Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15

John Adams to William Stephens Smith, 26 February 1803 Adams, John Smith, William Stephens
John Adams to William Stephens Smith
Dear Sir Quincy Feb. 26. 1803

I duely recd yours of the 16th with the Paper enclosed. I had given no Attention to the Attack upon you in Cheethams Paper, because I know that no Integrity of heart, no Purity of Conduct, or Innocence of Life can protect any Man from the Shafts of Calumny, in these times of party rage and under an elective Government, which breeds Passions and prejudices as fast as ever the sun upon the Slime of the Nile brought forth frogs:1 especially if a Man holds an office, which is covetted by numbers, and has Ennemies on both Sides.2 Our Papers are good for nothing but Advertisements, and I doubt whether We could get it printed. indeed I believe it is Scarcely worth while to excite any public Attention to the subject here. Your Character has not suffered here, on Account of it.

272

I recd and read with Attention Coriolanus. It is well written in a Simple clear and nervous Style, with a Knowledge of the subject, and with a Spirit, Decision and Intrepidity that I admire. I wish that our Government may not find reasons by a dear bought Experience to wish to regret that they did not at first adopt your the Project. The Compliments you pay to particular Characters you will not expect that I should approve or disapprove in this Letter. Your Faith in our Constitution that it can govern Canada, the West India Islands &c is Stronger than my grain of Mustard seed. your frank dissertation on an Alliance with England, altho it is not improper that our Nation should consider Such a contingent Possibility, I should not have thought it prudent to produce.3

The Pamphlet has raised your Reputation in this part among all who know the author: and it is written with so much respect to Authority that no reasonable Man can censure so frank and candid a submission of his sentiments to the public Opinion, by any free Citizen.— Since you have begun the Career of the Press I hope you will persevere: if you had begun twenty Years ago you might have done great things, eer now.

I rejoice to hear of the Welfare of my Daughter and your sons & Daughter. Make them Schollars. A taste for Letters, is a never failling source of Entertainment, and is usefull in every Station of Life. I am with the best Wishes for your Prosperity, sir your friend & sert

John Adams

RC (MH-H:Autograph File, A); internal address: “Col. smith.”; endorsed: “26th. Feby. 1803. / Jno. Adams / Quincy—” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 118.

1.

Exodus, 8:3.

2.

In his letter to JA of 16 Feb. (Adams Papers), WSS described attacks on his character in the New York American Citizen, 14, 18 Jan., a newspaper edited by James Cheetham. The attacks stemmed from allegations made by New York lawyer Robert Troup in a ship seizure case in which WSS had a role as surveyor for the port of New York. WSS was alleged to have improperly seized $500 from the plaintiff, merchant Ephraim Hart. WSS probably enclosed to JA the New York Evening Post, 15 Feb., which printed a series of five letters between WSS and Troup in which Troup withdrew his claims ( DAB , Burr, Political Correspondence , 2:761–763).

3.

WSS published nine letters under the pseudonym Coriolanus in the New York Morning Chronicle, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 24, 27, 30 Dec. 1802; 1, 10, 11, 12 Jan. 1803. He wrote the pieces in reaction to a 16 Oct. 1802 decree by the Spanish intendant of Louisana ending the right of American merchants to deposit goods duty-free in New Orleans warehouses. Spain, which continued to administer Louisiana after the territory’s 1800 retrocession to France, issued the decree to extract new duties on American goods. WSS echoed Federalist sentiment in declaring that the United States should join with Great Britain to wrest Louisiana and the Floridas from Spain and France, thus inaugurating a constitutional republic that would stretch from the West Indies to the Mississippi as “the largest empire that ever existed” (Morning Chronicle, 18 Dec. 1802). The Morning Chronicle, 24 Jan. 1803, announced that the series would be published as a pamphlet, Coriolanus, Remarks on the Late Infraction of Treaty at New-Orleans, N.Y., 1803, 273 Shaw-Shoemaker, No. 5075. On the same day the New York American Citizen printed a letter also signed Coriolanus that promised future letters on plans to colonize Louisiana by a “hopeful little band, with the brave, the humane and generous Col. W. S. S. at their head.” Objections by the Jefferson administration against a backdrop of Federalist calls for military action prompted Spain to reverse the decree on 1 March (Coriolanus, Remarks on the Late Infraction of Treaty at New-Orleans, p. 4–5, 6, 33, 41; David A. Carson, “The Role of Congress in the Acquisition of the Louisiana Territory,” Louisiana History, 26:372, 376, 380 [Autumn 1985]; Jefferson, Papers , 39:72).

Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Adams, 9 March 1803 Peabody, Elizabeth Smith Shaw Adams, Abigail
Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to Abigail Adams
My Dear Sister, Atkinson March 9th. 180’3

I hear by Dr Tufts that our Medford Farm will be greatly injured by the middlesex Canal being cut through the land—1 I am very sorry to have what little landed property I have destroyed— But I suppose it will do no service to object— People are so very economick, & publick spirited at this day, that every thing must be sacrificed to the common weal— But the President, & you my Sister know much more about the buisness than I, & whatever your better informed judgments conceive to be right, I shall consent to— The good Dr. declines taking any further care of the farm, for which I am exceedingly grieved, for I feel, as if I should never have confidence, in any Other person, as I could always repose in him—

I was glad to see your Son was chosen Senator.2 If he can have wisdom like an angel of God, & can stem the torrent of irreligion, & vice which threatens to deluge our Land, he may be more useful, perhaps, than in his Profession, & I hope eventually, it may prove for his interrest. I have known this winter a person who laboured under the like difficulty, which troubles your daughter Adams, & has found more releif from wearing the skin of musk Squash round her waist, than from any other thing she had ever done—3 But I suppose she will think it, like the king of Isreal, too small a thing, to submit to—

