Papers of the Winthrop Family, Volume 4
1640-10-05
vpon my motion at the last Generall Court for an Exposition of our Grant (occasioned by the questioning of some) Mr. Broadstreete desiring. some of the land granted to vs on the one side, and 290Mr. Woodbridge on the other, opposition was made contrary to my exspectation, and noise raised to my greife; though the lesse because we were but the occasion, and others the cause. Yet to preuent euen that also, if it be possible, I am bolde to make this addresse to yourselfe; rather then to come personally to the Court, except I shall heare it to be necessary.
You best knowe how oft we expressed ourselues, and how plainly, concerning our desired bounds, as Ipsw
We are loth to say all we might, except we be vrged. The second thing objected is, the words of the Grant, as it is recorded, that mention (they say) only eight miles euery waye. I answere that I suppose that might (if it be so) arise from hence, that many in the Court did not doubt, but that eight miles did afford vs our desired bounds: but this we say, that if we could not haue them vnder eighteene miles, we were to haue so much as did reach them. And it seemes the Register only looked at the Text not comment. And it wilbe prooued by good wittnesse, if neede be; That Newbery men desiring two miles more by Merimack, your selfe instantly replyed (which I heard 291hisce auribus) that that could not be, because it was granted already to vs. So that the notion of eight miles was not the main matter, but Merimacke.
Sir, I am hartely sory thus farre to trouble you: but your wisdome will see a necessity, and therfore pardon. I humbly beseech you to acquaint our worthy Gouernour herwith, and so many of the Court, as you see fitt, or the whole.2 I am sory also to thinke how harsh such things are like to be in England and Quillipiake, as they are like to be carryed thither quickly, if they be noised in open Court, so that it were well if that were preuented. It hath bene a trouble of late to my poore neighbours (though a quiet people) to heare of this, after their purchase and building, and returne from Quillipyake. Especially, since they heard that Mr. Broadstreete plainly in open Court saide he exspected land there, and therupon opposed vs; as I haue signifyed to himselfe, and doe thus write, because he still saide he intended to doe so. Though happily, if your selfe doe satisfy him, he will forbeare. But I forgett your trouble, therfore againe crauing pardon, with my seruice I rest Yours to commande
W. 3. 58; 4
Collections
, VII. 215–217.
The General Court took action on October 7, 1640, to satisfy Rowley's grievances regarding the boundaries of the town. Records of Massachusetts, I. 305; Journal, II. 15–16D.J.W.
1640-10-10
By the enclosed you may perceiue the ernest request of your unfaithfull servant Luxford who hath no lesse but much more importuned me since I recli per annum, but how he will pay it or raise it I know not, especially when he hath neither stock security foode nor credit. He saith 292there are some in the bay that will affourd him some help but who they are or what it is I know not.
I suppose you haue heard what was the issue of the day of humiliacion concerning the eleccion of Mr. Chancey;2 But things are like still to goe ill for on the 2d day of this weeke a mocion was made by Mr. Paddy and some that inordinately cleaue to him for his setling at Jones river some three miles from Plim
Mr. Blindman salutes you.
W. 2. 91; 4
Collections
, VI. 169–170.
The Reverend Charles Chauncy, at this time assistant to the Reverend John Rayner in the Plymouth church and later (1641–1654) minister of Scituate and (1654–1672) President of Harvard College.
For Chauncy's “errors” on the subject of baptism, see Journal, II. 321–322D.J.W.
, 322
History of Plymouth, II. 300–307.