Adams Family Correspondence, volume 14
N: 18.
r:24.
I had been almost three months without receiving a line
from you, or from any other of my correspondents in America; and although
upon coolly considering circumstances I was sensible that this was the
natural fruit of my own neglect of writing during the last Winter, yet as
one’s feelings never make the allowances which sober reason requires, I
began to think it strange to be so long without letters from you, when last
evening, on returning from Prince Ferdinand’s, (where the princess had
renewed my dolour by particularly enquiring when I had heard from you) I
found a cover from Mr: Pitcairn, enclosing your
most welcome favour of September 28–30.— This at least proves that my late
letters have not all failed on their passage; though between those of 28.
May and 24. July, which safely reached you, there were others of June 14 and
of July 6. 11. 15. 16. and 22. which ought regularly to have come to your
hands.—1 The most
important of them relative to my private affairs was that of 15. July, which
I sent by duplicates, and which I still hope you received soon after the
date of yours to which I am now replying.— I mention all these dates,
because from the frequency of failure in the conveyance of letters from
Hamburg to the United States, Mr: Pitcairn has
459 strong suspicions of mal practices on
the part of some Captains to whom they are entrusted.2
I am entirely satisfied with the account of your
proceedings in my pecuniary concerns.— If the disastrous influence of
New-York upon every thing in which our family are interested, were the only
cause of my distrusting the solidity of Manhattan stock, I believe I should
get over the scruples of mere fatality, and keep my shares; but besides my
aversion to against trusting my
property to any person of whose honesty I am not firmly convinced, the
circumstance you mention, that by selling out you could not place the money
elsewhere so profitably rather tends to strengthen suspicion than
confidence— It proves, that the interest upon that stock, bears more than
its proportional value to its capital.—3 It is an universal rule among
prudent merchants to distrust the solidity of a house that pays
extraordinary interest for money, and I am in this instance disposed to
apply the principle— I approve therefore of your intention of selling out to
the best advantage you can, even though by another use of the proceeds, the
interest yielded will not be quite so good.
You speak of it as a problematical point whether the federalists will divide at the new election; by all the other accounts from America it appears unquestionable that they will, and I consider already the result as perfectly ascertained— You are all so extremely discreet about the original cause of the difference which has ended in a scission of the friends to Government and good order, that I know not even to this day what it is imputable to— But if the last mission to France was the point, every real friend of the President, and of our Country will rejoyce that he adopted and persisted in that measure though it should be at the expence of his election.— There has been no one period since the commencement of our present national government, when the aspect of our affairs with relation to foreign states, has been so favourable as at the present moment. We have indeed suffered injustice from both the great warring powers, and in settling our controversies with them, have made our sacrifices for the benefit of preserving peace— But compare our losses and sufferings, I will not say with those of any nation which has been engaged in the war, but with those of any other neutral nation, and we shall have reason to esteem ourselves peculiarly fortunate— Whoever considers how essentially weak our government is, and with what a violent and powerful internal opposition it has had to contend, in carrying through every measure, with the immense importance to the future interests and welfare, of the United States, of 460 establishing as a precedent the system of neutrality, in all the wars of Europe in which they have no concern, will do ample justice to the wisdom and firmness of that policy which the first President of the Union adopted, and which his successor has so happily accomplished, that whatever the future events in Europe may be, we at least have a fair and rational hope of escaping the calamities of war.— With respect to our internal concerns, they still appear to have their dark and gloomy sides.— The spirit of faction reigns with unabated virulence, and even the sense of the indispensable necessity of the national union, for the welfare of all, seems rather to be weakening than gaining strength in the minds of the people.— Those absurd principles of unlimited democracy, which the people of our Southern States, by the most extraordinary of all infatuations have so much countenanced and encouraged, are producing their natural fruits, and if the planters have not discovered the inconsistency of holding in one hand the rights of man, and in the other a scourge for the back of slaves, their negroes have proved themselves better logicians than the masters.— I hope however that the dreadful catastrophe which befell the french islands of the West-Indies will yet be avoided in every part of our country, and above all that any insurrection of the blacks will, far from meeting any encouragement in the eastern States, have every exertion of their energy employ’d for its suppression.
