Papers of John Adams, volume 21
Permit me to introduce to you, rather too formally to be sure, as it is an old Acquaintance, my son John Quincy Adams, whom the President has honoured with an appointment to Holland.
His Disposition to Peace is as hearty. as that of his
Father, and in every Thing that may depend upon him, his Endeavours will not
be 293 wanting I presume to preserve it.
Mrs Adams joins me in Compliments to Mrs Hammond.1 With great / and sincere Esteem I
have the honour / to be &c.
RC (NHyF:Historical Manuscripts Coll.); internal address: “Mr Hammond / Minister Plenipotentiary from / The King of G. Britain.”
Margaret Allen, of Philadelphia, married Hammond on
20 May 1793 (
AFC
, 9:473).
I recd your letter with the correspondence of Gennet for
wch am much obliged to you but being put
into the post it cost 19s which the captains
often do as soon as they come to Land1
how mine was delayed know not beleive it was by a private hand.2
The communication by letters is exceeding dangerous the
habeas corpus bill being suspended, wch gives
power equal to lettres de cachet & it is used not only to prevent
correspondence but to examine all letters.3
it was the remarks on paine wch stockdale had the impudence to publish in your name—but no body
beleived it— the same man had the assurance to repeat through 3 Edits of the
life of Paine that I was instrumental to the publishing the rights of man
presiding over a committee of Democrates in this house whereas I never saw
the book till it was printed nor was there ever a committee of democrates in
this house nor did I ever preside at any one any where else but it was done
on purpose to mark a simple individual & it has had its effect.
if I called your performance a book it was not in contempt of it but in honor for remember Thucidides called a book an inheritance
in your work you have proved your point that for want of a Balance former republicks have died away but it was not for want of finding that Balance but not knowing how to preserve that Balane when found & in practice & therefore it has never been effected whither it is not better to build on a broader basis & not like a china Jarr admired at a distance but fall to peices when Touched
I esteem your work greatly & it introduces a new branch of Litterature much neglected & unknown in so much I wish you would complet it as much as you can by continuing your collection of Italian states.
294know then dear sir I have begun a series of that kind but
want your presence & aid to encourge & assist me without any
animosity to the man who is very ignorant &
impudent & is not to be depended on I fear your labors would suffer
greatly as he will consult nothing but his own interest & that at any
rate— the situation of this country is truly deplorabe & prevents for
the present other attentions
I had wrote a long letter on French affairs but prudene prevents sending it you could have given me your opinion freely but I cannot tho we think very differently!!!
should be glad to see your dialogue but why bring in Louis— France will neither be sluiced out nor partitiond by the combined power nor call out for the restoration of the old monarchy but—
Mr Jay & Mr Trumbull gave me the pleasure of their company
this day am highly pleased with the republican Simplicity & good sence
of yr minister & have no doubt he will maintain the dignity of his
republick & presenting its rights & liberties— will secure an Asylum
to the virtuous & distrest where the long hands of Tyrants cannot
reach
I have inclosed a few pamphlets4 & with them send my best
wishes for the health & happiness to you & Mrs Adams & desire you to beleive I am Dear sir / Sincerely
& affectionately yours
RC (Adams Papers); docketed by JA: “Th. Brand Hollis / 1794.”
Not found. JA likely sent The Correspondence between Citizen Genet,
Minister of the French Republic to the United States of North
America, and the Officers of the Federal Government, Phila.,
1794, Evans, No.
47056.
This was probably Hollis’ 18 Feb. 1793 letter,
above. There he enclosed a letter of introduction (Adams Papers) for the bearer, Harry
Toulmin, for whom see Elizabeth Mayhew Wainwright’s [ca. 14
May] letter, and note 2, above.
On 23 May 1794 Parliament suspended the Habeas Corpus Act (34 Geo. 3, ch. 54).
Not found.