Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
th.180’3
I hear by Dr Tufts that our Medford Farm will be greatly injured by the middlesex Canal being cut through the land—1 I am very sorry to have what little landed property I have destroyed— But I suppose it will do no service to object— People are so very economick, & publick spirited at this day, that every thing must be sacrificed to the common weal— But the President, & you my Sister know much more about the buisness than I, & whatever your better informed judgments conceive to be right, I shall consent to— The good Dr. declines taking any further care of the farm, for which I am exceedingly grieved, for I feel, as if I should never have confidence, in any Other person, as I could always repose in him—
I was glad to see your Son was chosen Senator.2 If he can have wisdom like an angel of God, & can stem the torrent of irreligion, & vice which threatens to deluge our Land, he may be more useful, perhaps, than in his Profession, & I hope eventually, it may prove for his interrest. I have known this winter a person who laboured under the like difficulty, which troubles your daughter Adams, & has found more releif from wearing the skin of musk Squash round her waist, than from any other thing she had ever done—3 But I suppose she will think it, like the king of Isreal, too small a thing, to submit to—
I was gratified to find my young friend was at Quincy— Her situation was truly trying—& yours too— She is at Newbury, I have not seen her—4
The youngest Daughter of the late judge Seargant was last Sabbath,
consigned to the Grave, after about three months confinement with a consumption.—
Lovely, blooming with health, & beautiful as Hebe she laid aside the bridal Attire, for the solemn humble garb of Death—5
These are some of the most trying scenes to which human nature is subjected— It seems as if the “Survivor died”—
274I saw, & could not but feel an entire acquiescence in the perusal of the paper, that Miss Paine was released from a world of trouble, & I trust “through faith, & patience inherits the promise[”]—she has so long been waiting for—6
the bearer waits, & I can write no more, than to beg you to give, & present my kind regards to all who love your / affectionate Sister
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “[. . . .] / [Qu]incy”; docketed by JA: “E. Peabody to AA.” Some loss of text due to a torn manuscript.
The Middlesex Canal, from the Merrimack River to Medford, Mass.,
was begun in Sept. 1794 and completed in Dec. 1802, and transport of goods from the
interior of New Hampshire to Boston began, utilizing the Mystic River for the final
leg into the city. Even before completion, officials began implementing plans for the
canal’s extension to Boston along the Mystic’s southern bank, which would eliminate
dependence on the river’s erratic tidal flow. The extension was ultimately constructed
on a route through the eighty-acre Medford farm that AA and Peabody
inherited from their father (vols. 10:265, 298; 13:569, 571; Boston Columbian Centinel, 1 Dec.; Carl Seaburg, Alan Seaburg, and
Thomas Dahill, The Incredible Ditch, Medford, Mass.,
1997, p. 26, 45; CFA, Diary
, 3:xix). For TBA’s negotiation of compensation for
right-of-way over the land, see
TBA to James Sullivan, 23 Oct. 1804, and note 1, below.
On 8 Feb. 1803 JQA was elected a U.S. senator from
Massachusetts to replace Jonathan Mason. The Mass. house of representatives chose
JQA on 3 Feb., after repeated ballots were taken in compliance with an
informal arrangement by supporters of Timothy Pickering who agreed that if Pickering
did not prevail in the early rounds they would throw their support to
JQA. Seven candidates received votes in four ballots, JQA
garnering 10, 6, and 56 votes on the first three before achieving the requisite
majority of 86 on the fourth. On 8 Feb. the Mass. senate concurred by a vote of 19 to
7, electing JQA to a six-year term that began on 4 March.
JQA completed his term in the state senate before taking his seat in
the U.S. Senate on 21 Oct., four days after the first session of the 8th Congress
convened. JQA wrote in his Diary that his election “will probably affect
very materially my future situation in life,” while LCA recalled that the
election meant “a change in our Situation tolerable in perspective but requiring great
sacrifices of domestic comfort” (Boston Columbian
Centinel, 5, 9 Feb.; A New Nation
Votes; D/JQA/27, 3 Feb., 4 March, 31 Dec., APM Reel 30; U.S. Senate, Jour.
, 8th Cong.,
1st sess., p. 300; LCA, D&A
, 1:184).
