Adams Family Correspondence, volume 15
Your favor of the 1st. inst. was duly
recieved, and I would not again have intruded on you but to rectify certain facts which
seem not to have been presented to you under their true aspect. my charities to
Callender are considered as rewards for his calumnies. as early, I think, as 1796. I was
told in Philadelphia that Callendar, the author of the Political progress of Britain,
was in that city, a fugitive from persecution for having written that book, and in
distress. I had read and approved the book: I considered him as a man of genius,
unjustly persecuted. I knew nothing of his private character, and immediately expressed
my readiness to contribute to his relief, & to serve him. it was a considerable time
after, that, on application from a person who thought of him as I did, I contributed to
his relief, and afterwards repeated the contribution.1 himself I did not see till long after, nor ever
more than two or three times. when he first began to write he told some useful truths in
his coarse way; but no body sooner disapproved of his writings than I did, or wished
more that he would be silent. my charities to him were no more meant as encouragements
to his scurrilities than those I give to the beggar at my door are meant as rewards for
the vices of his life, & to make them chargeable to myself. in truth they would have
been greater to him had he never written a word after the work for which he fled from
Britain. with respect to the calumnies and falsehoods which writers and printers at
large published against mr̃ Adams, I was as far from stooping to any concern or
approbation of them as mr̃ Adams was respecting those of Porcupine, Fenno, or Russell,
who published volumes against me for every sentence vended by their opponents against
mr̃ Adams. but I never supposed mr̃ Adams had any participation in the atrocities of
these editors or their writers. I knew myself incapable of that base warfare, &
believed him to be so. on the contrary, whatever I may have thought of the acts of the
administration of that day, I have ever borne testimony to mr̃ Adams’s personal worth,
nor was it ever impeached in my presence without a just vindication of it on my part. I
never supposed that any person who knew either of us could believe that either meddled
in that dirty work.
but another fact is that I “liberated a wretch who was suffering
412 for a libel against mr̃ Adams.” I do not know who
was the particular wretch alluded to: but I discharged every person under punishment or
prosecution under the Sedition law, because I considered & now consider that law to
be a nullity as absolute and as palpable as if Congress had ordered us to fall down and
worship a golden image; and that it was as much my duty to arrest it’s execution in
every stage, as it would have been to have rescued from the fiery furnace those who
should have been cast into it for refusing to worship their image.2 it was accordingly done in every instance,
without asking what the offenders had done, or against whom they had offended, but
whether the pains they were suffering were inflicted under the pretended Sedition
law.3 it was certainly possible that my
motives for contributing to the relief of Callender might
have been and liberating sufferers under the Sedition law, might have been to
protect, encourage and reward slander: but they may also have been those which inspire
ordinary charities to objects of distress, meritorious or not, or the obligations of an
oath to protect the constitution, violated by an unauthorised act of Congress. which of
these were my motives must be decided by a regard to the general tenor of my life. on
this I am not afraid to appeal to the nation at large, to posterity, and still less to
that being who sees himself our motives, who will judge us from his own knolege of them,
and not on the testimony of a Porcupine or Fenno.
You observe there has been one other act of my administration personally unkind, and suppose it will readily suggest itself to me. I declare on my honor, Madam, I have not the least conception what act is alluded to. I never did a single one with an unkind intention.
My sole object in this letter being to place before you attention that the acts imputed to me are either such as are falsely imputed, or as might flow from good as well as bad motives, I shall make no other addition than the assurances of my continued wishes for the health & happiness of yourself & mr̃ Adams.
RC (Adams
Papers); internal address: “Mrs. Adams”; docketed:
“Mr Jefferson to Mrs / A Adams July 22nd / 1804”; notation
by CFA: “published in his Writings / Vol 4. p 22.” That is, Jefferson, Correspondence, ed. Randolph, 4:22–24.
For The Political Progress of
Britain, James Thomson Callender’s 1792 polemic against the British government
and Thomas Jefferson’s support of Callender after he fled to the United States in
1793, see vol. 10:275–276,
277.
Daniel, 3:6.
For Jefferson’s pardon of the “wretch” Callender, see
AA to JQA, 30
May 1801, note 5, above. Of the 25 Democratic-Republicans arrested under the
Sedition Act between July 1798 and March 1801, ten cases went to trial and all led to
conviction. On taking office, Jefferson swiftly issued a blanket presidential 413 pardon to all violators of the act, which he
deemed to be unconstitutional (Geoffrey R. Stone, Perilous
Times: Free Speech in Wartime from the Sedition Act of 1798 to the War on
Terrorism, N.Y., 2004, p. 63).