Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
d1802
I received Your kind Letter, began at Washington, and finished at
Philadelphia.1 I received much pleasure
from the perusal. the communications were of a nature to excite Sober reflections: I
find your sentiments in perfect unison with my own; we have both of us been for a series
of years so intimately connected with political affairs 169 that we must have been very inattentive observers not to have Seen the motives which
led to a Change in the administration, and the chance Some were determined to run, to
effect that Change, this we know could not have been produced, if the Federal part of
the community had been united, if they had not Sacrificed the interest of their Country
to gratify their resentment; and ambition I have you well know; reason to say this of
some of the Federal Leaders; to them, more than their opponents, is to be ascribed all
that we have feard, all that we Shall be made to feel. the ax is already laid to the
Root of the Tree; if it destroyd only those which brought forth bad fruit; we ought to
rejoice, but when we see a Spirit of Party, deaf to all reasoning, all argument,
determined with rooted malignity to destroy all that is good wise and just; merely to
glut their resentment; what a hopefull prospect for the future? If we have nearly finishd our course. Still we cannot be
unmindfull of the lot, and portion of those who are to succeed us. Must not the Patriot
Say, verily we have labourd in vain, and spent our Strength for nought. the repeal of
the late judiciary Law, (I take it for granted, it is decreed) is a measure so full of
banefull concequences that like a Comet it will end I fear in the conflagration of the
constitution touch not mine anointed, and do my judges no harm;2 ought to have sounded terror to the evil
doers.
God grant that it may not be succeeded by an age of terror, of disorder and confusion— Peace and tranquility, are desirable objects in my Eyes the few remaining Days allotted me; tho I should live to three score years and ten, which from my frequent infirmities, I have little reason to expect; I have not a wish, not a desire the most distant, to be any other, than I now am; and tho some may suppose that I am like the fox in the fable who cryd out that the Grapes were sour; they must judge from their own Hearts; not from mine; I frequently felicitate myself, and my partner that we are released from the cares and responsibility of a situation, too cumberous, for to [be] Sustained with ease or tranquility; and which the inconstancy of the People, and the Ambition of Demagogues renderd everyday more Burdensome.—
I have written more freely to you than I should to many others. I have avoided writing a single Letter to Washington, except to Mrs Johnson in a domestic Line, and last week, I wrote one to mrs otis—4
If the outside frank should induce any one to scrutinize the within, 170 thinking to collect the Sentiments of a statesman they shall be welcome to the Female benidictions they find. When I see you; we will more cordially exchange our thoughts.
With my Best respects to the judge, / I subscribe your Friend
RC (private owner, 2016). Some loss of text where the seal was removed.
Cushing to AA, 18 Dec. 1801, above.
Psalms, 105:15.
Mary Collier, “The Woman’s Labour,” line 29.
AA’s most recent extant letter to Catherine Nuth Johnson was that of 21 Sept., for which see JQA to JA, 4 Sept., note 1, above. AA’s letter to Mary Smith Gray Otis has not been found.
Cushing wrote to AA on 25 June 1802, recalling socializing with AA and others in Philadelphia and Washington, D.C. She also reported on exchanges between U.S. Supreme Court justices about the Judiciary Act of 1802. Cushing wrote again to AA on 8 Sept., noting that she and William Cushing hoped to visit the Adamses (both Adams Papers).
ry7
th1802
Your Letter of the Jan’ry I received near a fortnight ago, and
have thought every day since that I would write to you;1 but few occurrences arise to amuse You, or
entertain You of a domestick nature, and dissertations are not what you want; Your
proposed project of removing to the state of Newyork occupies my attention. I know it
must be urksome to you to pluck up stakes, (as the saying is) and quit a profession to
which you have been Educated, to enter upon an untried scene, to form new acquaintance
& new connections; Yet when I consider the disadvantages you must labour under where
you are, that the political state of the Country, gives you no prospect of advancement
in your profession; for all those who are in power, both in the National and State
government where you reside, are decidedly opposed to your Sentiments and principles;
and I hope presume, ever will be; so that I cannot
believe you will Succeed in Buisness in that city. beside it is not a desirable place of
residence for a part of the Season always being in danger of the yellow fever; I wish to
learn from you what your prospects are if you go as you hinted, into the interior of
Newyork? it is a large, and flourishing state, tho it has a wrong Bias in politicks. I
think it must follow New England in self defence, sometime or other; we know not what is
before us. there is much reason to believe that confusion will result from the new
order, or rather from the disorder which will be the concequence of the measures pursued
by the Administration the 171 cultivators of the
Soil may find more rest for a time than any other class of men; If a Farm is your
object, I should advise You to see and judge for yourself; not to be led by the
Suggestions of others; to live without Society; would soon render you discontented &
unhappy. and even a polishd man soon becomes assimilated to the Manners of those who
Surround him; but as you have not explained Your objects, I can only conjecture. it will
not however give me any pain to find you determined upon quitting the city where you now
are; it is not a soil where you will ever flourish I hope however you may be
transplanted to one with sentiments more congenial to the best interests of our country
When I look back upon the past, I am ready to make many unpleasent reflections, but all
History furnishes us with Similar Instances in republican Governments. there is not any
thing stable, any thing which can long be depended upon;
I yesterday read mr Morris’s speach in reply to mr Mason & others. I do not recollect ever to have read a more masterly composition, or a finer peice of oratory.2 truths however painfull are painted as with a Sun beam; yet upon the callous Hearts of Jacobinism no impression appears to have been made. deaf to the Voice of Reason truth and justice, feeling power, they forget Right; N England is crushed, and will be trampled upon, untill oppression raises a spirit which will sweep like a whirlwind.
