Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
My last letter to you, was of November 25. since which I have not enjoyed the pleasure of receiving a line either from my mother or from you— To her I have in the interval written once; and now enclose a press-copy of the letter, in case the original should fail in the conveyance.1 My numerous letters to the Secretary of State, and to my brother will I hope apologize for my silence during so long a term, to yourself.
By our latest intelligence from America, I find that my
anticipations relative to the ratification of the Convention with France have not been
realized, and that even a conditional ratification could not obtain the necessary
majority of votes in the Senate— The situation of the United States therefore, in their
foreign concerns is far from being so advantageous and safe as I had flattered my self
it would be, upon your quitting the public administration— This circumstance I deeply
lament, not on your account but on that of my Country— The means of peace and safety
were in her own hands, and had in spite of innumerable obstacles and difficulties been
procured by your resolution and perseverance— That they were rejected it was impossible
for you to prevent; and for all the consequences good or bad which may ensue from the
system pursued in preference to yours, the praise or the blame must rest elsewhere— Of
any good that will ultimately result from this refusal of compromise, I have no hope— Of
great evils that may arise from it there is strong ground
for apprehension— My principal reliance for preservation from those evils is upon the
bounties of Providence, which are so often an effectual shield, when all the wisdom and
all the virtue of man prove impotent—
From the time when it was certain that a decided division had taken place among the friends of the American
Government, I was convinced that its consequence would be to throw the country into the
hands of their antagonists— The most unexpected thing
therefore in the issue of the late election, was to my mind, that the anti 23 federal majority was not larger. So long as the power was held by the federalists,
their principles were better calculated to promote the national prosperity than those of
their opponents— But if they had adopted for a maxim that a foreign war must be
fostered, for the sake of maintaining an army, and
increasing the public debt, it was time that they should be removed from the management
of affairs.
With respect to you as these events affect you personally, it is
not for me to tell you, that the leaders (as they are called) of the federal party, or
at least many of them, are the persons who at heart will
feel the sincerest pleasure at the loss of your election— After the first moment of
secret exultation at the issue, your successor will find that the contested place is not
a bed of roses, and his enjoyments in it, if any such he find, will often be dashed by
the consciousness that in justice it was not his proper place— His friends and partizans
who put him in it, will many of them feel the same unacknowledged rankling in the
breast, at his elevation, as those of the other party did at your’s; and amid the
general pleasure of a party triumph, every single heart will yearn with some individual
mortification— But the federal great men—The men of profound genius, and
all-comprehensive talents, who are alone qualified for the government of Empires; the
lynx-eyed statesmen and the Lion-hearted warriors who look down with eyes of pity upon
your services, while for party purposes they extol them, and think you might do for
President, since there was no hope of their getting the station for themselves— These
are the people who in the general ruin of federalism will find the soothing consolation
that in the misfortunes of our best friends there is always something not displeasing. How many of these characters there are, I am
not near enough to observe— It is a breed common to all ages of the world and to every
civilized nation— I trust you will not feel distress’d at their comforts, any more than
at the more loud-mouth’d triumphs of your avowed opponents.
Divisions of parties and changes of administrations are not confined to our Country, at the present day— All Europe seems to have adopted them like other cast-off french fashions. Total changes of ministry, proceeding from an important change of political systems have very lately taken place in Austria and Russia, as well as in Spain and Portugal—2 But none of them are of so great moment to the affairs of Europe, or indeed of the world, as the dissolution of the strong phalanx which had for many years composed the British Ministry.— The public are told that this is not to produce a change of system, and that the only cause which occasioned it was a 24 difference of opinion between the king and those of his ministers who have retired, upon the question of catholic emancipation in Ireland.—3 But after the wind has blown long and steadily from one quarter it seldom starts half round the compass at once. When it has changed a single point, the seaman were indeed a fresh-water sailor who should expect it to remain as fix’d to its new station as it had been to the last— The new English Ministers enter upon their offices at a moment of unexampled embarrassment and danger, without possessing the resources of talents or of reputation which their predecessors enjoyed— There is no probability that they will long stand their ground, and as the opposition will henceforth constantly be gaining strength, they must eventually force their way into the royal Councils, all prepared for a peace of disgrace and submission— This will however in some measure depend upon the result of external events.— Upon the success of the war, which they are obliged to sustain against all Europe.— As it is not likely they can long resist the pressure of so many enemies at once, we must look forward to that as the probable issue— On the other hand there is only one thing to be said—which is, that the most important turns in the affairs of Nations arise from unforeseen and uncalculated circumstances— In the war for the Spanish succession, after ten years of continual defeats, France obtained her object, at the very moment of her deepest distress, by the death of the Emperor Joseph—4 At the close of the seven years war, when every circumstance that human reason could foresee and combine, threatened the ruin of the king of Prussia, and the politicians of the time accordingly prophesied it with as much confidence as if it had already happened, the death of the Russian Empress Elizabeth, baffled all the anticipations of human foresight, and secured to Frederic 2 a triumph over all his enemies—5 At this moment, the death of Paul or of Bonaparte, both of whom are doom’d constantly to dwell in the crater of a volcano, might lead to a change no less unexpected and extraordinary than those— But in speaking of present probabilities, as no account can be taken of such incidents, they must always be considered as possibilities which if realized can only prove the mutability of human concerns.
