Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
th.feb. 1801
I have a thousand times wish’d to express to you my
gratitude for the attentions I received from you during your residence here;
and most particularly, for your kindness to my dear mother and family during
her late severe illness; but a consciousness of the inadequacy insufficiency of language to
give a faithful representation of my feelings, has hitherto imposed upon me
a silence which I fear may be construed into insensibility. I know that a
consciousness of your benevolence is the only return your heart asks for,
and I know that your gratification is highest when your good deeds are done
in secret. I am sensible also that a superfluity of expressions of Gratitude
is often meant as a cover’d and mode of requesting new favours. Thanks to
the democrats, my language can not now be liable to this imputation; and the
feeble attempt to express my thanks, will, I presume to hope, be received as
the sincere Effusion of my heart.—
I hope the roads & the weather, have permited you to escape the fell orgies of democratic exultation. To the eternal disgrace of George town, a dinner was yesterday given, at Barney’s, to the wretch Duane. I have not heard how the thing was conducted, but I am told it was set on foot, by that other wretch Duncanson. How can Virtue refrain from hiding her head in obscurity, when vice and falsehood when calumny & sedition are thus rewarded. It can not be possible that any man who reveres the memory of Washington, and every other character who has done honour to our Country, should join this homage to every thing that is base.— The times are changed, but I pray God that my Countrymen may not change with them. It would be good for them to smart a little. They deserve it for their supineness—for their treachery to themselves.—
As I could not accompany you, I have determined to defer my Journey to New York untill after
the 4th: of March; as I wish to see what
Congress will do for the Government of the Territory of Columbia, and how
they will dispose of the duties of the Commissioners.1 Mr.
Davis has brought forward a resolution, censuring the Conduct of the Speaker
in turning Smith, the printer, out of the house.2 It is expected to be called up to
day, and that the debates will be conducted with great asperity.— The
appropriations are made.—
The Evening before the choice of President was decided, a
small mob collected under my window and h[…]’d “Jeffe[rson] or no 575 Constitution”—but they could not […]
force enough to effect any thing. On the Evening of […] choice—A Mob of 40
or 50, went round and obliged us all to illuminate our windows. They were
all strangers. I have been told that six of them were the stoutest Butchers,
and bloodiest bullies of Philadelphia, the true representatives of the
Sovereign People. These insults will I hope unite the minds of people in
forming an energetic government in the district. They shew clearly what
would have happen’d if the Election had been held in Philada.—
I shall write my parents, as soon as I have liesure—in the mean time, present them my filial affection, and accept every sentiment of affectionate veneration from your grateful Nephew
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs. A. Adams / Quincey.” Some loss of text
where the seal was removed.
Congress passed two acts concerning the District of Columbia before the end of the session, for which see William Smith Shaw to TBA, 8 Jan., and note 8, above, although neither affected the duties of the commissioners of the district.
On 18 Feb. Kentucky representative Thomas Terry Davis
(d. 1807) introduced a resolution to censure House Speaker Theodore
Sedgwick for twice expelling Samuel Harrison Smith from the House.
Sedgwick believed that the Washington, D.C., National Intelligencer printer “grossly misrepresented” his
conduct as Speaker, particularly regarding the arrest of James Lane in
Dec. 1800, for which see William Smith Shaw to TBA,
8 Jan. 1801, and note 11, above. Smith countered in the National Intelligencer, 14 Jan., that the
sergeant-at-arms expelled him from the House chamber “without assigning
any reason for the direction” and that he would report the episode with
“a spirit of dignity and moderation that the frowns of power can never
dismay.” Davis contended that Sedgwick did not have the power to expel
Smith and that he had deprived Smith of his constitutional right to
report on House debates. On 20 Feb. Davis’ resolution was defeated 49 to
54. Albert Gallatin then introduced a resolution that limited the
Speaker’s ability to expel someone from the lobby or gallery, but this,
too, was defeated. Smith was barred from entry for the rest of the
session (
Biog. Dir. Cong.
; Washington,
D.C., National Intelligencer, 14, 16, 19
Jan.;
Annals of Congress
, 6th sess., 2d sess., p. 1036,
1041–1044; William E. Ames, “Samuel Harrison Smith Founds the National Intelligencer,” Journalism
Quarterly, 42:392–393 [Summer 1965]).
21 February 1801
I write You once More from this city. the Trenton River is impassable, and has prevented my Sitting out. we hope however that the Rain may clear it. I sent Townsend of to day; I have heard Some of the Democratic rejoicing Such as Ringing Bells & fireing cannon; what an inconsistancy Said a Lady to me to day, the Bells of Christ Church ringing peals of rejoicing for an Infidel President! the People of this city have evidently been in terror, least their Swineish 576 Herd should rise in rebellion and Seize upon their Property & share the plunder amongst them; they have permitted them really to overawe them; I foresee some day or other that N England will be obliged to march their Militia to preserve this very state from Destruction—
There is great uneasiness with the Merchants. they Say
the senate by rejecting the article in the convention to which they have
excepted, have plunged them into great difficultys— that they know not what
to do— that a better convention as it respects Commerce could not have been
made and why it should be hazarded by the senate they cannot conceive the
difference Mr Breck told me it would make to this Country in one year, would
be nine Millions of dollors— the Chamber of commerce meet this Evening, and
send off an express tomorrow to the Senators of this state, hopeing that
Something May yet be done; that the President May be requested to return the
convention to the senate with his reasons, and by Means give the Senate an
other opportunity of accepting it. the
Mr Breck says that he wrote the Sentiments of the Merchants of this city to
mr secretary otis requesting him to communicate them to mr Bingham &
others, Whilst the convention was before the senate; they regreet that they
did not exert themselves more2
I could not help smiling when Mr Breck told Me he had conversed with mr Wolcott, but could get no satisfaction, only mr Wolcott Said that there was no faith to be placed in French promisses treaties or conventions
I have shall leave
this city tomorrow I believe there is scarcly a Lady who ever came to the
Drawing Room but has visited me, either old or young—and very many
Gentlemen; as to a return of their visits, they cannot expect it; I believe
they have made a point of it; who publishd my arrival in the papers I know
not, but the next morning by ten oclock rainy as it was, they began to come
and have continued it by throngs ever since—3 I thank them for their attention
& politeness, tho I shall never see them again—
adieu My dear Friend— I wish You well through the
remainder of Your political journey— I want to see the list of judges— pray tell all who inquire after me
With Love to William / yours affectionatly
RC (Adams Papers); addressed by
TBA: “The President of the United States / City of
Washington”; endorsed: “Mrs A. Feb. 21.”
This is the final extant letter between AA and JA. Its dating is based on JA’s endorsement and AA’s 22 Feb. departure from Philadelphia (TBA to JA, 20 Feb., Adams Papers).
Members of the Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce
convened on 21 Feb. at City 577
Tavern to discuss the Senate’s exclusion of Art. 2 from its ratification
of the Convention of 1800, for which see
AA to Cotton Tufts, 15 Dec.
1800, and note 2. TBA wrote to JA on
20 Feb. 1801 (Adams Papers),
outlining the view of Samuel Breck Sr. and other chamber members that
ratification of the article was necessary to ensure that U.S. merchants
were compensated for vessels lost to French privateers (Philadelphia American Daily Advertiser, 21 Feb.; Madison, Papers, Secretary of State
Series
, 1:206).
AA’s arrival in Philadelphia was
reported in the city’s press on 18 Feb.; see, for example, the Gazette of the United States and the Philadelphia Gazette.