In my last letter I partly promis’d you a better account
than I could then give of Leipzig; and I ought perhaps earlier than this
have closed the series of my letters to you upon our summer’s tour, by
informing you of our return to this town—4 But even at the date of my last I
was afflicted with a severe pain in the breast, which I took at Breslau,
which was followed by a bad cough, and a slight spitting of blood, and which
was not entirely removed untill after we reached Berlin. During the five
weeks we spent at Leipzig, I was confined almost the whole time to my
chamber— My wife was yet more unwell than myself; so that we saw of that
city absolutely nothing but its streets, its houses, and its fair, which
resembles all the fairs of which you have seen so many in Holland; only that
here it is upon a larger scale.— We left Leipzig on the 23d: of October, and arrived safely here the 25th:— Since our return both my wife’s health and
my own have been much improved— At present I have only one complaint, from
which I believe it is vain to expect relief, and which is very tedious
though not dangerous. Louisa upon the whole is I think better than she has
been at any time since our marriage.
Our domestic life, since we came back has return’d to its
usual course. We live still in the same house, as when you left us, but have
made our arrangements for leaving it on the 1st:
of April next.—5 As there is
just at this time more cause why an American in public character should be
kept at some one of the northern Courts, than there has been before since
the Treaty here was finish’d, there is a possibility that it may not be
deemed expedient to recall me as yet; but I shall keep myself as much as
will be practicable, in a constant state of preparation to depart.
I feel a sort of reluctance in entering upon political topics, because the subject is hardly susceptible of compression within the limits of a single sheet, and I have lately been obliged in other letters to enter into it— The armistice between France and Austria which follow’d the great battle of Marengo has been renewed once or twice at the expence of immense sacrifices on the part of the Austrians; but as they have hitherto persisted in the pretension that England must be admitted to the negotiation for a general peace, and as France has irrevocably resolved to treat only with each of the two powers separately, the armistice is already at an end, and the hostilities have recommenced. By our latest accounts from Paris and from Vienna, it appears that the Emperor of Germany, and the first Consul Buonaparte, have both determined to place themselves at the head of their respective armies— But it is universally considered that France has the game altogether in her own hands— Nobody expects that it will cost the french more than one battle, to get to Vienna, and nobody doubts but that if the battle be fought it will be won by them. It is however by no means improbable that this will be avoided by the Austrian Cabinet, as they did in the year 1797, and that a momentary peace will be patch’d up again, at the expence of some poor defenceless German and Italian princes, and Republics. Even at the moment when the hostilities were renewed, Count Cobentzel and Joseph Bonaparte both went to Luneville, and are ready to sign preliminaries in four and twenty hours when the case of urgency shall call for it.6
England will therefore very soon be left once more to
carry on the war alone; as to her allies the Portuguese and the Turks they
are rather to be considered as burdensome than advantageous to her.— But she
will no longer have the sure neutrality, or the prospect of alliance with
the northern powers in her favour. They have all been turned partly by her
mismanagement, and partly by their own ill-judg’d passions against her in
heart and soul. The armed neutrality 462 is
recalled from its ashes to withstand her naval supremacy— The Emperor of
Russia is upon the point of formal war with her—Has embargoed all the
English vessels in his ports, and sent into Siberia all the English sailors
who were at St: Petersburg— Prussia holds indeed
a more soothing language but has shewn the same disposition of resistance
against English maritime law. This temper is the more perplexing to England
at this moment, because it has stop’d the sources from which she expected a
supply of grain, in the present distressing scarcity which she suffers.7 The exportation from
Livonia, and even from Dantzig is expressly prohibited— If at these measures
she ventures to show any resentment, her communication with all the north of
Europe will be instantly cut off, and to effect it the more easily, the king
of Prussia has taken possession of Cuxhaven and Ritzebuttel. Upon the whole
I consider the situation of England, as having never been more critical than
at present, and under these circumstances it is peculiarly fortunate for us
to have made our arrangement with France— The English Government, and all
their dependent newspaper writers declaimed against our negotiation at
Paris, because they themselves under the influence of a little brief
success, thought they should have it in their power to dictate for the whole
world.— But the tables have been so completely turned upon them that they
most heartily wish now, they had followed our example, and negotiated
themselves when the offer was made to them last Winter— They are at least
now so sensible that they have enemies enough to contend with, that they not
only think it expedient to take in good part our new Convention with France,
but have given a formal and positive assurance to that effect.
