Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15

453 Thomas Boylston Adams to James Sullivan, 23 October 1804 Adams, Thomas Boylston Sullivan, James
Thomas Boylston Adams to James Sullivan
Gentlemen Quincy 23d: October 1804.

Having waited some time in expectation of an answer to the last proposal, which I had the honor to submit to your consideration relative to the settlement of the dispute between the proprietors of the Middlesex Canal Company & the owners of the Teel farm at Medford, I am induced once more to call the attention of the Gentlemen of the Committee to this subject.1 The Season is already so far advanced that the removal of the house will not easily be effected this Autumn, unless the Committee should be persuaded to give orders for an immediate commencement of the work, & my instructions are such as will preclude me from giving any attention to the subject of compensation for damages, until the house is placed as remote from injury or inconvenience as it was before the Canal was cut before it.

The proposition of the Committee made some time since, to give the owners of the Teel farm an equal quantity of land in exchange for that which was taken by the Corporation—has not grown into much favor by being maturely considered. It is hoped the Committee will think of some indemnity more likely to meet acceptance.

It would be esteemed a favor, if the Committee would give a prompt attention to this business, and for my own convenience I will beg leave to suggest that a speedy answer would be very acceptable, as I have now an opportunity of conferring with all the proprietors; as the agent of whom / I have the honor to be, very respectfully / Gentlemen, / Your very hb̃le Servt

T. B. Adams.

RC (MHi:Richard Frothingham Papers); addressed: “Honble: James Sullivan Esqr / President of the Middlesex Canal Compy / Boston”; internal address: “Honble: James Sullivan Esqr: / Chairman of a Committee of the / Middlesex Canal Compy &ca”; endorsed: “Thos Adams Esqr’s / letter respecting / Teel farm. / Oct 23rd 1804.—”

1.

An extension of the Middlesex Canal from Medford to Boston along the banks of the Mystic River cut through the Medford farm inherited by AA and her sisters from their father, for which see Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to AA, 9 March 1803, Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody from their father, for which see Peabody to AA, 9 March 1803, and note 1, above. The property was called Teel farm after its tenant, Benjamin Teel. The company did not negotiate compensation prior to cutting the canal through the property. Sullivan, as the company’s president, wrote to TBA on 6 Aug. 1804, proposing that the company trade six acres of contiguous land “in exchange for what we take from you; and a reasonable Sum be paid for removing the house over the canal on higher ground Where it may stand near the new road proposed by you.” TBA responded on 8 Aug. that he would visit Medford to view the tendered property (both MHi:Richard Frothingham Papers). As this letter indicates, TBA accepted the offer to move the house but rejected the property exchange. After he prepared documents to file suit seeking damages in 1805, the dispute 454 was settled on 14 May 1806 when the canal company paid JA, AA, and the Peabodys $800 for a strip of land comprising 4 ½ acres (vol. 5:472; TBA to William Smith Shaw, 24 April 1805, 5 Sept., both MHi:Misc. Bound Coll.; JA, “A plan of President Adams land taken for Middlesex Canal … to draw the deed by,” 21 April 1806, MH-BA:Baldwin Papers; Middlesex South Registry of Deeds, Cambridge:Middlesex County Deeds, 180:24–25).

Abigail Adams to Thomas Jefferson, 25 October 1804 Adams, Abigail Jefferson, Thomas
Abigail Adams to Thomas Jefferson
Sir Quincy october 25 1804

Sickness for three weeks past, has prevented my acknowledging the receipt of Your Letter of Sep’br th 11th. when I first addrest You I little thought of entering into a correspondence with you upon political topicks. I will not however regreet it, since it has led to Some Elucidations and brought on some explanations, which place in a more favourable light occurrences which had wounded me.