The removal of Count Panin from the office of Vice-chancellor in
Russia, followed by banishment to his country-seat, happened about three months ago—
Mr: Kalütchew was made Vice-Chancellor, and at the same
time sent as Ambassador to Paris— This was probably done by Count Rostopsin, then minister of foreign affairs, who having long been the
emperor’s favourite, considered Panin as a rival for 25 influence, and
thought that by having a mere titular Vice-chancellor and keeping him at a distance, he
should alone possess the keys of imperial favour— But the most formidable rival was not
a Vice-Chancellor or an Ambassador— It was a french opera-singer—the woman I mentioned
in my letter of Novr: 25— She in her turn has overthrown Rostopsin, who has just been disgraced and exiled— Kalütchew,
remains Ambassador at Paris, but is no longer Vice-chancellor— That office has been
transferred to a Prince Kurakin, and a General von der Pahlen is minister of foreign
affairs— At the same time the banishment of Count Panin is removed, and he has
permission to reside at St: Petersburg or Moscow at his own
option—6
In Switzerland and Holland there is much talk of changes in the Constitutions: all under the auspices of France—7 But these perpetual discussions about written forms of Government in Countries such as the Helvetic and Batavian republics, are only sources of internal disquiet and agitation to them, while they shed indelible ridicule upon the debates themselves in the eyes of other nations— These universally look upon them as the deliberations of prisoners in a house of correction, to regulate the management of the institution.
I am, Dear Sir, ever faithfully your’s
P. S. I have directed a small chest of books which I have in
Holland, to be shipped for Boston to the care of Mr:
Smith— Of which I beg you to give him notice, and when they arrive to receive them
with my other library.8
RC (DLC:John Quincy Adams Papers); internal address: “J. Adams Esqr.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 134.
For JQA to JA, 25 Nov. 1800, see vol. 14:445–454. The enclosed FC-Pr of JQA’s 10 March 1801 letter to AA , above, has not been found.
On 20 Sept. 1800 Austrian emperor Francis II replaced foreign
minister Baron Johann Amadeus Franz de Paula Thugut with Count Johann Ludwig Josef von
Cobenzl, who then pursued peace negotiations with France that culminated in the
signing of the Treaty of Lunéville on 9 Feb. 1801. Spain and France signed preliminary
articles of alliance in January, and after Portugal refused France’s demand that it
sever relations with Britain, Spain declared war on Portugal in March and invaded soon
thereafter. The invasion followed the reemergence in 1800 of Spain’s former secretary
of state, Manuel Godoy y Álvarez de Faria, who through Napoleon’s patronage assumed a
role akin to prime minister after a three-year hiatus from government (Deutsche
Biographie, www.deutsche-biographie.de;
Cambridge Modern Hist.
, 9:69, 247–248; Jefferson, Papers
, 33:563–564; José Baptista de Sousa, Holland House and Portugal: English Whiggery and the Constitutional Cause in
Iberia, N.Y., 2018, p. 13; H. V. Livermore, A New
History of Portugal, 2d edn., Cambridge, Eng., 1976, p. 246; Angel Smith, Historical Dictionary of Spain, 3d edn., Lanham, Md.,
2018). For political conditions in Russia, see note 6, below.
A key issue of contention between George III and William Pitt was
Pitt’s support of Catholic emancipation in the 1800 Act of Union between Ireland and
Britain. Pitt advocated for admission of Catholics to Parliament, a concession that
the king opposed 26 and subsequently vetoed (
Cambridge Modern Hist.
,
9:677–679).
The War of Spanish Succession was waged from 1701 to 1714 by an
alliance of Britain, Austria, and the Netherlands to stop France from aligning with
Spain after the Spanish throne passed from the childless Charles II to Philip V,
grandson of Louis XIV of France. The death of Austria’s Joseph I on 17 April 1711 was
a factor in bringing the conflict to a close, for Joseph was succeeded by his brother
Archduke Charles, whom the alliance had proposed as an alternative Spanish monarch.