The french have as usual in the course of the armistice
taken care to enjoy almost every advantage, they could have had in a state
of hostility— The three fortresses of Ulm, Ingolstadt and Philipsburg were
put into their hands as a depôt, for continuing
the armistice forty-five days.— Before the hostilities were renewed, they
demolished all those fortifications, and have in consequence no strong place
to arrest them in their progress to Vienna— In Italy they improved their
time equally well, and overran all Tuscany, during the very period of the
armistice—8 The Austrians
complain that these proceedings were in both instances violations of good
faith— That the fortresses were delivered as a trust, and that Tuscany was
expressly included within the armistice— But what avail complaints against
the power of the strongest? What argument has ever been found to resist the
logic of victory?
Among the most curious vicissitudes of human affairs and opinions, may be reckoned the indisputable fact that in no part of Europe the cause of Jacobinism is in a state of so much humiliation and disgrace as in France.— Bonaparte like Caesar, used their principles as the steps of his ladder for ascending to supreme power, and the moment he was mounted kicked the ladder away— They begin already to circulate in France pamphlets to prove the necessity of vesting the sovereignty in him and his family, as a hereditary right— This I think he will hardly accomplish, for although Fortune has hitherto treated him as one of her most darling favourites, she will hardly in a long course of time abandon for his sake the character of fickleness which essentially belongs to her nature— Every moment of his existence depends upon a perpetual miracle of her kindness to him, and the time must sooner or later come when that miracle will cease; the time when as one of his countrymen long ago said
Adieu, my dear brother. I hope to hear from you soon again, and that the communication between the two continents will not be so much obstructed by the rigour of the season this winter, as it has been the two years past— There is hitherto no immediate prospect of an interruption in the navigation of the Elbe, and I shall not suffer again so long an intermission of my correspondence, as I had to answer for the last Spring— I am ever your’s
RC (Adams Papers); internal address:
“Thomas B. Adams Esqr.”; endorsed: “JQ Adams
Esqr: / 3d:
Decr: 1800 / 19th. June Recd: 1801.” and “No 18.” LbC (Adams Papers); APM Reel 134.
TBA’s letter to JQA of 28 Sept. has not been found. Of the letters JQA wrote to TBA between 28 May and 24 July, only that of 6 July has not been found. The letter of 28 May is above. In his letter of 14 June, JQA reported on social activities in Berlin and urged TBA to write to LCA (FC-Pr). JQA’s letter of 10 July, for which the LbC is dated the 11th, is above, and for that of 15 July, see his letter to TBA of 16 July, and note 1, above. The letters of 22 and 24 July were begun on the 20th and 23d, respectively, for which see A Tour of Silesia, 20 July 1800 – 17 March 1801, No. I, and note 11, above.
Joseph Pitcairn raised his suspicions about the mishandling of mail sent to the United States in a letter to JQA of 4 Nov. 1800, not found, for in his reply of 11 Nov. (LbC, APM Reel 134) JQA voiced his disapproval: “If the captains are guilty of such practices as you have reason to suspect, there should be some provision by law to guard against them, & punish them.” JQA reported the information and made a similar recommendation in an 8 Dec. dispatch to John Marshall (LbC, APM Reel 132).
For JQA’s shares in the Manhattan Company, see his letter to TBA of 28 May, and note 2, above.
See A Tour of Silesia, 20 July 1800 – 17 March 1801, No. IX, and note 2, above.
Since June 1798 JQA and LCA
had resided in an apartment at the corner of Friedrichstrasse and
Behrenstrasse, in an area 464
where much of the diplomatic corps in Berlin lived (LCA, D&A
, 1:56).
