Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
th:June 1801.
Your favors of the 7th: & 31st: of March & 3d: of April,
are yet unacknowledged, though they have been some time received. No vessel has sailed
directly for your port, since I last wrote; until the ship Benjamin, on board of which I
sent you a packet of the port folio. I also sent a packet for my Brother, but I
apprehend he will have left 99 Berlin before it can
arrive, though possibly he may not have embarked for home.1
The Spectateur & another pamphlet have likewise been received from you; but this pamphlet addressed by my brother to my father, & enclosed by you to me, was unfortunately put on board a ship, bound to NewYork, though said, on the cover, to be sent by the Pennsylvania, for this place; coming by post to me, it inflamed my postage bill, rather more than a poor attorney can bear without grumbling; so I charge you to be more careful, in future, how you enclose pamphlets to me, which are addressed to another person. Congress, conferred the privilege of franking, upon John Adams, but they were not so generous to his son.2
I thank you for all your political intelligence. Poor, free,
imperial Hamburg! How art thou bandied about, like a football, kicked, cuff’d &
squeezed, until thou hast scarce breath enough left to sigh a complaint, at thy
indignities! Thou has been convicted, at sundry times & in divers manners of being
rich, and because thou wouldst not fight, thou fain must pay. I hate to see the weak
trodden under foot, but since the abrogation of the law of
Nations, this has been a trick of the times. I think however, that these little,
paltry, insignificant, trading towns, which are mock-dignified by the epithet of free
& imperial Cities, are such a burlesque on sovereignty,
that I care little who takes them under protection, provided it be a power competent to
the service.3
I presume you get newspapers from this place, and therefore I need
not tell you any thing about the heinous sins of our political rulers. They are
chronicled every day in the vehicles of scandal, otherwise called free presses. There is
sore complaint at removals from Office, and there is unceasing clamor that so few
removals are made. The sovereign, begins to bellow, about
the loaves & fishes, which are the very quintescence of Republicanism. The Alpha
& Omega of democracy. “We have yet gained little,” say the Republicans, if any
federal officer be continued in employ, and it is beginning to transpire, that the
triumph of principle, in the late struggle of parties, is
nothing more than the triumph of the unprincipled office-seekers of the Country.4
We hear & read every day, that our fathers fought & bled
for the sake of establishing a free & independent republic— Well, we had flattered
ourselves, (till lately, when we have been bettered informed) that we had been living
under a republican form of government, & some have been foolish enough to think,
that the Country has 100 prospered under the administration of the two first
Presidents; but we are now assured, by all the democratic prints, that the Independence,
that which was declared in 1776. was never
established till the 4th: March 1801.5
My dear Sir, you seem to retain a respect for the good sense of my Countrymen & are willing to believe, that fair argument & free discussion, will yet avail, in preserving our political institutions. I advise you to banish this impression, as too destitute of foundation, for if a people were ever befooled & besotted with intemperate zeal for any thing, my Countrymen certainly are, for the name of Republicanism. But enough. I ought, like Noah’s sons to step back & cover the nakedness of a parent.
I believe “a political intolerance, as despotic as wicked,” is about to commence. Hitherto we have seen but little of it, though I have looked for it, more than other’s, who have more faith than I had in smooth words. You I think may calculate upon being removed, provided any body should want to be Consul at Hamburg.6
Your old friend Clinton has again got into the saddle upon the back of NewYork. The good beast called the sovereign, had always a propensity to be ridden by this jockey, and only threw him out of his seat, by stumbling over Jay.
Our NewYork & Boston friends are well. The enclosed half Centinel will afford you some reading—7
With great esteem I am, dear Sir, / your friend & hble Servt:
RC (OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters); addressed: “Joseph Pitcairn Esqr: / Consul of the United States / Hamburg”; endorsed:
“Philadelphia 17 June / 1801 / Thomas Adams / Rd 1 Ocr /
Acd 2 Der”; notation by TBA: “Ship
Benjamin.”
Pitcairn’s letters to TBA have not been found.
