Papers of John Adams, volume 20
r19
th.1789.
Though I know your extreme Delicacy as to any Interference in the
executive Affairs of the U.Ss. yet to you I must apply; for, Heaven &
Secretary Jackson know I may be chagrined in an Attempt to address the President.
I am in Dread least an Action should take Place which will renew
the Vigour of the Opponents & damp the Spirit of the Friends of Government: And, it
will be out of Time to await the Motions of a deliberate
Legislature
The enclosed Copy of a Letter will explain my Dread.1 If it appears well-founded and of sufficient
Importance to call for a speedy Remedy, a very mild but efficacious one may be
suggested. The President may see the circular Instruction
of Octr 31st. and advise that it
be immediately followed by another stating the Point “to
appear, upon Review, to be of such a Kind as to need, perhaps, Legislative Attention”;
and therefore proposing to the Collectors to stay all Proceedings therein “till they
hear again from the Treasury.[”]
I am totally rong in my Conceptions of the Business, or else it may be expected that one single Suit commenced in each of the States would produce a Multitude of News paper Suggestions of a very unpleasant Sort both respecting the General Government and its new Law Courts.
Am I consummately impudent in this
Application? Whatever may be your Judgement of it, you may be assured I will attribute
so much of that Charge to myself as to keep my Doings herein a profound Secret.—
I am endeavouring to break the Neck of some Enemies to the french
Consulate here. You must know I admire that Institution, because by the Kings
Ordonnances it’s Chancery has all the Spirit & Essence of our Jury of Equals.
The Herald inclosed proclaims my first
Onset, as the Printer of it 191 did not feel my sly
Knock at his Licentiousness so sensibly as to refuse me the
Use of his Types.2
Here, I am aground: For, as your Lady has all my Regards, what have I left for You? The Jus Mariti3 must relieve me. Demand your Quantum from the
Bone of your Bone or as RTP Esquire would quaintly gallicize it—from that Bonne of You Bon.
RC and enclosure (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency /
John Adams”; endorsed: “Mr Lovel 19. Decr. / 1789.”
Lovell enclosed a copy of his 17 Dec. letter to Benjamin Lincoln,
expressing reluctance to comply with the collector’s 16 Dec. request for a record of
Boston imports from 1 to 10 August. Once the Tariff Act took effect on 1 Aug.,
importers were required to pay certain customs, but they were allowed a grace period
until local collecting houses were established; in Boston, they were formally created
on 10 August. Lovell argued that an interim collection was unfair to importers who had
sold their goods and that it targeted ports with better records. Responding to
critics, Alexander Hamilton sent a circular letter on 31 Oct. to the nation’s port
collectors stipulating that while customs must be collected to fund the debt,
moderation was key. The backlash continued, and on 30 Dec. Hamilton again issued a
circular letter. There, the treasury secretary admitted that the new policy was
problematic, and he recommended that Congress revise the plan in its second session
(Hamilton, Papers
, 5:478–479; 6:39, 290).
Despite his lack of an appointment, Lovell continued to monitor
the politics of the port. When Philippe André Joseph de Létombe, the French consul at
Boston, was suspected of forcing a French intendant to sign for supplies that may not
have been delivered, Lovell intervened in the press. He trained his criticism on
Létombe’s accuser, Louis Baury de Bellerive. Originally from St. Domingue, Bellerive
(1754–1807) was a French officer who fought in the Continental Army and aided in the
suppression of Shays’ Rebellion. Claiming that the charge was “false in the
groundwork,” Lovell issued a four-letter defense of Létombe, which began appearing in
Edmund Freeman’s Herald of Freedom the day before Lovell
wrote this letter to JA. Bellerive fired back via the same newspaper,
replying that Lovell had “too much of my contempt to merit further notice” (vol. 14:159; Boston Herald of Freedom, 18, 22, 25 Dec. 1789, 5 Jan. 1790; Reports of Committees of the House of Representatives Made
during the First Session of the Thirty-second Congress, Washington, D.C., 1852,
147:1;
AFC
, 9:173).
On the mounting significance of fraud in New England ports, see Stephen Higginson’s
letter of 21 Dec. 1789, and
note 1, below.
