Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
th:October 1800.
I now enclose you my Brother’s letter of July the 10th: which I promised to transmit by this day’s
Mail; but being anxious to see a considerable portion of it in print, &
solicited by M r:
Dennie to furnish him a copy for the Gazette of the U.S. of Monday
next, I could not complete the copy in time for sending, so that I am
apprehensive you will not receive it until after the President’s
departure—1 If so, you
can enclose it to him, with request to return it to me. The writer of this
letter, has given an opinion upon the Mission to France, so decided and so
energetic, that it should not be suffered to remain as a private
deposite.
In a series of essays, which appeared last April, in
Brown & Relf’s paper, under the signature of “A
friend to his Country,” professing to be “a parallel between the
policy, avowed by the British Government as it respected a renewal of
negociation for peace with the french republic, & the policy of the
American Government on the same subject,” there are facts, sentiments &
principles advanced, so correspondent to the opinions in the enclosed
letter, that the writer of those essays, may find that reward, credit &
consolation, from the comparison, which he never received, in public or in
private, at the time they came out. Cold water was thrown upon his well
meant zeal, in the first place by the printer, who did not think entirely
with the author, and who published the numbers at such long intervals that
the thread, and the interest & connection of the subject-matter, were
entirely lost, and moreover the 7th: & last
number, which contained a recapitulation of the whole & pointed out the
inferences, which were intended to be deduced, the Editor’s never published
at all— I know that both you & my father noticed the first number of the
series, but I did not wish it to be known that I wrote them— 411William Shaw charged me with them and
to him I confessed—2 If I
could send you the six numbers that were published by a private hand, I
would— The design & scope of the whole was to vindicate the mission to
France, upon the principles of the law of nations; upon sound policy, &
by analogy drawn from the practice of Great Britain & all her Allies,
during this present contest. I boast not of the execution, but the design
was good, and I have never changed an opinion delivered in any of the
pieces— Indeed, had the last number been published it would have been seen,
that the principle of sending Envoys to treat, (offend whom it might) was
the most material one to be established—that the public could not, nor ought
they to calculate upon indemnity for the losses sustained by french
Spoliation, except by promises to he performed at a
future day, when France might be more able to pay, than she was then & now is. This idea, the
printer thought would be unpopular, I suppose,
and possibly it would have been so, but was it just?—was it correct? Has not
experience evinced its truth?
The writer of this letter will, I presume, be easily
guessed, by the Jacobins, who are so severely lashed in it, Cooper &
Priestley, and as they will smart under it, it may be, they will come out, under anonymous signatures to attack
the Author— Cooper is already writing the Constitutionalist, in the Aurora—
I believe you will do well to stay at Quincy for the present, though I dread the influence of our Nothern climate upon your health in the winter season. I hardly looked for my father so soon as you give me reason to expect him— I shall, after he arrives at the City, send my letters for you, under cover to him—
Present me kindly to all friends— I should like to pay them a visit, this winter, if my business would permit— It is not improbable I may be under the necessity of going to Boston, though I can scarcely afford either the time or the expence—
With great affection, / I am, dear Mother / Your Son
PS. 6th: Octr: I rejoyce to hear of Boylston’s being
better and that some hopes were entertained of his recovery—
RC (Adams Papers); addressed: “Mrs: A Adams / Quincy”; internal address:
“Mrs: A Adams.”; endorsed: “T B Adams
october / 5th 1800.”
The five paragraphs that covered public matters in
JQA’s 10 July letter to TBA, above, were
printed in the Philadelphia Gazette of the
United States, 7 October. AA wrote to Catherine
Nuth Johnson on 10 Oct. (Adams Papers), stating that JQA’s letters were
“a 412 fund of entertainment.” She also
reported on illness in Quincy and communicated plans for her upcoming
journey to Washington, D.C.
Six essays by TBA as “A Friend to His
Country” were published in the Philadelphia
Gazette, 15, 17, 18, 22, 26 April, 2 May, with no concluding
seventh essay printed. In the series he discussed the impact of the
French Revolution on Anglo-French and Franco-American relations and
endorsed the second mission to France. In particular, TBA
highlighted Britain’s and France’s foreign policies in contrast to the
foreign policy of the United States, noting in his essay of 22 April,
“This country is not an indifferent spectator of the war of extermination, which rages with unabated
fury between France and England. As one of the remote parties to the
war, she has a right and it is her duty to give all the weight of her
testimony and all the strength of her authority against the prolongation
of it; morality, justice, and benevolence, enjoin upon her the
obligation to restore, if possible, consistently with her honor, the natural state of nations, viz.
peace and friendship.” On 26 April TBA concluded, “Peace
with all nations, is the true policy of the United States.”