LCA was in the midst of a difficult pregnancy and
recalled after JA2’s birth “constant faintings and violent attacks of
illness short in their duration, … these attacks being incident to my situation and
always alarming as to their results.” As Peabody implied, medical texts prescribed
compresses of melon pulp and seeds as a remedy for distempers of the bladder and
kidneys and “to provoke Urine, and to allay the Heat of the Reins” (LCA, D&A
, 1:185, 187; Noel Chomel, Dictionaire Oeconomique; or, The Family Dictionary, 2d rev. edn., 2 vols.,
London, 1725).
Peabody offered further comment on the relationship between
AHA and TBA in a 2 March letter to Mary Smith Cranch.
Peabody reported that the couple “had long been struggling with a sincere attachment,
founded upon a belief of each others virtue, & honour. I mentioned the affair to
you, hoping you would do as prudence would direct.— Twenty times I thought I would
relate the whole affair, for I have long been convinced if there were any meaning in
language, that he was only endeavouring to establish himself in buisness, & get
property, & Some independance that he might openly declare his intentions— I
freely told her, that I thought the engagements had better be known. That to continue
a correspondence of this nature, in a Clandestine way was what parents might consider
undutiful— And that the affair had better be discreetly
opened, let it turn as it would— And to let her friend
know, that she could not consistent with her sentiments of delicacy, &
prudence think it best to let things remain as they had done— It subjected her to 275 so many reflections, from every rank—Envy, &
Curiosty being never asleep—” (DLC:Shaw
Family Papers).
Sarah Sargeant (b. 1774), one of six daughters of Nathaniel
Peaslee Sargeant and Rhoda Barnard Sargeant, of Haverhill, Mass., died on 4 March. In
describing her death, Peabody evoked Hebe, the daughter of Hera and Zeus (Edwin
Everett Sargent, Sargent Record, St. Johnsbury, Vt.,
1899, p. 30;
Oxford
Classical Dicy.
).
Eunice Paine (b. 1733), sister of Robert Treat Paine and a friend
of both AA and JA before their marriage, died in Boston on 2
February. Peabody quoted Hebrews, 6:12, in alluding to Paine’s long struggle with
illness. An obituary in the New-England Palladium, 4
Feb., described an infirmity of fifty years’ duration and noted that in her last years
she was “reduced to painful and helpless decripitude, till nature was exhausted with
violent & incessant struggles, and she was released from her earthly prison” (vol.
5:388; Sarah Cushing
Paine, Paine Ancestry, Boston, 1912, p. 24; The Papers of Robert Treat Paine, ed. Stephen T. Riley and
Edward W. Hanson, Boston, 2005– , 2:175; JA, D&A
, 1:123).
th:March 1803.
I have received your favors of the 18th: ult: and 2d: instant, the latter enclosing a
valuable communication from my father; for which please to express my thanks.1 I have taken note of those “thoughts on the
times,” and will make use of them. I hope Mr:
Ames, will continue to expand his thoughts on those
topics.2 The Port Folio begins to get
into some favor all over the Country, and the coldness which prevailed for a
considerable time towards it, in consequence of what was conceived, even by its best
friends to be rashness & intemperance, which no party in this Country, dared to
countenance, is now gradually wearing away. The politics of the paper, are not changed,
but ameliorated; the public judgment & feeling is not now insulted by arrogant
contrasts & odious comparisons. The vices and the wildness of democratic councils,
are exposed with boldness unmixed with rancour. The main design of the paper is
literature, not politics, but there is such an abundance of political fervor throughout
the Country; such an avidity to read skilfull strictures upon men & things, that the
political department must not be neglected.
I received some-time since, a letter from Mr: van der Kemp, my father’s old acquaintance, accompanied by a voluminous
manuscript, purporting to be an history of the Achæan Republick—dedicated to “the genius of France,” to wit the Emperor of the Gauls. The
letter expressed a wish that I would undertake to revise
the manuscript, which is written in English, such as a
Dutchman might be supposed to write. Had it been written in the author’s mother-tongue,
the task of translating it into English would have been much easier to me, though I
would not have undertaken even that labour for an 276 hundred pounds—poor
as I am; so that I shall, after having kept the sheets, a decent length of time, very
civilly transmit them to the proprietor.3
I enclose you a small paper, printed at Georgetown (Ptmk) which
contains the first part of JQA—s Oration, extracted from the Charlestown Courier, a
paper of promise lately established at the Capital of So
Carolina. A favorable review of it has appeared at New York and will be republished
here.4
I hope the inflamation in your eye, is gone ere this. Present me kindly to my father & the rest of the family, and believe me ever your’s
RC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “Mrs: A Adams.”