Franco-Austrian hostilities in Germany were suspended
on 15 July 1800 and an armistice was signed at Paris on the 28th. The
armistice was renewed on 20 Sept. after concessions by Austria and
expired on 14 Nov., after which France informed Austria it would not be
renewed. Hostilities resumed in December, and Gen. Jean Victor Moreau
secured a decisive victory for France on 3 Dec. at the Battle of
Hohenlinden. Archduke Charles was appointed to the command of the
Austrian forces on 9 Dec. and fighting continued until the 25th, when an
armistice was signed at Steyr, Austria. Count Johann Ludwig Josef von
Cobenzl subsequently initiated peace negotiations with Joseph Bonaparte
and Talleyrand at Luneville, France, where a treaty was signed on 9 Feb.
1801, ending the war between Austria and France and reaffirming many of
the provisions of the 1797 Treaty of Campo Formio (vol. 12:272; Roberts, Napoleon
, p. 285–286, 290; Karl
A. Roider Jr., Baron Thugut and Austria’s
Response to the French Revolution, Princeton, N.J., 1987, p.
347–348, 357–359).
Britain signed an alliance with Portugal in 1793, but
after the coup d’état of 18 brumaire France and Spain pressured the
Portuguese to cut ties with Britain. Portugal refused, culminating in a
Spanish invasion in May 1801. Britain also signed a defensive alliance
with the Ottoman Empire on 5 Jan. 1799. On 30 Oct. 1799 the Ottomans
granted the British most favored nation status, which helped Britain to
address a national grain shortage that was compounded by the Russian
embargo of 18 Nov. and the renewal of the League of Armed Neutrality of
1780 (Alexander Grab, Napoleon and the
Transformation of Europe, Basingstoke, Eng., 2003, p. 145–146;
J. C. Hurewitz, Diplomacy in the Near and Middle
East: A Documentary Record: 1535–1914, 2 vols., Princeton,
N.J., 1956, 1:65–68; W. Freeman Galpin, The
Grain Supply of England during the Napoleonic Period, N.Y.,
1925, p. 16–18). For more on Anglo-Russian relations, see
JQA to
TBA, 28 May 1800, and note 6, above.
The Austrian fortresses at Ulm, Ingolstadt, and
Philippsburg were relinquished as a condition of the renewal of the
Franco-Austrian armistice on 20 September. Disregarding the truce,
however, General Moreau ordered their demolition on 13 October. France
also occupied Florence during the armistice (JQA to John
Marshall, 4 Oct., LbC, APM Reel 132; Yair Mintzker, The Defortification of the German City,
1689–1886, N.Y., 2012, p. 123–124; Roider, Baron Thugut, p. 347–348; Napoleon
Bonaparte, Correspondance générale, ed.
Thierry Lentz and others, 14 vols. to date, Paris, 2004–, 3:415).
Jean Baptiste Rousseau, “Ode à la Fortune,” lines 119–120, which JQA translated in 1803 as “The mask drops off—the man remains— / The hero disappears” when he translated the entire poem into English (M/JQA/42, APM Reel 237).
No22
r:26
th:
th:December 1800.
Since the date of my last I have received several numbers
in continuation of the series, which you have been kind enough to address
me, giving so ample & instructive details of your excursion to Silesia.
The last number which came to hand was No 1. and I had a few days before
received No 14, which is the highest; but three intermediate numbers, viz:
Nos 7. 11 & 12 are yet wanting to
complete the list & supply the chasm in the narrative.1 These, or some of them, I am
fearful have been lost, as we have heard of the capture 465 & recapture, first by the french,
then by the british of the Ship Sally bound from Hamburg to this port, on
board of whom it is highly probable they were.2 I have likewise to acknowledge the
receipt of the pamphlet in the German language, which you sent me by
quadruplicate, together with the translation, preface &ca: It came to hand in the morning of the day on
which I sat out to accompany my mother, from this place, to the City of
Washington, and I had time, sufficient only, to put it into the hands of a
printer, with directions & proposals for him to publish it, as soon as
he conveniently could. He promised, and would have been true to his word, to
make it appear in ten days, but for the negligence & sloth of the person
who undertook to correct the press for him. I hope by the first direct
opportunity to send you the number of copies you ask; mean time I enclose
the annunciation made of the work, written by Joseph Dennie Esqr:.3
I have promised to furnish Dennie with copious extracts
from your Silesian tour for his “port folio,” a
literary Magazine, which he is about to publish here. There is much valuable
& much interesting matter in those letters, which is related in a style,
that would grace the first journals in our language, and I feel proud, that
you have furnished me the means of bestowing them upon our Countrymen. The
translation of Juvenal’s 13th: Satire is a
choice morsel, which will find a place in the same vehicle.4
You cannot hear by this opportunity, the result of the
great election, which took place on the 3d:
instt: The returns from NewJersey & this
State are already known. Adams & Pinckney have all the votes of the
former, and seven votes each here, as you may see by the enclosed list.
