he made a copy,
adding “a little polish to the verse”
(D/JQA/24, APM Reel 27;
M/JQA/34, APM Reel 229).
Priestley,
Letters to Northumberland
,
1:8–9; 2:9, 10, 15–17, 20, 26.
Comte Pierre de Beurnonville (1752–1821) was a French
general who served as minister to Prussia from 22 Jan. 1800 to 20 Feb.
1802 (Hoefer, Nouv. biog. génerale
;
Repertorium
, 3:132).
Joseph Priestley’s comments on China were made in Letters to Northumberland, 2:30, and those
on his intercepted correspondence with John Hurford Stone were printed
in Copies of Original Letters Recently Written
by Persons in Paris to Dr. Priestley in America, London, 1798,
1:22–24. The notion that the French Revolution would lead to a
millennium of rational Christian rule was first raised by Priestley in
sermons published in 1793 and 1794 and was the subject of a conversation
with JA over breakfast soon after the author arrived in the
United States in 1794. It was a notion that JA argued was
without basis (Clarke Garrett, “Joseph Priestley, the Millennium, and
the French Revolution,” Journal of the History
of Ideas, 34:51–52, 60–61, 64 [Jan.–March 1973]).