Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
d1802
Indolence shall no longer prevent my acknowledging, the pleasure I
felt (my dear Mrs Adams) from your kind & affectionate
letter which I received some time ago.1
Your sentiments on the subject of friends are so congenial with my own, that I wish by every means in my power, to cherish with the warmest affection, the few that are spared to me.
The last respects were paid to our friend Mrs Stodart, the day after receiving your letter, I saw her about a fortnight
before her death, she inquired with much anxiety after your health, & desired to be
perticularly remembered to you.
It gives me great pleasure to hear that my Sister S—— has so surprisingly recovered from your account of her & Betsy’s the first of the winter, I was very apprehensive that I should never see her face any more; but I now anticipate the pleasure of seeing her & all my other friends, in six or eight weeks. It is not quite certain when Congress will adjourn, for you know, there are many who would spin out business till mid summer, rather than relinquish 6 Dll. There have been a number of ladies belonging to Congress here this winter, but I assure you, the Jews have but little dealings with the Samaritans.2
We are pleased with the prospect, of the Sun of fedaralism’s rising again in the east, and allso, that your Son is comeing forward in his political career.3
Mrs Daltons & Mrs Cranch’s family’s are well, the measles have been
universial, but Mary has not taken them, for which I am sorry, as she is at a good
age.4 Mrs
Bayard is the only one in our house that has taken them, and she had them very
favourably.5
I regret the loss which Mr Johnson’s
family have sustained, I am told they intend remaining in Fredrick.6
Please to remember me to Mrs Cranch
& Louisa. Mr O with Harriet & Mary join their best
respects to you, & your Friend with / Your
Affectionate
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Madam Adams / Quincy / Massachusett”; endorsed: “Mrs Otis / 1802.”
AA
to Otis, [post 15 Dec. 1801], above.
John, 4:9.
The Washington Federalist, 19 April
1802, reprinted an article from the New York Evening
Post, 12 April, titled “The Sun of Federalism Once More,” reporting on the
successes 198 of Federalist candidates in the Massachusetts
election. JQA’s election to the state senate was reported, along with
JA’s vote for “his expatriot,” Gov. Caleb Strong.
That is, Otis’ daughter Mary Ann, who was then seven years old.
Ann Bassett Bayard (1777–1854) was the wife of James Asheton
Bayard and the daughter of former Delaware governor Richard Bassett. Both the Bayards
and the Otises lodged at Stelle’s Hotel in Washington, D.C. (Joseph Gaston Baillie
Bulloch, A History and Genealogy of the Families of Bayard,
Houstoun of Georgia, and the Descent of the Bolton Family, Washington, D.C.,
1919, p. 12, 63;
Biog. Dir. Cong.
; List of Members of the
Senate and House of Representatives, with their Places of Abode, [Washington,
D.C., 1801,], p. 2, Shaw-Shoemaker,
No. 1507).
For Joshua Johnson’s death, see JQA to Walter Hellen, 28 April, and note 1, below.
I received last evening your favour of the 20th: instt: containing the distressing intelligence
of Mr: Johnson’s decease; which I had indeed been in some
measure prepared to expect, by a letter from Mrs: Johnson to
Mrs: Adams, received a few days before—1 I endeavoured to communicate the melancholy
event to my wife in a manner which might soften as much as possible the shock— The
agitation into which it threw her, was however so violent that she has been quite unwell
last night; and has not yet entirely recovered— She had flattered herself lately so much
with hopes, that the stroke was quite unexpected to her.— In addition to her distress at
her irreparable loss and that of her family, she was extremely concerned on account of
Mrs: Hellen— Your letter of the 22d: however, which I have just given her, has relieved her mind in a great
measure on this account, and given her as much joy as she was at this time susceptible
of receiving.— We both join in congratulating you upon this new accession to your
family, and hope soon to hear of Mrs: Hellen’s perfect
recovery.2
The situation in which Mr: Johnson has
left his family is a subject of deep concern to our minds; and with you, I shall be
happy to make every exertion in my power for their comfort— Just before he left England,
he made a Will, in which he constituted you, his son Thomas (upon his coming of age) and
myself his Executors for his concerns in America— Of this Will, I have a copy in my
possession, and it is attested by my brother as one of the Witnesses— If there has been
no subsequent Will, I presume it will be necessary to prove that, in the Maryland Court
of Probate—3 I likewise suppose that you
have a copy of the same Will, unless another has been 199 made, and will take
such steps as will be necessary for the probate; and for making such dispositions with
regard to his property as may carry the Will as far as possible into effect— The State
of his affairs is much better known to you than to me, and at this distance, it will
perhaps be impossible for me to obtain such a knowledge of them as to enable me to act
much in the capacity of Executor— I shall however be ready cheerfully to join in any
measure which you may deem expedient for settling the Estate in the manner the most
beneficial possible to the interests of his family.
