Adams Family Correspondence, volume 4
1781-07-14
Your favour by General Ward2 was not deliverd me
till this day or I should have replied to it by the last post; the Generous acknowledgement of
having tran
I am gratified however to have from your own Hand arguments 177to rectify the Ideas of some who I really believe your Friends, but
who not knowing or fully attending to the circumstances you mention, have been left to wonder
at a conduct they could not account for. The affectionate regard you profess for a Lady who I
believe every way deserving of it, intirely banishes from my mind the insinuations of
Cornelia, and I could wish that Letter might not be submitted as you tell me others have
been,3 least it should unnecessaryly give pain to
a Lady I must more and more Esteem—and with whom I am determined to cultivate a more
particular acquaintance. Possibly I may be able to render her some small services. I cannot be
so particular as I wish because this must take its chance by the post. I will not thank you
for your comments upon my Letter of March 17th. They are not generous. However as I have never
spaired my correspondent when I thought him wrong, I will suppose that he really believed
Portia deserving the censure he has bestowed.—“Dutch Idea” abominable. You know I meant by the
Word property, only an exclusive right, a possession held in ones own right.4 Will you please to consult Johnson upon the term?—Still more
Sophistical is your comment upon the fine tuned Instrument. If I did not know you I should
suppose you a practiseing Attorney. There is one thing however that sticks a little hardly by
me—“I am very unwilling that it should be submitted to the Eye of one so very much my Friend as you profess yourself
to be.” This looks like such a distrust of my sincerity as wounds me. There are some
other strokes to which I am not callous, but can forgive them considering the freedom I have
exercised in my own remarks.
Will you balance accounts? and we will begin a New Score upon the old Stock of Friendship. I do not pretend to exculpate from censure what I really thought deserving of it, but only the doubtfull right I had to use it as it did not at that time particularly affect me.
You have not fulfilled one part of your promise which was to transmit to me some Annecdotes
respecting my Friend abroad and as a preparitive I was to see Mr.——.5 I have received my preparitive. In the Name of
Indignation can there be any thing more diabolical than what is put into my Hands? False
insinuating disembling wretch—is it for this your Grey Head is spaired—is this the language of
courts?—is this the reward of an Independant Spirit, and patriotick virtue? Shall the Zealous
and Strenuous asserter of his countrys rights be sacrificed to a court Sycophant? This
finished Courtier has first practised his Arts upon the M
Join to him an upright honest Man of real abilities and he will thank you for an assistant
should a negotiation commence, but do not Saddle him with a Man
who looks no further than the present state of existance for a retribution of his virtues or
his vices, but who considering this world as the summum bonum of Man might I think have a
little more regard to the happiness of his fellow Mortals in the present state, and not quite
so willing to relinquish their Natural Rights. One will speak a bold and firm language
becomeing a free sovereign and Independant Nation, the other will be indesisive yealding
fauning flattering. Are these consistant qualities? Very justly does he observe that they do
not always hold the same language and the one may erase the impressions of the other.—If after
all the Efforts of the Friends of Liberty Cconsidering himself only as one individual of the
many he represents.
Day of the month, left blank by AA, supplied from Lovell's acknowledgment of receipt of this letter in his reply of 10 Aug., below.
Dated 16 June, above.
The “Lady” is Mrs. Lovell, and “that Letter” (which AA did not wish to have “submitted” to Mrs. Lovell) is AA's to Lovell, 23 June, above.
On the “Dutch Idea” see Lovell to AA, 16 June, above, at note 10.
Samuel Adams; see Lovell to AA, 29 May, above.
AA wrote “&.”
Sentence thus punctuated in MS. The allusions in this paragraph will not 179be clear unless read in the light of a number of letters that precede. The “False ... wretch” is Franklin, and what had been put into AA's hands—her “preparitive”—was a text of Franklin's letter to Congress of 9 Aug. 1780, which took the French side in the dispute between JA and Vergennes and which Lovell characterized as “most unkind and stabbing” toward JA (Lovell to AA, preceding; see note 7 there; and see also vol. 3:394–395, above).
AA's term “the M
1781-07-16
I have enclosed to you a Copy of certain Letters lately transmitted to Congress by B:F:
Esqr.—Copies of them having been sent from Congress Philadelphia to your Friends
here, I tho't it my Duty to let you know as soon as possible what treatment you receive from
that Gentleman. I have heard (sub rosae) that influence has been used in a certain
Place august Assembly to have the Regulator of Heaven's Artillery
Conductor of Lightning joined with you in a certain Negotiation bearing the Olive
Branch. This Time may discover. I know not whether you have ever seen an Order of Congress of
Decr. 12th. 1780. I have enclos'd a Copy of it as sent to your Dear Lady. I suppose it referrs
to the same Subject when transmitted by you to Congress, which is now said to have given such
offence elsewhere.1
I have wrote you often, particularly by Doctor Dexter on the 28th of May, and again largly by a Vessell bound to Denmark on the 22d of June: And tho' I have never yet had the happyness of receiving a Line from you since you left us, yet I shall embrace every Oportunity, of writing to you, believing that you have written to me tho' I have been so unhappy as not to have received your Letters.
The General Court is now prorogued untill the 3d Wednesday in September sufficient Provision
having been first made for filling up what is yet wanting in our Quota of the Continental
Army; and also for sending into the Field immediately 3,200 Melitia from this Commonwealth to
assist in the present Campaign on the North River &c. As I wrote you before, so I must
still lament the want of a sufficient number of Ships of War on this Coast. For want of a very
few More Ships those that are here already can do little or no service, being too weak to
venture far out of Port. By this means the Enemys Ships of every sort on the Coast of Virginia
and the Carolinas can with safety by water carriage facilitate every movement of their Army
without 180interruption, while our Troops and those of our
Generous Allies under that best of Men and of Generals, the Marquis de la Fayett and other
excellent Commanders, are subjected to the slow tiresom and expensive Modes of Land Carriage
by which all their Plans for our defence are
I saw your dear Lady and Children Yesterday, who with your Mother and Brother &c. are all well. My Dear Partner and Children are in usual Health, and join with me in the tenderest sentiments of Love and Friendship to you, your dear little Boys, and Mr. Thaxter. We have not heard from you for above eight Months (if I recollect right) a tedious Period! especially to those whose “Love is without Dissimulation,” among whome I hope you will always find him who in Days of Yore signed himself
At least two of Cranch's enclosures, though not found, are clearly identifiable: (1) a copy
of Franklin's letter to Pres. Huntington, 9 Aug. 1780, enclosing copies of JA's
recent correspondence with Vergennes and commenting unfavorably on JA's high
tone toward the French court; see above, Lovell to AA, 13 July, note 7, and vol. 3:394–395; (2) copy of Congress' resolution of 12 Dec. 1780 approving
JA's letter to Vergennes of 26 June 1780, which had defended the new monetary
policy of Congress against Vergennes' criticisms; see vol. 3:391–392. JA's letter had been read in Congress on 30
Nov. and referred to a committee of three, Lovell chairman; the committee reported on 6 Dec.
but action was postponed; and on the 12th Congress ordered “That the said letter be referred
to the Committee of Foreign Affairs, and that they be instructed to inform Mr. Adams of the
satisfaction which Congress receives from his industrious attention to the interests and
honor of these United States abroad, especially in the transactions communicated to them by
that letter” (
JCC
, 18:1107, 1123, 1147).