Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
a
r13th. 1800
By the post on the 9th
instant I intruded a hasty line upon you, upon a reference Tench Coxe had
made to me upon the subject of Mr Adam’s
political principles.1 I
wrote to Mr Coxe on the same day to demand
justice from him for the injury he had done me. His publication has been
contradicted as far as it relates to me in several of our papers. Tomorrow
an Avowal of what I wrote to you a few days ago will appear in the Aurora
with the following addition to it. “that I have uniformly heard Mr Adams say, what he has published in his works,
that our present government was best calculated for our Country.”—2
I cannot express to you the distress which I continue to
suffer from this cruel Act of Mr Coxe. I am
consoled it is true, not only by 421 a
Consciousness of my integrity towards Mr Adams,
but by the universal indignation and horror which Mr Coxe’s friends as well as enemies
express, in speaking of his Conduct. They both knew my tenderness for him.
My connection with him began in early life. He was my groomsman when I was
married, and I felt disposed to forgive his defection from his Country when
a body boy, in beholding his able &
successful exertions in the establishment of the general government. Since
his dissmission from Office I have seldom seen him. The only hour I have
passed with him for two Years, was the one from which he has taken Occasion
to misapply a general declaration to him. Indeed his publication contains
not a word from me upon the subject of Mr
Adams’s monarchical principles. It is an artful
reference only, expecting no doubt that I would be compelled if any
thing had come to my knowledge to divulge it, or by my Silence give a
currency to it his insinuation. My
declarations have hitherto not only defeated his views, but had a contrary
effect. I lament that they were necessary, for my heart sickens at the idea
of taking any part in the present disputes which divide our Country. Mr Adam’s character did not require my feeble
testimony in its favor.
I have called upon several of my democratic patients, and
asked them to recollect whether they ever heard me utter a word, that could
lead to an inference unfavorable to Mr Adam’s
principles. They have not only declared they had not, but have added, that
every thing I have ever said of him, was calculated to beget esteem and
respect, and a Confidence in the integrity, and wisdom of his
Administration. Indeed Madam since the year 1774 his name, and the
independance, and happiness of the our
Country have always been associated in my mind, and there is no One
circumstance in my political life, that I review with half the pleasure that
I do the uninterupted friendship with which he has honoured me for six &
twenty years. My whole family have often heard me exult in it.
Since T Coxe’s publication I have learned, that he has
harboured a secret enmity to me for not interceding with the President to
restore him to his Office, or to confer some Other Office upon him. This
would have been highly indelicate, for I well knew he was not dismissed on
account of his democratic principles, or Opposition to Mr Adams’s election but for his disputes with
Mr Wolcot.3 I am the more disposed to ascribe
his publication to this cause, from having experienced similar, but more
open resentment from an old School mate, whose recommendation to the
President for an Office I refused to subscribe.
I have only to add to this long letter, that all Cobbet’s
cruelties to me, were tender Mercies, compared with Tench Coxe’s.—4 Our language does not afford a
word sufficiently expressive of its
thier baseness.
My dear Mrs Rush who
sympathizes with me in my distress, and who, better than any One else knows
the Ardor and extent of my respect & Affection for Mr Adams, joins in love to you and all the
family, with my dear Madam your / sincere and / Affectionate friend
n:Rush
RC (Adams Papers); docketed: “Dr Rush
to AA / October 13th 1800.”
Not found.
Tench Coxe in October and November launched a series
of newspaper attacks on JA, implicating unwitting
accomplices such as Rush and setting himself up as a prominent critic of
the Adams administration. An article by Coxe in the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 9 Oct., claimed
that Rush believed that JA was a monarchist. Rush wrote to
Coxe on the same day, denying the allegation and demanding that Coxe
retract his statement. Coxe refused, and Rush on 11 Oct. wrote a letter
that was published in the Philadelphia
Gazette, 14 Oct., and in the Aurora, 15 Oct., stating that JA never
articulated “any other opinion upon government, than those contained in
his defence of the American constitutions” and concluding, “I never
heard him express a wish for a monarchy in the United States” (Jacob E.
