Papers of John Adams, volume 20
I am honoured with yours of the 5th.
instant I thank you for your kind & polite Offers of Hospitality. Experience has
convinced me of your Friendship on this Head—
I find from the Reflexions occasioned by the just Observations in
your Letter that I have expected too much & am therefore not entitled to the Right
of complaining under Dissappointment. Tho’ placed in a new Situation, we are the same
People & are playing something of the old Game tho’ we have changed our Pack—
Allons—jouez bien votre Cartes— I am only a Stander-by & will patiently wait the
Event: For, after all the grave Calculations of the gravest Politicians (among whom by
the By I do not rank myself) Success in the Eyes of most Men stamps a substantial Value
upon Measures— We were however very near losing our Liberty in the first Stages of the
War by temporary military Expedients, under a Fear that a well organized & permanent
Army might turn out dangerous to it. I wish we may not bring it again into Jeopardy by
the same Fears excited by different Objects. But the Transactions of many Years past
have made me somewhat of a Predestinarian in Politicks I therefore, judging of the
future by what has past, I rest firmly convinced that all will
end well.
I am happy to find by your Letter that you are likely to be settled
so, as I presume, to have your Family with you. This Satisfaction of mine is on your own
Account, for as a Pennsilvanian I do not desire you to be so comfortably settled where
you are as not to be convinced that you could do better where all Pennsilvanians wish
you— Wherever you are be assured of the sincere & respectful Esteem with which / I
am your obedt Servant—
P.S. The Sentiments of Montesquieu on the Subject you mention have indeed been miserably construed. He was a great & sensible Man but has in many Passages of his Works rendered his Meaning obscure by a Habit of too much condensing his Ideas so as to avoid Prolixity. He is a Kind of Bible for Politicians & it fares with his as it 28 does with the good Book—every one finds a Text to suit his own Purposes. If indeed the Text does not exactly fit, convenient Interpretations must do the Business.
RC (MHi:Adams-Hull Coll.); addressed: “His Excellency / John Adams / V President of the United States / New York”; internal address: “His Excy John Adams—”; endorsed: “Richard Peters. / June 15.”; notation by CFA: “1789.”
a
th:1789
I have been so long accustomed to regard all your opinions upon
goverment with reverence, that I was disposed upon reading your last letter,1 to suspend my belief in republican Systems of
political happiness; but a little reflection led me again to adopt them, and upon this
single principle, that they have Never had a fair tryal.
Let us try what the influence of general science & religion diffused in early life,
will have upon our citizens. Let us try the effect of banishing the latin & greek
languages from our country. They consume the flower of human life—and by enabling us to
read agreeable histories of ancient crimes, Often lead us to imitate or to tollerate
them. Hitherto the factions have been fewer, & less violent in America since the
year 1776 than in many monarchies in the same number of years, under less irritating,
and dividing circumstances. Passions which in Europe would have vented themselves in
war, here discharged themselves only in newspaper scurrility, or in inflammatory
resolves, or addresses.— One thing further, my profession has taught me, Viz: that
political passions produce fewer diseases in a republic than in a monarchy.—
Disappointed ambition in Sweden and in Italy has produced sudden death from colics,
& apoplexies,— In america, it has scarcely of late
years produced a single hypocondriac disorder. In time, I believe the effects of the
political passions upon health & life will be still less perceptable in our country.
I think likewise our republican form of government, has already softned the religious
passions. we have less bigottry than formerly—and while there is no court, nor monarch,
no mode of worship will be preferred from interested considerations. Do you not think it
will be better to raise our people to a pure & free goverment by good education,
than to sink to their present vulgar habits by accommadating a goverment to them? Much
has been done already to enlighten our 29 citizens—but much
more may be done.— What do you think of a federal University, & of English free Schools in every township in the United
States?—2
I find we think more alike in your last letter upon a certain subject, than we did in your first.— I have a right to believe that the residence of congress in new York has always been an object of more importance in the eyes of many people, than the adoption or establishment of the federal Goverment.—
Many pious people wish the name of the supreme Being had been
introduced Somewhere in the new constitution. Perhaps an acknowledgement may be made of
his Goodness, or of his providence in the proposed amendments.— In all enterprizes,
& parties, I believe the praying, are better Allies,
than the fighting part of communities.—
I am Dear Sir with great regard / Your affectionate and / steady friend
nRush
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Dr Rush June 15 /
ansd 19. 1789.”
Of 9 June, above.
Rush’s essay “To Friends of the Federal Government: A Plan for a
Federal University” was published under the pseudonym “Citizen of Pennsylvania” in the
Philadelphia Federal Gazette, 29 Oct. 1788. Rush’s
proposed curriculum included government, history, manufacturing, commerce, math,
science, English, French, and German (Rush, Letters
,
1:491–495).