Papers of John Adams, volume 20

Jabez Bowen to John Adams, 28 December 1789 Bowen, Jabez Adams, John

From Jabez Bowen

Sir Providence Decmr 28. 1789

I Congratulate you on the accession of No. Carolina to the general Government. our Antis are Thunderstruck at the News more especially as the Majority was so large.1 I have waited several Days to find out what they intend to do wheather to agree to Call a Convention, or stand out longer; in hopes that something would Turn up to 199 perplex the New-Government. They are not well agreed among themselves. But the Heads of the party lately proposed (at one of their Night meetings) that the Duties on all Goods Imported should be put verry low (say one pr Cent.) and that our Ports should be opened to all the World (or in other words that Rd Island should be the St Estatia 2 of the North).3

The Consequences of such a proceedure can be better seen into by you Sir than by me—and I have no Idea that Congress will suffer such a set of people to remain impure in the verry middle of their Teritorys.

Our Genl: Assembly meets on the second Monday of January— when we shall muster all our Forces to procure a Vote for a State Convention. if we fail ’tis proposed by the most Respectable Inhabitants of the Towns of Newport Providence Bristol &c to seperate from the State Government provided Congress will protect us, and we wish to know thro some safe medium wheather This Idea meets the approbation of Congress, or wheather some different mode will be adopted to Oblige us to submit, when 49 parts out of 50, is for the adoption, and one half of the 50th part are of the same mind

I hope and Intreat that Congress will not think of Restricting our Trade as that will but Distress the Federal Towns and will be well pleasing to our Antis. in a word we shall be happy to fall in with any measures that will be adopted by Congress for the Compleating the Union. if Congress would Answer the Letter Received from this State4 before your Adjornment and State in short the necessity that there was of Their Committing the Consideration of the Federal Governmt to the People in the way prescribed by the Grand Convention and by the old Congress and perhaps hint that it was necessary that something should be done before the first of April it might, bring some of them to consider of the necessity of Acting soon on the Business—

I fully intended to have seen you when at Boston but was prevented by Indisposition, please to present Mrs Bowens & my Comps to Mrs Adams— I Remain with the highest Esteeme Your Excellency Most Obedt. & Verry Humle Servant

Jabez Bowen

P.S. in a Letter to the president I lately asked the Question about our seperation. it may not be amis to let him know that I have wrote to you on the same subject &c—5

RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “Excellency John Adams—”; endorsed: “Jabez Bowen / Decr. 28. 1789.”

200 1.

As in Rhode Island, North Carolina’s delay in ratifying the Constitution was engineered by a powerful Antifederalist party in the state legislature that favored the emission of paper money. North Carolina citizens objected to dominant federal power, a standing army, congressional control of elections and commerce, and the lack of a bill of rights safeguarding individual liberties. Largely shaped by class divisions, public attitudes toward the Constitution in North Carolina were aggravated by a 1788 election season rife with fraud and street violence. Meeting in convention that summer, North Carolinians proposed 26 amendments and resolved to hold off on considering it any further for ratification until they were approved.

Economic interdependence, Federalist press campaigns, the need to subsidize military defense, the prospect of paying foreign tonnage duties, and the birth of a federal government with a formal Bill of Rights—all of these factors combined to erode Antifederalist sentiment statewide by the early autumn of 1789. North Carolina delegates reconvened on 16 Nov. to debate the Constitution, which they adopted five days later in a vote of 194 to 77, becoming the penultimate state to join the union (Albert Ray Newsome, “North Carolina’s Ratification of the Federal Constitution,” The North Carolina Historical Review, 17:290, 291, 293–299 [Oct. 1940]).

Blocking attempts at ratifying the Constitution and hosting secret night meetings, Rhode Island’s Antifederalist contingent made claims like this in the press for several months. On 25 Feb. 1790, for example, the Newport Herald printed a letter that exhorted citizens: “Let the Constitution be immediately rejected, we have dallied with it too long for our interest,—the Revenue Act of the State be repealed,—and our ports thrown open to all the world, commerce will then revive, and agriculture and manufactures flourish. . . . We shall exceed St. Eustatius in its most flourishing state” ( Doc. Hist. Ratif. Const. , 26:734).

Closing parenthesis editorially supplied.

Acting at the General Assembly’s behest, Gov. John Collins wrote a memorial to George Washington and Congress on 19 Sept. 1789, reiterating Rhode Islanders’ “Attachment and Friendship to their Sister States, and of their Disposition to cultivate mutual Harmony and friendly Intercourse.” Collins sought exemptions on the costly foreign tonnage duties that his constituents now faced. He explained that Rhode Islanders, while “strongly attached” to the principles of democracy, perceived in the Constitution “an Approach . . . towards that Form of Government from which we have lately dissolved our Connection, at so much Hazard and Expence of Life and Treasure.” The president forwarded Collins’ letter on 26 Sept. to Congress, where it was tabled. In the following weeks, Collins’ memorial was widely published in the American press ( Doc. Hist. Ratif. Const. , 25:599–600, 605–607).

Bowen made a similar report on the state of Rhode Island politics in his 15 Dec. letter to Washington, indicating that news of North Carolina’s ratification of the Constitution would “have some weight with the opposition” (Washington, Papers, Presidential Series , 4:410–412).

Charles Carroll to John Adams, 29 December 1789 Carroll, Charles (of Carrollton) Adams, John

From Charles Carroll

Dear Sir Annapolis 29th. Decr. 1789.

Our Legislature did not rise till late in the night on the 26th instant. I have been obliged to attend the whole Session; constant attendance & application have injured my health; it is now so precarious, & delicate, that I am fearful of undertaking a journey to New York at this inclement Season of the year. If my attendance, for want of a Sufficient number of members to compose a Senate, can not be dispensed with, I shall be under the necessity of resigning my Seat. The executive of this State is authorised to appoint my successor, during the recess of the Assembly, in case of my resignation. I wish 201 to execute, to the best of my power, the trust, with which I have been honored by my country, but I am confident, my fellow citizens would not require me to hazard my life, or health in the execution of it.

I hope to be able to set out for New York in the beginning, or at furthest, by the middle of March. If I can not have leave of absence so long, be pleased, Sir, to impart to me the determination of the Senate on this point, that my successor may be appointed without loss of time, who may immediately, or very soon after his appointment repair to New York, to take his seat in the Senate I beg you to present my respectful compliments to the members of the body over whom you preside.1 I remain with great regard and esteem / Dear Sir / yr. most obdt. hum. Servt.

Ch. Carroll of Carrollton

RC (NHi:Gilder Lehrman Coll., on deposit); addressed: “His Excellency / John Adams Esqr. / Vice President / of the United States. / New York.”

Charles Carroll of Carrollton (1737–1832), who had been JA’s colleague in the Continental Congress, took his seat in the Senate on 15 March 1790. He represented Maryland in the Senate until 1792, while continuing to serve in the state senate until 1800 (vol. 4:28; First Fed. Cong. , 1:258; Biog. Dir. Cong. ).