Having once entertained for you a respect and esteem, founded upon the Character of an affectionate Parent, a kind Master, a candid and benevolent Friend, I could not suffer different political opinions to obliterate them from my mind, and I felt the truth of the observation, that the Heart is long, very long in receiving the conviction that is forced upon it by reason. Affection Still lingers in the Bosom, even after esteem has taken its flight. It was not untill after circumstances concured to place You in the light of a Rewarder and encourager of a Libeller whom You could not but detest and despise, that I withdrew the esteem I had long entertaind for You. Nor can you wonder Sir that I should consider as personal unkindnesses the instances I have mentiond. I am pleased to find that, which respected my Son, all together unfounded. he was as you conjecture appointed a commissoner of Bankrupcy together with Judge Daws, and continued to serve in it, with perfect Satisfaction to all parties, at least I never heard the contrary, untill Superseded by a new appointment.1 The Idea Sugested, that no one was in office, merely because it was not perminant, and concequently no removal could take place, I cannot consider in any other light, than what the Gentlemen of the Law would term a quible—as Such I pass it— Judge Daws was continued; or reappointed which placed mr Adams in a more conspicuous light, as the object of personal resentment. nor could I upon this occasion refrain calling to mind the last visit you made me at Washington, when in the course of conversation You assured me, that if it should Lay in Your power to serve me or my family, nothing would give You more pleasure. I will do you the justice to Say at this hour: that I believe what you then said, you then 455 meant. With respect to the office it was a Small object, but the disposition of the Remover was considered by me as the barbed arrow. this however by your declaration, is withdrawn from my mind. With the public it will remain, and here Sir may I be permitted to pause—and ask you whether in your ardent zeal, and desire to rectify the mistakes, and abuses as you may consider them, of the former administrations, You are not led into measures Still more fatal to the constitution and more derogatory to Your honour, and independence of Character? pardon me Sir if I say, that I fear You are.

I know from the observations which I have made that there is not a more difficult part devolves upon a chief Majestrate, nor one which subjects him to more reproach, and censure than the appointments to office, and all the Patronage which this enviable power gives him, is but a poor compensation for the responsibility to which it subjects him— it would be well however to weigh and consider Characters as it respects their Moral Worth and integrity. he who is not true to himself, nor just to others, seeks an office for the benifit of himself, unmindfull of that of his Country.

I cannot agree, in opinion, that the constitution ever meant to withhold from the National Government, the power of Self defence, or that it could be considerd, an infringment of the Liberty of the press, to punish the licentiousness of it;

Time Sir must determine, and posterity will judge with more candour, and impartiality, I hope than the conflicting parties of our Day, what measures have best promoted the happiness of the people; what raised them from a State of depression and degradation to Wealth, honor, and Reputation; what has made them affluent at home, and respected abroad, and to whom ever the tribute is due to them may it be given—

I will not Sir any further intrude upon Your time, but close this correspondence, by my Sincere wishes, that you may be directed to that path which may terminate in the prosperity and happiness of the people over whom You are placed, by administring the Government with a just and impartial hand.

Be assured Sir that no one Will more rejoice in your Success than

Abigail Adams.2

RC (DLC:Jefferson Papers). Dft (Adams Papers). Tr (Adams Papers); APM Reel 327.

1.

Thomas Dawes Jr. (1757–1825) was a bankruptcy commissioner for Massachusetts who often worked and socialized with JQA. On 7 July 1802, Dawes was the only commissioner whom Jefferson reappointed under the Judiciary Act of 1802 (vol. 8:195; D/JQA/24, 456 24 Feb. 1802, 6 May, 20 July, APM Reel 27; Madison, Papers, Secretary of State Series , 4:237).

2.

At the close of the Dft of this letter, JA wrote the following: “Quincy Nov. 19. 1804 The whole of this Correspondence was begun and conducted without my Knowledge or Suspicion. Last Evening and this Morning at the desire of Mrs Adams I read the whole. I have no remarks to make upon it at this time and in this place. / J. Adams.” While JQA would move into Jefferson’s political orbit and party in the coming years, JA and AA did not correspond with Jefferson again until 1812 and 1813, respectively.