I was gratified to find my young friend was at Quincy— Her situation was truly trying—& yours too— She is at Newbury, I have not seen her—4

The youngest Daughter of the late judge Seargant was last Sabbath, consigned to the Grave, after about three months confinement with a consumption.— Lovely, blooming with health, & beautiful as Hebe she laid aside the bridal Attire, for the solemn humble garb of Death—5

These are some of the most trying scenes to which human nature is subjected— It seems as if the “Survivor died”—

274

I saw, & could not but feel an entire acquiescence in the perusal of the paper, that Miss Paine was released from a world of trouble, & I trust “through faith, & patience inherits the promise[”]—she has so long been waiting for—6

the bearer waits, & I can write no more, than to beg you to give, & present my kind regards to all who love your / affectionate Sister

Elizabeth Peabody

RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “[. . . .] / [Qu]incy”; docketed by JA: “E. Peabody to AA.” Some loss of text due to a torn manuscript.

1.

The Middlesex Canal, from the Merrimack River to Medford, Mass., was begun in Sept. 1794 and completed in Dec. 1802, and transport of goods from the interior of New Hampshire to Boston began, utilizing the Mystic River for the final leg into the city. Even before completion, officials began implementing plans for the canal’s extension to Boston along the Mystic’s southern bank, which would eliminate dependence on the river’s erratic tidal flow. The extension was ultimately constructed on a route through the eighty-acre Medford farm that AA and Peabody inherited from their father (vols. 10:265, 298; 13:569, 571; Boston Columbian Centinel, 1 Dec.; Carl Seaburg, Alan Seaburg, and Thomas Dahill, The Incredible Ditch, Medford, Mass., 1997, p. 26, 45; CFA, Diary , 3:xix). For TBA’s negotiation of compensation for right-of-way over the land, see TBA to James Sullivan, 23 Oct. 1804, and note 1, below.

2.

On 8 Feb. 1803 JQA was elected a U.S. senator from Massachusetts to replace Jonathan Mason. The Mass. house of representatives chose JQA on 3 Feb., after repeated ballots were taken in compliance with an informal arrangement by supporters of Timothy Pickering who agreed that if Pickering did not prevail in the early rounds they would throw their support to JQA. Seven candidates received votes in four ballots, JQA garnering 10, 6, and 56 votes on the first three before achieving the requisite majority of 86 on the fourth. On 8 Feb. the Mass. senate concurred by a vote of 19 to 7, electing JQA to a six-year term that began on 4 March. JQA completed his term in the state senate before taking his seat in the U.S. Senate on 21 Oct., four days after the first session of the 8th Congress convened. JQA wrote in his Diary that his election “will probably affect very materially my future situation in life,” while LCA recalled that the election meant “a change in our Situation tolerable in perspective but requiring great sacrifices of domestic comfort” (Boston Columbian Centinel, 5, 9 Feb.; A New Nation Votes; D/JQA/27, 3 Feb., 4 March, 31 Dec., APM Reel 30; U.S. Senate, Jour. , 8th Cong., 1st sess., p. 300; LCA, D&A , 1:184).

3.

LCA was in the midst of a difficult pregnancy and recalled after JA2’s birth “constant faintings and violent attacks of illness short in their duration, … these attacks being incident to my situation and always alarming as to their results.” As Peabody implied, medical texts prescribed compresses of melon pulp and seeds as a remedy for distempers of the bladder and kidneys and “to provoke Urine, and to allay the Heat of the Reins” (LCA, D&A , 1:185, 187; Noel Chomel, Dictionaire Oeconomique; or, The Family Dictionary, 2d rev. edn., 2 vols., London, 1725).

4.

Peabody offered further comment on the relationship between AHA and TBA in a 2 March letter to Mary Smith Cranch. Peabody reported that the couple “had long been struggling with a sincere attachment, founded upon a belief of each others virtue, & honour. I mentioned the affair to you, hoping you would do as prudence would direct.— Twenty times I thought I would relate the whole affair, for I have long been convinced if there were any meaning in language, that he was only endeavouring to establish himself in buisness, & get property, & Some independance that he might openly declare his intentions— I freely told her, that I thought the engagements had better be known. That to continue a correspondence of this nature, in a Clandestine way was what parents might consider undutiful— And that the affair had better be discreetly opened, let it turn as it would— And to let her friend know, that she could not consistent with her sentiments of delicacy, & prudence think it best to let things remain as they had done— It subjected her to 275 so many reflections, from every rank—Envy, & Curiosty being never asleep—” (DLC:Shaw Family Papers).

5.

Sarah Sargeant (b. 1774), one of six daughters of Nathaniel Peaslee Sargeant and Rhoda Barnard Sargeant, of Haverhill, Mass., died on 4 March. In describing her death, Peabody evoked Hebe, the daughter of Hera and Zeus (Edwin Everett Sargent, Sargent Record, St. Johnsbury, Vt., 1899, p. 30; Oxford Classical Dicy. ).

6.

Eunice Paine (b. 1733), sister of Robert Treat Paine and a friend of both AA and JA before their marriage, died in Boston on 2 February. Peabody quoted Hebrews, 6:12, in alluding to Paine’s long struggle with illness. An obituary in the New-England Palladium, 4 Feb., described an infirmity of fifty years’ duration and noted that in her last years she was “reduced to painful and helpless decripitude, till nature was exhausted with violent & incessant struggles, and she was released from her earthly prison” (vol. 5:388; Sarah Cushing Paine, Paine Ancestry, Boston, 1912, p. 24; The Papers of Robert Treat Paine, ed. Stephen T. Riley and Edward W. Hanson, Boston, 2005– , 2:175; JA, D&A , 1:123).