Calculations give 73 federal votes & 65 Anti-federal, but the prevailing
politics & complection of the Legislature of South Carolina, is not
known with precision. If the Electors there vote for both the federal
Candidates unanimously, that ticket will prevail; if they vote for Pinckney
& Jefferson, Pinckney will stand first, supposing all New England to
vote “fairly & honorably”; as it is called;
the apprehension is however, that mutual distrust between the North &
the South will induce some gentlemen to with hold their votes from each of
the federal Candidates, whereby the choice of both may be endangered;
perhaps lost.5
The foregoing is all the information I can give you now, we shall soon be possessed of authentic documents on this subject; when you shall be informed of the result.
466I passed a week at the City of Washington when I went
down with my Mother. The President occupies the palace built for the accommodation of the chief magistrate, though
it is not yet finished. The City has increased rapidly since I was there,
and begins to assume somewhat the appearance of an inhabited region; much
wood, stubble & stumps, however, still standing. The members of Congress
are a good deal discomfited by the removal & good accommodations are
scarce—they will weather a short Session, not without groanings &
execration.
Your Louisa’s family were all in health except Caroline,
who was seized with a fever a few days before my arrival, which confined her
to the bed all the time I stayed, and to her chamber ever since. I heard
yesterday from Mr: Rogers who left the City
three or four days since, that Caroline’s disorder had taken a favorable
turn, and that she is now quite out of danger; and I rejoice that I have it in my power
to send such comfortable tidings to your wife. I have to thank her for a few
lines, which she wrote me on the 5th: of July,
and I intend to do it soon by direct means—6 The little package she recommended
to my care, came safe & was delivered by the Secy of State.
I have a sorrowful event to announce to you in concluding
my letter. We have lost our Brother at New York. He expired after a
lingering illness, on Sunday last, the 1st:
instt: at the house of our Sister Smith.7 May you be prepared to meet
this mournful intelligence with resignation & composure. We have long
been looking for the catastrophe, which it was not in human power to avert.
Let silence reign forever over his tomb.
I am, with tenderest affection / Your Brother
RC and enclosure (Adams Papers); internal address: “J
Q Adams. Esqr:”; endorsed: “22. T. B. Adams.
6. Decr: 1800. / 4. Feby: 1801. recd: /
7. Do: Ansd:.”
JQA’s letters to TBA from Silesia numbered 1, 7, 11, 12, and 14 were dated 20 July and 6, 16, 20, 27 Aug., respectively. For all of those letters, see A Tour of Silesia, 20 July 1800 – 17 March 1801, No. I; No. III, note 7; No. VI; and No. VII, and note 10, all above.
The ship Sally, Capt.
Daniel McPherson, sailed from Hamburg for Philadelphia on 21 Aug. 1800.
On 13 Sept. it was seized by the French frigate La Franchise, Capt. P. Jurien de La Gravière. The two vessels
were dispatched to Bordeaux, but en route the Sally was separated from La
Franchise and captured by the British privateer Phoenix, Capt. Daniel Hammon, who
subsequently libeled the vessel for salvage at Jersey (Williams, French Assault on American
Shipping
, p. 316–317).
On 15 June Friedrich von Gentz sent JQA
four copies of his comparative study of the American and French
Revolutions as printed in the Berlin Historisches Journal, 2:1–96, 98–140 (May, June 1800). Gentz’s
work characterized the American Revolution as a natural and systematic
transition and the French Revolution as a violent and disordered one.
Already familiar with the study, JQA praised Gentz for the
“honorable manner in which 467
you have born testimony to the purity of principle upon which the
revolution of my country was founded” and reported that he would take
“much satisfaction in transmitting & making known the treatise to
persons in the United States.” JQA translated the work by
28 June, though none of the four German-language copies or
JQA’s translation and preface have been found.