Cooke, Tench Coxe and the Early Republic,
Chapel Hill, N.C., 1978, p. 382–384).
A few months after Rush married Julia Stockton in
Jan. 1776, Coxe fled Philadelphia for British-held New York City. He
returned when the British took control of Philadelphia a year later and
remained there as a merchant, barely escaping a conviction for treason
in May 1778. Rush introduced Coxe to JA on 22 Jan. 1789,
and Coxe served as commissioner of the revenue from 1792 until being
dismissed by JA at the behest of Secretary of the Treasury
Oliver Wolcott Jr. on 23 Dec. 1797. Rush told JA on 14 Aug.
1805 that he had had no contact with Coxe since this incident (vol. 12:370; Jefferson, Papers
, 29:595;
ANB
; Rush, Letters
, 1:499,
2:903).
For Rush’s dispute with William Cobbett, see AA to Mary Smith Cranch, 22 Dec. 1799, and note 4, above.
th1800
I have not written to you since you left Me, but as I know you must feel anxious to hear, I write tho it will but add to your apprehensions; my own Health has mended, tho the Weather has been so wet and unpleasent that I have not dared to venture out, not even to See my dear sister in her sickness and distress. she is very low with the fever confined to her Bed. Katy Gannet taken down, & George Palmer, added to this Mrs Norten was thought dyeing all thursday. she is since a little revived, tho exceeding dangerous from the same cause which carried off poor Humphries—1 the fever spreads. there are 8 new cases since last week Jackson is very sick with it, & has not left his Bed since you went away the Dr hopes he will not be 423 worse.2 I have sent to his Father and Friends to inform them; and prevaild upon mr Porter to have him removed down to the Farm House—as it was very inconvenient to me, and prevented my making any progress in getting ready to go away, taking my help to attend him— I have to seek an other coachman— Mr Black & Mr Smith are upon the inquiry. I wrote to sole, but his wife was so sick that he could not leave her—3 it is very distressing to me to leave My sister, to whom I owe so Much for her attention and kindness to Me at all times, but more particuliarly in My long sickness— when I might be of service to her, all the aid I can afford her whilst I stay, is by watchers—and My help are very ready to serve me, for her. the season is growing cold and wet. I shall endeavour to get away next Week if I am successfull in procuring a driver— I Must commit my Dear Friends to a kind Providence—and with a heavey heart leave them— I got mr Shaws Letter from William’s since which I have not heard from you—4 I pray God preserve you, and give us a joyfull Meeting
Mrs Brisler had a Letter from Mr Brisler at Washington last Evening dated the 8th day after he left here. he tells her he fear he shall be worse off, than Adam was in Paridice, for he had a woman provided for him but there they tell him no such Being is to be had. he therefore requests I would send him on a freight— I shall make every exertion in my power— inclosed you will find some return Letters
with Love to William / I am Your affectionate
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed by
TBA: “Mrs: A Adams / 18th: October 1800 / 26th: Recd:.”
George Palmer (1788–1855) was the youngest son of
Elizabeth Hunt and Joseph Pearse Palmer, a nephew of Richard Cranch’s
who died in 1797 leaving his large family in financial difficulties.
Charles Humphrey (b. 1782) died of “putrid fever” in Weymouth on 2 Oct.
1800 (Megan Marshall, The Peabody Sisters: Three
Women Who Ignited American Romanticism, Boston, 2005, p.
xii–xiii, 36–37; Vital Records of Weymouth
Massachusetts to the Year 1850, 2 vols., Boston, 1910, 1:141,
2:284).
The Adamses’ coachman was James Jackson (b. ca.
1772). He died in Quincy on 22 Oct. (AA to Elizabeth Smith
Shaw Peabody, 26 Oct., DLC:Shaw Family Papers; Sprague, Braintree
Families
).
Not found.
Not found.