Papers of the Winthrop Family, Volume 4
1639-12-22
I thanke you very much for your loue and liberality by Mr. Rawson you sent me more then I desired I haue 2 more earnest requests to yow, 1 That yow would please to advise throughly with the counsell whether it will not be of ill consequence to send the Court busines to the common consideration of the freemen.2 I feare it will too much exauctorate the power of that Court to prostrate matters in that manner. I suspect both Commonwealth and Churches haue disended to lowe already. I see the spirits of people runne high and what they gett they hould: they may not be denyed their proper and lawfull liberties, but I question whether it be of God to interest the inferiour sort in that which should be reserued inter optimates penes quos est sancire leges. Yf Mr. Lachford haue writt them out I would be glad to peruse one of his copies if I may receiue them.3
The other is that yow would not passe your promise nor giue any incour163agment concerning any plantation att Quichichacke or penticatt,4 till my self and some others either speake or write to yow about it which shalbe done so soone as our counsilles and contrivalls are ripened: In too much hast I comitt yow and your affaires to the guidance of God, in whome I rest Your Wor
s10
i22
°
There is a necessity that the Couenant if it be agreed vpon should be considered and celebrated by the seuerall Congregacions and Townes and happily the
W. Au. 93; 4
Collections
, VII. 26–27. For Ward, see 4
Collections
, VII. 23n.; Samuel E. Morison, “Nathaniel Ward, Lawmaker and Wit,” Builders of the Bay Colony (Boston, 1930), 217–243.
Ward's reference is to the Body of Liberties adopted in November, 1641, which was now in draft form and had been ordered by the General Court to be sent around to the several towns for the criticism of the elders and other freemen. Records of Massachusetts, I. 279.
Cf. 3
Collections
, III. 88.
Andover and Haverhill.