The crowning of the new emperor decreased the appetite for war among Austria’s allies,
who feared an alliance between Spain and Austria more than one between Spain and
France. Negotiations ended in the 1713 Peace of Utrecht in which France achieved its
objective of installing Philip V as Spain’s ruler (James Falkner, The War of the Spanish Succession, 1701–1714, Barnsley,
Eng., 2015, p. xii, 194–195, 219;
Cambridge Modern Hist.
, 5:401, 429, 431–432,
458).
When Empress Elizabeth of Russia died on 5 Jan. 1762 during the
Seven Years’ War, the throne passed to her nephew Peter III. Peter, an admirer of
Frederick II, immediately negotiated peace with Prussia (
Cambridge Modern Hist.
,
6:328).
The preceding months were marked by political turmoil and
shifting allegiances at the Russian court. On 15 Nov. 1800 Vice Chancellor Nikita
Petrovich Panin was removed from his post and banished from government, and he did not
hold office again. Panin was replaced by Stepan Alekseević Kolyćev on 8 Jan. 1801, and
Kolyćev was in turn succeeded on 20 Feb. by Prince Aleksandr Borisovich Kurakin. After
leaving his post, Kolyćev served as Russian ambassador to France from 6 March to 24
September. Peter von der Pahlen was governor general of St. Petersburg and a close
adviser of Paul I until turning against the monarch (David Saunders, Russia in the Age of Reaction and Reform 1801–1881, N.Y.,
2014, p. 6–9; Allen McConnell, “Alexander I’s Hundred Days: The Politics of a
Paternalist Reformer,” Slavic Review, 28:383–384 [Sept.
1969]; K. A. Papmehl, ed., “Letters by L. K. Pitt, British Chaplain in St. Petersburg,
on the Person and Policies of the Emperor Paul,” Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 7:90 [Spring 1973];
Repertorium
, 3:354). For
JQA’s earlier discussion of Count Feodor Vasilievitch Rostopchin and
the French actress Madame Chevalier, see vol. 14:450, 453.
A movement for a new Swiss constitution that would establish
Switzerland as an independent state, as called for in the 9 Feb. Treaty of Lunéville,
was quashed by Napoleon. Instead, he imposed the Constitution of Malmaison in May,
which transformed the Swiss cantons into semiautonomous entities but placed them under
a national government controlled by France. In the Netherlands, Napoleon on 6 Oct.
proclaimed a new constitution that created a central government under his influence
(
Cambridge Modern
Hist.
, 9:88–90, 97–99).
For the shipment of JQA’s books to Boston, see JQA to JA, 25 April, and note 4, below.
th:March 1801.
A ship called the Cleopatra sailed from this port a few weeks since
without bearing any thing for you from me, which I desire may be attributed to my want
of notice, that she was about to depart— I now enclose you the sequel of the Port Folio,
and at the same time have the pleasure to acknowledge the receipt of your favor of the
8th: December, which came to hand on the 5th: instt:.1
In return for your European intelligence, I can only announce to you the commencement of a new era in our political history; one which my letters to you, more than a twelvemonth ago anticipated, and to which my mind has been familiarized by the frequency of my 27 contemplations respecting it.2 A change of men has yet produced no visible change of measures, nor would it be fair or reasonable to predict as to the future conduct of administration, evil consequences, as the result of error or design— The depravity of heart, which exists among what is called the Democratic Republicans, is indicative of little respect for moral obligations, nor have we good reason to expect, that their craving appetites for place, power & profit, will be satisfied with occasional vacancies being supplied, or a few obnoxious officers removed for the sake of filling them from their number—
One real benefit is already felt as a consequence of the new order
of men. The clamors of the vulgar herd, which without
ceasing have disturbed the peace & quiet of the Country for a series of years, are
now no more They have been so swallowed up in the enjoyment of the fancied triumph of
Democracy or Republicanism over, their opposites, that it has to them operated like a
reality— The streams, whence the vilest slanders used to flow, in such abundance,
threatening to inundate & overwhelm the brightest fame of our most estimable
people—are become fountains of fulsome flattery to the rulers of the day— The gall of
Jacobinism is become sweet as honey, and an aspiring, giddy & depraved faction, (to
whom might rightly have been applied two lines of a great poet—
thy praise.)
