Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
In point of form I know not how the balance of epistolary correspondence between you and me stands; and it is altogether immaterial: having at present some leisure and the prospect of more, I cannot employ it to better advantage than in adding to the frequency of communication with you.
My wife has recently received a letter from you, and has answered it within these two days, with an invitation to you to come and spend the remainder of the summer with us—1 She gave this invitation in my name as well as her own; but I cannot be easy without repeating it under my own hand— If the fever at Philadelphia should really disappear, as from our latest accounts we have some reason to hope, you had much better be here amusing yourself between Boston and Quincy, than boiling upon that grid-iron of Penn—2 If it should spread, you cannot stay there, and surely you can have no retreat preferable to my house— At least you will find none by the choice of which you can confer so much pleasure.
I am obliged to Oldschool for the handsome manner in which he has spoken of the address; and I am sorry to see that his paper is so rapidly dying of a consumption—3 So totally destitute of all support from sources which tend in this country to circulate periodical prints, his day must be fixed; and a short one too— I wish it were in my power to prolong his life.
You told me in one of your late letters, that Rule-New-England, was a sentiment as obnoxious to Pennsylvania federalists, as Rule Virginia—4 I can readily conceive that; but there is a still stronger objection against it— The sentiment is fundamentally wrong— It is substituting a part for the whole— It is making one great interest, the slave or the tool of another, and every system of administration founded upon such a principle, must in its nature be oppressive— But it must be confess’d that the Pennsylvania federalists have been so active so industrious and so successful in support of the common cause, they are even now sacrificing themselves with so much devotion, and making such powerful and disinterested exertions for it, that the mere idea of New-England’s rule, would be unjust beyond 220 measure.— New-England shews three states where the honourable and just principles of federalism, have at least maintained their ground; where the State Legislature’s and Executive’s, have not sacrificed to the Gods of delusion and democracy—where the men and the measures which have produced the present prosperity of this Country, are still held in honour, and where the federalists have not in a selfish and lifeless despair abandoned the public and its interests to political impostors and United Irishmen—to the lying fifty-dollar men, and their paymasters— When the sturdy spirit of New-England federalism shall be so far subdued and degraded, as to suffer all these things without daring to utter a sigh against them, without presuming to vote for a candidate of virtuous mind and manners against some staggering Silenus of democracy—then! then my good friends and fellow-citizens who call yourselves Pennsylvania federalists, New-England if she will take my advice shall come to you for rulers— Then! at least she will disclaim all pretension to rule, herself, for she will have no principles to rule by.— Pray how stands the prospect of your election for Governor?
You see my letter is dated from Quincy— It has become almost a necessary of life for me to come out on Saturday in the afternoon, and breathe a little fresh air untill monday morning— The tranquility of the place affords me relaxation and relief from the perpetual agitation and hurry of the week— The wharf below gives me an excellent opportunity for the sea-bath, and I pass the leisure time of the day in the library reading the moral treatises of Plutarch in Amyot’s old french translation, or the letters of Madame de Sevigné—5 I am now writing in it; and if all my poetical ideas were not irrecoverably drown’d, the prospect from the window where I sit, and the music of the birds upon every tree, would inspire such thoughts as the Muses are wont to impart, as effectually, as were this delicious pasture the vale of Tempe, the rippling stream I hear, the waters of Helicon, and those feathered songsters the sweetest nightengales of Arcadia.
Whitcomb and his wife are out here upon a visit, and the sight of
her portly person as she passes along reminds me of your question some time since, how
they come on? Whitcomb is doing very well in his business,
and making money fast— So that he thrives in all sort of ways.6
Your mother has just shewn me a letter from you, noticing among
other things a paragraph in the Aurora pointed partly against me—7 I wonder that it should have had a sting, in
your estimation, for when I first read it, I was indebted to it for a hearty laugh.— It
was such a 221 whimsical compound of lies and blunders, such a
hotchpot of mistake and wilful falsehood, and withal so free from all mixture of wit as
well as of truth, that it gave me not a little diversion— I hope the wholesale dealer in
slander gets such paragraphs as that dog-cheap, if not thrown into the bargain— Else his
oeconomical reputation will stand but a poor chance in
the long run.