The legal right of a husband to acquire his wife’s estate by
virtue of marriage (Black, Law Dictionary
).
r.19
th.1789
Yours of the 17th. of Sepr. I have been honored with.— I truly esteem myself so by
every Mark of Your Attention— Your unexpected Visit to Boston prevented an Answer
sooner— My Concern as a Friend to my Country is awakened at the Account You give of some
disagreable Symptoms attending Your Breast upon close attention, 192 and in publick speaking. How we can spare You from the first I scarce can tell.— But
you must somewhat abate in the Severity of it— As to the latter, Reading &c, I would
advise that You let one of the Clerks do all the publick Reading, even every Motion
made— I know many Explanations and Observations, Opinions &c &c must be expected
from the Chair; but you have a peculiar Faculty of speaking multum in parvo—
I was very glad to find upon my Return that my Family had found out
your Son:— He had taken up Lodgings and could not be tempted to release them. His very
agreable Manners and Improvements rendered Him too entertaining to cause any Regret, but
that of His too suddenly leaving the Town— We hope Mr. Adams
and His, will never pass Us without Notice—1
You must be right, and I stand corrected as to the Time of the Prediction &c I heretofore alluded to— It must have been,—I well remember it was at Philadelphia— The Matter, and the Effect of it, as it struck my Mind, and to all Appearance every Member present I never can forget.— I have mentioned it a hundred Times, tho’ not the Author, save to a very few—
You may remember when I had the Honor of seeing you at New-York
last Sept.— I informed You, Our Assembly had been called
specially, after I left Newport.— That it boded no good;—and I was confident the Govr. had been induced to it, by His Friends who were alarmed at
what might take Place in the New House at Octr. sessions,—
And therefore were determined by some Means or other, if possible to raise some
Difficulty in Their Way:— It turned out so:— The special Assembly, (at which I arrived
in Time to be mortified with Their Conduct)—directed Town-Meetings to be called to give
their new Members Instructions— Those New members had been appointed in Consequence of
the Alteration which had greatly taken Place in the Minds of the People as to the Paper
Mony System: But the People still not so much relenting in Their Opposition to the New
Constitution did indeed instruct Their Members agt. a
Convention— Upon Consultation out of the House, we found most of the new members would
have risked giving a Vote for a Convention, if the Disposition of the People had been
any way flattering, of Success in a Convention— This not being the Case, it was thought
prudent, the members should conduct agreably to Their Instructions, thereby to continue
Their Credit with Their Constituents, till They might be induced to more favourable
Sentiments of the New Constitution— With this Opinion the old Fœderal Members
politically 193 coincided Our Assembly again sits the second Monday
of January— The Ground is considerably changed since the Instructions given last
October. The Amendments have been sent forth by Congress, And North Carolina by a very
large Majority have acceeded to the Union, And for which I sincerely give You Joy.
What effect those Circumstances may have we cannot possitively conclude. We have been often deceived in Our Hopes, and I do not wish to be sanguine— As to interested Motives, I know of none of much Importance, that we can advance to Our Country Members that have not been already urged, that will operate till the next Fall upon Them—While Our merchantile Interest on the fifteenth of January will be in a most deplorable State— It has been an unhappy Circumstance hitherto, that nothing could be done by which the merchantile and Country Interest should be affected at the same Time,—And unless the merchantile Interest is indulged till next Fall, They must suffer and severely too, at least nine Months before the Country Interest can be much affected— This however upon the Supposition that there should not be a voluntary giving up of former Sentiments, or the Measures of Congress should not prove sufficient Inducements to lead Our People to a Spirit of Condescention—
I was at New Haven the begining of Novr. where I placed my Son under President Stiles, in the second Year.—2 I arrived there two Hours after His Excellency
The President, had left the Town on His Return to New-York—3
I hope You have refreshed Your Body and Spirits by Your Journey;
and that you found Mrs. Adams & Family well— Be pleased
to present my Respects & Compliments—
I am most truly / Your old and / sincere Friend
y:Marchant
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “His Excellency John Adams Esqr.”; endorsed: “Marchant. 19. Decr / 1790 / answered March
20.”
Passing through Newport, R.I., on 10 Sept. and again on 6 Oct.,
JQA briefly recorded meeting Marchant and his wife, Rebecca Cooke, on
11 Sept. (
AFC
, 8:417,
445;
D/JQA/14, APM Reel 17).
William Marchant (1774–1857), of Newport, Yale 1792, later served
as chief justice of the Court of Common Pleas in Rhode Island (Dexter, Yale
Graduates
, 5:30).
As part of his New England tour, George Washington visited New
Haven from 17 to 19 Oct. and met Gov. Samuel Huntington, Lt. Gov. Oliver Wolcott Sr.,
and Mayor Roger Sherman. The president heard two addresses, one by state lawmakers and
another by Congregationalist clergy, and replied with thanks for the “tender interest
which you have taken in my personal happiness, and the obliging manner in which you
express yourselves on the restoration of my health.” After a trip to Yale College,
Washington learned about the area’s linen manufacturers and glassworks (Washington, Diaries
, 5:463–466, 467; Connecticut
Journal, 21 Oct.).