Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
I have had the pleasure of receiving your favour of the 18th and congratulate you, on the Success of your labours. Thank
you for the 265 Print of Dr Smith, and
Should not dislike to have one of my old Friend McKean.
Whatever may be said of that Gentlemans Consistency of Conduct, his Uniformity of
Principle and System, his Fidelity to his Friends, his conjugal Felicity, his Constancy
in his opinions, his Modesty, his Humility, his Meekness or his Temperance; thus much
must be confessed, that he Understands the Management of the People of Pensilvania,
better than any of the Federalists. I have known So many Men, of far Superiour Knowledge
and Talents, to his in whom there has been as little Stability, that I find it is in
vain to rail at them or clamour about them. My Advice to you is to treat them all with
Civility and do them all Justice. Mr McKean is as far from being an enthusiast for Democracy as I am: Parade,
Ceremony, Pomposity and Finery are ten times more in his head and heart too than in
mine.1 I never was fond of any of those
Things. I always despised and detested them. The Stations I have held demanded them: The
World demanded them of me. but I always loathed them. Monarchy and hereditary Presidents
and Senates, have been ten times more approved by him than by me. Indeed, neither was
ever approved or desired by me, in the Government of this Country: though I know that
the great Nations of Europe cannot exist without them but in endless War and Bloodshed.
Elections of first Magistrates and Senators, would be nothing but a contention of
Bribery: and that Party which would exhaust the largest Purse would carry the Point and
then plunder the People to fill it again.
I, however must lie under any Slanders, they please to fabricate:
for I have no friends to contradict any thing. I hire no Duanes, Freneaus Callenders,
Cheethams, Woods or Paines, to writes Lyes or Truths for me. There is one Lye they have
propagated and insisted on for fourteen years, which has never been contradicted vizt that I Sett up John Fenno and his Gazette at New York &
Philadelphia. A falshood so entirely without foundation, or even Colour, was never told
and so often repeated for so long a time, without contradiction in any Country—2 When I went to take my place in Senate as
Vice President in 1789 in April, I found Mr Fenno Settled
there with his Family and editing his News Paper. I Scarcely knew the Man. I never
contributed one farthing to assist him in beginning carrying on or concluding his
Affairs, in any other Way than taking one of his Papers. after I became acquainted with
him I esteemed the Man for his, good Sense and honesty, and would have been very glad to
have assisted him, with a Loan of Money or otherwise, if it had not been 266 inconsistent with a rule I thought it necessary for me to observe, vizt to avoid
every possible Imputation or just suspicion of hiring Libellers to abuse my Ennemies, or
to flatter my Friends or myself.
I want to write more largely about your Situation.— I wish you were here upon one of my Farms.— You may be a Man here—and a freeman: you will be a slave for Life in Philadelphia.—
RC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “T. B. Adams.”; endorsed: “John Adams Esqr: / 28th: January 1803 / 7th: Feby Recd: / 25 Do Ans d.” Some loss of text where the signature was removed.
For the engraving of Gov. Thomas McKean that prompted JA’s comments, see Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 2, above.
The Philadelphia Aurora General
Advertiser, 21 June 1802, claimed that John Fenno, former printer of the
Philadelphia Gazette of the United States, had been “in
the employment of John Adams.” Although JA sent material to Fenno for
publication, including his Discourses on Davila in 1790
and 1791, for which see JA, Papers
, 20:337–339, Fenno’s newspaper was launched and financed by
Alexander Hamilton and Rufus King (vol. 9:213; Gouverneur Morris, A Diary of the
French Revolution, ed. Beatrix Cary Davenport, 2 vols., Boston, 1939,
2:566).