The old rope that bound together the faggots of democracy, has not
been able to stand the wear and tear of a single-year— It has broken asunder by its own
rottenness, and we are to see what substitute will be found to gather up and tie the
bundle again— The Country will not suffer by the dissolution of the faction— Her only
danger is from its Union— You observe truly that the New-York Caesar and Pompey, as well
as the bank-bill philosopher, all appear to have taken equal delight in seeing the
object of their common hatred libelled—but there is another observation which the late
disclosures have impress’d with equal force on my mind; which is that all that infamous
ribaldry poured upon him in such torrents for such a series of years, is thus
ascertained to have been purchased and paid for by his personal enemies and rivals—
Whether the people will see and reflect upon this is of no
consequence— At least posterity will not be duped by the smiling villains of this age;
and eternal Justice though late will assert her rights.8
Your’s faithfully
RC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “T. B. Adams.”; endorsed: “J. Q Adams Esqr. / 25th: July 1802 / 30th: Recd: / 2d: Aug: Ansd:.”
Neither TBA’s letter nor LCA’s response has been found.
The Boston Republican Gazetteer, 21
July, noted that Philadelphia was experiencing a yellow fever epidemic comparable to
those it experienced “in the years ’93, 97, 98 and 99,” although in contrast the
Boston Columbian Centinel, 24 July, reported that
incidences of the disease were declining. TBA also wrote of yellow fever
in Philadelphia in a short letter of 13 Sept. to William Smith Shaw, stating that
reports from the city’s board of health “confirm all our terrors respecting the
prevalence of the fever” (MHi:Misc.
Bound Coll.).
The Port Folio, 2:214–215 (10 July)
included a review of JQA’s 28 May address to the Massachusetts Charitable
Fire Society, for which see
AA to TBA, 13 March, and note 5, above,
describing the address as “the vigorous and graceful off-spring of a mind, stored with
the aphorisms of wisdom, and imbued with a deep tinct of classical literature.”
In a letter to JQA of 18 June, TBA made
the following comment: “The friends and pretended admirers of N England politic’s,
& institutions, laugh, here, at the, what they call, arrogance of her pretentions. ‘Rule new England’ is quite as humiliating to a
Pennsylvania federalist, as to a Virginia Democrat; but Virginia Rule, is not so
grating to the Pennsylvania democrats; for thereby dominion is conferred upon them. We
shall never be able to change the present order of things, without some external
pressure.” He also reported on local electioneering and discussed bankruptcy
commissions in Pennsylvania (Adams
Papers).
Les oeuvres morales & meslees de
Plutarque, transl. Jacques Amyot, Paris, 1572, and Marie de Rabutin-Chantal,
Marquise de Sévigné, Recueil des lettres de Madame la Marquise
de Sévigné, à Madame la Comtesse
222
de Grignan, sa fille, 8 vols., Paris, 1775, a copy of
which is in JA’s library at MB; see also
JQA to LCA, 25 May 1804, and note 4, below (
Catalogue of JA’s
Library
).
At the start of 1803, Tilly Whitcomb was operating a stable at
the Haymarket Tavern in Boston. In April he became the proprietor of the New Coffee
House in Half-Court Square. Until 1 July 1804 Whitcomb leased the property from
JQA, who purchased it in Nov. 1802 from Boston merchant Charles Nolen
(Boston Commercial Gazette, 20 Jan. 1803, 21 April;
JQA to
LCA, 2 May 1804, below; Memorandum between JQA and
Nolen, 13 Oct. 1802, MWA:Adams Family
Letters; D/JQA/24, 6 Nov., APM Reel 27).
TBA to AA, 14 July, and note 4, above.
Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act I, scene v,
lines 106, 108.
I am much alarmed at the Intimations in the public Prints of the appearance and prevalence of the Fever in Phyladelphia. Anxiety for the public in all our great Cities as well as in Philadelphia, is not So easily removed as our concern for your Person may be by your own discretion, in removing immediately from the Scene of danger. It will be a favourable moment to make a Visit to Us. I long to See you and to converse with you on various Subjects: but espesially on your future prospects. Come to N. york by the Stage and to Providence by Water, which you may do in a few days and you will not only be out of danger of the Pestilence, I hope, but will See prospects of Life as well as of nature more pleasing than you can have in Philadelphia.
affectionately yours
RC (NN:T. H. Morrell Coll.).
I duly received your letters of the 21st: enclosing the pamphlet of Gentz, and likewise the post-note, with your
account—1 This last I have not yet
examined, but I presume it to be substantially correct.— I am again to repeat my thanks
for your attention to my affairs.
I hope to have the pleasure of seeing you soon here, though I hope also that the tremendous menaces of malignant yellow fever at Philadelphia, have permanently subsided— The weather here for a fortnight past has been very oppressive, and with strong putrid tendencies— We hope and pray for the best.
