Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
th[
6] 1804
I recieved your kind favour of the 24th
Yesterday morning never did a letter prove more welcome as I had suffer’d a great degree
of anxiety at not hearing from you it is three weeks since the date of your last and I
was very apprehensive you had been prevented from writing by indisposition I am wretched
if you do not write me once a week at least to inform of your health— It is perhaps
fancy my most loved friend but from the stile of your two last letters it appears to me
that your spirits are unusually depressed which gives me real uneasiness1 I cannot indulge a hope that my absence can have
produced this effect as we are less together at Quincy than at any other time however
let the cause my best friend be what it may I am ready and willing to return home
immediately and to do every thing in my power to lessen the heavy burthen which I hourly
feel I am become I brought you nothing and therefore have no claim on you whatever my
life ever has been and ever must remain a life of painful obligation cease then to talk
of expence on my account had I imagined my remaining here would have proved more
expensive than living at your Farm I should never have proposed it if you will send the
means of return I will with pleasure take charge of the Children provided you will let
me bring one of my Sisters to assist me Women frequently do such things and I am not more timid than the rest of my Sex As for the House while my family are obliged to live upon the bounty of others any
house is good enough for me I believe I never made any objection to it I only said that
in the state you represented your affairs to be that it would be both imprudent and
inconsistent to build. I think you had better make what alterations you please and as
soon as possible if Mrs Adams could reside there with four
Children I can certainly live there with two—
You have seen by the papers I suppose the loss the President has
371 sustain’d Mrs Epps died
of an Abcess in her breast producd by a cold taken during her confinement she was
removed in a litter to Monticello where for a day or two she appear’d to recover which
raised her fathers hopes and render’d the shock more bitter2 Mrs. Maddisson says
this stroke as been almost too severe for him she was his favorite Child—
Our English friends have got into more difficulties but I do not
exactly know of what nature some persons slave in the Country was employed by the
domestics as report says and upon application of the Master they refused to give him up
upon which the man took a Constable to the House and carried of his slave the right power of the Constable in that House is the
question in dispute I understand and will probably be made a national question—3
I was at Stewards yesterday he has finished all the Pictures we saw
and several others he has now a most beautiful likeness of Mrs. Merry I do not like Mrs. Bonaparte’s at all
though a very fine likeness—4
The Children are both well George is grown half an inch since the last time you measur’d him the rest of us are well
Adieu my beloved friend remember me affectionately to your family and believe there is no human being who loves you half as well as your faithful and affectionate wife
P.S. John T. Mason has just lost his Uncle who has left him between four and five hundred thousand dollars5
RC (Adams
Papers); addressed: “John Q. Adams Esqr.”;
endorsed: “L. C. Adams. 12. 6. May 1804. / 16. May red: /
20. May Ansd:”; notation by LCA: “I have made
a mistake in the date / as to day is only the 6th of
May.”
JQA’s previous two letters to LCA were dated 15 and 24 April, for which see the latter, and note 2, above.
For the death of Mary Jefferson Eppes, see AA’s letter to Thomas Jefferson of 20 May, below.
On 2 May Henry Scott, an enslaved man in the employ of the
British minister Anthony Merry, was forcibly removed from Merry’s residence and
imprisoned, ostensibly because he hired himself to Merry without the permission of his
slaveholder, “Mrs. Stone.” Stone’s agent, Henry Suttle, claimed that he had negotiated
a separate work arrangement for the man but that Scott violated this when he sought
employment with Merry, for whom he had previously worked. Suttle then enlisted the aid
of a constable named Edwards, and Scott was removed from Merry’s home. Two days after
the incident Merry appealed to James Madison, claiming that the removal constituted a
violation of diplomatic protocol. Although Merry questioned the veracity of the
circumstances, the breach of privilege that the removal represented was more
significant to him because, he wrote, “My Consent to the Measure had not been obtained
by any previous Communication to me on the Subject from the Government of the United
States.” The secretary of state sought the attorney general’s opinion, but Levi
Lincoln found no legal precedent for the situation and believed the whole furor would
have been avoided if Merry had been notified before Scott’s capture. Suttle eventually
apologized to Merry, claiming he was unaware of 372 the political
implications of his action, and no legal action appears to have been taken (Madison, Papers,
Secretary of State Series
, 7:150–152, 154, 193–198, 205–207).