Your Brother has taken an office in Boston.3 how long he will have patience to hold it, depends upon circumstances I hope if any attempt should be made to send him to the National legislature he will decidely reject it—come out from among them—4 they are doomed to dissolution— an attempt has been made to get an address to the President from our Legislator, but did not succeed as the papers will inform you; the same proposition is now under debate in the Senate, but I trust will not succeed—5 Burr has Shown us what he will do when the fate of the Country, hangs suspended upon his veto in the National Goverment—6
We have had a remarkable mild winter untill this Month commenced, when we have had a taste of cold & some Snow— Your uncle Cranch is very sick with one of his old lung complaints I have many fears least it should prove too hard for him. Your Father enjoys good Health: and spirits. my own has been better through the winter than for several past. I forgot to mention to you that B Adams is married, three weeks since— I had a Letter Yesterday from Sally.7 She writes that you had been once out to see her. I hope you will go again. Sally is a valuable woman, and deserving a better lot than she 172 has met with, which make me desirious of Showing her every kind attention in my power—
the Boys are gone to N york— I cannot but regreet their removal. John had just got his ambition excited, and was pursueing his studies with great assiduity, and earnestness; he appeard dull and mortified at his removal, and fearfull of the concequences to himself. he had much thought & reflection upon the Subject, as well as anxiety for his Brother, who he thought was not inclined to the necessary application, and whose mind might easily be dissipated— it is a pitty two such fine Boys should be in a way to be ruined, and their Father has no Head for to plan out their Education;
I like to hear from you once a fortnight, if only by a few lines. Remember me kindly to all those of my acquaintance who retain any Regard for me, and be / assured alway of the tenderness / and affection of your / Mother
RC (Adams
Papers); addressed: “Thomas B Adams Esqr— / Philadelphia”; endorsed: “Mrs: A Adams / 7th: Feby 1802 / 15th: Do Recd: / 22d: ansd:.”
Not found.
On 13 Jan. Stevens Thomson Mason of Virginia argued for the
repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801, alleging that Federalist arguments for its
retention were illogical and hypocritical. Mason also argued that during
JA’s administration there was “an immoderate thirst for Executive
patronage.” The speech was printed in the Boston Columbian
Centinel, 3 Feb. 1802, while that of Gouverneur Morris was printed in the 6
Feb. issue (
Annals
of Congress
, 7th Cong., 1st sess., p. 59–69).
For JQA’s Boston law office, see Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 1, above.
2 Corinthians, 6:17.
On 2 Feb. the Mass. house of representatives debated a motion by
Perez Morton to present an address to Thomas Jefferson that was “expressive of the
confidence which this House entertain in his Integrity and Patriotism.” Supporters
suggested that the statement also endorse the appointment of treasury secretary Albert
Gallatin. Opponents characterized Gallatin as “a foreigner, whose language is now almost unintelligible to a native American”
and also argued that the dismissal of JA’s appointees precluded such an
address. Nathan Fisher moved to postpone consideration of the address, and it carried
by a vote of 141 to 91. On 5 and 6 Feb., the Mass. senate debated a similar motion,
which was defeated by a vote of 19 to 14 (Boston Columbian
Centinel, 3, 6, 10 Feb.; Boston Independent
Chronicle, 28 Jan., 4 Feb.).
On 26 Jan. Vice President Aaron Burr cast a tie-breaking vote to
advance the bill proposing the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801 to a third reading.
Burr’s vote, which was his first as Senate president, was reported in the Boston Columbian Centinel, 6 Feb. 1802 (
Annals of Congress
, 7th Cong.,
1st sess., p. 147; Burr, Political Correspondence
, 2:654).
SSA to AA, 23 Jan., above; AA enclosed her reply, not found, with this letter to TBA ( TBA to AA, 22 Feb., below).