th1800
First I would inform You that B Adams is we hope out of
Danger; his reason is returnd pretty clearly. he is not Yet permitted to
leave his Chamber— I congratulate the Philadelphians that they have this
Year escaped the Pestilence. it is now so late in the Season that I hope
they may wholy escape Since I was first an inhabitant of this place I never
knew it So sickly as it has been this summer. last week there were 42
persons down with fevers in about one Mile of each other. in the begining of
July William Baxter was taken sick of a Billious intermitting fever. this
went through his family, his wife two Children maid and Man;1 from that Neighbourhood in which
there are two slaughter Houses, the fever has Spread. Scarcly a House, or
family but have been visited with it. two Children only have dyed, but many
of the Adults have escaped with the skin of their teeth, for they have been
reduced to mere skelitons; Edward Norten took the fever at mrs Vintons
school held in Newcombs House, went Home to Weymouth well, but was taken
Sick with the fever, and lay at the point of Death for several days he is
now a walking Shadow.2
Richard & Jacob are now down with it, but what is more to be regreeted
Mrs Norten is taken down with the same fever, and in her weak debilitated
state we have many fears for her. Your Aunt Cranch is also sick we fear of
the same disorder. her Maid is just recovering— this is the first day for
more than a week that I have been able to sit up, or write a line. mine my sickness has been more of the
Rhumatic fever and sleepless Nights than of the nature of the prevaling
fever these fevers run to 6 & 8 weeks where they are bad— this is the
season for poor Rhumatic invalids to feel the effects of it. I think 413 often of You and fear to hear that
You are attackd— I hope my next Letter Will convey to you more agreable
intelligence—
I must now acknowledge the receipt of three two Letters from You, one of the 2
one of the 3d october3 I did read the peices You mention,
and considerd them as the only Well written peices upon any subject which
that paper has contained. there were some things in the first number which
made me think they were not Written by …4 Such as the Charge made against
the Gazzet of the united states “that it is devoted to the British, is only
a trick of Duanes”5 now it is
very notorious that from the appointment of envoys to France, that the Gazet
was a party paper during the whole time that it was in the hands of that
coxcomb J Ward Fenno, and was much more a British than an American
paper—that it is,6 what it
originally was in the Hands of the Father of the degenerate Son, no person
will pretend to say. the lay Preacher is a sensible Man, but he has been
soured, and is too much inclined to praise old Bel dame Britain and her
ospring at the expence of his native country. I wish he had more of the
scotchman in him in that respect beside I See no reason why a Man who will
pemit the Jeffersoniad to be republishd in his paper, which is certainly
coppied from the centinal, should refuse to republish peices Much better
written— this does not work both ways. if I can collect these peices you
Mention, I will Send them to the Secretary of the Historic Society, who in
his last volm publishd an account of all the Newspapers Edited in the united
states7 as to Pincknys
Letter, between ourselves, I believe The Letter alluded to is a genuine
coppy— I wish I could find coxs Letter which led to the observations— You
know it was Pinckny the Senator who got the commission limited—and who
requested col smith when he was appointed Secretary of legation, to become a
spy upon the minister and make to him secreet communications—8 I only regreet the Publication of
the Letter least it should wound the feeling of very Worthy Men, of whom it
would never have been written, if they had been then personally known, as
they since have been I am certain the President entertains for them a regard
and esteem fully equal to their merrits— as to mr Pinckny or Rutledge ever
calling upon the President to make any inquiries upon the Subject of the
Letter it is all false. neither of them ever changed a word upon the
subject. the New Haven buisness is all a misrepresentation, and Parson dana
would behave more like a Gentleman if he told all the conversation, which
however was between themselves, and cannot now be 414 accurately recollected. but the story
of a hereditary monarchy is all Stuff for Electioneering purposes— you know
that it must be so. you know that it is the furtherest from the thoughts of
the President of any Man in the united states—9 Dana was lamenting the divisions,
and the heats occasiond by the approaching Election—to which the President
replied that it Was always so in Elective Governments—and would continue So,
unless the nature of man could be altered. it appears if we May judge from
what we hear that the N Haven visitors went with a design to tempt the P——t
to Say Something which they could catch hold of—and by misrepresentation use
and pervert to the Vilesest purposes— My advise to him upon the approaching
journey is in the old moral to a fable
these are cold heart Chilling lines for a soul fraught with benevolence, but I believe Sound advise upon the present occasion—
Duans views are very evident— he will brew a Hell cauldron if he can, and he has all the ingredients in his own Venomous Heart. parson ogden is well provided for—but has left a Hydra head behind him
how could you believe upon the Aurora assertion that otis was a Jeffersonian— he could not have written Decius—11 he would not have run such a hazard
I have written myself Weary— mr Brisler left with Mrs Reisdel the silk stocking washer some lace to be washd for Me.12 if you can get it for me before Your Father comes, he can Frank it to me. pay for it, and I will reimburse You. I will return JQAs Letter the next opportunity.13 your Father goes on monday the 13th Biney & Hare dined here Yesterday—14
RC (Adams Papers); endorsed: “Mrs: A Adams / 10th: Octr: 1800 / 18th Recd: / 19th answd:.”
