Papers of John Adams, volume 21
I received, last night, your favour of the 20th and a day or two before had recd that of the 2d,
returned to me from Philadelphia.1 Thanks for Mr Winthrops Prophecies.
I wrote to Charles Thompson on the subject of Cooks
Voyage, long enough before I left Philadelphia to have had an Answer but
none has yet arrived. Mr Thompson is as deeply
engaged in Preparing an English Translation of the Septuagint as Mr Winthrop is in unriddling Prophecies, and
possibly cannot find time to write upon such Trifles as Dr Kippis’s Sacrifice of the Honour of our
Country to his Stupid adulation of Franklin. If I were to study Prophecies I
doubt not I should find the Worship of Latria paid by the Presbyterian
Parsons in England to Franklin among some of the Traits or Features of the
whore of Babylon. In their Imaginations, he always appeared to me, to have
exalted himself above all that was worshipped. And this Circumstance among
others contributed Somewhat to diminish my Reverence for Presbyterian
Parsons.
I have read the Queries concerning the Rise & Progress of slavery but as it is a Subject to which I have never given any very particular attention I may not be able to give you so much Information as many others.
I was concerned in Several Causes, in which Negroes Sued
for their Freedom before the Revolution.2 The arguments in favour of their
Liberty were much the same as have been urged Since in Pamphlets and
Newspapers, in Debates in Parliament &c arising from the Rights of
Mankind, which was the fashionable Word at that time. Since when that time they have dropped the
“kind.”—
argument might have some Weight, in the Abolition of Slavery in the Massachusetts, but the real Cause was the multiplication of labouring White People, who, would no longer suffer the Rich to employ these Sable Rivals, so much to their Injury. This Principle has kept Negro Slavery out of France England and other Parts of Europe. The common People would not suffer, the Labour by which alone they could obtain a subsistance to be done by Slaves. If the Gentlemen had been permitted by Law to hold Slaves, the common white People would have put the Negroes to Death and their Masters too perhaps.
388I never knew a Jury by a Verdict to determine a Negro to be a Slave—They always found them
free. As I was not in the General Court in 1773 I have no particular
Remembrance of the Petition for the Liberation of all the Blacks, and know
not how it was supported or treated.
The common white People, or rather the labouring People, were the Cause of rendering Negroes unprofitable servants. Their Scoffs & Insults, their continual Insinuations, filled the Negros with Discontent, made them lazy idle, proud, vicious, and at length wholly Useless to their Masters: to such a Degree that the Abolition of slavery became a Measure of Œconomy.
I am, at present in haste your Friend & sert
RC (MHi:Jeremy Belknap Papers); internal
address: “Dr Belknap.”; endorsed: “Vice
Presidt. Adams.”
Belknap’s letter of 20 March (Adams Papers) summarized his planned reply regarding the controversy with Andrew Kippis, as outlined in his letter to JA of 2 March, above.
For JA’s handling of manumission cases,
see JA, Legal Papers
, 2:48–67.
I have the honor of returning to you the letter of Mr. J. Q. Adams.1 It is one among the many proofs of
his attention, penetration and fitness for his present functions; which I
feel a sincere pleasure in announcing on all proper occasions. The President
desires me to present his acknowledgments to you for the communication.
It will be agreeable to you to learn, that no intelligence from Amsterdam gives the least reason to expect, that your sons will be placed in any jeopardy by the late catastrophe in Holland; and that our instructions do not require the minister at the Hague to incur the smallest personal danger.
If you are not a subscriber to Bache’s scandalous chronicle,2 it may be a subject of momentary Amusement to be now informed, that it is filled with discussions on the treaty; not one word of which, I believe, is known thro’ a regular channel to any person here, but the President and myself.
I have the honor to be / with great respect, dear sir / Sincerely yours
RC (Adams Papers); internal address: “The hoñble / J. Adams / Braintree near / Boston.”
Randolph returned JQA’s 21 Dec. 1794 letter to JA, above.
Benjamin Franklin Bache (1769–1798) was Benjamin
Franklin’s grandson. Formerly a classmate of JQA’s in
Passy, France, he printed the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, which cultivated pro-French
sentiments throughout the 1790s (Jay, Selected
Papers
, 3:446;
AFC
, 3:15,
14:403).