TBA sent the packets to Pitcairn and JQA on the ship Benjamin, Capt. Richard Copeland Beale, which departed
Philadelphia for Hamburg on 18 June. TBA’s most recent letters to
Pitcairn and JQA were of 27 March and 8 June,
respectively, both above (vol. 11:316; Philadelphia Gazette of the United
States, 6, 18 June).
The enclosures have not been found. The first was probably an
issue of Le spectateur du nord, journal politique, littéraire
et moral, which Pitcairn had regularly sent to JA since 1798. The
second was likely Jean André de Luc’s pamphlet Bacon tel qu’il
est, for which see
JQA to TBA, 28 March 1801, and note 1, above.
Both were probably carried by the ship Ann, Capt. Lee,
which departed Hamburg on 16 April and arrived in New York on 20 May. Pitcairn also
probably forwarded JQA’s 10 March letter to AA
and 4 April letter to TBA
, both above.
The ship Pennsylvania, Capt. Peter Yorke, departed
Hamburg on 19 April and arrived in Philadelphia on 28 May (vol. 13:112; Pitcairn to
JQA, 17, 31 March, both Adams
Papers; JQA to Pitcairn, 28 March, OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters; New York Daily Advertiser, 20 May; Philadelphia Gazette, 28 May, 6 June).
For the Danish occupation of Hamburg, see JQA to TBA, 28 March, and note 5, above.
Here and below, TBA quoted Thomas Jefferson’s 4
March inaugural address, for which see
AA to TBA, 22 March, and
note 3, above, repeating Jefferson’s statement that “we have yet gained little if we
countenance 101 a political intolerance.” TBA was
describing a debate in the Philadelphia Aurora General
Advertiser, 18 May, which declared that the people expressed a “universal
disgust” of JA’s policies when they elected Jefferson and that the new
president “was therefore perfectly correct in not commissioning those officers who
were so unjustifiably nominated by Mr. Adams.” The Philadelphia Gazette responded later the same day, citing the inaugural line
quoted by TBA and countering: “Mr. Adams certainly cannot be accused of
nominating men, or pursuing measures contrary to the will of the majority. If Mr.
Jefferson chuses to withhold commissions from those appointed by the late President,
he can and will; yet such conduct would certainly merit and receive, the
disapprobation of most people” (Jefferson,
Papers
, 33:149).
TBA was referring to an essay in the Boston Constitutional Telegraphe, 4 March, which claimed that with
the election of Jefferson “the Revolution of 1776 is now, and for the first time arrived at its completion.” George Washington
had been “deceived by the insidious arts of the flatterers who surrounded him,” the
newspaper stated, and JA’s “partizans thought to govern the country
themselves, by making him their tool.” The essay concluded that the new
administration’s removal of laws unfairly targeting citizens and the press meant that
“the reign of terror and corrupt government is at an end.”
On 1 Feb. 1802 Jefferson nominated John Murray Forbes as U.S.
consul at Hamburg, and the Senate confirmed the nomination three days later. Despite
losing his post, Pitcairn remained in Hamburg until 1815 (U.S. Senate, Exec. Jour.
, 7th
Cong., 1st sess., p. 406–407; Margrit Schulte Beerbühl, “Hard Times: The Economic
Activities of American Consuls on the North Sea Coast under the Continental System,”
transl. Emily Richards, German Historical Institute London
Bulletin, 40:7 [Nov. 2018]).
Enclosure not found.
TBA wrote again to Pitcairn on 11 July 1801 (OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters), thanking
him for forwarding JQA’s letters and packages and reporting on the
reception of the Port Folio in the United States. The
July letter is the final extant between TBA and Pitcairn.
d:June 1801.
