Papers of John Adams, volume 20
y.22
d.1791
From the Borders of the Grave, revived, and even established in Health, I once more present my Respects with my accustomed Fervency to You and Yours.
But, with my Respects I must also send my Complaints and Supplications.
In a Transaction where you was only, according to your own chosen
Expression, Teste di Legno, I was fretted disgraced & beslaved; and have taken some
Measures for Emancipation. You will know why I was not
Collector of this Port; but I have never told you how
perfectly you reconciled me at
first to my present Office, or how I ceased afterwards even to wish for any Change during the Remainder of my Days. But,
Sir, what tended heretofore to give me Tranquillity serves at present to heighten my
Chagrin. Possessing the good Will of the President and yourself I am martyred by one or
more Committee-Men who have carried private Friendship and Relationships into their
public official Doings. I know but two of the Committee one of whom can give no better
Rationale of the inimical Transaction than because the other “perhaps was more a Friend
to the Collector than to the Naval officer,” while in fact he was himself brother in Law
to a Surveyor, and the Naval Officer is sacrificed to both.
This will appear œnigmatical till you have read my Letter to mr Gerry.1 I
intreat you to do that; and to quiet me by a Condemnation of my Discontent, or by
promoting Redress—according to the Verdict of that sound Judgement to which I now submit
myself.
Be so good as to allow me to present my respectful Love to your Lady, and to think me continuing devotedly / Sir / Your obedient / Friend & Humble / Servant
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “The Vice President / of the United States / His
Excellency / John Adams Esqr / Philadelphia”; endorsed: “Mr Lovel”; notation by Lovell: “favd by / Majr Genl. Lincoln”; and by
CFA: “Jany 22d
1791.”
Lovell also wrote to Elbridge Gerry on 22 Jan., complaining that
personal connections between members of Congress and those applying for jobs in the
revenue service meant that Gerry and his colleagues were biased enforcers of the
Collection Act. He wrote: “As there are 67 Collectors 54 Surveyors and but 13 Naval
Officers it is evident how the Proportion of Relations
Friends and Patrons will naturally stand in the Great Assembly.” Lovell trained his criticism on
appointments made for the ports of Baltimore, Philadelphia, Newburyport, and Salem,
Mass., where, he observed, “Rivalry & Heart-burnings” for federal posts dominated
local politics. Equally troubling, in Lovell’s view, was the hazy status of officers’
duties, their annual salaries, and their treatment of emoluments (
First Fed.
Cong.
, 21:494–497).
I have been So much of an Antiœconomist as to leave your Letter of June the fifth unanswered to this day.
The Defence of the American Constitutions, is not I apprehend a “Misnomer.” Had the Patriots of Amsterdam repulsed the Duke of Brunswick from the Haerlem Gate, an History of the Action, might have properly been called an Account of the Defence of Amsterdam: although the City, on the Side of the Leyden Gate and Utrecht Gate, had been so ill fortified as to have been indefensible, had the Prussian Attack been made on either of those Quarters.1
My three Volumes are a Defence of the American Constitutions, on
that Side on which they are attacked. Mr Turgot attacked
them for aiming at three orders and a Ballance. I defended them in this Point only. Had
he attacked them for not making their orders distinct and independent enough: or for not
making their Ballances compleat, I should have been the last Man in the World to have
undertaken their Defences. If another Edition should ever be published I would insert in
the Title Page “A Defence &c against the Attack of Mr
Turgot.[”] This I apprehend would cure all Defects, in Point of Title.
But as you observe the Feelings of Mankind are so much against any rational Theory, that I find my labour has all been in vain: and it is not worth while to take any more Pains upon the subject.
The Rivalry between the State Governments and the national Government, is growing daily more active and ardent. Thirteen Strong Men embracing thirteen Pillars at once, and bowing themselves in concert, will easily pull down a frail Edifice. If the Superiority of the national Government is not more clearly acknowledged, We shall soon be in a confusion, which We shall not get out of, for twenty Years.
There was never more occasion for firmness, in all who wish in Sincerity for Peace, Liberty or Safety.
The Secretary of the Treasury is all that you think him. There is no office in the Government better filled. it is unhappy that New York has taken away one of his Supports. Your Sentiments of other Characters, and of Measures in general appear to me to be so just, that I cannot but wish that You had more to do in public affairs. But they say that you “love Wit better than your friend”: and although I dont believe this, I expect from you, by Way of revenge for this Piece of information, a sheet or two of their Sarcasms upon me. I know that altho the ridiculous can never escape your observation, in a friend or an Ennemy; yet you love the former and have no ill Will against the latter.
The Independence of your fame and fortune, and your happiness in
private Life are more to be envied than any public office or Station. For myself I find
the office I hold, tho laborious, so wholly insignificant, and from the blind Policy of
that part of the World from whence I came, So Stupidly pinched and betrayed that I wish
myself again at the Bar, old as I am. My own Situation is almost the only one, in the
World in which Firmness and Patience are Useless. I have derived so much pleasure from
your Correspondence, that notwithstanding the long interruption of it, I hope you will
not deny it in future / to your friend & humble sert [.
. . .]
RC (NjP:Andre De Coppet Coll.); internal address: “Counciller Trumbull.”;
endorsed: “Honble. John Adams / Jany 23d. 1791.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 115. Some loss of text due to a cut
manuscript.
Karl Wilhelm Ferdinand, Duke of Brunswick, was instrumental in
restoring the stadholder during the Prussian invasion of the Netherlands in 1787 (Schama, Patriots and Liberators
, p. 129).