Artist Gilbert Stuart rented a studio in Washington, D.C., from
Dec. 1803 to July 1805, executing portraits of capital visitors, including Elizabeth
Patterson Bonaparte and Elizabeth Death Leathes Merry, and Washington residents, like
Anna Maria Brodeau Thornton, for which see Descriptive List of Illustrations, No. 5, above (Charles
Merrill Mount, “Gilbert Stuart in Washington: With a Catalogue of His Portraits
Painted between December 1803 and July 1805,” Columbia Hist. Soc., Records
,
48:81, 87, 93, 125, 126 [1971–1972]). See also
LCA to JQA, 29 May 1804,
and note 5, below.
For John Thomson Mason’s inheritance, see LCA to JQA, 29 May, and note 2, below.
th1804
I recieved your favor of the 3d three
days since it gave me real pleasure as you appear to be in good spirits and write much
more cheerfully than you have done some time past—1
I was much surprized at the change you mention in Mrs. Whitcombs person she wrote Caroline she had been unwell
but I did not think she had been seriously sick—
I have just done reading Madame de Staals new Novel which makes so
much noise in the fashionable world. I scarcely dare form
much more give an opinion of it the language is most
beautiful but the morals appear to me detestable her characters appear to me to be very much overdrawn and the faults of her hero
and heroine are so dressed as to wear the semblance of virtue I wish very much that you
would read it as there are several letters in it which I should like to know your
oponion of one of these letters is on the subject of divorce it is in general much
approved but it strikes me in a very different light in this letter she asks how it is
possible if we represent the Deity to ourselves as merciful and good to imagine that any
vows can bind us during life upon this idea she recommends
every body to divorce as soon as they upon trial find that
there dispositions do not accord this letter is I am told very much admired I think I
must have misundertood it very much for it appears to me calculated to destroy every
moral principal to destroy every tie which binds society together—2
Mr: & Mrs. Law are really seperated She says she has made a Vow never to live with him
and he has very generously declared her insanity to be the cause of his parting from Mrs. L. retires into
the Country though she says only for a time Mr. L. goes to
England and the child is to be taken from her mother and placed at a Boarding School
this is setting the opinion of the world at defiance3 I never 373 wish to court it but
I should dread it too much ever to set it at defiance—
Adieu my beloved friend write me soon and indulge me by reading this book though the last Vol. is Sentiment on stilts I am sure your mother would like to read it and it would afford her great amusement do not let any one see what I write you as it would destroy all the pleasure I feel when writing to you and though I am now a wretched correspondent time and a sincere desire to please may improve me—
Our Children are both well I have wean’d John and have got over this painful business without much difficulty he has never slept from me one night—
Our family are all pretty well Harriet is so much reduced she is now thinner than I am however she does not complain they all desire to be remember’d to yourself and friends time rolls heavily along my beloved friend and this delightful season seems to me to have lost its greatest charm it is my own fault and I must not complain Adieu believe me most sincerely and affectionately yours
RC (Adams
Papers); addressed: “John Q Adams Esqr.”;
endorsed: “L. C. Adams 13. May. 1804. / 22. May recd: /
25. May. Ansd:.”
An inadvertence; JQA’s letter was that of 2 May, above.
Anne Louise Germaine Necker, Baronne Staël von Holstein (Madame
de Staël), Delphine, 6 vols., Geneva, 1802, was widely
reprinted and translated. The original French edition was first advertised in the
United States in May 1803, and an English translation was advertised in June. A
“remarkable work” that achieved commercial success in Paris, it was, like many of her
other works, subsequently banned by Napoleon for its critique on French society. Set
in an epistolary style, the novel addresses divorce in Letter XVII (New York Commercial Advertiser, 11 May; New York Daily Advertiser, 8 June; Francine du Plessix Gray, Madame de Staël: The First Modern Woman, N.Y., 2008, p.
112).
Thomas and Elizabeth Parke Custis Law legally separated on 9 Aug.
1804. Their daughter, Eliza (1797–1822), was placed at the French boarding school run
by Deborah Grelaud in Philadelphia. Thomas initially went to Bath, Va., while
Elizabeth went to stay with her aunt Rosalie Stier Calvert at Riversdale near
Bladensburg, Md. (Clark, Greenleaf and Law
, p. 285; Mistress of Riversdale: The Plantation Letters of Rosalie Stier Calvert,
1795–1821, ed. Margaret Law Callcott, Baltimore, 1991, p. x, 97, 336; Lucy
Leigh Bowie, “Madame Grelaud’s French School,” Maryland
Historical Magazine, 39:141–142 [1944]; Thomas Law to John Law, 4 Sept., ViMtvL:Peter Family Papers).