ante 25] Feb. 1803
In my last I attempted to prove that Goverment and Society are
inseperable from each other.1 In the case
that was Stated the Government of the Mother over her Infant, was proved to be coeval
with the first Act of Society or Sociability between them. Without the Government of the
Mother there could have been no Connection or Intercourse between them: and the Child
must have perished in the first moments of its Life. Another Hypothesis may be now
advanced, which will Shew the Same Truth in another light not less clear. Suppose the
first Man and Woman created upon Earth, in full Strength and Stature.— At the first View
of each other, they would both probably cry out if they could Speak, or if they could
not Speak they would think “Surely tis some Infant of the Sun, dressed in its father
gayest Beams.[”]2 Nature has made Men and
Women for each other. Call it Instinct, Sympathy or Feeling it is the Constitution of
human Nature. The human Face is to the human Eye, perhaps the finest and certainly one
of the most wonderful of the Works of God in this lower material World. The
configuration of the Body, has Elegancies which nothing in this Sublunary Scene,
exceeds. The Motions of the Body in Walking or running have a grace, that is fascinating
to the Sight. All these feelings of delight would concur to banish all fears and Soon
bring the new created 267 Couple to nearer Intercourses and more intimate
Connections. The Superiour Stature Strength and Agility of the man, has not more Charms
in the Estimation of the Woman, than her Superiour Softness Delicacy and Timidity have
in that of the Man his. They would Soon be so fond
of each others Company that they would both be uneasy when absent or out of Sight. This
Uneasyness would Soon produce an Agreement to live to gether, to Search for grains Herbs
fruits Roots and to chase together for Birds and terrestrial animals for food. or
possibly an agreement to a division of labour, the female to Search for Vegetables and
the Male to chase and hunt for Game, for their common stock of Nourishment and
Subsistance. An hollow Tree if to be found would be their common Habitation by common
consent, or a hut made of branches of Trees broken off for Stakes and covered with furn,
Moss, or Bark and carpeted and lined within with Furs and skins. This is a social
Compact, a mutual covenant made for common Utility, i.e for the better easier acquisition of the Necessaries,
Conveniences Comforts and Pleasures of Life. This is Law, Order, and Government. for Law
implies Government, order implies Government. The Simple uneasiness arising to one from
a breach of this order, or the painfull fear of disgusting or offending or even grieving
the other, would be a Sanction of Rewards and punishment to this Law. This alone is
enough to constitute Government. Among the first Acts of this Intercourse and
association it is probable the Male would be conscious on one side of a general
Superiority, the female on the other of an inferiority, of capacity I mean for the
common defence and procuring Subsistance and an Authority. A very Strict or Severe
Government wd not be necessary nor Usefull. But ever So
Slight an Influence or Authority assumed or conceeded is sufficient to constitute the
Idea of Government. The Power of the Man is clearly Superiour, his Wisdom wd soon be Superiour by his wider range of Observation and his
good Will to the Welfare and happiness of the Union would be equal to say no more. Now
Wisdom Power and Goodness united compose the natural and legitimate Idea or Theory of
Authority and Government is nothing more than Authority reduced to practice.
The Existence of Government from the beginning of Society and even
from the first Acts of Sociability, may be argued from another Topic. Subordination and
consequently Government is an universal Law of Nature, ordained by the Will of God,
through all the Tribes and Species of the Animal Creation. The Bees, the Ants, the
Doves, every kind of Birds, all sorts of Poultry, Sheep, Goats, Cattle. a 268 Farmer with an hundred head of Cattle in his barnyard Sees a peaceful regular
society, and an established Government extending from the great Prince first Consul the Bull, through all his oxen Cows, Steers, Heifers,
down to his youngest Calves. Every one knows his place, or if he forgets it for a moment
the Magistrate of Nature Soon reminds him of it, by his irresistable horn. No Reason can
be assigned to shew that Men and Women are left by nature in a more unhappy Situation
than other Animals, and condemned to a mischevous Anarchy from their Beginning. A Glare
of the Eye, a frown of the Eyebrow, a movement of Anger, Ridicule or contempt in the
Countenance would after carry Authority with them & Constitute Government. If these
would not answer, We know that a Jogg, a Stroke, a Kick would supply the deficiency. and
if these would not do a Battle would decide the controversy.
