Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
d:June 1801.
It falls to my lot to do things so repugnant to my inclination
& so contrary to my sense of strict propriety, that I know not what apology to offer
for complying, in opposition to both, with the absurd customs of the times, which so
often impose a necessity of thus betraying my judgment. What answer can be given to a
man who after living for a few months under the same roof with you, though in no
particular habits of intimacy, shall accost you thus? “Mr:
Adams have you any commands for Boston?” Are you going to Boston Sir? “Yes.” I know not
that I have any particular commands. “Will you give me some letters to your friends?” I
will Sir, with pleasure. This is the substance of a
dialogue, which passed between your friend, Mr: Thomas
Radcliff & myself last evening.1 He
has lived, during the whole winter, under the same roof with me, and though I did not
become acquainted with him, until about two or three months ago, he presumes on this as
a sufficient title to ask letters to my friends in Boston. You know what a kind of
reputation he had in this place, at one time; but in justice to him I must say, that I
think a great deal of artificial, mlignant censure was cast upon him, though he was 102 certainly somewhat to blame in all the disputes, in
which he has been involved. I have found him, in the little intercourse I have had with
him, perfectly correct in his conduct, while he was not affected with wine; but when
exhilirated, he is often thrown off his guard.
I have entered into this detail for the sake of explaining to you, how it happened, that I should give letters of introduction to a man of this stamp. This is the third instance wherein I have introduced people, to my friends by solicitation, & I confess it is a very irksome thing, for I place considerable importance upon this custom of giving introductory letters, though others may esteem it lightly.
I beg you to apprize Mr: Smith, that I
have given a letter [to] Radcliff, for him, under these circumstances; I have also given
a letter for [my] father. I am not afraid that any conduct of Mr: Radcliff, in their company, would disgrace my introduction, but I cannot
answer for him else-where. My friends, in Boston, I fear, will think I keep strange
company, by the specimens I have given in my introductions.
Mr: Radcliff accompanies his mother,
who has recently arrived at New York, from So: Carolina.
I have your favor of the 10th: and the
paper with it, containing an account of the Juvenile procession, which warmed my filial
blood.2 Youth, ingenuous youth! The
biass of envious, interested, abitious rivalship, hath not warped the natural
propensities of your hearts! The paralizing stroke, of age, hath neither perverted your
understandings nor blinded the eye of gratitude. Contemporaneous emulation, though
exhibited in glowing colors before you, hath not dazzled your powers of discernment, nor
taught you to be unjust. In blushing for your Sires, some of whom, with less sincerity
than yourselves, may have swelled the numbers of your procession, you may proudly apply
the motto from Gay’s immortal fable of the “Hare & many friends” “Older & abler
pass’d you by; How strong are those! how weak am I.”3
I have this morning a letter of the 11th: April, from my brother. He is the most exhaustless writer that I ever knew.
The three last numbers of the Port folio, are compiled from his communications, more
than half— You may know his mark, by one of the letters which make the word Columbus, being at the bottom of each poetical effusion.
I have my mother’s letter, of the 12th:
this morning. Cordially your’s
RC (MWA:Adams Family Letters); addressed: “William S. Shaw / Boston”; internal
address: “W S Shaw.”; endorsed: “rec 29 Feb”; docketed: “1801 / June 22.”; notation by
Shaw: “[. . . .] effectually. You may look for a / [. . . .]ion now. / June 26th
103 1801.” Loss of text due to a torn manuscript
comprises at least three lines of Shaw’s notation.
Thomas Radcliffe Jr. (ca. 1779–1804) was the son of Charleston,
S.C., merchant Thomas Radcliffe Sr. and Lucretia Constantia Hurst Radcliffe
(1758–1821). Thomas Jr. was traveling to New England in advance of his wedding to Wine
Field Tracy of Jamaica, which took place on 28 July in Providence, R.I.
TBA’s letters of introduction to William Smith and JA have
not been found (Frederick Dalcho, An Historical Account of the
Protestant Episcopal Church, in South-Carolina, Charleston, S.C., 1820, p. 124;
ScCoAH:City of Charleston, Returns
of Death Registers for the City of Charleston, 6–13 June 1821; “A Register of
Marriages and Deaths, 1800–1801,”
PMHB
, 23:245 [1899]; James N. Arnold, Vital Record of Rhode Island, 1636–1850, 21 vols.,
Providence, R.I., 1891–1912, 10:143).
Neither Shaw’s letter nor the enclosure have been found, but the
latter may have been the Boston Columbian Centinel, 3
June, for which see
AA
to TBA, 12 June, and note 9, above.
John Gay, “The Hare and Many Friends,” lines 57–58.
th1801
If any one had foretold that three or four months would have passed
away at Stonnyfield, and that I should have written but one short line to my dear
Thomas, I should have resented the prediction, as an affront to my understanding, if not
to my heart—yet so it is. I have not even acknowledged yours of 21st. of May. My heart was too full to write upon the subject of that of your
letter which enclosed the one from your Brother, in which he expresses so much
sensibility and generosity towards his Father.1 That letter ought to be more than a compensation
for all that I had lost. I have lately received from him a Work, under the title of L
Etat de France a la fin de l’an 8. printed, in October last. It is written with more
knowledge of the history public Law & Politicks of Europe, than any thing I have
read of late years, It was composed probably by the direction of the French Government
to prepare Europe for a Peace conformable with the wishes of that power It threatens
Europe with a perpetuity of the french Military system, if the powers do not comply with
the wishes of France. But this is a vain aid. There must be some new Civil Government,
invented before such a military discipline can be very long supported at its heigth The
French are too fickle to compose such a government, or to persevere in such a
discipline. I recd also Bacon’s tell qu il est, which
exposes one of the most egregious frauds of Jacobinism—2
I am almost afraid to write you—lest I should take up too much of your time. But I dont desire you to write me when you have any call of business or study, of more consequence. I could tell you how my 104 grass grows & corn & apples or how much wall I lay up every day, but by taking a walk in the environs of your City. You will see husbandry in a more pleasing dress— In answer to your complement on the late administration I will not boast that I had a longer reach than my perverse ministers or their more perverse Generals. Suum cuique decees potestas rependit.3
Your affectionate
LbC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “T. B. Adams Esqr.”;
APM Reel 118.
JA last wrote to TBA on 6 April, above. TBA’s 21 May letter to JA has not been found, and it was his letter of 10 April, above, that enclosed JQA’s 27 Dec. 1800 letter to him.
For Alexandre Maurice Blanc de Hauterive’s De l’état de la France, a la fin de l’an VIII, see
JQA to JA, 25
April 1801, and note 1, and for Jean André de Luc’s Bacon, tel qu’il est, see
JQA to TBA, 28 March, and note 1, both above.
3 “Posterity gives to everyone what is due” (vol. 4:332; Tacitus, Annals, transl. Jon R. Stone, 2005, Book IV, ch. xxxv).