Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
th:October 1800.
I have received your favors of the 10th: & 12th:
instts: and am highly gratified by their
contents; excepting the bill of health, which is less cheering than I could
wish it might have been. I have been so occupied with attendance upon Courts
and writing to my correspondents in Europe, during the last ten days, that I
have not found time to write you; & the expectation of William’s
departure before my letter could reach him, prevented my answering his last
letters to me.1 He has sent
me a list of some books, which have been packed up for me— I want some more
than his list contains, particularly a sett of Livy, which you may possibly
find room to bring on with you. I am quite provoked sometimes, when I think
how improvident I was, not to retain a great
proportion of the Books that were here last winter— There was the
Encyclopedia—Postlethwaite’s Dictionary & a variety of useful books,
which will never be touched at Quincy, and which I would gladly have
purchased at prime cost; but on my return from my journey in the Spring,
they were all packed up & sent off, and among them many books really my
own—2 When I go to Quincy
in person I shall lay violent hands upon them.
The letters from my Brother, which I sent you are written
in the true style of a Scientific & observant traveller. I have received
the continuation to the 1st: of August, which I
forbear sending you, since I am promised the pleasure of seeing you in the
course of a month. The extract was published at
large in the Gazette of the U.S. a part of it, which related to the Mission
was published in New York & thence taken into Brown & Relf here; but
although more people here approved of that measure, than in the Eastern
States, and notwithstanding the distance of an Essex junto; there is still a
violent, though not a numerous band, who will not listen to any vindication
of it.3 The Jacobins profess
to admire & respect the independence of Mr:
Adams’s character, and several of them have told
me, that next to their Idol Jefferson
they would infinitely prefer him to any man in the Country. This language is
humorous enough, and one hardly knows which it savors of most, rudeness or
flattery. The high-toned ones here, who deserve no better name than Royalists, are very indignant at these
commendations, because they contain a reflection upon their views &
conduct. The Jacobins, within a few 427 days,
talk of a coalition of Mr: Adams’s & Mr: Jeffersons friends, to keep under the
Hamiltonians; this is insidious, false & treacherous doctrine to be held
up at this moment, because if believed or even suspected to be true or
likely, it would tend to split entirely asunder the friends of Government—
No such thing is contemplated by Mr: A——s
friends, and yet they are alternately accused of the design or the fact, by
the other two parties— The Demo’s know it will injure Mr: A—— in the esteem of his adherents to
propagate such a story, and the Anglo——s circulate it to mortify the P——t if
not to hurt his interest. The hopes & confidence of the Jaco——s are yet
strong; but unless this State can give her weight in their scale, they are
yet uncertain as to the result. If Maryland had been on our side, we should
have gained the election, supposing South Carolina to be entirely opposed;
but then we must calculate upon a majority in North Carolina in our favor,
of which I am very dubious. I have made a random estimate, which shaves very
close— You have it herewith.4
I will not send away the Aurora, which contains some
precious matter with respect to the conduct, sentiments & language of
our old friend Dr: Rush, exposed and betrayed by
Tench Coxe. An open & public appeal was made in a letter of Coxe’s to
the Aurora Editor, to Dr: Rush, calling upon him
to substantiate & testify to the truth of the charge of Manarchical
principles made against Mr: Adams. You will see
the passage in the federal papers— The poor Doctor is in a dreadful fease
about it; he comes out in a letter, flatly contradicting the insinuations
contained in Coxe’s letter. Coxe publishes again & gets the Dr: deeper in the mire. The Dr: came to me & palavered about it— I told
him his letter was enough for my satisfaction and I presumed it would be
sufficient with the family— He has written twice to you on the subject— But
Coxe wont let him rest— He tells more strange stories, whether true or
false, they will hurt the Dr: and he would soon
be weary of contradicting them— You remember my words last spring in my
letter to my father—“I wish Dr: R—— had less
profession & more sincerity”— The old proverb that says, “when rogues
fall out, honest men get their due,” will apply well-enough—5 I pity the Dr: for this lesson, much less than I do his wife & family
& her connextions who will be much chagrined at the incident—6 The old womanish politics of Dr: R—— have been proverbial in my estimation,
almost ever since I knew him— His private virtues are enough to cover in my
opinion a multitude of his crude theories upon government— It is hoped by
some & expected by more 428 that
this late disclosure will make a breach between our family & the Doctor,
but I see no necessity for it, since my opinion has not varied one tittle by
reason of the exposure, which Coxe has made, taking it all as matter of
fact— I hope the P——t & you are of the same opinion—
Mr: & Mrs: Otis arrived safely here a day or two ago.—
You will have a few friends about you at Washington, and considering all
circumstances I am glad you are to be with my father this winter. The
prospect is dreary enough; not for him, but for the Country. You know full
well, that we have as little to lose as any
body; but we have an interest in the honor the reputation & the
prosperity of our Country; Yet suppose another four years of upright,
independent administration, can it save us from Revolution, division or
anarchy? There is a chance that it may, but a feeble one, in my opinion;
when the war in Europe terminates, what are we to look for, if no settlement
be previously made of our differences with France? There is no trust but in
Omnipotence itself, which “in that day & hour, must provide against our
dangers.”7
Reading a paper in the Spectator the other day, I fell upon the following remarks, descriptive of a great mind; I know few men in this world to whom they apply with so much justice & truth, as to the P——t.
“A solid & substantial greatness of soul looks down
with a generous neglect on the censures and applauses of the multitude, and
places a man beyond the little noise and strife of tongues. Accordingly we
find in ourselves a secret awe and veneration for the character of one, who
moves above us in a course of virtue, without any regard to our good or ill
opinions of him, to our reproaches or commendations.” You may find the whole
passage, which I omit for want of room, in the 255th: Number of the Spectator;8 I estimate it as the essence of
wisdom.
With the truest love & attachment I am &ca:
RC (Adams Papers); internal address:
“Mrs: A Adams.”; endorsed: “T B A 19 /
october 1800.”
Not found.
JA’s library at MB includes Encyclopedia; or, A Dictionary of Arts, Sciences, and Miscellaneous
Literature, 18 vols., Phila., [1790–]1798; Jacques Savary des
Brûlons, The Universal Dictionary of Trade and
Commerce, ed. and transl. Malachy Postlethwayt, 4th edn., 2
vols., London, 1774; and several editions of Livy (vol. 13:303;
Catalogue of JA’s Library
).
For JQA’s 1 Aug. letter to
TBA, see A Tour of Silesia, 20 July 1800 – 17 March
1801, No.
II, note 9, above. Extracts of
JQA’s 10 July 1800 letter to
TBA
, above, were reprinted in the New York
Daily Advertiser, 10 Oct., and the Philadelphia Gazette, 11 October.
Not found.
TBA made the statement about Benjamin
Rush in his letter to
JA of 26 July, and JA commented
on it in his response
of 4 Aug., 429
both above. The proverb is in Johann König, A
Royal Compleat Grammar, English and High-German, London, 1715,
p. 138.
TBA might have been referring to Julia
Stockton Rush’s brother, Richard Stockton Jr., a New Jersey Federalist
who served in the U.S. Senate from 1796 to 1799 and would run for
governor in 1801 (
Biog. Dir. Cong.
).
Mark, 13:32.
The passage cited by TBA is from an
essay by “C.” on the soul, the passions, and vanity in Joseph Addison’s
The Spectator, No. 255 (22 Dec.
1711).