Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
th:Sept
r:1800
I have received your favors of the 6th. & 10th:
instts:—
1 The little schism which took place
among the federal people at their late meetings, & which was detailed in
one of my late letters, has terminated to general satisfaction & from
the turn it has taken will probably very much promote a union of interest
& exertion. Every measure, which was pursued to modify the proceedings
of the majority at the public meetings, was done in private meetings of the
two Committees, & when the result of their conferences was to be laid
before the general assembly for their approbation, no notice was taken of
any difference having existed. Every thing went on smoothly & with
greater unanimity than at any former meeting. You will see by the papers
that my name has been brought into public for the purpose of attesting these
proceedings.
There is nothing of a public nature to excite much
observation at this time, other than the Electioneering warfare, which is
carried on with much warmth & some accrimony. The Newspapers here
publish 401 no such speculations as those of
Junius Americanus & Massasoit, (a foolish
& absurd signature by the way.) voluntarily.2
The Mission to France excites enquiry—there seems even to
be a great degree of impatience discovered, because the Executive has not
thought fit to divulge what has been done & what is likely to be done
further; & moreover what the Envoys were instructed to do. I am, for my
own part, so indifferent upon this subject, that I feel a secret pleasure
that this whimsical, womanish curiosity, of the people, should has not been gratified, as indeed
I see not how it could be, consistently with prudence. But the high-flyers
are by far the most eager to come at the state of the business—for no other
purpose than to cavil and growl at it. The reports which circulate so freely
on the subject of the speedy return of the Commissioners, are intended to
worm & worry out the secret; at least they have this appearance. I
scarcely know what creed is best on this occasion, for my data are no more
authentic than those of other people, & yet my doubts are strong as to a
satisfactory adjustment.
Upon the subject of your favor of the 10th: I have nothing to add, except to concur with
you in deploring the calamity which seems so inevitably to await us. Your
determination concerning the unhappy object & cause of our affliction,
is righteous & just.
I am, dear Sir / Your Son
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The President of the U.S.”
On 10 Sept. JA wrote to TBA about CA in a letter that is extant only as an incomplete and wholly canceled LbC. William Smith Shaw began to transcribe the letter but stopped in the middle of the third sentence and canceled what he had written. In the portion of the canceled text that is legible, JA wrote, “A being so lost to all sense of morality & all social feelings cannot be reclaimed” (LbC, APM Reel 120).
The Boston Russell’s
Gazette, 11 Sept., published an essay by Massasoit that opposed
Federalist attempts to undermine JA’s candidacy in the
presidential election and criticized John Ward Fenno’s Desultory Reflections, claiming that its
chief design was to discredit the Franco-American peace negotiations and
advocate “the removal of Mr. Adams, as the
principal mean of return to the path of dignity and safety.” For
Massasoit’s second installment, see
AA to TBA, 26
Sept., and note 6, below.
d:Sept
r:1800
I inclose you the Aurora of this morning which is pretty
rich in contents. For some time past it has been too flat & insipid to
compensate the trouble of sending it to you. I observe that the pieces under
the signature of Decius are ascribed to H. G Otis— I have 402 read but a few of the numbers, but I
have no doubt the Author is clearly & rightly designated. The story he
tells in his No 15 of the Caucus, is not quite correct— Mr: O—— should have dared to avow, that all except one agreed, “as far as their advice
& influence would go,” to run Mr: Adams
& Mr: Pinckney, both
“fairly” as President, and that the one who differed from the rest discovered, that this fair
proposition was both artful & insidious, because all the Gentlemen upon
their return to their Constituents, “as far as their advice & influence
would go,” might endeavor to undermine Mr: Adams
for the purpose of promoting the choice of Mr:
Pinckney. This he must have foreseen & although the gentlemen professed
an intention of “supporting Mr. A—— fairly as
President,” he well knew that very few of them had any intention of doing
so; and the fact has since been amply verified— Mr: Dexter differed from all the rest of the federalists. Mr: D—— understood the party he was dealing
with.1
The Jacobins here, & in Virginia are very sanguine in
their expectations of success— They are very quiet & still about it, but
their activity & zeal is unabating. Corresponding Committees exist in
every State and information is regularly circulated from the extremities to
the center. The grand Committee is at New York. This is no visionary thing I
can assure you— They count upon Connecticutt or Rhode Island to give them
votes by withholding them from Mr. Adams.2 I rather think it is
Connecticutt. New Jersey & Maryland are yet doubtful, and some talk
revives of convening the new Legislature of this State for the purpose of
prescribing a mode of chusing Electors. If the complection of the
Legislature should be more democratic than the present, it will be
convened—otherwise I think not.