It falls to my lot to do things so repugnant to my inclination
& so contrary to my sense of strict propriety, that I know not what apology to offer
for complying, in opposition to both, with the absurd customs of the times, which so
often impose a necessity of thus betraying my judgment. What answer can be given to a
man who after living for a few months under the same roof with you, though in no
particular habits of intimacy, shall accost you thus? “Mr:
Adams have you any commands for Boston?” Are you going to Boston Sir? “Yes.” I know not
that I have any particular commands. “Will you give me some letters to your friends?” I
will Sir, with pleasure. This is the substance of a
dialogue, which passed between your friend, Mr: Thomas
Radcliff & myself last evening.1 He
has lived, during the whole winter, under the same roof with me, and though I did not
become acquainted with him, until about two or three months ago, he presumes on this as
a sufficient title to ask letters to my friends in Boston. You know what a kind of
reputation he had in this place, at one time; but in justice to him I must say, that I
think a great deal of artificial, mlignant censure was cast upon him, though he was 102 certainly somewhat to blame in all the disputes, in
which he has been involved. I have found him, in the little intercourse I have had with
him, perfectly correct in his conduct, while he was not affected with wine; but when
exhilirated, he is often thrown off his guard.
I have entered into this detail for the sake of explaining to you, how it happened, that I should give letters of introduction to a man of this stamp. This is the third instance wherein I have introduced people, to my friends by solicitation, & I confess it is a very irksome thing, for I place considerable importance upon this custom of giving introductory letters, though others may esteem it lightly.
I beg you to apprize Mr: Smith, that I
have given a letter [to] Radcliff, for him, under these circumstances; I have also given
a letter for [my] father. I am not afraid that any conduct of Mr: Radcliff, in their company, would disgrace my introduction, but I cannot
answer for him else-where. My friends, in Boston, I fear, will think I keep strange
company, by the specimens I have given in my introductions.
Mr: Radcliff accompanies his mother,
who has recently arrived at New York, from So: Carolina.
I have your favor of the 10th: and the
paper with it, containing an account of the Juvenile procession, which warmed my filial
blood.2 Youth, ingenuous youth! The
biass of envious, interested, abitious rivalship, hath not warped the natural
propensities of your hearts! The paralizing stroke, of age, hath neither perverted your
understandings nor blinded the eye of gratitude. Contemporaneous emulation, though
exhibited in glowing colors before you, hath not dazzled your powers of discernment, nor
taught you to be unjust. In blushing for your Sires, some of whom, with less sincerity
than yourselves, may have swelled the numbers of your procession, you may proudly apply
the motto from Gay’s immortal fable of the “Hare & many friends” “Older & abler
pass’d you by; How strong are those! how weak am I.”3
I have this morning a letter of the 11th: April, from my brother. He is the most exhaustless writer that I ever knew.
The three last numbers of the Port folio, are compiled from his communications, more
than half— You may know his mark, by one of the letters which make the word Columbus, being at the bottom of each poetical effusion.
I have my mother’s letter, of the 12th:
this morning. Cordially your’s
RC (MWA:Adams Family Letters); addressed: “William S. Shaw / Boston”; internal
address: “W S Shaw.”; endorsed: “rec 29 Feb”; docketed: “1801 / June 22.”; notation by
Shaw: “[. . . .] effectually. You may look for a / [. . . .]ion now. / June 26th
103 1801.” Loss of text due to a torn manuscript
comprises at least three lines of Shaw’s notation.
Thomas Radcliffe Jr. (ca. 1779–1804) was the son of Charleston,
S.C., merchant Thomas Radcliffe Sr. and Lucretia Constantia Hurst Radcliffe
(1758–1821). Thomas Jr. was traveling to New England in advance of his wedding to Wine
Field Tracy of Jamaica, which took place on 28 July in Providence, R.I.
TBA’s letters of introduction to William Smith and JA have
not been found (Frederick Dalcho, An Historical Account of the
Protestant Episcopal Church, in South-Carolina, Charleston, S.C., 1820, p. 124;
ScCoAH:City of Charleston, Returns
of Death Registers for the City of Charleston, 6–13 June 1821; “A Register of
Marriages and Deaths, 1800–1801,”
PMHB
, 23:245 [1899]; James N. Arnold, Vital Record of Rhode Island, 1636–1850, 21 vols.,
Providence, R.I., 1891–1912, 10:143).
Neither Shaw’s letter nor the enclosure have been found, but the
latter may have been the Boston Columbian Centinel, 3
June, for which see
AA
to TBA, 12 June, and note 9, above.
John Gay, “The Hare and Many Friends,” lines 57–58.