With regard to his demands against Messrs: Wallace and Muir, I have heard nothing since I left Washington— I never had
an opportunity to go into a complete investigation of all the transactions, but as far
as I was acquainted with them, it appeared to me he had suffered such gross and flagrant
injustice, that a representation of it properly drawn up, and presented to the
legislature of his native State, was the properest expedient he could adopt, and the
best if not the only remedy remaining to him— The proceedings of the Chancellor in
particular are of such a nature, that a statement of his own decree—with his allegation
of motives, his hand-bill, and in short the whole course of his proceedings must I think
produce a salutary effect, presented to the impartial view of an honest legislative
Assembly, the common protectors of individual rights and of public Justice—4 I suggested this idea to Governor Johnson, when
I had the happiness of seeing him at Frederick, and though he did not give a decisive
opinion upon the subject, it appeared to me that he did not disapprove it.
If the suit has not yet been decided, his Executors must no doubt be now admitted to prosecute it, and for that purpose the probate of the Will must be made as early as possible— I shall be happy to hear from you on this subject, and to join in any possible effort to obtain that justice for his afflicted and distress’d family which was so cruelly denied to him.
With great regard, and attachment, I remain, Dear Sir, your friend
and very humble Servt:
LbC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “Mr: Walter Hellen—
Washington.”; APM Reel 135.
Not found. Joshua Johnson died on 17 April in Frederick, Md.,
following a long illness that JQA described as “the gravel,” or kidney
stones. On learning of her father’s death, LCA recalled that she was
“overwhelmed” and “could not be comforted or consoled” (LCA, D&A
, 1:160, 170; D/JQA/24, 3 Nov. 1801, 27
April 1802, APM Reel 27).
Not found. Ann Johnson Hellen gave birth to a son, named
Washington Hellen (d. 1803), in April (LCA,
D&A
,
1:195).
Although JQA received a copy of a will 200 Johnson had written in 1797, Johnson’s final will
was dated 12 Dec. 1801. In it, he bequeathed to Catherine Nuth Johnson $800 per year
and the use of his household goods during her lifetime. The remainder of his personal
and real estate was divided among his eight living children. The will was proven on 7
Dec. 1803 but was not settled until 31 Jan. 1818. Following Joshua Johnson’s death,
Thomas Baker Johnson and JQA corresponded regularly about the estate. In
letters to JQA of 29 April 1802, 20 May, and 29 June, Thomas detailed
their roles as executors before reporting that Walter Hellen would act as the sole
administrator of the estate. In letters of 27 May 1802 and 23 May 1804 (all Adams Papers), JQA relinquished
his position as an executor (vol. 12:91, 92; LCA, D&A
, 1:167, 171, 198, 202; 2:773–774;
FC, Joshua Johnson’s Will, Adams
Papers, Genealogical Material).
Charles Wallace (1727–1812) and John Muir (1741?–1810) were
Joshua Johnson’s former partners in the mercantile firm of Wallace, Johnson, &
Muir. The partners reached a financial settlement through arbitration in 1799, but
Johnson later challenged the settlement in court. In Oct. 1799 Maryland chancellor
Alexander Contee Hanson (1749–1806) ruled against Johnson. Hanson issued a handbill
dated 31 March 1800 justifying his actions, but Johnson appealed the decision. The
case was abated on Johnson’s death, and although it was revived in 1811 it was again
abated on Wallace’s death and no further action was taken (vols. 12:259–260; 13:289–290, 364–365; LCA, D&A
, 1:3, 35, 36, 50–53; Washington, Diaries
, 6:103; To the People of Maryland, Baltimore, 1800, C. Burr Artz
Public Library: Ross Manuscript Coll.; Papenfuse, Pursuit of Profit
, p. 229).