AA’s 18 Feb. letter to TBA is partially
extant in two fragments comprising the dateline, AA’s signature, and
three half-sentences pertaining to AHA: “to give the Lady reason to think
[. . . .] altho I did not think consider myself
[. . . .] not having been consulted. Yet I” (Adams Papers, Adams Office Manuscripts). In her letter of 2 March (MB:Ch.M.1.7 [64]), AA informed
TBA that she was troubled by an inflammation of the eyes and that she
was sending the first extracts of JA’s translation of Antoine Marie Héron
de Villefosse, Essais sur I’histoire de la Révolution
française, par une société d’auteurs latins, Paris, 1799, which denounced the
French Revolution as “a delirium of terror.” The translation was printed anonymously
in the Port Folio, 3:90 (19 March), 114–115 (9 April),
121–122 (16 April), 129–130 (23 April), 138–139 (30 April), 145–147 (7 May), but the
enclosure has not been found (François Adriaan Van der Kemp to JA, 15
Dec. 1802, Adams Papers; Kerber and Morris, “The Adams Family and the
Port Folio,” p. 476).
AA in her letter of 2 March 1803 recommended that
TBA read a two-part series of “Thoughts on the Times” in the New-England Palladium, 25 Feb., 1 March. The unsigned
articles, which AA attributed to Fisher Ames, warned that the “vilest
excesses” of the French Revolution could occur in the United States if a “mob”
comprised of a “one hundredth part of our population” was not reined in.
Letter and enclosure not found. Dutch anti-Orangist Patriot
François Adriaan Van der Kemp (1752–1829), who immigrated to the United States in 1788
and settled in Oneida County, N.Y., wrote to JA on 24 March 1802 (Adams Papers), asking him to critique his “A
Sketch of the Achaian Republic,” in which Van der Kemp considered how the Netherlands
and the United States could avoid the factionalism that splintered the classical
Achaean League. JA responded on 24 July, calling the work “a valuable
Addition to American Litterature,” and he wrote again on 3 Jan. 1803 (both PHi:John Adams’ Papers) to suggest that
Van der Kemp send the manuscript to TBA, who might edit it and give it to
Joseph Dennie Jr. for publication in the Port Folio. Van
der Kemp did so, but TBA returned it with the message that Dennie
declined to publish it. When Van der Kemp informed JA of
TBA’s message in a letter of 15 July (Adams Papers), he also reported that he sent the manuscript
to Leyden printer Jean Luzac. Van der Kemp continued to circulate copies of the work,
inquiring of JA as late as 12 Sept. 1824 (Adams Papers) whether JQA had read a copy he
had sent. The work was never published, and a manuscript copy is at NUtHi:Van der Kemp Papers.
The dedication quoted by TBA was a phrase that
Napoleon reportedly used in 1800 to describe himself, though the extant version of Van
der Kemp’s work is dedicated to George Washington instead (vol. 4:267; JA, D&A
, 2:456;
Harry F. Jackson, Scholar in the Wilderness: Francis Adrian
Van der Kemp, Syracuse, N.Y., 1963, p. 176–183; Peter Van Cleave, Revolt,
Religion, and Dissent in the Dutch-American Atlantic: Francis Adrian van der Kemp’s
Pursuit of Civil and Religious Liberty, Arizona State Univ., Ph.D. diss., 2014, p.
144–148; “Foreign Intelligence,” Edinburgh Magazine,
15:498 [Dec. 1800]).
The enclosure, which has not been found, 277 was the Georgetown, D.C., Olio, 4 March 1803, which printed part of JQA’s Forefathers’ Day
address, for which see
TBA to JQA, 5 Jan., and note 9, above. The
newspaper called the address a “happy combination of the
perspicuous, the majestic, the nervous and the pathetic.” The 11 March issue
printed the remainder. Both were reprinted from the Charleston
Courier, 10, 11 Feb., which was founded on 10 Jan. by Loring Andrews, a native
of Hingham, Mass., who in the first issue declared it a Federalist newspaper. Notices
of JQA’s oration were also printed in the New York Evening Post and the New-York
Gazette, both 31 Dec. 1802 (A. S. Salley Jr., comp., Marriage Notices in Charleston Courier, 1803–1808, Columbia, S.C., 1919, p.
3).