My family and our father’s, are generally in average health— Your mother continues at intervals to be very unwell— My child suffers by 223 the season, and at this critical time is cutting several large double teeth—
You have seen two letters from your father to S. Adams, written in
1790. lately published in the Newspapers— They have been attacked with characteristic
violence and bitterness, by the fifty-dollar men at Washington, Worcester and Boston—
They are defended in the Boston Gazette— The first publication was to defeat the basest
misrepresentations, which were circulating here by the paid slanderers, who had seen
them, by the treachery of the old prophet, and who were affirming that the letters in so
many words urged the establishment of an hereditary monarchy, and nobility in this
Country, and named the families of which this nobility was to be composed—2 Judge how much the publication has exasperated
these fellows, by taking the lie out of their mouths, and holding it up to the public
view— They are flouncing, and foaming and spouting, and dashing with the tail at a
furious rate; but the harpoon is in them—they shall have their full length of rope to
plunge downward; and then if they are not drawn up, cut up, barreled up and salted tried down for the benefit of the public, say
to all the world that I am the disgrace of New-England whale-men.
Your’s faithfully.
RC (MQHi); internal address: “T. B. Adams Esqr.”
Neither the letters from TBA to JQA of
21 Aug. nor the enclosures have been found. The first enclosure mentioned was Gentz, Origin and
Principles of the American Revolution
, which JQA had
requested from TBA on 10 Aug. (MHi:Adams Papers, All Generations). The second enclosure was a post-note for
$1,805.94 for JQA’s shares in the Bank of North America. JQA
had asked TBA to sell the shares in a 30 July letter, not found, and
TBA reported on 5 Aug. (Adams
Papers) that it would be a straightforward process. He also informed
JQA that he would take care if yellow fever returned to Philadelphia.
JQA’s 10 Aug. letter was in reply, and in addition to requesting the
Gentz pamphlet, he asked for William Loughton Smith’s Phocion essays, published as The Pretensions of Thomas Jefferson to the Presidency Examined;
And the Charges against John Adams Refuted, 2 vols., [Phila.], 1796, Evans, Nos. 31212, 31213, and James
Thomson Callender’s The Prospect before Us (vol. 11:438, 439;
M/JQA/12, APM
Reel 209).
The Boston Commercial Gazette, 19,
22 July, published JA’s letters to Samuel Adams of 12 Sept. 1790 and 18
October. The letters were apparently obtained from Adams by Dr. Charles Jarvis, who
sent copies to the newspaper and to Thomas Jefferson. In the 12 Sept. letter,
JA remarked that a recent visit to Philadelphia had sparked memories of
their service in the Continental Congress, and he also commented on the state of
current politics: “What? my old Friend is this World about to become.? … Are there any
Principles of political Architecture?” In the 18 Oct. letter JA continued
his political discussion, arguing that a “natural and actual Aristocracy among Man
kind” has a legitimate role in republican government and citing as an example the
leadership of Boston’s “noble Families.” Although Adams’ replies of 4 Oct. and 25 Nov.
demonstrate an exchange of political ideologies, it was only JA’s letters
that were initially published. They received a mixed response, with Federalist
newspapers characterizing them as innocent discourse and Democratic-Republican
publications condemning them as monarchical. The Boston
Commercial Gazette, 224 26 July 1802,
praised the 18 Oct. 1790 letter as “universally read and eulogised, by all men, who
have the capacity to think and the honesty to speak.” Whereas the Worcester, Mass., National Aegis, 28 July 1802, stated that JA
had “a thorough contempt and detestation, even for the very name of ‘Republic’”; the Washington, D.C., National Intelligencer, 4 Aug., called the letters a “Libel upon liberty, upon
all that is sacred in America”; and the Boston Republican
Gazetteer, 7 Aug., noted that had JA’s letters been published
prior to the presidential election of 1800, “he would not have obtained ten votes.”
The full exchange was published as a pamphlet on 16 Aug. 1802 (JA, Papers
, 20:413–414, 417–419, 424–429, 434–439; Jefferson, Papers
, 38:249–250;
Four Letters: Being an Interesting Correspondence between
Those Eminently Distinguished Characters, John Adams, late President of the United
States, and Samuel Adams, late Governor of Massachusetts, on the Important Subject
of Government, Boston, 1802, Shaw-Shoemaker, No. 1713; Boston Commercial
Gazette, 16 Aug.).