TBA delivered the translation to Asbury Dickins
(1780–1861), a bookseller and stationer at 25 North Second Street in
Philadelphia, who published it without reference to JQA as
the translator on 23 Dec. as Gentz, Origin and
Principles of the American Revolution. The “annunciation”
referred to by TBA described the work as “no ordinary
pamphlet, but that it will demand and deserve the attention of the
American politician and philosopher.” It appeared first in the
Philadelphia Gazette of the United States,
19 Nov., but TBA enclosed with this letter a column of the
Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 6
Dec., which reprinted it (Gentz to JQA, 15 June, Adams Papers;
JQA to Gentz, 16 June, LbC, APM Reel 134;
D/JQA/24, APM Reel 27; Palmer, Age of the Democratic Revolution
,
p. 456; William S. Powell, ed., Dictionary of
North Carolina Biography, 6 vols., Chapel Hill, N.C.,
1979–1996;
Philadelphia Directory
, 1800, p.
41, Evans, No. 38549;
Philadelphia Gazette, 23 Dec.). See
also
TBA
to JQA, 15 Jan. 1801, and note 2, below.
In a five-page Prospectus of
a New Weekly Paper, [Phila., 1800], Evans, No. 49059, Joseph Dennie Jr.
outlined his goal for the Port Folio: “to
combine literature with politics” for “men of affluence, men of
liberality, and men of letters.” The weekly journal was available by
subscription only at a cost of $5 annually. It was first published in
1801 by Dennie and Dickins in partnership and continued successfully
under Dennie’s editorial direction until his death in 1812 and
thereafter in various forms until the mid-1820s. The inaugural issue on
3 Jan. 1801 included the first of JQA’s letters on Silesia
and also his translation of Juvenal’s thirteenth satire (
ANB
; Kaplan, Men of Letters
, p.
140).
On 3 Dec. 1800 presidential electors throughout the
United States met in their respective states to cast their ballots.
Months of electioneering meant the results were largely anticipated
prior to being read in the Senate on 11 Feb. 1801, and unofficial
results began circulating almost immediately after the election. The
enclosure that TBA included from the Philadelphia Aurora General Advertiser, 6 Dec. 1800,
carried an article that reported the Pennsylvania vote split, with 7
votes for JA and 8 for Thomas Jefferson. The previous day’s
Philadelphia Gazette reported the votes
for both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, where JA and Charles
Cotesworth Pinckney each received 7 votes. Ultimately, JA
and Pinckney earned near unanimous support from the five New England
states, New Jersey, and Delaware, while Jefferson and Aaron Burr claimed
Georgia, Kentucky, New York, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Virginia.
The votes in Pennsylvania, Maryland, and North Carolina split between
the four candidates. While the outcomes for most states were predicted,
South Carolina was the exception; the state’s 8 votes each for Jefferson
and Burr proved decisive. The final electoral tally yielded
JA 65 votes, Pinckney 64, John Jay 1, and Jefferson and
Burr 73 votes each (Jefferson, Papers
, 32:2,
265–266, 318; Burr, Political Correspondence
, 1:434,
469–470, 471; Elkins and
McKitrick, Age of Federalism
, p.
741). For the breaking of the electoral deadlock, see
AA to
JA, 13 Feb. 1801, and note 2, below.
Not found. Abner Rogers was returning to Massachusetts after visiting Virginia (Elizabeth Smith Shaw Peabody to William Smith Shaw, 27 Dec. 1800, DLC:Shaw Family Papers).
CA died of “a dropsy of the breast”
stemming from alcoholism on 30 Nov. under AA2’s care. The
New-York Gazette, 1 Dec., reported that
his funeral would take place at the house owned by WSS at
89 Broad Street in New York City at 4 p.m.: “On this occasion, regimental orders have been issued
for the performance of military funeral honors.” The city’s fusiliers
were ordered to assemble at Lovett’s Hotel at 2 p.m. to prepare to perform at the
cemetery. Interment was in the burying ground of New York’s First
Presbyterian Church (
AA to Cotton Tufts, 15 Dec., below;
Philadelphia Gazette of the United States,
3 Dec.).