Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
th:Sept
r:1800
Since my last to you, I have none of your favors, although I have within a week past received three letters from my Brother with your mark upon them. The last of these came to hand this day & was written while my brother was upon his journey to Silesia.1 The details of his travels are very interesting.
The most remarkable domestic occurrence, since the date
of my last, is the discovery of a pretty extensive combination among the
Slaves in the Southern States, for the purpose of a practical illustration
of those seducing theories—the equal rights of all
men, which they have been accustomed to hear discussed, with great
zeal, for several years past, at the tables of their owners. The
perpetration of the plot was alone prevented by an intervention, almost
supernatural. A black cloud arose in the afternoon, preceeding the night
when the general Massacre of the white inhabitants of Richmond & its
vicinity, was to have taken place; & a flood of rain, which soon burst
from it, so deluged the Country, as to render the execution, for that night,
impracticable; the sudden overflow of a small stream, cut off the
communication of some of the principal conspirators, from the place of
rendezvous; in the mean time, the plot was revealed or detected, and many of
the principal actors were seized & sent to prison— They have been tried
in a summary manner & publicly executed; the particulars, which
transpired at their trials, were of a nature to shock insensibility itself—
The enterprize was boldly conceived—arms were provided & the whole
Country might have been, at this moment, a scene of carnage &
desolation, but for the providential discovery— An insurrection of a similar
nature has broken out in the neighborhood of Charleston S.C. and though less
formidable than at first represented, it forebodes much danger. Even in
North Carolina & Maryland apprehensions are entertained. It is said,
upon what authority I have been unable to discover, that frenchmen were the
secret instigators of the Virginia revolt, and in the examinations of some
of the detected blacks it appeared in evidence, that the white french inhabitants were to have been spared in
the general massacre. The leader of the whole band, has hitherto escaped 408 although a considerable reward has
been offered by proclamation for his head—2 It is hoped that this warning to
the Southern proprietors, will produce a favorable effect upon their conduct
& alter the style of their inflamatory language on subjects of
government— But if they should prefer paying their debts, by having their
throats cut, they will yet persevere in despite of all this.
The City of Philadelphia yet continues more healthy than any of the neighboring Cities, although New York has been in a great degree exempt from infectious disorders, this season— All our friends are in health.
I can offer nothing but conjecture upon the subject of our Elections— The Democrats are very strong, both in skill, intrigue & numbers— The failure, (as we hear) of the negociation with France, will I apprehend do some harm to the federal cause.
I am, with esteem, your friend
RC (OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters); internal
address: “J Pitcairn Esqr:.”
The letters from JQA that TBA received most recently were those of 28 May, above; 10 June, for which see JQA to AA, 12 June, note 7, above; and probably 23 July, for which see A Tour of Silesia, 20 July 1800 – 17 March 1801, No. I, note 11, above (AA to Catherine Nuth Johnson, 10 Oct. 1800, Adams Papers).
Gabriel (1776–1800), a literate artisan enslaved by
Thomas Henry Prosser, planned a slave revolt in Richmond, Va., for 30
Aug. with support from at least two unidentified Frenchmen, but a severe
thunderstorm hampered the action. Gabriel was tried and convicted for
“conspiracy and insurrection” on 6 Oct. and executed four days later.
Twenty-six others were also hanged. The Philadelphia Gazette, 23 Sept., reported a second insurrection
outside of Charleston, S.C., stating that between 700 and 5,000 slaves
participated (Douglas R. Egerton, Gabriel’s
Rebellion: The Virginia Slave Conspiracies of 1800 and 1802,
Chapel Hill, N.C., 1993, p. 20, 21, 65, 69, 102, 108–111, 112, 114; Philadelphia Gazette, 24 Sept.).