As there is a natural Society and a natural Government, so there is an artificial Society and an artificial Government. As our natural Couple became by time and Observation better Acquainted with themselves and each other, with their mutual Powers and Capacities of Body and mind, with their respective and mutual Wants [. . . .] and Vegetables most Usefull and most hurtfull or dangerous to [. . . .]3 became more constant regular and necessary and so would [. . . .]4 [exp]erience would soon render both more artificial. Reason would every day Suggest Improvements in the social Life, and at the same time Suggest the means of strengthening the Authority of one Party, and increasing the docility and Submission of the other.
Without tracing the Rise and Progress of the natural Society & Government of our natural Couple, through all their gradations, We may Suppose they begin to have Children and as We can make them as fruitfull as We please We may suppose they have two a year for twenty Years: or if this should shock you let them have twenty Children in twenty years. I shall not Say with Grotius that a Right of Empire over Children is acquired to Parents by the Act of Generation.5 I See no connection of any right with this Social Act. But the Instinct of Nature, of Love to the Child in the father and mother, the absolute Power they have over it, the Capacity they have to cherrish and nourish it, constitute an Absolute Authority, and more, not only a Right but a duty to govern it for their comfort and its own preservation, Growth improvement Perfection and Happiness. for their is no Certainty, no Knowledge no Science, more intuitive in my mind than this that Wisdom Goodness and Power united constitute, Right, Authority and Government in all conceivable Cases.
269This Authority is common to both Parents. For there being by our
Supposition, but one couple in the World, there can be no dispute about Fatherhood or
Motherhood. If questions arise between Father and Mother about the manner of nourishing
cherishing cloathing, or educating a Child or the Children, they must be decided by
Reasoning and persuation, by considerations of prudence and Utility, Convenience or
necessity, and if all these Resources fail, the controversy would be settled as all
others are by the Supream Power, the highest authority of Government in the Family or
the Ratio Ultima. But Government absolute Government over all the Children, must be
exercised over by the Father or Mother or both in
Harmony from their Births, through the first, Second and third at least of Shakespeares
seven Ages.6 Where then is your Society
founded in Wants without Government, all this While. I See no Symptom of any Society or
any Social Act, or exertion of Sociability without Government. Government grows out of
the Wants of the Man the Woman and all the Children, as soon as the Wants are felt and
before they can be Supplied.
I am &c
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “T. B. Adams.” Some loss of text where the signature was removed. Filmed at Feb. 1803.
The dating of this letter is based on
TBA’s reply of 25 Feb., below, which
acknowledged receipt of this letter and one of 2 Feb. on the same subject. In the 2
Feb. letter (Adams Papers), JA
wrote that his rumination on the origins of government and society was prompted by
James Thomson Callender’s commentary in the Richmond, Va., Recorder, 2 Dec. 1802. Callender reviewed Thomas Paine’s recent “Letters to
the Citizens of the United States,” for which see
TBA to JQA, 25 Jan.
1803, and note 2, above, supporting Paine’s attacks on JA and the
Federalists but chastising him for offering no critical assessment of Thomas Jefferson
and the Democratic-Republicans. In the course of his essay Callender endorsed Paine’s
opening statement in Common Sense, which claimed that
“society is produced by our wants, and government by our wickedness.” JA
agreed with the first part, that the efforts of humans to provide for their families
led to the development of society, but he rejected Paine’s contention that government
arose from a need to curb human wickedness. Instead he argued that it arose from the
submission of some in society to the rule of the wise or strong resulting in a greater
satisfaction of wants. JA concluded of Paine’s statement: “All those
Parts of Mr Paines Writings which have been read with Such
noisy applause in Bar Rooms, Alehouses and dram Shops, and have had the greatest
Effect in the World, are mere Jingles of Words” (Paine, Common
Sense, Phila., 1776, p. 1).
John Dryden, The Tempest; or, The
Enchanted Island, a Comedy, Act II, scene ii, lines 161–162.
Two or three words missing.
Three words missing.
Hugo Grotius, The Rights of War and
Peace, Book II, chap. v, para. 1.
Shakespeare, As You Like It, Act II,
scene vii, line 150.