William Baxter (1768–1829) and his wife, Abigail
Newcomb (1772–1819), of Quincy had three children: William Jr.
(1792–1840), Lewis (1794–1862), and Abigail (1797–1864) (Sprague, Braintree Families
).
The schoolteacher was possibly Sarah Thayer Vinton
(1744–1807), whose daughter Lois was reported ill by Richard Cranch in
his 31 Oct. letter to
AA
, below (Sprague, Braintree
Families
).
For TBA to AA, 2 Oct., see his letter of 3 Oct., and note 3, above.
Ellipsis in MS.
AA was quoting from TBA’s
final essay 415 as
Mutius Scævola in the Philadelphia Gazette of
the United States, 6 September.
At this point in the MS, “not” was added in another hand.
Rev. John Eliot served as corresponding secretary of
the Massachusetts Historical Society from 1798 to 1813. Eliot, under the
pseudonym “A. Z.,” published “A Narrative of the Newspapers Printed in
New-England,” MHS, Colls.
, 1st ser., 5:208–216
(1798), 6:64–77 (1799) (vol. 3:112; MHS, Procs.
,
1:l [1791–1835]; Albert Matthews, Bibliographical Notes on Boston Newspapers, 1704–1780,
Cambridge, 1907, p. 412).
JA in his May 1792 letter to Tench Coxe
that was printed in the Philadelphia Aurora
General Advertiser, 28 Aug. 1800, claimed that “the two Mr.
Pinckneys” had lobbied to limit JA’s appointment as
minister to Britain so that one of them could succeed him, an allusion
to a motion made by Charles Pinckney and approved in the Continental
Congress on 18 Feb. 1785 to limit to three years the terms of all U.S.
diplomats. Charles’ cousin Thomas Pinckney served as U.S. minister to
Britain from 1792 to 1796. AA was also probably referring
to suggestions by Elbridge Gerry and Charles Storer in 1785 that
supporters of unsuccessful southern candidates for the post insisted
that WSS be appointed JA’s secretary,
prompting Gerry and Storer to suspect that WSS might engage
in “Intrigue against the Minister of the Legation” (
JCC
, 28:83–84;
ANB
; U.S. Senate, Exec. Jour.
, 2d Cong., 1st sess.,
p. 96; 4th Cong., 1st sess., p. 209; JA, Papers
,
16:544; 17:596, 598).
The Philadelphia Aurora
General Advertiser, 26 Sept. 1800, reported that while
JA was in New Haven in June, Rev. James Dana heard him
repeatedly state, “We shall never have liberty or happiness in this
country, until our first Magistrate is hereditary.” Dana (1735–1812),
Harvard 1753, was minister of the First Church of New Haven between 1789
and 1805. The Philadelphia Gazette, 27
Sept. 1800, claimed that the Aurora report
was penned by a New Haven clergyman, Rev. John Cosens Ogden (1751–1800),
Princeton A.M. 1789. The Aurora, 2 Oct.,
however, identified Rev. Andrew Steele of South Carolina as the source,
and in the issue of 6 Oct. Coxe stated that Ogden could not be the
writer because he had died in September (
Sibley’s Harvard
Graduates
, 13:305, 316, 319, 320;
Princetonians
, 2:93, 96–97; Jacob E. Cooke, Tench Coxe and the Early Republic, Chapel
Hill, N.C., 1978, p. 379–380).
AA was probably referring to Aesop’s fable “The Wolf and the Shepherd.”
See AA to TBA, 12 July, and note 4, above.
Possibly the wife of John Risdel, a grocer who
resided at 46 South Fifth Street (Philadelphia
Gazette, 29 Oct.;
Philadelphia Directory
,
1800, p. 104, Evans,
No. 38549).
Probably JQA to TBA, 23 July, for which see TBA to Joseph Pitcairn, 30 Sept., and note 1, above.
Horace Binney (1780–1875), Harvard 1797, was a
Philadelphia attorney and resided in the same boardinghouse as chemist
Robert Hare Jr. (TBA to William Smith Shaw, 15 Sept., MHi:Misc. Bound Coll.;
Biog. Dir. Cong.
; Charles Chauncey Binney, The Life of Horace Binney, Phila., 1903, p.
44–45; Charles P. Keith, The Provincial
Councillors of Pennsylvania, Phila., 1883, p. 131).