TBA wrote to Pitcairn again on 16 and 17 Oct., reporting that Democratic-Republicans had dominated local congressional and state elections (both OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters).
d:Oct
r:1800
I have your favor of the 26th: ulto: with an enclosure; with what
I paid for the servant’s trunk & the cask of wine, the account is just
balanced. I have not been called on for any more charges & imagine none
are due— The wine I suppose to be a present from Our Consul Mr: Willis.1
I am extremely grieved at the disaster, which has befallen my Cousin Boylston, & which, according to your prediction, may be followed by such fatal consequences. I felt an unusual degree of friendship for him, independent of any relationship, & I believe none 409 of his family would more sincerely mourn his untimely loss, than I should. “When sorrows come,” (says the poet) “they come not single spies, but by battalion’s.”2 How often do we find occasion for the application of this remark! The experience of our immediate family connections is replete with such instances.
Within ten days past I have received five letters from my brother at Berlin—one of which I sent you yesterday—tomorrow I will forward another; the others are upon private business.3 He has now attoned in some degree for former omission’s.
I send the Aurora again because of its contents— The use
which they will try to make of that letter, will be to excite animosity on
the side of the pinckney’s. If it be true that Mr: Thomas Pinckney did call on the President with Mr: Rutledge and received the explanation which
the Aurora refers to—he had no occasion to have written exactly such a
letter as he has—4 I have
read so many palpable lies in the Aurora, about the President’s letters
& conversations, that I ought always to distrust what I read; but some
times a contradiction from good authority would have a good effect—
Your Boston writers have borne the palm in the
Electioneering warfare— Our printers will do as
they like, and although they have never refused to insert any thing original
from me, they will not make the selections from other prints, which I
should— I have written nothing of a formal series, of late, unless the
pieces published in the Gaz. of the US. under the signature of Mutius Scavola, be entitled to this
denomination. They seem to have attracted no notice at all—not even from my
own family, & therefore I conclude they were not intrinsically entitled
to any; & yet, a few gross errors of the press excepted, I thought
pretty well of them myself. They came out in
July or August & the provocation which produced them was a piece of British insolence & bull-ism, that appeared
in the Aurora—
I thank William for his letter & the newspapers, which I shall read at leisure—5
With great affection I am / Your Son
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs: A Adams / Quincy”; internal address:
“Mrs: A Adams”; endorsed: “T B Adams 3 /
October 1800.”
New Bedford, Mass., merchant William Willis
(1754–1853) was nominated by JA to be U.S. consul at
Barcelona on 28 Dec. 1797. Willis was confirmed by the Senate on the
29th and served until 1803 (Charleston
Courier, 12 Feb. 1853; Walter B. Smith II, America’s Diplomats and Consuls of
1776–1865, Washington, D.C., 1986, p. 235; U.S. Senate, Exec. Jour.
, 5th Cong., 2d sess.,
p. 256).
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act
IV, scene v, lines 78–79.
In his letter to AA of 2 Oct. 1800 (Adams Papers),
TBA enclosed the Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, 1 Oct., and 410 discussed the publication of
JA’s May 1792 letter to Tench Coxe, noting that he,
Coxe, and Joseph Dennie Jr. were residents of the same Philadelphia
boardinghouse and frequently dined together. “Well may it be said that
the golden age is come,” he wrote, “the Lion & the tyger are playing
with the lamb.” He also probably enclosed JQA’s 23 July
1800 letter to him, for which see
TBA to Joseph Pitcairn, 30
Sept., and note 1, above.
The Philadelphia Aurora
General Advertiser, 3 Oct., printed a 15 Sept. letter from
Thomas Pinckney, which alleged that JA’s May 1792 letter to
Coxe was either a forgery or “founded on a misapprehension of persons.” The newspaper also claimed that
Pinckney and former South Carolina governor John Rutledge (1739–1800)
had met with JA and that JA did not deny the
authenticity of the letter but told them the subject was Charles
Pinckney rather than Thomas (vol. 8:15;
Biog. Dir. Cong.
).
Not found.