Why dont you find out who writes Chatham, Cato, Junius
Americanus &ca:
3 I should know if I were acquainted
with the Printer. There were three papers under the signature of Matius Scavola, giving an history of the Aurora
lately published in Wayne’s paper
Gazette—4 Did you read
them?
I am dear William / Your friend
PS. I sent your letter to Peters—6
RC (MWA:Adams Family Letters); addressed: “W. S.
Shaw Esqr: / Quincy”; endorsed: “Phila 23
Sept / T B. Adams Esqr / rec 29th / Ans
30.”; docketed: “1800 / Sept 23.”
The Philadelphia Aurora
General Advertiser, 23 Sept., included the third of ten
installments of a series by “A Constitutionalist,” identified by
TBA as Dr. Thomas Cooper. Published between 19 Sept.
and 13 Oct., the essays alleged that JA favored monarchies.
TBA also quoted from the 15th installment of Decius’
“Jeffersoniad,” which was published 403 in
the Boston Columbian Centinel, 13 Sept.
(
TBA
to AA, 5 Oct., below).
Aaron Burr visited New England in August and
September to mobilize support for the Democratic-Republican presidential
ticket. He met in Rhode Island with Gov. Arthur Fenner, who told Burr
that he expected some of the state’s electoral votes to go to Thomas
Jefferson (Isenberg, Fallen Founder
, p. 204; Hamilton, Papers
, 25:59). For Burr’s
influence in the selection of electors in New York, see
TBA to
JQA, 11 May, and note 5, above.
The Boston Russell’s
Gazette published two six-part essay series that defended
JA’s presidency and criticized both the
Democratic-Republican Party and Hamiltonian Federalists. The Chatham
essays ran from 17 July to 6 Oct., and those by Cato appeared from 24
July to 15 September.
TBA authored three essays under the
pseudonym Mutius Scævola in the Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 1, 3, and 6 Sept., in which he
criticized the Philadelphia Aurora General
Advertiser as “the official governmental paper of the French
Republic.” The newspaper’s stance, TBA argued, traced back
to founder Benjamin Franklin Bache, who spent his youth in France with
his grandfather Benjamin Franklin and “saw his old—fond and amorous
Grand Sire, in the habit of caressing, and being caressed by the
seducing females of France.” TBA noted William Duane’s
foreign birth and denounced the “diabolical zeal” with which he edited
the Aurora. “I shall still cherish the
hope,” TBA concluded, “that there is yet left among us,
enough of virtue, honor, discernment and patriotism, to counteract the
evils disseminated by it; enough attachment to the federal government
and to those who administer it, to secure federal majorities at the
approaching election.” The essays were a response to an article in the
Aurora on 8 July entitled “British
Insolence and Tyranny,” in which the changes in JA’s
cabinet were criticized as an empty gesture having no effect on policy,
John Marshall was labeled a Hamiltonian Federalist, and Samuel Dexter
was said to have little regard for the U.S. Constitution. Caleb P. Wayne
(1776—1849) was the publisher of the Gazette of
the United States from 28 May 1800 to Nov. 1801 (
TBA to
AA, 3 Oct. 1800, below; Jefferson, Papers
, 38:406).
TBA also wrote to Shaw on 13 and 29 Sept. (MWA:Adams Family Letters), discussing essays by Junius Americanus, reporting rumors regarding Franco-American negotiations, and commenting on the forthcoming local elections. He also wrote on 15 Sept. (MHi:Misc. Bound Coll.), introducing Philadelphia lawyer Horace Binney, for whom see AA to TBA, 10 Oct., and note 14, below.
Not found.