is now rioting & reveling & wallowing in the luxury of “soft music, warbling voice, & melting lay’s:”3
You will not learn first from me, the
distribution which has been made of public honors & offices, since the new men came
in— Chancellor Livingston of NewYork, is Commissioned, as Minister, to the french
Nation, and he will probably sail in May or June— meantime, Beau Dawson has just
emba[rked] as messenger; with the Convention.4
Mr: Madison is Secretary of State;
Genl: Dearborne of War—the o[ther] Departments are yet
vacant—5 Sundry inferior officers have
been removed & creatures put in their places—6 This I expected—it could not be otherwise and
the federalists, who expect, that the President will be able, if disposed to persevere
in a system of moderation & forbearance with respect to app[oint]ments, will be
disapointed— It begins to be well understood by both or all
parties a[nd] us, that success in obtaining a Candidate of their own, at the 28 head of gov[ern]ment, is sufficient to authorize a system of proscription with regard
to t[heir] opponents— This is Republicanism—
Dear Sir, I am very sincerely / Your’s
RC (OCHP:Joseph Pitcairn Letters); addressed: “Joseph Pitcairn Esqr: / Consul of the United States / Hamburg.”; internal
address: “Jo: Pitcairn Esqr:”; endorsed: “T. B. Adams / 27
March 1801 / Rd 6 June / And 3 July.” Some loss of text due to wear at the edge.
The ship Cleopatra, Capt. Blakiston,
departed Philadelphia for Hamburg on 21 March. TBA may have sent this
letter aboard the ship Tom, Capt. Turner, or the brig Molly, Capt. Huggins, both of which were accepting mail for
Hamburg on 27 March. The Tom departed on 3 April and the
Molly three days later. Pitcairn’s letter of 8 Dec.
1800 has not been found (Philadelphia Gazette, 27, 28
March 1801; Philadelphia American Daily Advertiser, 3, 6
April).
TBA predicted that Thomas Jefferson would win the presidency in a letter to Pitcairn of 31 May 1800, for which see vol. 14:265–267.
The Philadelphia Aurora General
Advertiser, 26 March 1801, declared that “the principles of 1776, are restored,
after suffering a protracted period of dishonor.” TBA closed his comments
by quoting Robert Lowth, “The Choice of Hercules,” stanza XIX, lines 6–8.
Jefferson wrote to Robert R. Livingston on 24 Feb. 1801 informing
him that upon the commencement of his administration he intended to nominate him as
minister to France. Jefferson submitted the nomination to the Senate on 5 March and
the appointment was confirmed the same day. Livingston accepted on 12 March, but his
departure was delayed until after Virginia representative John “Beau” Dawson departed
for France on 22 March with the conditionally ratified Convention of 1800. France
agreed to the Senate’s amendment and ratified the convention on 31 July 1801.
Livingston departed on 15 Oct., arriving in Paris on 3 Dec. (vol. 14:376, 484; Jefferson, Papers
, 33:viii,
61, 253, 255; 36:207; New York Commercial Advertiser, 15
Oct.).
Jefferson began assembling his five-member cabinet the day after
his inauguration, a process that would stretch into midsummer. On 5 March he nominated
James Madison as secretary of state, Henry Dearborn as secretary of war, and Levi
Lincoln as U.S. attorney general, and the Senate confirmed the appointments the same
day (U.S. Senate, Exec. Jour.
, 7th Cong., special sess., p. 395–396). Jefferson would
take longer to name secretaries of the navy and the treasury, for which see
TBA to JQA, 12
April, and note 5, and
AA to TBA, 16 May, and note 2, both below.
Soon after entering office Jefferson sent out a circular letter
to many of the federal officers JA nominated, advising them that because
JA was “so restricted in time as not to admit sufficient enquiry &
consideration,” the appointments would be reevaluated and should be considered void
until further notice. He then began removing federal office-holders and installing
others by recess appointments. By the date of this letter he had made 42 new
appointments. During the course of his first term he deposed and replaced 146 federal
officeholders, or 46 percent of the 316 positions under the power of the president.
For AA’s later correspondence with Jefferson on the appointments, see
Jefferson to AA, 13
June 1804, and
AA to Jefferson, 1 July, both below (Jefferson, Papers
, 33:ix–x,
172–173, 663–665, 674–675; Carl E. Prince, “The Passing of the Aristocracy:
Jefferson’s Removal of the Federalists, 1801–1805,”
JAH
, 57:565–567 [Dec. 1970]).
Jefferson’s actions set the stage for the landmark U.S. Supreme Court case of Marbury
v. Madison, for which see Hannah Phillips Cushing to AA, 18 Dec.
1801, and note 8, below.